1. Planning Results for High Tibial Osteotomies in Degenerative Varus Osteoarthritis Using Standing and Supine Whole Leg Radiographs
- Author
-
Benjamin Bockmann, Wolfgang Nebelung, Christoph K Boese, Tobias L Schulte, and Arne J Venjakob
- Subjects
Male ,Sitting Position ,Clinical Article ,Tibia ,Reproducibility of Results ,Varus ,Osteoarthritis, Knee ,Patient Care Planning ,Leg axis ,Osteotomy ,Radiography ,Weight-Bearing ,lcsh:RD701-811 ,lcsh:Orthopedic surgery ,Preoperative Period ,Standing Position ,Clinical Articles ,Humans ,Knee ,Female - Abstract
Objective In this study, we hypothesized that standing and supine X‐rays lead to different preoperative planning results. Methods The present study included 168 pictures from 81 patients who were treated surgically with high tibial osteotomy (HTO) for varus deformity between January 2017 and February 2018. Each patient underwent whole leg X‐ray examinations in both standing and supine position. On both images, the following parameters were measured: degree of axis deviation (DAD), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA), width of medial (MJS) and lateral joint space (LJS), and the correction angle (CA). The results were correlated with the patients’ age and body mass index (BMI). To analyze intra‐observer reliability, the same researcher, blinded to the previous measurements, remeasured all X‐rays from 10 patients 8 weeks after the initial measurements were carried out. Results While mLDFA (P = 0.075), mMPTA (P = 0.435), and MJS (P = 0.119) did not show any differences between the two modalities, LJS (P = 0.016) and DAD (P, In this study, we hypothesized that standing and supine X‐rays lead to different preoperative planning results in high tibial osteotomies. Indeed, we did find an influence of the imaging modality on planning results; however, these results were not influenced by body mass and age.
- Published
- 2020