1. Vitamin D Supplement for Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- Author
-
Fangfang Liang, Yage Du, Liping Zhang, Haoying Dou, and Jie Liu
- Subjects
Pharmacology ,medicine.medical_specialty ,business.industry ,Subgroup analysis ,General Medicine ,Cochrane Library ,Confidence interval ,law.invention ,Randomized controlled trial ,Alzheimer Disease ,Strictly standardized mean difference ,law ,Internal medicine ,Meta-analysis ,Dietary Supplements ,medicine ,Vitamin D and neurology ,Humans ,Verbal fluency test ,Pharmacology (medical) ,Vitamin D ,business - Abstract
Background Prevention of Alzheimer's disease (AD) with Vitamin D (VD) supplementation has been studied widely, but the results in the literature are very conflicting. The study question Can VD supplementation really prevent AD? Study design The literature was searched from PubMed, Cochrane library, Web of Science, and EMBASE to identify relevant randomized clinical trials (RCTs). The titles and abstracts were evaluated independently by 2 of the authors. Results Nine RCTs with 2345 participants were included. In the meta-analysis, we found no significant difference in the Mini-Mental State Examination, verbal fluency, verbal memory, visual ability, and attention scores between the VD intervention group and comparison group [standardized mean difference (SMD) = -0.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) = -0.51 to 0.41; SMD = -0.01, 95% CI = -0.13 to 0.11; SMD = 0.12, 95% CI = -0.45 to 0.69; SMD = 0.42, 95% CI = -0.15 to 1.00; and SMD = 0.01, 95% CI = -0.24 to 0.27, respectively]. In subgroup analysis, we found that the intervention with only VD or plus calcium, follow-up duration, and baseline 25(OH)D levels did not explain the cause for high heterogeneity. Conclusions Overall, the current evidence did not support the beneficial effect of VD supplement to prevent AD. High quality RCTs and further studies are needed to clarify the effects of VD supplementation on preventing AD.
- Published
- 2020