Search

Objective: Elinzanetant is a selective neurokinin-1,3 receptor antagonist in development for the treatment of vasomotor symptoms (VMS) associated with menopause. The pivotal, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 studies Overall Assessment of efficacy and Safety of elinzanetant In patients with vasomotor Symptoms (OASIS) 1 and 2 will assess the efficacy and safety of elinzanetant in women with VMS., Methods: The OASIS 1 and 2 pivotal studies are designed in accordance with regulatory guidance. Postmenopausal women with moderate/severe VMS are randomized to receive 120 mg elinzanetant or placebo once daily for 12 weeks, followed by a 14-week active treatment extension. Primary endpoints are the mean change in frequency and severity of moderate/severe VMS from baseline to weeks 4 and 12. Key secondary endpoints will assess the onset of action and effects on sleep disturbance and menopause-related quality of life. Primary and key secondary endpoints will be analyzed using a mixed model with repeated measures. Feedback from postmenopausal women with VMS was used during protocol development., Results: Women confirmed the relevance of endpoints that assess the impact of VMS, sleep disturbance, and mood changes, and the need for new nonhormone treatments. Educational materials around study design, conduct and expected assessments and procedures were developed based on questions and concerns raised by women., Conclusions: The OASIS 1 and 2 pivotal phase 3 studies will enable assessment of the efficacy and safety of elinzanetant as a treatment for VMS, together with its effect on sleep disturbances, depressive symptoms, and menopause-related quality of life. Feedback from postmenopausal women with VMS was used to maximize patient centricity in the trials., Competing Interests: Financial disclosure/conflicts of interest: JoAnn V. Pinkerton serves as principal investigator at University of Virginia for the multicenter Bayer OASIS 2 trial, the fees from the trial are to the University of Virginia, currently serves on the Editorial Board of OBG Management, and is a contributor to Merck Manuals and Up to Date. Nick Panay has lectured and acted in an advisory capacity for Abbott, Bayer, Besins, Gedeon Richter, Mithra, Novo Nordisk, SeCur, Theramex, and Viatris. James Simon has grant/research support from AbbVie, Inc, Bayer Healthcare LLC, Daré Bioscience, Ipsen, Mylan/Viatris Inc, Myovant Sciences, and Sebela Pharmaceuticals Inc; serves as a consultant/is on advisory boards for Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc, Besins Healthcare, California Institute of Integral Studies (CIIS), Daré Bioscience, Femasys Inc, Khyria, Madorra Pty Ltd, Mayne Pharma, Inc, and Vella Bioscience Inc; serves on speaker's bureaus of Astellas Pharma, Inc, Mayne Pharma, Inc, Myovant Sciences, Inc, Pfizer Inc, Pharmavite LLC, and Scynexis Inc; is a stockholder (direct purchase) of Sermonix Pharmaceuticals. Lineke Zuurman and Cecilia Caetano are employees of Bayer CC AG. Christian Seitz, Susanne Parke, Uwe Mellinger, Claudia Haberland, Cornelia Holz, Sven Nisius, and Matthias Schaefers are employees of Bayer AG. Nazanin Haseli Mashhadi is an employee of Bayer PLC. Gordana Atanackovic and Marina Morrison are employees of Bayer US LLC. Guangping Mao is an employee of Bayer Healthcare Co Ltd., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The Menopause Society.)

For women at elevated risk of thrombosis, clinicians are challenged to relieve menopausal symptoms without increasing the risk of thrombosis. Oral menopausal hormone therapy increases the risk of venous thromboembolism by 2-fold to 3-fold. Observational studies suggest less thrombotic risk with transdermal therapies and with progesterone over synthetic progestogens (progestins), but the data are limited. Beneficial nonpharmacologic therapies include cognitive behavioral therapy and clinical hypnosis, whereas beneficial nonhormonal pharmacologic therapies include selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors. For treatment of the genitourinary syndrome of menopause, vaginal lubricants and moisturizers, low-dose vaginal estrogen, and intravaginal dehydroepiandrosterone are options.

Objective: To evaluate the impact of baseline hot flush frequency and severity on time to symptom improvement during treatment with conjugated estrogens/bazedoxifene (CE/BZA)., Methods: Data were pooled through week 12 from two randomized placebo-controlled trials (SMART-1 and SMART-2) of nonhysterectomized postmenopausal women with hot flushes treated with CE 0.45 mg/BZA 20 mg or CE 0.625 mg/BZA 20 mg. Time to transient and stable improvement (≥ 50% reduction in hot flush frequency/severity) was estimated using nonparametric models., Results: Transient improvement in hot flush frequency occurred earlier in women treated with CE 0.45 mg/BZA 20 mg with less frequent versus more frequent baseline hot flushes per day: median time to transient improvement was 2, 7, and 11 days for women with < 3, 3 to < 8, and ≥ 8 hot flushes per day at baseline, respectively (P = 0.0009). Transient improvement in severity occurred earlier for women with less severe versus more severe baseline hot flushes: median time to transient improvement was 2, 6, and 16 days for women with mild, moderate, and severe hot flushes at baseline, respectively (P < 0.0001). Stable improvement typically occurred 2 to 3 days after the transient event and was less influenced by baseline status. A similar pattern was observed with CE 0.625 mg/BZA 20 mg treatment, though improvement occurred a few days earlier than with CE 0.45 mg/BZA 20 mg., Conclusion: Women with more frequent/severe hot flushes take longer to achieve transient improvements with CE/BZA and should be encouraged to continue treatment, as it may take longer than a few weeks to achieve significant improvement.

Objective: This post hoc analysis estimates time to transient and stable reductions in hot flush frequency in postmenopausal women using conjugated estrogens/bazedoxifene., Methods: In the 12-week Selective estrogens, Menopause, And Response to Therapy (SMART)-2 trial of conjugated estrogens/bazedoxifene 0.45 mg/20 mg and 0.625 mg/20 mg, women with at least seven moderate/severe hot flushes per day or 50 per week at screening recorded frequency of moderate/severe hot flushes in diaries. Nonparametric models and SAS Proc Lifetest were used to estimate median times to various degrees of transient reductions (first day with improvement) and stable reductions (first day with improvement maintained through study's end) in hot flush frequency., Results: Treatment produced transient hot flush reductions of 40% to 100% and stable reductions of 30% to 100% significantly faster than placebo. Median time to a transient 50% reduction was 8 days for conjugated estrogens/bazedoxifene 0.45 mg/20 mg, 9.5 for 0.625 mg/20 mg, and 10 for placebo; median time to a stable 50% reduction was 9, 10, and 38 days. Median time to a transient 90% reduction was 32 and 22.5 days for 0.45 mg/20 mg and 0.625 mg/20 mg, and median time to a stable 90% reduction was 83 and 29 days, respectively; median times to transient/stable 90% reductions were not reached during the 12-week study in the placebo group., Conclusions: Although not all women using conjugated estrogens/bazedoxifene achieve permanent elimination of hot flushes, the frequency is likely to be substantially reduced during the first week to month. Women can expect approximately 50% reduction in hot flush frequency after about 8 to 10 days, and sustained improvement with continued treatment.

Objective: The aim of the study was to determine the time course of effect with conjugated estrogens/bazedoxifene (CE/BZA) in nonhysterectomized postmenopausal women in five phase 3 trials., Methods: This post hoc analysis identified when CE 0.45 mg/BZA 20 mg and CE 0.625 mg/BZA 20 mg first achieved a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) versus placebo in individual trials and the duration the difference persisted for prespecified efficacy endpoints., Results: CE/BZA significantly reduced hot flush frequency beginning at weeks 2 to 4 and severity at weeks 3 to 6; benefits were maintained through month 24. Significant improvements in lumbar spine, total hip, femoral neck, and femoral trochanter bone mineral density were evident at month 6 or 12 and changes in bone turnover markers at month 3 or 6; benefits were maintained throughout the studies (12 or 24 mo). In symptomatic women with less than 5% vaginal superficial cells at baseline, vaginal maturation index was significantly improved by week 4. Reductions in parabasal cells were maintained throughout the studies (through months 3 and 24), but superficial cell count changes persisted only with the higher CE/BZA dose. Menopause-Specific Quality of Life total and vasomotor domain scores were improved at all assessments, from months 3 through 24. Some measures of sleep, especially quality and time to fall asleep, improved during weeks 4 to 8 and were maintained in a majority of weeks thereafter., Conclusions: In the context of studies designed primarily to evaluate efficacy at final study endpoints, both doses of CE/BZA achieved significance versus placebo at early assessments for most outcomes, and benefits were well maintained.

Objectives: Conjugated estrogens/bazedoxifene (CE/BZA) reduced menopause-related hot flashes (HFs) in the Selective estrogens, Menopause, And Response to Therapy (SMART) trials. This post hoc pooled analysis of SMART-1 and -2 further characterized effects of CE/BZA on HFs in the overall population and patient subgroups., Methods: Data from two randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled, phase 3 studies were pooled for nonhysterectomized postmenopausal women with moderate/severe HFs given CE 0.45 mg/BZA 20 mg, CE 0.625 mg/BZA 20 mg, or placebo for 12 weeks. HF frequency and severity were assessed by daily diary., Results: The pooled analysis included 403 participants. At 12 weeks, CE 0.45 mg/BZA 20 mg and CE 0.625 mg/BZA 20 mg significantly (all p < 0.001) decreased moderate/severe HF frequency versus placebo (-7.9, -8.2, -4.1), reduced adjusted average daily HF severity score versus placebo (-1.0, -1.3, -0.3), increased the percentage of women who had a ≥50% (81.2%,87.1%, 50.6%) and ≥75% (62.4%, 74.8%, 26.4%) reduction from baseline in daily frequency of moderate/severe HFs, increased the percentage with ≥50% (38.3%, 58.1%, 11.0%) and ≥75% (24.2%, 38.1%, 5.5%) reductions in average daily HF severity score, and improved MENQOL vasomotor function versus placebo (adjusted mean change-3.08, -3.69, -1.37). CE/BZA was significantly more effective than placebo irrespective of time since menopause, with some evidence of a lower placebo response in women in later menopause (>5 years) versus early menopause (≤5 years)., Conclusions: CE/BZA effectively reduces moderate/severe HFs in postmenopausal women. NCT#'s: NCT00675688; NCT00234819.

Objective: This study characterizes and quantifies the relationship of vasomotor symptoms (VMS) of menopause with menopause-specific quality of life (MSQOL) and sleep parameters to help predict treatment outcomes and inform treatment decision-making., Methods: Data were derived from a 12-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial that evaluated effects of two doses of conjugated estrogens/bazedoxifene on VMS in nonhysterectomized postmenopausal women (N = 318, mean age = 53.39) experiencing at least seven moderate to severe hot flushes (HFs) per day or at least 50 per week. Repeated measures models were used to determine relationships between HF frequency and severity and outcomes on the Menopause-Specific Quality of Life questionnaire and the Medical Outcomes Study sleep scale. Sensitivity analyses were performed to check assumptions of linearity between VMS and outcomes., Results: Frequency and severity of HFs showed approximately linear relationships with MSQOL and sleep parameters. Sensitivity analyses supported assumptions of linearity. The largest changes associated with a reduction of five HFs and a 0.5-point decrease in severity occurred in the Menopause-Specific Quality of Life vasomotor functioning domain (0.78 for number of HFs and 0.98 for severity) and the Medical Outcomes Study sleep disturbance (7.38 and 4.86) and sleep adequacy (-5.60 and -4.66) domains and the two overall sleep problems indices (SPI: 5.17 and 3.63; SPII: 5.82 and 3.83)., Conclusions: Frequency and severity of HFs have an approximately linear relationship with MSQOL and sleep parameters-that is, improvements in HFs are associated with improvements in MSQOL and sleep. Such relationships may enable clinicians to predict changes in sleep and MSQOL expected from various VMS treatments.

Objective: To examine the effect of ospemifene 60 mg/d on vasomotor symptoms in postmenopausal women using clinical safety and efficacy data from five phase 2 and 3 studies., Methods: The incidence of hot flush treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was compiled from five randomized, placebo-controlled clinical studies; baseline parameters associated with hot flush incidence were also identified. Ospemifene's effects on the frequency and severity of hot flushes were evaluated in a previously unpublished, 6-week, placebo-controlled study., Results: Analysis of pooled hot flush TEAE data for 2,166 women showed an incidence of hot flush of 8.5% for ospemifene and 3.2% for placebo (P < 0.0001). Hot flushes were most frequent during the first 4 weeks of ospemifene treatment and decreased in frequency thereafter. Logistic regression analysis revealed that hormone therapy within 6 months before study start (P = 0.0234), longer study treatment duration (P = 0.0234), and more hot flush days per month at baseline (P = 0.0313) were associated with more hot flushes. Ospemifene 60 mg/d did not worsen the frequency and severity of existing hot flushes in a 6-week, placebo-controlled trial of 198 postmenopausal women who were experiencing moderate to very severe hot flushes., Conclusions: In randomized trials, hot flush TEAEs were more frequent with ospemifene 60 mg/d than with placebo, particularly among women with prior history of hormone therapy use. The majority of hot flushes, however, waned after 4 weeks of ospemifene treatment. Ospemifene did not worsen existing hot flushes in women experiencing moderate to very severe hot flushes.

