Search

Voltage-gated potassium 11.1 (K

Background and Purpose Kv11.1 (hERG) channel blockade is an adverse effect of many drugs and lead compounds, associated with lethal cardiac arrhythmias. LUF7244 is a negative allosteric modulator/activator of Kv11.1 channels that inhibits early afterdepolarizations in vitro. We tested LUF7244 for antiarrhythmic efficacy and potential proarrhythmia in a dog model. Experimental Approach LUF7244 was tested in vitro for (a) increasing human IKv11.1 and canine IKr and (b) decreasing dofetilide‐induced action potential lengthening and early afterdepolarizations in cardiomyocytes derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells and canine isolated ventricular cardiomyocytes. In vivo, LUF7244 was given intravenously to anaesthetized dogs in sinus rhythm or with chronic atrioventricular block. Key Results LUF7244 (0.5–10 μM) concentration dependently increased IKv11.1 by inhibiting inactivation. In vitro, LUF7244 (10 μM) had no effects on IKIR2.1, INav1.5, ICa‐L, and IKs, doubled IKr, shortened human and canine action potential duration by approximately 50%, and inhibited dofetilide‐induced early afterdepolarizations. LUF7244 (2.5 mg·kg−1·15 min−1) in dogs with sinus rhythm was not proarrhythmic and shortened, non‐significantly, repolarization parameters (QTc: −6.8%). In dogs with chronic atrioventricular block, LUF7244 prevented dofetilide‐induced torsades de pointes arrhythmias in 5/7 animals without normalization of the QTc. Peak LUF7244 plasma levels were 1.75 ± 0.80 during sinus rhythm and 2.34 ± 1.57 μM after chronic atrioventricular block. Conclusions and Implications LUF7244 counteracted dofetilide‐induced early afterdepolarizations in vitro and torsades de pointes in vivo. Allosteric modulators/activators of Kv11.1 channels might neutralize adverse cardiac effects of existing drugs and newly developed compounds that display QTc lengthening.

TLR-induced signaling potently activates cells of the innate immune system and is subject to regulation at different levels. Inflammatory conditions are associated with increased levels of extracellular adenosine, which can modulate TLR-induced production of cytokines through adenosine receptor-mediated signaling. There are four adenosine receptor subtypes that induce different signaling cascades. In this study, we demonstrate a pivotal contribution of adenosine A

The expression of human G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae containing chimeric yeast/mammalian Gα subunits provides a useful tool for the study of GPCR activation. In this study, we used a one-GPCR-one-G protein yeast screening method in combination with molecular modeling and mutagenesis studies to decipher the interaction between GPCRs and the C-terminus of different α-subunits of G proteins. We chose the human adenosine A2B receptor (hA2BR) as a paradigm, a typical class A GPCR that shows promiscuous behavior in G protein coupling in this yeast system. The wild-type hA2BR and five mutant receptors were expressed in 8 yeast strains with different humanized G proteins, covering the four major classes: Gαi, Gαs, Gαq, and Gα12. Our experiments showed that a tyrosine residue (Y) at the C-terminus of the Gα subunit plays an important role in controlling the activation of GPCRs. Receptor residues R103(3.50) and I107(3.54) are vital too in G protein-coupling and the activation of the hA2BR, whereas L213(IL3) is more important in G protein inactivation. Substitution of S235(6.36) to alanine provided the most divergent G protein-coupling profile. Finally, L236(6.37) substitution decreased receptor activation in all G protein pathways, although to a different extent. In conclusion, our findings shed light on the selectivity of receptor/G protein coupling, which may help in further understanding GPCR signaling.

The structure of the human A2A adenosine receptor has been elucidated by X-ray crystallography with a high affinity non-xanthine antagonist, ZM241385, bound to it. This template molecule served as a starting point for the incorporation of reactive moieties that cause the ligand to covalently bind to the receptor. In particular, we incorporated a fluorosulfonyl moiety onto ZM241385, which yielded LUF7445 (4-((3-((7-amino-2-(furan-2-yl)-[1, 2, 4]triazolo[1,5-a][1, 3, 5]triazin-5-yl)amino)propyl)carbamoyl)benzene sulfonyl fluoride). In a radioligand binding assay, LUF7445 acted as a potent antagonist, with an apparent affinity for the hA2A receptor in the nanomolar range. Its apparent affinity increased with longer incubation time, suggesting an increasing level of covalent binding over time. An in silico A2A-structure-based docking model was used to study the binding mode of LUF7445. This led us to perform site-directed mutagenesis of the A2A receptor to probe and validate the target lysine amino acid K153 for covalent binding. Meanwhile, a functional assay combined with wash-out experiments was set up to investigate the efficacy of covalent binding of LUF7445. All these experiments led us to conclude LUF7445 is a valuable molecular tool for further investigating covalent interactions at this receptor. It may also serve as a prototype for a therapeutic approach in which a covalent antagonist may be needed to counteract prolonged and persistent presence of the endogenous ligand adenosine. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11302-016-9549-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Contains fulltext : 103842.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access) The adenosine A1 receptor is a member of the large membrane protein family that signals through G proteins, the G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). GPCRs consist of seven transmembrane domains connected by three intracellular and three extracellular loops. Their N-terminus is extracellular, the C-terminal tail is in the cytoplasm. The transmembrane domains in receptor subfamilies that bind the same endogenous ligand, such as dopamine or adenosine, tend to be highly similar. In contrast, the loop regions can vary greatly, both in sequence and in length, and the role these loops have in the activation mechanism of the receptors remains unclear. Here, we investigated the activating role of the second and third extracellular loop of the human adenosine A1 receptor. By means of an (Ala)3 mutagenic scan in which consecutive sets of three amino acids were mutated into alanine residues in EL2 and a classical alanine scan in EL3, we revealed a strong regulatory role for the second extracellular loop (EL2) of the human adenosine A1 receptor. Besides many residues in the second and the third extracellular loops important for adenosine A1 receptor activation, we also identified two residues in EL2, a tryptophan and a glutamate, that affect the influence of the allosteric modulator PD81,723. These results, combined with a comparison of the different receptor loop regions, provide insight in the activation mechanism of this typical class A GPCR and further emphasize the unique pharmacological profile the loops can provide to individual receptors, even within subfamilies of GPCRs.

Allosteric ligands for G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) may alter receptor conformations induced by an orthosteric ligand. These modulators can thus fine-tune classical pharmacological responses. In this review we will describe efforts to synthesize and characterize allosteric modulators for one particular GPCR subfamily, the adenosine receptors. There are four subtypes of these receptors: A(1), A(2A), A(2B) and A(3). Allosteric enhancers for the adenosine A(1) receptor may have anti-arrythmic and anti-lipolytic activity. They may also act as analgesics and neuroprotective agents. A(3) allosteric enhancers are thought to be beneficial in ischemic conditions or as antitumor agents. We will summarize recent developments regarding the medicinal chemistry of such compounds. Most data have been and are published about the adenosine A(1) and A(3) receptor, whereas limited or no information is available for the A(2A) and A(2B) receptor, respectively. Receptor mutation studies are also discussed, as they may shed light on the localization of the allosteric binding sites. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: "Adenosine Receptors".

The fact that GPCRs might function in a dimeric fashion is currently well accepted. For GnRHR, a GPCR that regulates gonadotropin release, there is evidence that the receptor also functions as a dimer. We here describe the design and synthesis of a set of dimeric GnRHR antagonists in order to understand the interaction of dimeric ligands to the receptor and to address the question whether GnRHR dimerization is a prerequisite for signalling. Biological evaluation of the compounds shows no discrimination between monomeric and dimeric-ligands in respect to binding affinities, however, the dimeric ligands appear to have different functional properties.

The superfamily of human G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is large and regulates a plethora of important physiological processes by transducing extracellular signals over cell membranes. A diversity of natural variants occurs in these receptors, including rare mutations and common polymorphisms. These variants differ in their impact on DNA, ranging from single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) to copy number variants, and in their impact on protein function. Natural variants furthermore vary in their effects on human phenotypes from neutral to disease-associated. As mutation data are highly dispersed over numerous sources, a single resource for variants would aid investigators of GPCRs. The GPCR NaVa database therefore integrates data on natural variants in human GPCRs from online databases, the scientific literature, and patents. Where available, variants contain information on their location in the DNA (and protein sequence), the involved nucleotides (and amino acids), the average frequency of each allele, reported disease associations, and references to public databases and the scientific literature. The GPCR NaVa database aims to facilitate studies into pharmacogenetics, genotype–phenotype, and structure–function relationships of GPCRs. The GPCR NaVa database is interlinked with the family-specific GPCRDB resource and is accessible as a stand-alone database through a user-friendly website at http://nava.liacs.nl (last accessed 28 August 2007). Hum Mutat 29(1), 39–44, 2008. © 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Adhesion G protein-coupled receptors (ADGRs) are believed to be activated by auto-proteolytic cleavage of their very large extracellular N-terminal domains normally acting as a negative regulator of the intrinsically constitutively active seven transmembrane domain. ADGRG2 (or GPR64) which originally was described to be expressed in the epididymis and studied for its potential role in male fertility, is highly up-regulated in a number of carcinomas, including breast cancer. Here, we demonstrate that ADGRG2 is a functional receptor, which in transfected HEK293 cells signals with constitutive activity through the adhesion- and migration-related transcription factors serum response element (SRE) and nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NFκB) presumably via coupling to Gα12/13 and Gαq. However, activation of these two pathways appears to occur through distinct molecular activation mechanisms as auto-proteolytic cleavage is essential for SRE activation but not required for NFκB signaling. The overall activation mechanism for ADGRG2 is clearly distinct from the established ADGR activation mechanism as it requires the large extracellular N-terminal domain for proper intracellular signal transduction. Knockdown of ADGRG2 by siRNA in the highly motile breast cancer cell lines Hs578T and MDA-MB-231 resulted in a strong reduction in cell adhesion and subsequent cell migration which was associated with a selective reduction in RelB, an NFκB family member. It is concluded that the adhesion GPCR ADGRG2 is critically involved in the adhesion and migration of certain breast cancer cells through mechanisms including a non-canonical NFkB pathway and that ADGRG2 could be a target for treatment of certain types of cancer.

Scintillation proximity assay (SPA) is a radio-isotopic technology format used to measure a wide range of biological interactions, including drug-target binding affinity studies. The assay is homogeneous in nature, as it relies on a "mix and measure" format. It does not involve a filtration step to separate bound from free ligand as is the case in a traditional receptor-binding assay. For G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), it has been shown that optimal binding kinetics, next to a high affinity of a ligand, can result in more desirable pharmacological profiles. However, traditional techniques to assess kinetic parameters tend to be cumbersome and laborious. We thus aimed to evaluate whether SPA can be an alternative platform for real-time receptor-binding kinetic measurements on GPCRs. To do so, we first validated the SPA technology for equilibrium binding studies on a prototypic class A GPCR, the human adenosine A1 receptor (hA1R). Differently to classic kinetic studies, the SPA technology allowed us to study binding kinetic processes almost real time, which is impossible in the filtration assay. To demonstrate the reliability of this technology for kinetic purposes, we performed the so-called competition association experiments. The association and dissociation rate constants (k on and k off) of unlabeled hA1R ligands were reliably and quickly determined and agreed very well with the same parameters from a traditional filtration assay performed simultaneously. In conclusion, SPA is a very promising technique to determine the kinetic profile of the drug-target interaction. Its robustness and potential for high-throughput may render this technology a preferred choice for further kinetic studies.

The human adenosine A(2B) receptor belongs to class A G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). In our previous work, constitutively active mutant (CAM) human adenosine A(2B) receptors were identified from a random mutation bank. In the current study, three known A(2B) receptor antagonists, 4-{2-[7-amino-2-(2-furyl)[1,2,4]triazolo-[2,3-a][1,3,5]triazin-5-yl-amino]ethyl}phenol (ZM241385), 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (DPCPX), and N-(4-acetylphenyl)-2-[4-(2,3,6,7-tetrahydro-2,6-dioxo-1,3-dipropyl-1H-purin-8-yl)phenoxy]acetamide (MRS1706) were tested on wild-type and nine CAM A(2B) receptors with different levels of constitutive activity in a yeast growth assay. All three compounds turned out to be inverse agonists for the adenosine A(2B) receptor because they were able to fully reverse the basal activity of four low-level constitutively active A(2B) receptor mutants and to partially reverse the basal activity of three medium-level constitutively active A(2B) receptor mutants. We also discovered two highly constitutively active mutants whose basal activity could not be reversed by any of the three compounds. A two-state receptor model was used to explain the experimental observations; fitting these yielded the following relative intrinsic efficacies for the three inverse agonists ZM241385, DPCPX, and MRS1706: 0.14 +/- 0.03, 0.35 +/- 0.03, and 0.31 +/- 0.02, respectively. Moreover, varying L, the ratio of active versus inactive receptors in this model, from 0.11 for mutant F84L to 999 for two highly constitutively active mutants yielded simulated dose-response curves that mimicked the experimental curves. This study is the first description of inverse agonists for the human adenosine A(2B) receptor. Moreover, the use of receptor mutants with varying levels of constitutive activity enabled us to determine the relative intrinsic efficacy of these inverse agonists.

Clustering problems arise in various domains of science and engineering. A large number of methods have been developed to date. The Kohonen self-organizing map (SOM) is a popular tool that maps a high-dimensional space onto a small number of dimensions by placing similar elements close together, forming clusters. Cluster analysis is often left to the user. In this paper we present the method TreeSOM and a set of tools to perform unsupervised SOM cluster analysis, determine cluster confidence and visualize the result as a tree facilitating comparison with existing hierarchical classifiers. We also introduce a distance measure for cluster trees that allows one to select a SOM with the most confident clusters.

Allosteric modulation of G protein-coupled receptors has recently been recognized as an alternative approach to gain selectivity in drug action. In this overview, allosteric modulators that enhance or diminish the effects of (endogenous) agonists or antagonists on a variety of G protein-coupled receptors are described. Emphasis is placed on the latest developments in this research area, including data on the first clinical studies. It appears that all three major classes of G protein-coupled receptors (A, B and C) are amenable to allosteric modulation by small molecules. This constitutes an attractive and novel means to identify new leads in the drug discovery process. However, it requires a re-engineering of the majority of current assays. Finally, it is suggested to introduce the term 'non-competitive agonism' or 'allosteric agonism' next to allosteric modulation.

We studied fusion proteins between the human adenosine A1 receptor and different 351Cys-mutated G(i1) alpha-subunits (A1-Gialpha) with respect to two important concepts in receptor pharmacology, i.e. allosteric modulation and constitutive activity/inverse agonism. The aim of our study was twofold. We first analysed whether such fusion products are still subject to allosteric modulation, and, secondly, we investigated the potential utility of the fusion proteins to study constitutive receptor activity. We determined the pharmacological profile of nine different A1-Gialpha fusion proteins in radioligand binding studies. In addition, we performed [35S]GTPgammaS binding experiments to study receptor and G protein activation of selected A1-Gialpha fusion proteins. Compared to unfused adenosine A1 receptors, the affinity of N6-cyclopentyladenosine (CPA) at wild-type A1-Gialpha fusion proteins (351Cys) increased more than eightfold, while the affinity of 1,3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine (DPCPX) did not change significantly. Furthermore, we showed that the allosteric enhancer of agonist binding, PD81,723 (2-amino-4,5-dimethyl-3-thienyl-[3-(trifluoromethyl)-phenyl]methanone), elicited similar effects on ligand binding; i.e. CPA binding to the A1-Gialpha fusion proteins was enhanced, whereas the affinity of DPCPX was hardly affected. Moreover, sodium ions were unable to decrease agonist binding to the majority of the A1-Gialpha fusion proteins, presumably because they exhibit their effect through uncoupling of the R-G complex. From [35S]GTPgammaS binding experiments, we learned that all the A1-Gialpha fusion proteins tested had a higher basal receptor activity than the unfused adenosine A1 receptor, thereby providing improved conditions to observe inverse agonism. Moreover, the maximal CPA-induced stimulation of basal [35S]GTPgammaS binding was increased for the five A1-Gialpha fusion proteins tested, whereas the inhibition induced by 8-cyclopentyltheophylline (CPT) was more pronounced at 351Cys, 351Ile, and 351Val A1-Gialpha fusion proteins. Thus, the maximal receptor (de)activation depended on the amino acid at position 351 of the Gi alpha-subunit. In conclusion, A1-Gialpha fusion proteins, especially with 351Cys and 351Ile, can be used as research tools to investigate inverse agonism, due to their increased readout window in [35S]GTPgammaS binding experiments.

In this review the latest developments in ligand design for the adenosine A(1) receptor are summarized. Novel series of agonists and antagonists are discussed, leading to the conclusion that ligands truly selective for the human adenosine A(1) receptor are still scarce.

1H,3H-Pyrido[2,1-f]purine-2,4-diones, which can be described as fused xanthine structures, have been synthesized by a novel synthetic procedure, and their affinities for the human adenosine A(1), A(2A), and A(3) receptors have been evaluated in radioligand binding studies. The synthetic procedure employed was developed in our laboratory and involved a two-step one-pot reaction that consists of the treatment of 6-aminouracil derivatives with N-bromosuccinimide to generate a 5,5-dibromo-6-imino intermediate that reacts "in situ" with pyridine, 4-methoxypyridine, 4-tert-butylpyridine, or 4-phenylpyridine to afford the corresponding 1H,3H-pyrido[2,1-f]purine-2,4-diones (2-5). Functionalization at the N(3) position in compounds 2-5 was performed by reaction with DBU and different alkyl, alkenyl, alkynyl, or benzyl halides. Binding studies at human adenosine A(1), A(2A), and A(3) receptors revealed significant antagonist effects in the low nanomolar range, in particular against the A(3) receptor. Thus, the 1-benzyl-3-propyl-1H,3H-pyrido[2,1-f]purine-2,4-dione derivative 6, which can be considered a lead compound in this series, exhibited a K(i) value of 4.0 +/- 0.3 nM against the hA(3) receptor. Because xanthine derivatives have traditionally been considered poor A(3) antagonists, the described pyrido[2,1-f]purine-2,4-dione derivatives represent a new family of adenosine receptor antagonists which deserves further exploration.

Novel 2,5'-disubstituted adenosine derivatives were synthesized in good overall yields starting from commercially available guanosine. Binding affinities were determined for rat adenosine A(1) and A(2A) receptors and human A(3) receptors. E(max) values were determined for the stimulation or inhibition of cAMP production in CHO cells expressing human adenosine A(2A) (EC(50) values as well) or A(3) receptors, respectively. The compounds displayed affinities in the nanomolar range for both the adenosine A(2A) and A(3) receptor, without substantial preference for either receptor. The derivatives with a 2-(1-hexynyl) group had the highest affinities for both receptors; compound 4 (2-(1-hexynyl)adenosine) had the highest affinity for the adenosine A(2A) receptor with a K(i) value of 6 nM (A(3)/A(2A) selectivity ratio of approximately 3), whereas compound 37 (2-(1-hexynyl)-5'-S-methyl-5'-thioadenosine) had the highest affinity for the adenosine A(3) receptor with a K(i) value of 15 nM (A(2A)/A(3) selectivity ratio of 4). In general, compounds with a relatively small 5'-S-alkyl-5'-thio substituent (methyl-5'-thio) displayed the highest affinities for both the adenosine A(2A) and A(3) receptor; the larger ones (n- or i-propyl-5'-thio) increased the selectivity for the adenosine A(3) receptor. The novel compounds were also evaluated in cAMP assays for their (partial) agonistic behavior. Overall, the disubstituted derivatives behaved as partial agonists for both the adenosine A(2A) and A(3) receptor. The compounds showed somewhat higher intrinsic activities on the adenosine A(2A) receptor than on the A(3) receptor. Compounds 37, 40 and 45, 48, with either a 5'-S-methyl-5'-thio or a 5'-S-i-propyl-5'-thio substituent had the lowest intrinsic activities on the adenosine A(2A) receptor. For the A(3) receptor, compounds 34, 35, 38, 39, and 46, 47, with a 5'-S-ethyl-5'-thio or a 5'-S-n-propyl-5'-thio substituent had the lowest intrinsic activities.

New N,5'-di- and N,2,5'-trisubstituted adenosine derivatives were synthesized in good overall yields. Appropriate 5-O-alkyl-substituted ribose moieties were coupled to 6-chloropurine or 2,6-dichloropurine via Vorbrüggen's glycosylation method. Subsequent amination and deprotection of the intermediates yielded compounds 18-35. Binding affinities were determined for rat adenosine A1 and A2A receptors and the human A3 receptor. The ability of compounds 18-35 to inhibit forskolin-induced (10 microM) cyclic AMP (cAMP) production and their ability to stimulate guanosine 5'-O-(3-[35S]thio)triphosphate ([35S]GTPgammaS) binding, via either the adenosine A1 receptor or the adenosine A3 receptor, were assessed. N-Cyclopentyl-substituted adenosine derivatives displayed affinities in the low nanomolar range for the adenosine A1 receptor, whereas N-(3-iodobenzyl)-substituted derivatives had high affinity for the adenosine A3 receptor. Compound 22 had the highest affinity for the adenosine A1 receptor (K(i) value of 16 nM), and compounds 20 and 26 had the highest affinities for the adenosine A3 receptor (K(i) values of 4 and 3 nM, respectively). A chlorine substituent at the 2-position either did not affect or slightly increased the adenosine A1 receptor affinity, whereas the A3 receptor affinity was affected differently, depending on the N-substituent. Furthermore, the introduction of chlorine slightly increased the A3/A1 selectivity ratio. At the 5'-position, an O-methyl substituent induced the highest adenosine A1 receptor affinity, whereas an O-ethyl substituent did so for the A3 receptor. All compounds showed partial agonistic effects in both the cAMP and [35S]GTPgammaS assays, although more marked in the latter assay. In general, the 2-chloro derivatives seemed to have lower intrinsic activities compared to the 2-H-substituted compounds on both the adenosine A1 and the adenosine A3 receptors. The compounds with an N-(3-iodobenzyl) substituent displayed the lowest intrinsic activities. Finally, all compounds also showed partially antagonistic behavior in the [35S]GTPgammaS assay.

Allosteric modulation of G protein-coupled receptors is a relatively novel and unexplored pharmacological concept that may lead to more selective and more ‘natural’ drugs for these receptors. In particular, allosteric enhancers may serve as tools to intensify selectively a weakened hormone or neurotransmitter signal caused by a localized deficit, such as in Alzheimer's or Parkinson's disease. In this paper, attention is paid to the adenosine A 1 receptor, for which novel allosteric enhancers were synthesized and characterized that proved superior to the prototypic allosteric enhancer PD 81,723.

The influence of nitro substituents on the properties of adenosine and 1-deazaadenosine was studied. Combination of a nitro group at the 2-position with several N6 substituents such as cyclopentyl and m-iodobenzyl gave a series of analogues with good adenosine receptor affinity, showing directable selectivity for the A1, A2A and A3 adenosine receptor subtypes.

The concept of functional selectivity offers great potential for the development of drugs that selectively activate a specific intracellular signaling pathway. During the last few years, it has become possible to systematically analyse compound libraries on G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) for this 'biased' form of signaling. We screened over 800 compounds targeting the class of adenosine A(1) receptors using a β-arrestin-mediated signaling assay in U2OS cells as a G protein-independent readout for GPCR activation. A selection of compounds was further analysed in a G protein-mediated GTPγS assay. Additionally, receptor affinity of these compounds was determined in a radioligand binding assay with the agonist [(3)H]CCPA. Of all compounds tested, only LUF5589 9 might be considered as functionally selective for the G protein-dependent pathway, particularly in view of a likely overestimation of β-arrestin signaling in the U2OS cells. Altogether, our study shows that functionally selective ligands for the adenosine A(1) receptor are rare, if existing at all. A thorough analysis of biased signaling on other GPCRs also reveals that only very few compounds can be considered functionally selective. This might indicate that the concept of functional selectivity is less common than speculated.

The hydroxy-carboxylic acid (HCA) receptors HCA(1), HCA(2), and HCA(3) were previously known as GPR81, GPR109A, and GPR109B, respectively, or as the nicotinic acid receptor family. They form a cluster of G protein-coupled receptors with high sequence homology. Recently, intermediates of energy metabolism, all HCAs, have been reported as endogenous ligands for each of these receptors. The HCA receptors are predominantly expressed on adipocytes and mediate the inhibition of lipolysis by coupling to G(i)-type proteins. HCA(1) is activated by lactate, HCA(2) by the ketone body 3-hydroxy-butyrate, and HCA(3) by hydroxylated β-oxidation intermediates, especially 3-hydroxy-octanoic acid. Both HCA(2) and HCA(3) are part of a negative feedback loop which keeps the release of fat stores in check under starvation conditions, whereas HCA(1) plays a role in the antilipolytic (fat-conserving) effect of insulin. HCA(2) was first discovered as the molecular target of the antidyslipidemic drug nicotinic acid (or niacin). Many synthetic agonists have since been designed for HCA(2) and HCA(3), but the development of a new, improved HCA-targeted drug has not been successful so far, despite a number of clinical studies. Recently, it has been shown that the major side effect of nicotinic acid, skin flushing, is mediated by HCA(2) receptors on keratinocytes, as well as on Langerhans cells in the skin. In this chapter, we summarize the latest developments in the field of HCA receptor research, with emphasis on (patho)physiology, receptor pharmacology, major ligand classes, and the therapeutic potential of HCA ligands.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the major drug target of medicines on the market today. Therefore, much research is and has been devoted to the elucidation of the function and three-dimensional structure of this large family of membrane proteins, which includes multiple conserved transmembrane domains connected by intra- and extracellular loops. In the last few years, the less conserved extracellular loops have garnered increasing interest, particularly after the publication of several GPCR crystal structures that clearly show the extracellular loops to be involved in ligand binding. This review will summarize the recent progress made in the clarification of the ligand binding and activation mechanism of class-A GPCRs and the role of extracellular loops in this process.

The chemokine receptor CCR3 is believed to play a role in the development of allergic diseases such as asthma, atopic dermatitis, and allergic rhinitis. Despite the conflicting results that have been reported regarding the importance of eosinophils and CCR3 in allergic inflammation, inhibition of this receptor with small molecule antagonists is thought to provide a valuable approach for the treatment of these diseases. This review describes the structure-activity relationships (SAR) of small molecule CCR3 antagonists as reported in the scientific and patent literature. Various chemical classes of small molecule CCR3 antagonists have been described so far, including (bi)piperidine and piperazine derivatives, N-arylalkylpiperidine urea derivatives and (N-ureidoalkyl)benzylpiperidines, phenylalanine derivatives, morpholinyl derivatives, pyrrolidinohydroquinazolines, arylsulfonamides, amino-alkyl amides, imidazole- and pyrimidine-based antagonists, and bicyclic diamines. The (N-ureidoalkyl)benzylpiperidines are the best studied class in view of their generally high affinity and antagonizing potential. For many of these antagonists subnanomolar IC(50) values were reported for binding to CCR3 along with the ability to effectively inhibit intracellular calcium mobilization and eosinophil chemotaxis induced by CCR3 agonist ligands in vitro.

The human olfactory subgenome has recently been fully characterized with over 1000 genes. Although as many as two thirds of them are expected to be pseudogenes, it still leaves us with about half of all human G protein-coupled receptors being olfactory. It is therefore of great interest to characterize olfactory receptors with high precision. Usually it is done through sequence motifs that are not fully conserved, making an exact characterization difficult. In this paper, we propose a rule-based characterization of olfactory receptors derived from a multiple sequence alignment of human GPCRs. We show that just seven alignment sites are sufficient to characterize 99% of human olfactory GPCRs with one feature, a tyrosine at site 7.41, being of particular importance. We also show dependencies between sites near the extracellular and intracellular region of a membrane-embedded receptor, indicating that olfactory receptors are characterized by a combination of important residues in these two areas, whereas nonolfactory receptors tend to have residues of lower importance at the same sites. Proteins 2007. © 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

The concept of constitutively active G-protein-coupled receptors is now firmly rooted in receptor pharmacology. Many independent research groups have contributed to its acceptance since its introduction by Costa and Herz in 1989. This concept necessitated a revised ligand classification, and a new category of inverse agonists was introduced alongside existing agonist and antagonist ligands. Initially, it was hoped that new therapeutic modalities would become available. However, the drug industry has not adopted inverse agonism as a design criterion and instead accepted that some compounds emerge as (neutral) antagonists in compound screening, whereas other compounds possess inverse agonistic activity. In this article, we summarize aspects of the impact of constitutive activity on the drug-discovery process: for example, its use in orphan receptor assays, its link with pharmacogenetics and genomics, and its relevance for currently marketed drugs.

Contains fulltext : 48658.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access) To study the effect of allosteric modulators on the internalization of human adenosine A(1) receptors, the receptor was equipped with a C-terminal yellow fluorescent protein tag. The introduction of this tag did not affect the radioligand binding properties of the receptor. CHO cells stably expressing this receptor were subjected during 16 h to varying concentrations of the agonist N(6)-cyclopentyladenosine (CPA) in the absence or presence of 10 microM of the allosteric enhancer PD 81,723 ((2-amino-4,5-dimethyl-3-thienyl)-[3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]methanone) or the allosteric inhibitor SCH-202676 (N-(2,3-diphenyl-1,2,4-thiadiazol-5(2H)-ylidene)methanamine). CPA itself was able to internalize 25% and 40% of the receptors at a concentration of 400 nM or 4 muM, respectively. Addition of either PD 81,723 or SCH-202676 alone had no effect on internalization. However, with PD 81,723 a slight amount of internalization was obtained already at 40 nM of CPA and at 400 nM CPA 59% of the receptors internalized. SCH-202676 on the other hand effectively prevented CPA-induced internalization of the receptor.

We studied the wild-type human adenosine A 1 receptor and three mutant receptors, in which the glycine at position 14 had been changed into an alanine, a leucine, or a threonine residue. All receptors were characterized in radioligand binding experiments, the wild-type and the Gly 14 Thr mutant receptor in greater detail. Both receptors were allosterically modulated by sodium ions and PD81,723 (2-amino-4,5-dimethyl-3-thienyl-[3(trifluoromethyl)-phenyl]methanone), although in a different way. All mutant receptors appeared to be spontaneously or “constitutively” active in a [ 35 S]GTPγS binding assay, the first demonstration of the existence of such CAM (constitutively active mutant) receptors for the adenosine A 1 receptor. The Gly 14 Thr mutant receptor was also constitutively active in another functional assay, i.e., the inhibition of forskolin-induced cAMP production in intact cells. Importantly, this mutant displayed a peculiar “locked-on” phenotype, i.e., neither agonist nor inverse agonist was capable of modulating the basal activity in both the GTPγS and the cAMP assay, unlike the wild-type and the two other mutant receptors.

The adenosine A(2B) receptor is the least well characterized of the four known adenosine receptor subtypes because of the absence of potent, selective agonists. Here, we present five non-adenosine agonists. Among them, 2-amino-4-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-6-(1H-imidazol-2-ylmethylsulfanyl)pyridine-3,5-dicarbonitrile, 17, LUF5834, is a high-efficacy partial agonist with EC(50) = 12 nM and 45-fold selectivity over the adenosine A(3) receptor but lacking selectivity versus the A(1) and A(2A) subtypes. Compound 18, LUF5835, the 3-hydroxyphenyl analogue, is a full agonist with EC(50) = 10 nM.

Novel 3,8- and 8,9-disubstituted N(6)-cyclopentyladenine derivatives were synthesised in moderate overall yield from 6-chloropurine. The derivatives were made in an attempt to find a new neutral antagonist with high affinity for adenosine A(1) receptors. N(6)-Cyclopentyl-9-methyladenine (N-0840) was used as a lead compound. Binding affinities of the new analogues were determined for human adenosine A(1) and A(3) receptors. Their intrinsic activity was assessed in [35S]GTPgammaS binding experiments. Elongation of the 9-methyl of N-0840 to a 9-propyl substituent was very well tolerated. A 9-benzyl group, on the other hand, caused a decrease in adenosine A(1) receptor affinity. Next, the 8-position was examined in detail, and affinity was increased with appropriate substitution. Most derivatives were A(1)-selective and 20 of the new compounds (6-9, 15-21, 23-26, 28, 31, 33, 35, and 36) had higher adenosine A(1) receptor affinity than the reference substance, N-0840. Compound 31 (N(6)-cyclopentyl-8-(N-methylisopropylamino)-9-methyladenine, LUF 5608) had the highest adenosine A(1) receptor affinity, 7.7 nM. In the [35S]GTPgammaS binding experiments, derivatives 5, 14, 22, 23, 25, 26, 33 and 34 did not significantly change basal [35S]GTPgammaS binding, thus behaving as neutral antagonists. Moreover, four of these compounds (23, 25, 26, and 33) displayed a 4- to 10-fold increased adenosine A(1) receptor affinity (75-206 nM) compared to N-0840 (852 nM). In summary, we synthesised a range of N-0840 analogues with higher affinity for adenosine A(1) receptors. In addition, four new derivatives, LUF 5666 (23), LUF 5668 (25), LUF 5669 (26) and LUF 5674 (33), behaved as neutral antagonists when tested in [35S]GTPgammaS binding studies. Thus, these compounds have improved characteristics as neutral adenosine A(1) receptor antagonists.

