1. Association of high ligation versus low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery on anastomotic leak, postoperative complications, and mortality after minimally invasive surgery for distal sigmoid and rectal cancer
- Author
-
Fayez A. Quereshy, Tyler R. Chesney, Arman Draginov, Sami A Chadi, and Humzah A. Quereshy
- Subjects
Male ,Laparoscopic surgery ,Left colic artery ,Leak ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Colorectal cancer ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Anastomotic Leak ,030230 surgery ,Anastomosis ,Inferior mesenteric artery ,Cohort Studies ,03 medical and health sciences ,Postoperative Complications ,0302 clinical medicine ,Colon, Sigmoid ,medicine.artery ,medicine ,Humans ,Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures ,Ligation ,Aged ,Rectal Neoplasms ,business.industry ,Anastomosis, Surgical ,Mesenteric Artery, Inferior ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Neoadjuvant Therapy ,Surgery ,Treatment Outcome ,Female ,030211 gastroenterology & hepatology ,business ,Abdominal surgery - Abstract
In the treatment of distal sigmoid and rectal cancer, the appropriate level for the ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) remains unresolved. High ligation divides the IMA proximally at its origin, and low ligation ligates the IMA distal to the origin of left colic artery. We assessed the association of level of ligation in scheduled minimally invasive resection of sigmoid and rectal cancers on anastomotic leak, postoperative complications, and death within 30 days. We identified all patients with primary sigmoid and rectal cancer treated with scheduled minimally invasive resection and primary anastomosis between January 2002 and June 2018 using linked institutional and National Surgical Quality Improvement Program databases. We assessed the association of level of ligation with each outcome by fitting individual univariable and multivariable logistic regression models, adjusting for surgical approach, tumor location, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, and Charlson comorbidity index. We included 158 patients treated with high ligation and 123 patients treated with low ligation. Overall, 12 patients had an anastomotic leak requiring intervention within 30 days: 5 in the high ligation group (3.2%, 95% CI 1.4–7.2%) and 7 in the low ligation group (5.7%, 95% CI 2.8–11.3%). There was no association between the level of ligation and anastomotic leak (unadjusted OR 1.85, 95% CI 0.58–6.38; adjusted OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.16–2.55). Similarly, there was no association between the level of ligation and reoperation for anastomotic leak (OR 1.29, 95% CI 0.15–10.9), major complications (Clavien-Dindo III–V; OR 2.22, 95% CI 0.90–5.77), minor complications (Clavien-Dindo I–II; OR 1.51, 95% CI 0.88–2.60), and all complications (OR 1.58, 95% CI 0.94–2.67). No deaths occurred in either group. There was no association of level of ligation of the IMA with anastomotic leak, postoperative complications as a composite, or death. The choice of high or low ligation of the IMA should be made based on technical factors such as length for the creation of a tension-free anastomosis.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF