1. The Use of Social Media to Increase the Impact of Health Research: Systematic Review
- Author
-
Elie A. Akl, Mohamad A. Chahrour, Lokman I. Meho, Abdul Sattar Raslan, Rola El Rassi, Marco Bardus, and Elie W. Akl
- Subjects
Biomedical Research ,social media ,Applied psychology ,Psychological intervention ,MEDLINE ,Health Informatics ,Review ,CINAHL ,MEDLARS ,Bibliometrics ,lcsh:Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Humans ,Social media ,030212 general & internal medicine ,research ,Altmetrics ,lcsh:Public aspects of medicine ,05 social sciences ,lcsh:RA1-1270 ,journal impact factor ,Systematic review ,translational medical research ,lcsh:R858-859.7 ,0509 other social sciences ,050904 information & library sciences ,Psychology ,Medical literature - Abstract
Background Academics in all disciplines increasingly use social media to share their publications on the internet, reaching out to different audiences. In the last few years, specific indicators of social media impact have been developed (eg, Altmetrics), to complement traditional bibliometric indicators (eg, citation count and h-index). In health research, it is unclear whether social media impact also translates into research impact. Objective The primary aim of this study was to systematically review the literature on the impact of using social media on the dissemination of health research. The secondary aim was to assess the correlation between Altmetrics and traditional citation-based metrics. Methods We conducted a systematic review to identify studies that evaluated the use of social media to disseminate research published in health-related journals. We specifically looked at studies that described experimental or correlational studies linking the use of social media with outcomes related to bibliometrics. We searched the Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Excerpta Medica dataBASE (EMBASE), and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) databases using a predefined search strategy (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews: CRD42017057709). We conducted independent and duplicate study selection and data extraction. Given the heterogeneity of the included studies, we summarized the findings through a narrative synthesis. Results Of a total of 18,624 retrieved citations, we included 51 studies: 7 (14%) impact studies (answering the primary aim) and 44 (86%) correlational studies (answering the secondary aim). Impact studies reported mixed results with several limitations, including the use of interventions of inappropriately low intensity and short duration. The majority of correlational studies suggested a positive association between traditional bibliometrics and social media metrics (eg, number of mentions) in health research. Conclusions We have identified suggestive yet inconclusive evidence on the impact of using social media to increase the number of citations in health research. Further studies with better design are needed to assess the causal link between social media impact and bibliometrics.
- Published
- 2020