1. Utilization of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in high‐risk, node‐negative early breast cancer
- Author
-
Ipshita Prakash, N. Ben Neely, Samantha M. Thomas, Sarah Sammons, Rachel C. Blitzblau, Gayle A. DiLalla, Terry Hyslop, Carolyn S. Menendez, Jennifer K. Plichta, Laura H. Rosenberger, Oluwadamilola M. Fayanju, E. Shelley Hwang, and Rachel A. Greenup
- Subjects
Male ,Cancer Research ,Neoplasm, Residual ,Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens ,Breast Neoplasms ,Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms ,Neoadjuvant Therapy ,cancer management ,surgical oncology ,breast cancer ,Oncology ,Chemotherapy, Adjuvant ,Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ,clinical management ,Humans ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Female ,RC254-282 ,neoadjuvant chemotherapy - Abstract
Background Controversy exists regarding the optimal sequence of chemotherapy among women with operable node‐negative breast cancers with high‐risk tumor biology. We evaluated national patterns of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) use among women with early‐stage HER2+, triple‐negative (TNBC), and high‐risk hormone receptor‐positive (HR+) invasive breast cancers. Methods Women ≥18 years with cT1‐2/cN0 HER2+, TNBC, or high recurrence risk score (≥31) HR+ invasive breast cancers who received chemotherapy were identified in the National Cancer Database (2010–2016). Cochran‐Armitage and logistic regression examined temporal trends and likelihood of undergoing NACT versus adjuvant chemotherapy based on patient age and molecular subtype. Results Overall, 96,622 patients met study criteria; 25% received NACT and 75% underwent surgery first, with comparable 5‐year estimates of overall survival (0.90, 95% CI 0.892–0.905 vs 0.91, 95% CI 0.907–0.913). During the study period, utilization of NACT increased from 14% to 36% and varied according to molecular subtype (year*molecular subtype p
- Published
- 2022