1. When Temporal Certainty Doesn't Help
- Author
-
Slav Pesin, Ayelet N. Landau, Flor Kusnir, and Gal Moscona
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,Thesaurus (information retrieval) ,Time Factors ,Information retrieval ,Cognitive Neuroscience ,media_common.quotation_subject ,Sensory system ,Certainty ,Anticipation, Psychological ,Vibration ,Young Adult ,Sensory input ,Touch Perception ,Auditory Perception ,Humans ,Female ,Psychology ,Psychomotor Performance ,media_common - Abstract
In a dynamically changing environment, the ability to capture regularities in our sensory input helps us generate predictions about future events. In most sensory systems, the basic finding is clear: Knowing when something will happen improves performance on it [Nobre, A. C., & van Ede, F. (2017). Anticipated moments: Temporal structure in attention. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 19, 34–48, 2017]. We here examined the impact of temporal predictions on a less-explored modality: touch. Participants were instructed to detect a brief target embedded in an ongoing vibrotactile stimulus. Unbeknownst to them, the experiment had two timing conditions: In one part, the time of target onset was fixed and thus temporally predictable, whereas in the other, it could appear at a random time within the ongoing stimulation. We found a clear modulation of detection thresholds due to temporal predictability: Contrary to other sensory systems, detecting a predictable tactile target was worse relative to unpredictable targets. We discuss our findings within the framework of tactile suppression.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF