of progression in male patients who otherwise do not have a major burden of documented and important Background. The insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorph- ism of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE ) gene prognostic factors for progressive renal insuYciency. determines the concentration of ACE in serum and local tissues. The role of this polymorphism in pro- progression gressive chronic renal disease is still not fully clear. Methods. We analysed the impact of the D/D poly- morphism on the rate of decline in renal function in patients with non-diabetic, chronic progressive renal Introduction insuYciency. Seventy non-diabetic patients, aged 21-69 years at baseline, with moderately advanced Polymorphism of the angiotensin I-converting enzyme renal insuYciency due to primary chronic renal (ACE) gene was identified in 1990 (1). The insertion/ disease were followed for an average of 3 years with deletion (I/D) polymorphism of the ACE gene has repeated measurements of their glomerular filtration been shown to determine the concentration of ACE in rate (GFR). Their mean GFR at baseline was serum and in local tissues (2,3). The pathophysiological 41 ml/min/1.73 m2 body surface area (BSA). The poly- role of this polymorphism has been discussed and it merase chain reaction (PCR) amplification method has been proposed that the DD genotype of the ACE was used to detect the I/D polymorphism of the ACE gene may be an independent risk factor for cardiac gene. GFR was measured as the clearance of 51Cr- disease (4-8). Whether the I/D polymorphism plays EDTA and the individual rate of progression was an important role in renal disease is still controversial calculated using linear regression. (9). Results. The distributions of the genotypes were: D/D In diabetic nephropathy there are conflicting results 30%, I/D 49%, and I/I 21%. The rates of progres- regarding whether patients with the DD genotype sion in the three ACE genotype groups were an progress in their renal insuYciency at a higher rate annual decline in renal function of '4.2 (SD (10-14). In the meta-analysis of Staessen et al. (8) it 4.6) ml/min◊1.73 m2 BSA in the D/D group, '2.7 was concluded that the deletion polymorphism sets the (SD 3.4) in the I/D group and '1.7 (SD 3.4) in the stage for renal microvascular complications. Studies in I/I group (ANOVA P=0.12). In patients with pro- patients with IgA nephropathy have suggested that the teinuria below 3.5 g/24 h, the D/D group had a signi- I/D polymorphism may play a role in the progression ficantly higher rate of progression than patients with of this particular renal disease (15-20). In three recent, the I allele. The same was found in a separate analysis but rather small, studies it was reported that the decline when only patients with normal apoliprotein B (below in renal function was also more rapid in patients with 155 mg/dl ) levels were analysed. Furthermore, the D/D the DD genotype in other non-diabetic renal patient genotype was a significant predictor of a more rapid categories (21-23). Furthermore, it has also been decline in renal function in male, but not female, discussed whether the therapeutic response to ACE- patients. inhibition is dependent on the ACE gene polymorph- Conclusion. The results in this study in non-diabetic ism (9,15,17,21,24,25). patients with chronic renal disease indicate that the As pointed out in two recent reviews (9,26 ), a presence of the D allele in the ACE genotype may be common problem in addressing the question of whether of particular importance as a predictor of a high rate gene polymorphism plays a role in various renal dis- eases is the limited size of the patient samples, with