1. Surgical management and outcome of newly diagnosed glioblastoma without contrast enhancement (low-grade appearance): a report of the RANO resect group.
- Author
-
Karschnia, Philipp, Dietrich, Jorg, Bruno, Francesco, Dono, Antonio, Juenger, Stephanie, Teske, Nico, Young, Jacob, Sciortino, Tommaso, Häni, Levin, van den Bent, Martin, Weller, Michael, Vogelbaum, Michael, Morshed, Ramin, Haddad, Alexander, Molinaro, Annette, Tandon, Nitin, Beck, Juergen, Schnell, Oliver, Bello, Lorenzo, Hervey-Jumper, Shawn, Thon, Niklas, Grau, Stefan, Esquenazi, Yoshua, Rudà, Roberta, Chang, Susan, Berger, Mitchel, Cahill, Daniel, and Tonn, Joerg-Christian
- Subjects
WHO 2021 ,contrast enhancement ,extent of resection ,glioblastoma ,surgery ,Humans ,Glioblastoma ,Retrospective Studies ,Brain Neoplasms ,Prognosis ,Magnetic Resonance Imaging - Abstract
BACKGROUND: Resection of the contrast-enhancing (CE) tumor represents the standard of care in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. However, some tumors ultimately diagnosed as glioblastoma lack contrast enhancement and have a low-grade appearance on imaging (non-CE glioblastoma). We aimed to (a) volumetrically define the value of non-CE tumor resection in the absence of contrast enhancement, and to (b) delineate outcome differences between glioblastoma patients with and without contrast enhancement. METHODS: The RANO resect group retrospectively compiled a global, eight-center cohort of patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma per WHO 2021 classification. The associations between postoperative tumor volumes and outcome were analyzed. Propensity score-matched analyses were constructed to compare glioblastomas with and without contrast enhancement. RESULTS: Among 1323 newly diagnosed IDH-wildtype glioblastomas, we identified 98 patients (7.4%) without contrast enhancement. In such patients, smaller postoperative tumor volumes were associated with more favorable outcome. There was an exponential increase in risk for death with larger residual non-CE tumor. Accordingly, extensive resection was associated with improved survival compared to lesion biopsy. These findings were retained on a multivariable analysis adjusting for demographic and clinical markers. Compared to CE glioblastoma, patients with non-CE glioblastoma had a more favorable clinical profile and superior outcome as confirmed in propensity score analyses by matching the patients with non-CE glioblastoma to patients with CE glioblastoma using a large set of clinical variables. CONCLUSIONS: The absence of contrast enhancement characterizes a less aggressive clinical phenotype of IDH-wildtype glioblastomas. Maximal resection of non-CE tumors has prognostic implications and translates into favorable outcome.
- Published
- 2024