1. Two-year interim safety results of the 0.2 µg/day fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant for the treatment of diabetic macular oedema: the observational PALADIN study
- Author
-
Sam E. Mansour, Daniel B. Roth, Daniel F. Kiernan, Samer Kaba, Nancy M. Holekamp, David A Eichenbaum, and Erica Werts
- Subjects
Male ,retina ,Intraocular pressure ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Time Factors ,Visual acuity ,genetic structures ,medicine.drug_class ,Population ,Visual Acuity ,Macular Edema ,Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience ,Fluocinolone acetonide ,Ophthalmology ,medicine ,Humans ,macula ,Macula Lutea ,Prospective Studies ,education ,Glucocorticoids ,Intraocular Pressure ,Aged ,Drug Implants ,education.field_of_study ,Diabetic Retinopathy ,Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ,business.industry ,Clinical Science ,Interim analysis ,eye diseases ,Sensory Systems ,Clinical trial ,Treatment Outcome ,Fluocinolone Acetonide ,inflammation ,treatment other ,Intravitreal Injections ,Corticosteroid ,Female ,Implant ,medicine.symptom ,business ,Follow-Up Studies ,medicine.drug - Abstract
BackgroundThe 0.2 µg/day fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) implant delivers continuous, low-dose, intravitreal corticosteroid for the treatment of diabetic macular oedema (DMO). This ongoing, 3-year, observational clinical trial provides long-term, ‘real-world’ safety results for the FAc implant in DMO.MethodsThis 24-month interim analysis of a prospective, observational study investigated patients with DMO receiving the commercially available intravitreal 0.2 µg/day FAc implant. The primary outcome was incidence of intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering procedures. Other IOP-related signals and their relationship to previous corticosteroid exposure, best-corrected visual acuity, central subfield thickness (CST), ocular adverse events and frequency of other treatments were also measured.ResultsData were collected from 95 previously steroid-challenged patients (115 study eyes) for up to 36 months pre-FAc and 24 months post-FAc implant. Mean IOP for the overall population remained stable post-FAc compared with pre-FAc implant. IOP-related procedures remained infrequent (two IOP-lowering surgeries pre-FAc; two trabeculoplasties and four IOP-lowering surgeries post-FAc). Mean visual acuity was stable post-FAc (mean improvement of 1–3 letters) and fewer DMO treatments were required per year following FAc implant. Mean CST was significantly reduced at 24 months post-FAc implant (pConclusionFew IOP-related procedures were reported during the 24 months post-FAc implant. Positive efficacy outcomes were noted after treatment, with stabilisation of vision and reduction in inflammation, demonstrated by CST. The FAc implant has a favourable benefit–risk profile in the management of DMO, especially when administered after a prior steroid challenge.Trial registration numberNCT02424019.
- Published
- 2020