Allosteric modulation of G-protein-coupled receptors may provide an alternative approach for selective receptor interactions. The article is an overview of allosteric modulators enhancing or diminishing the effects of (endogenous) agonists or antagonists on a variety of G-protein-coupled receptors such as muscarinic, α-adrenergic, serotoninergic, dopaminergic, adenosine, metabotropic glutamate and Ca2+ receptors. Efficacious allosteric modulators have been published for the serotonin receptor (5-HT moduline; oleamide), the dopamine receptor (cyclic analogues of the tripeptide prolyl-leucyl-glycinamide), the metabotropic glutamate receptor (CPCCOET (mglu1); MPEP (mglu5)) and the Ca2+ receptor (NPS R-568; NPS 2143). Leads are available for the muscarinic (Ach) receptor (K5720) and the α2A-adrenoceptor (agmatine). SCH-202676 and amiloride analogues are nonselective allosteric modifiers interacting with several different receptors. They may not be suitable as leads for future drugs but such compounds may be u...

Novel phenomena, such as constitutive activity and inverse agonism, have led to a ligand (re)classification along an agonists-neutral antagonist-inverse agonist continuum. This review focuses on adenosine A(1) receptor ligands and their intrinsic activity (alpha). The intrinsic activity of a ligand depends both on the chemical characteristics of the compound itself and on the experimental conditions in which it is assayed. Consequently, due to this tissue-dependency determination of a ligand s intrinsic activity is not always easily performed. Meanwhile, this feature may also be used in a profitable manner, namely to separate desired and unwanted effects of the drug. Briefly, this review provides possible screening methods to distinguish the different classes of ligands. It also deals with the structural elements and functional groups in the adenosine A(1) receptor ligands that determine their intrinsic activity.

T-cell receptors (TCRs) of a series of minor histocompatibility antigen (mHag) HA-1–specific cytotoxic T-cell (CTL) clones isolated from 3 unrelated patients have been shown to use the same BV6S4A2 segment with conserved amino acids in the CDR3Vβ region. This suggests that different HA-1–specific TCRs interact similarly to the HA-1 antigen presented by the HLA-A2 molecule. The mHag HA-1 forms an immunogenic complex with HLA-A2 and induces strong alloimmune responses after stem cell transplantation (SCT). It was questioned, therefore, whether clonal and polyclonal HA-1–specific CTL responses can be antagonized by a single TCR antagonistic peptide. Functional analysis and molecular modeling of single and double amino acid substitutions of TCR contact residues, adjacent residues, and HLA-A2 binding residues resulted in 4 peptides with high affinity for HLA-A2 and with the capacity to inhibit the lysis of endogenously HA-1–expressing EBV-BLCL by 3 different HA-1–specific CTL clones. These peptides also efficiently antagonized HA-1–specific polyclonal CTL lines derived from 3 patients and significantly reduced the number of interferon-γ–producing HA-1–specific CTL of a patient with graft-versus-host disease after HA-1–mismatched SCT. These data show that general TCR antagonists can be developed that inhibit HLA-A2–restricted HA-1–specific CTL responses on the clonal and the polyclonal level and that TCR antagonists may modulate the immunodominant mHag HA-1 responses.

To provide insights into interactions between ligands and A(2A) adenosine receptors, site-directed mutagenesis was used to test the roles of a glutamic acid residue in the first transmembrane domain (Glu13) and a histidine residue in the seventh transmembrane domain (His278). The two residues, which have been suggested to be closely linked in molecular modeling studies, were mutated to glutamine (E13Q) and tyrosine (H278Y), respectively. Saturation experiments revealed that [(3)H]ZM241385 (4-2-[7-amino-2-(2-furyl)-1,2, 4-triazolo[1,5-a][1,3,5]triazin-5-yl-amino]ethylphenol) bound wild-type and mutant receptors in membranes from COS-7 cells expressing human A(2A) adenosine receptors with high affinity and low non-specific binding. It was found from the competition experiments that the affinity of the A(2A) adenosine receptor agonists for the mutant receptors was 3- to 200-fold lower than for the wild-type receptor. Among antagonist competitors of binding at E13Q and H278Y mutant receptors, there was variation in the affinity depending on their different structures, although changes were relatively minor (3-fold) except in the case of theophylline, whose affinity was decreased approximately 20 times on the H278Y mutant. The possible involvement of the two residues in sodium ion regulation was also tested. The agonist competition curves for [(3)H]ZM241385 were shifted to the right in both wild-type and mutant receptors in the presence of 1 M sodium ions, but the extent of shift (2- to 27-fold) in wild-type receptor was generally larger than for the mutant receptors. Sodium ions also decreased [(3)H]ZM241385 dissociation from both wild-type and mutant receptors, being more influential on the former than the latter. The results suggest that the two closely linked residues Glu13 and His278 in A(2A) adenosine receptor are most important for agonist recognition and are partly responsible for the allosteric regulation by sodium ions.

The antiarrhythmic properties of beta-adrenoceptor antagonists have long been recognized and, according to the Vaughan Williams classification of antiarrhythmic drugs, these drugs are regarded as a separate entity, namely class II. In this review, Ad IJzerman and Willem Soudijn focus on the nature and the molecular basis of the antiarrhythmic action of beta-adrenoceptor antagonists. Structure-activity relationship studies demonstrate that the antiarrhythmic profile of different beta-adrenoceptor antagonists is not fixed and some compounds have class I or class III properties which may be clinically relevant.