Search

Nucleic acid testing (NAT) was implemented in Poland in 1999 for screening of plasma for fractionation and for all blood donors in 2002. To analyze seronegative NAT‐positive samples representing hepatitis C virus (HCV) window‐period (WP) in the years 2000 to 2016 and to determine infection outcome. We analyzed results of 17 502 739 donations screened in minipools (6‐48) or individually. Index samples underwent viral load (VL) quantification, genotyping and Ag, and anti‐HCV re‐testing using chemiluminescence (CMIA), electrochemiluminescence (ECLIA), and fourth‐generation enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (IV EIA) assays. HCV‐seronegative infections were identified in 126 donations (7.2/mln donations; 95% confidential intervals, 6.0‐8.6). Frequency of NAT yields was decreasing over time. Of the initial 126 seronegative index cases 106 were retested: 32.1% were reactive in IV EIA, 11.3% in ECLIA, and 1.9% in CMIA. The lowest VL correlated with absent anti‐HCV and HCV Ag, while VL was highest when the antigen was detectable and then it decreased when anti‐HCV appeared at a level detectable by sensitive third generation tests while retesting. The proportion of genotype 1 was 38.9% in samples positive only for HCV RNA and 71.4% in samples that were anti‐HCV reactive in re‐testing. In parallel, genotype 3 frequency was 50% in the former group and 21% in the latter. NAT is an effective measure to limit HCV transmission by transfusion and IV EIA seems to have higher clinical sensitivity than ECLIA. Samples representing likely successive phases of early HCV infection were characterized by different genotype distribution probably due to very early elimination of genotype 3., Highlight NAT is highly effective in prevention of transmission of HCV seronegative infections.In nearly 7% of followed up donors antibodies appeared later than 50 days after index donation.The highest clinical sensitivity was demonstrated by the IVth generation tests.Among the third generation assays, ECLIA showed higher sensitivity than CMIA.Samples representing likely successive phases of early HCV infection demonstrated different genotype distribution.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is characterized by high genetic variability, which is manifested both at the inter-host and intra-host levels. However, its role in the clinical course of infection is less obvious. The aim of the present study was to determine the genetic variability of HCV HVR1 (hypervariable region 1) of genotype 1b and 3 in plasma of blood donors in the early seronegative stage of infection (HCV-RNA+, anti-HCV−) and in samples from chronically infected patients using next-generation sequencing. Sequencing errors were corrected, and haplotypes inferred using the ShoRAH software. Genetic diversity parameters (intra-host number of variants, number of nucleotide substitutions and diversity per site) were assessed by DNA SP and MEGA. During the early infection, the number of variants were significantly lower in subjects infected with genotype 3 than with genotype 1b (p

The infection with more than one hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype especially in subjects with a high risk of multiple HCV exposures has been demonstrated. The role of HCV mixed-genotype infection in viral persistence and treatment effect is not fully understood. The prevalence of such infection varies greatly depending on the technique used for genotype determination and studied population. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) which is suitable for extensive analysis of complex viral populations is a method of choice for studying mixed infections. The aim of the present study was to determine the prevalence of mixed-genotype HCV infections in the Polish seronegative, HCV-RNA-positive blood donors (n = 76). Two-step PCR was used for amplification of 5'-UTR of HCV. Using pyrosequencing altogether, 381,063 reads were obtained. The raw reads were trimmed and subjected to similarity analysis against the entire unfiltered NCBI nt database. Results obtained from NGS were compared with the standard genotyping. One (1.3%) mixed-genotype [3a, 2989 reads (94.8%); 1b, 164 reads (5.2%)] infection was found in a sample diagnosed as genotype 3a only by routine testing. Two samples were identified with different genotypes, compared to routine testing. In conclusion, NGS is a sensitive method for HCV genotyping. The prevalence of mixed-genotype HCV infections in blood donors is low.

Until now, markers of hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection have not been studied in blood donors throughout Poland, and no acute case of HEV infection has been closely documented or confirmed by HEV RNA detection. The prevalence of HEV infection markers, including HEV RNA in Polish blood donors and virus genotypes was investigated.In total, 12,664 individual donations from 22 Polish blood transfusion centers were tested for HEV RNA by transcription-mediated amplification. In addition, 3079 first-time donors sampled throughout Poland also were screened for antibodies to HEV. HEV RNA and immunoglobulin M-positive donations were confirmed using real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and Western blotting, respectively.Ten donors were identified as RNA initial reactive (one of 1266 donors), and six (one of 2109) were identified as repeat reactive and confirmed by real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction or seroconversion. Sequence analysis identified HEV Genotype 3c in one donor and Genotype 3i in two others. On average, 43.5% of donors were immunoglobulin G-positive. Immunoglobulin G seroprevalence ranged from 22.7% to 60.8% in group ages 18 to 27 years and 48 to 57 years, respectively and differed between administrative regions from 28.9% in Podlasie to 61.3% in Wielkopolska. Thirty-nine of the donors were immunoglobulin M-positive, and seven donors were IgM positive only (0.2%). Of 37 immunoglobulin M-reactive samples tested by Western blot, 24 (64.9%) were confirmed.The current results indicate a high level of HEV endemicity throughout Poland compared with other countries. There is an urgent need to consider the protection of recipients of blood components against transfusion-transmitted HEV infection.

Blood donor screening of viral markers in Poland is based on serologic testing for anti-HCV, HBsAg, anti-HIV1/2 (chemiluminescence tests) and on nucleic acid testing (NAT) for RNA HCV, RNA HIV-1 and DNA HBV performed in minipools of 6 with real-time PCR (MPX 2.0 test on cobas s201) or with TMA in individual donations (Ultrio Plus or Ultrio Elite). Donors of plasma for anti-D and anti-HBs production are tested for parvovirus B19 DNA. Before implementation tests and equipment are evaluated at the Institute of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine (IHTM). The last 20 years witnessed a decreasing trend for HBsAg in both first time and repeat donors (1%-0.3% and 0.1%-0.02% respectively). Prevalence of anti-HCV repeat reactive results was stable and oscillated around 0.8% for first time donors and 0.2% for repeat donors. Elevated prevalence of seropositive HIV infected donors was recently observed (7.5-9 cases/100,000 donors). Since respective molecular markers implementation HCV RNA was detected on average in 1/119,235 seronegative donations, HIV RNA in 1/783,821 and HBV DNA in 1/61,047. HBV NAT yields were mostly occult hepatitis B (1/80,248); window period cases were less frequent (1/255,146). The efficiency of HBV DNA detection depends on the sensitivity of the HBV DNA screening system.

To improve the blood transfusion safety, according to the international recommendations anti-HCV negative blood donors are screened for HCV RNA. For decreasing the costs, the pools of 48 donor samples are tested. Until now 2,500,000 Polish donors were tested and HCV RNA was detected in 40. Anti-HCV was detected in plasma of all donors available for follow up for more than three months. No clinical symptoms were observed but in 20 donors slightly elevated ALT level was found. In the follow up, after detection of anti-HCV in 9/11 donors elevated ALT (167-2043 U/l) was observed. In two donors, out of 4 observed for more than 12 months HCV RNA was not detected in the follow up whereas anti-HCV were still present. In 7 donors probable source of infection was identified. The early detection of HCV infection is a serious challenge not only to transfusion medicine but also to general practitioners and hepatologists due to the necessity of further monitoring and treatment of infected individuals.