1. Assessing the quality of electronic medical records as a platform for resident education
- Author
-
Jun Neng Roan, Han-Wei Huang, Hsuan Hung, Yu Ning Hu, Pao-Yen Lin, Jiun-Ling Wang, Chin-Chung Tseng, Po-Fan Chen, Ching Chuan Liu, Ling-Ling Kueh, and Shu-Yen Wang
- Subjects
Quality management ,media_common.quotation_subject ,Writing ,Problem list ,Documentation ,Medical Records ,Education ,Obstetrics and gynaecology ,Physicians ,Electronic Health Records ,Humans ,Quality (business) ,Quality improvement ,Child ,media_common ,Medical education ,Resident education ,Note quality ,LC8-6691 ,business.industry ,Medical record ,Research ,Internship and Residency ,General Medicine ,Special aspects of education ,Checklist ,Medicine ,Psychology ,business - Abstract
Background Previous studies have assessed note quality and the use of electronic medical record (EMR) as a part of medical training. However, a generalized and user-friendly note quality assessment tool is required for quick clinical assessment. We held a medical record writing competition and developed a checklist for assessing the note quality of participants’ medical records. Using the checklist, this study aims to explore note quality between residents of different specialties and offer pedagogical implications. Methods The authors created an inpatient checklist that examined fundamental EMR requirements through six note types and twenty items. A total of 149 records created by residents from 32 departments/stations were randomly selected. Seven senior physicians rated the EMRs using a checklist. Medical records were grouped as general medicine, surgery, paediatric, obstetrics and gynaecology, and other departments. The overall and group performances were analysed using analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results Overall performance was rated as fair to good. Regarding the six note types, discharge notes (0.81) gained the highest scores, followed by admission notes (0.79), problem list (0.73), overall performance (0.73), progress notes (0.71), and weekly summaries (0.66). Among the five groups, other departments (80.20) had the highest total score, followed by obstetrics and gynaecology (78.02), paediatrics (77.47), general medicine (75.58), and surgery (73.92). Conclusions This study suggested that duplication in medical notes and the documentation abilities of residents affect the quality of medical records in different departments. Further research is required to apply the insights obtained in this study to improve the quality of notes and, thereby, the effectiveness of resident training.
- Published
- 2021