Search

With the advanced laparoscopic and robotic surgery, thromboembolic prophylaxis in urologic procedures has traditionally been based on the experience of other surgical specialties. This paper aims to analyze the current recommendations, through a detailed study of the European clinical guidelines and bibliography, applying the recommendations of thromboprophylaxis to the daily urological practice.To elaborate general recommendations to surgical patients in Urology, avoiding the risk of perioperative thromboembolic events. Optimize medication in chronic patients and accurately classify who are eligible for bridge therapy.A review of the available literature and the European clinical guidelines was carried out. We analyzed the most recent consensus articles by studying the available bibliography, trials and reviews on which the European guidelines for thromboprophylaxis in urology are based.Thromboembolic prophylaxis should be targeted towards surgeries that require abdominal approaches, prolonged bed rest or oncological pathologies. Bridge therapies with low molecular weight heparins should be limited. Patients undergoing treatment for chronic conditions can benefit from bridge therapies in specific cases.According to the current guidelines, there might be an overuse of heparins in the daily clinical practice. The development of -direct oral- anticoagulants have shown to reduce the time to reintroduction of medication for chronic conditions as well as a more effective bleeding management.

The difference between the simple renal cysts, that doesn't require surgical treatment, and those that need it, sometimes is difficult. The laparoscopic surgical treatment (laparoscopic cyst decortication -laparoscopic partial nefrectomy or radical laparoscopic nefrectomy) its becoming the gold standard technique, recommending this procedure in Bosniak cyst type III or IV, and in the symptomatic renal cyst type I/II and in any patients with Bosniak cyst renal II. We present a case report in which a renal cell carcinoma was found after laparoscopic cyst decortication of Bosniak cyst type II with laparoscopic radical nefrectomy posteriorly.

To report two cases of verrucous carcinoma of the penis, a rare tumor with a characteristic course and specific treatment that accounts for approximately 1% of tumors in the male.Two patients, aged 86 and 51 years, with verrucous carcinoma of the penis are described. Treatment was by partial penectomy and resection of the glans penis, respectively. The anatomopathological characteristics and prognostic aspects are reviewed.Verrucous carcinoma of the penis usually presents as an exophytic lesion in the glans penis or prepuce and should be distinguished from epidermoid carcinoma which carries a worse prognosis and requires a different therapeutic approach. The differential diagnosis is based on the biopsy findings. Verrucous carcinoma of the penis carries a good prognosis and can be managed by conservative surgery (partial penectomy).

Prostate biopsy is the diagnostic method to detect prostate carcinoma. We try to identify the optimal PSA cut-off, biopsy indication and the clinico-pathological characteristics in order to differentiate those patients with negative biopsy in which we should repeat the proceeding.We study 344 biopsies in 292 patients for 16 months. An univariate and multivariate study to identify the influent factors in the existence of prostate cancer in the first biopsy and in the patients with a second one was taken place.Patients in the first biopsy Univariate study: Out of these variables (PSA, PSA ratio, digital rectal examination and prostate volume) just the PSA has statistical significance. Multivariate study: Only the the PSA is an indepent influence factor. Receiving Operated Curve: The optimal cut-off is 10.5 ng/ml. Patients with a second biopsy Univariate study: None of the variables is related with the existence of prostate cancer. Groups comparison: A comparison between the patients in the first biopsy and the patients with a second biopsy is performance with no statistical differences in the variables already mentioned.The patient with a PSA greater than 4 ng/ml should be perform a prostate biopsy, mostly if his PSA is over 10 ng/ml. In our experience we do not related the need of a second biopsy with any factor in particular, therefore in our opinion and because of the high rate of negative false, all of the patients should be controlled and undergo a second biopsy if any change in PSA or clinics modification takes place.

To study the survival in patients with prostate adenocarcinoma, lymph nodes involvement in the intraoperative pathological examination, evaluating both radical surgery and early ablation as treatment. Identification of clinical factors that can predict node involvement.20 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy between 1988-1998 were included in the study. All patients clinically diagnosed with T1-2N0Mx prostate adenocarcinoma (T.N.M. 1992), single metastatic node involvement in the pathological study and early sub-albuginea orchidectomy. This group was compared to a 200-patient control group also with T1-2N0Mx prostate adenocarcinoma but with no pathologic nodular involvement. Statistical study: contingency 2Xb tables (Pearson's chi 2 or Fisher's exact test) to compare qualitative variables; Student's t test for means comparison; Kaplan-Meier for actuarial survival calculations and comparison of Log-rank survival curves. For the study of clinical variants with influence in node involvement a logistic regression model was used.Mean age was 63 +/- 0.8 years. Median follow up 56 months. Mean PSA 33 +/- 4.4 ng/mL and 55% had Gleason 5-7. 16 patients were stage pT3. Specific 5-year survival was 90 +/- 8% and biochemical progression free survival 63 +/- 12%. Clinical variables with statistical significance for node involvement are: pre-surgical PSA greater than 20 ng/mL (RR = 4.6), and Gleason higher than 4 (RR = 3). The remaining variables showed no statistical significance.Gleason and PSA are the only clinical values that predict node involvement. The procedure performed obtains good results and a survival comparable to that of the control group.

To study patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction treated in our department and a retrospective study of this pathology, focus our attention in the diagnosis and treatment.62 patients from 7 weeks to 68 years old (mean 29 +/- 1.9). Half of the patients were men and the other half women. In 30 patients the UPJ obstruction was on the right side and 32 patients was on the left side.The most frequent symptom was the flank pain (46.8%). To confirm the diagnosis, we had IVU in the 61.3% of the patients and ultrasound in the 38.7%. The treatment was the Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty in the 96.8% of the patients. In 33 patients we used a ureteral catheter. The overall success rate was 90.3%. The 29% of the patients presented postoperative complications.Open pyeloplasty is the gold standard treatment of the UPJ obstruction in selected cases, mainly in children.

To describe a case of epithelial cell paratesticular carcinoma of the epididymis and briefly review the literature on this tumor type.A 69-year-old male consulted for a testicular mass and intrascrotal pain, together with irritative bladder symptoms. The patient underwent orchidectomy, but consulted again shortly thereafter for persistent irritative bladder symptoms. A TUR biopsy of the bladder wall demonstrated undifferentiated carcinoma arising from the epididymis. The patient did not respond to chemotherapy. He developed systemic metastasis and died 4 months after the diagnosis.Carcinoma of the epididymis is a rare malignant paratesticular tumor arising from the epithelial cells with a very poor prognosis. Its clinical features are unspecific and this tumor type should be taken into account when making differential diagnosis from intrascrotal masses arsing from other causes. Due to the rarity of this disease, it has not been possible to identify treatments that might achieve better results.