Search

The presence of bipolar low-voltage zone (LVZ) is a predictor of AF recurrence after PV isolation (PVI). However, changes of wavefront and bipole directions may cause different electrogram characteristics. We aimed to investigate whether using omnipolar maximum voltage (Vmax) map derived from high density (HD) Grid mapping catheter could assess LVZ and AF ablation outcome accurately.Fifty paroxysmal AF patients (27 males, 57.8 ± 9.5 years old) who underwent 3D mapping guided PVI were enrolled. Left atrial voltage mapping during sinus rhythm before ablation was performed. The significant LVZ (0.5 mV with area 5 cmPVI was performed in all patients, and there were 2 patients (4%) who also received additional non-PV triggers ablation. After a follow-up of 11.4 ± 5.4 months, recurrence of AF occurred in 12 patients (24%). The presence of a significant LVZ was less detected by omnipolar Vmax map, compared to HD wave map (24.0% vs. 58.0%, p = 0.001). LVZ detected by omnipolar Vmax map independently predicted the AF recurrence (odds ratio 16.91; 95% CI, 3.17-90.10; p = 0.001).LVZ detected by omnipolar Vmax map accurately predicts the AF recurrence following ablation in paroxysmal AF, compared to conventional bipolar and HD wave maps, suggesting the omnipolar Vmax map can precisely define the atrial substrate property.

The comprehensive surveillance for interval changes in signal-averaged P-wave (SAPW) after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) remains lacking. We aimed to analyze the SAPW parameters before and after PVI and explored their link to the left atrial electrical properties.Eighteen patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation receiving primary catheter ablation were enrolled. SAPW parameters, including root mean square voltages in the last 40, 30, and 20 ms (RMS40, RMS30, and RMS20, respectively), the total P-wave (RMSt), the integral of P-wave potentials (Int-p), and P-wave duration (fPWD), were measured before and after PVI and correlated to the left atrial activation time (LAT) and mean left atrial voltage (LAV) from electro-anatomical mapping.Compared with the SAPW before PVI, fPWD (before vs after PVI: 144.1 ± 5.2 vs 135.1 ± 11.9 ms, p = 0.02), Int-p (687.4 ± 173.1 vs 559 ± 202.5 mVms, p = 0.01), and RMSt (6.44 ± 1.3 vs 5.44 ± 2.0 mV, p = 0.04) all decreased after PVI. RMS20, RMS30, and RMS40 showed no significant difference. Similarly, LAT (97.5 ± 9.3 vs 90.5 ± 9.3 ms, p = 0.008) and LAV (1.37 ± 0.27 vs 0.96 ± 0.31 mV, p = 0.001) decreased after PVI. Although consistent changes after PVI were observed between SAPW parameters and LAT or LAV, no linear correlation was observed among them.The consistent changes in SAPW and left atrial electrical properties after PVI suggest that SAPW may be used as a noninvasive tool to monitor the responses to PVI.

Dynamic display of real-time wavefront activation pattern may facilitate the recognition of reentrant circuits, particularly the diastolic path of ventricular tachycardia (VT).We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of LiveView Dynamic Display for mapping the critical isthmus of scar-related reentrant VT.Patients with mappable scar-related reentrant VT were selected. The characteristics of the underlying substrates and VT circuits were assessed using HD grid multielectrode catheter. The VT isthmuses were identified based on the activation map, entrainment, and ablation results. The accuracy of the LiveView findings in detecting potential VT isthmus was assessed.We studied 18 scar-related reentrant VTs in 10 patients (median age: 59.5 years, 100% male) including 6 and 4 patients with ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy, respectively. The median VT cycle length was 426 ms (interquartile range: 386-466 ms). Among 590 regional mapping displays, 92.0% of the VT isthmus sites were identified by LiveView Dynamic Display. The accuracy of LiveView for isthmus identification was 84%, with positive and negative predictive values of 54.8% and 97.8%, respectively. The area with abnormal electrograms was negatively correlated with the accuracy of LiveView Dynamic Display (r = -.506, p = .027). The median time interval to identify a VT isthmus using LiveView was significantly shorter than that using conventional activation maps (50.5 [29.8-120] vs. 219 [157.5-400.8] s, p = .015).This study demonstrated the feasibility of LiveView Dynamic Display in identifying the critical isthmus of scar-related VT with modest accuracy.