Objective: The objective of this document is to generate a practice guideline for the management and treatment of symptoms of the menopause., Participants: The Treatment of Symptoms of the Menopause Task Force included six experts, a methodologist, and a medical writer, all appointed by The Endocrine Society., Evidence: The Task Force developed this evidenced-based guideline using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system to describe the strength of recommendations and the quality of evidence. The Task Force commissioned three systematic reviews of published data and considered several other existing meta-analyses and trials., Consensus Process: Multiple e-mail communications, conference calls, and one face-to-face meeting determined consensus. Committees of The Endocrine Society, representatives from endorsing societies, and members of The Endocrine Society reviewed and commented on the drafts of the guidelines. The Australasian Menopause Society, the British Menopause Society, European Menopause and Andropause Society, the European Society of Endocrinology, and the International Menopause Society (co-sponsors of the guideline) reviewed and commented on the draft., Conclusions: Menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) is the most effective treatment for vasomotor symptoms and other symptoms of the climacteric. Benefits may exceed risks for the majority of symptomatic postmenopausal women who are under age 60 or under 10 years since the onset of menopause. Health care professionals should individualize therapy based on clinical factors and patient preference. They should screen women before initiating MHT for cardiovascular and breast cancer risk and recommend the most appropriate therapy depending on risk/benefit considerations. Current evidence does not justify the use of MHT to prevent coronary heart disease, breast cancer, or dementia. Other options are available for those with vasomotor symptoms who prefer not to use MHT or who have contraindications because these patients should not use MHT. Low-dose vaginal estrogen and ospemifene provide effective therapy for the genitourinary syndrome of menopause, and vaginal moisturizers and lubricants are available for those not choosing hormonal therapy. All postmenopausal women should embrace appropriate lifestyle measures.

Objective: Sleep disturbances are common among women in midlife; prevalence increases among perimenopausal/postmenopausal women with vasomotor symptoms. Paroxetine 7.5 mg is the only nonhormonal treatment that has been approved in the United States for moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms associated with menopause. In two pivotal phase 3 studies evaluating its efficacy and safety, improvements in sleep disturbances were also prospectively evaluated., Methods: Postmenopausal women with moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms were randomly assigned to paroxetine 7.5 mg (n = 591) or placebo (n = 593) once daily for 12 weeks (both studies) or 24 weeks (24-wk study). Predefined assessments on weeks 4, 12, and 24 included number of nighttime awakenings attributed to vasomotor symptoms, sleep-onset latency, sleep duration, and sleep-related adverse events. The two studies' data for weeks 1 to 12 were pooled., Results: At baseline, participants reported a mean of 3.6 awakenings/night attributed to vasomotor symptoms. Nighttime awakenings attributed to vasomotor symptoms were significantly reduced within 4 weeks of initiating paroxetine 7.5 mg treatment (39% reduction vs 28% for placebo; P = 0.0049), and reductions were sustained through 12 or 24 weeks of treatment. Paroxetine 7.5 mg treatment also significantly increased nighttime sleep duration (week 4, +31 vs +16 min for placebo; P = 0.0075), but no significant between-group differences in sleep-onset latency or sleep-related adverse events such as sedation were observed., Conclusions: In postmenopausal women treated for menopausal vasomotor symptoms, paroxetine 7.5 mg significantly reduces the number of nighttime awakenings attributed to vasomotor symptoms and increases sleep duration without differentially affecting sleep-onset latency or sedation.

Objective: This study aims to confirm the factor structure of the Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQOL) questionnaire by using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and to determine whether improvements in menopause-specific health-related quality of life (HRQOL) observed with bazedoxifene (BZA)/conjugated estrogens (CE) relative to placebo are clinically meaningful., Methods: Postmenopausal women with seven or more moderate to severe hot flushes per day (or ≥50 per wk) received BZA 20 mg/CE 0.45 mg, BZA 20 mg/CE 0.625 mg, or placebo for 12 weeks. HRQOL and treatment satisfaction were evaluated using the MENQOL questionnaire and the Menopause Symptoms Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire, respectively. The structure of the MENQOL questionnaire was evaluated using CFA. To estimate clinically important differences (CIDs) in HRQOL, we used a repeated-measures model to estimate changes in MENQOL domain and total scores using Menopause Symptoms Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire items as anchors., Results: The CFA model fits the MENQOL data (Bentler's comparative fit index >0.9). CID estimates ranged from 0.5 to 1.2 for the MENQOL domains and total score. Change from baseline in MENQOL vasomotor domain score for BZA 20 mg/CE 0.45 mg and BZA 20 mg/CE 0.625 mg compared with placebo was greater than the estimated CID, as were changes in MENQOL physical domain and total scores for BZA 20 mg/CE 0.625 mg compared with placebo., Conclusions: CFA confirms the factor structure of the MENQOL questionnaire. Treatment with BZA/CE provides clinically meaningful improvements in HRQOL in a population of postmenopausal women with bothersome vasomotor symptoms.

Objective: Describe the effects of conjugated estrogens/bazedoxifene (CE/BZA), a new treatment for vasomotor symptoms (VMS) and osteoporosis prevention, on menopause-specific quality of life (MSQOL) across different patient population types in phase 3 clinical trials., Design: MSQOL was prospectively evaluated in 4 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies. The populations studied included healthy, non-hysterectomized postmenopausal women with symptomatic VMS or vulvar-vaginal atrophy (VVA) and general postmenopausal women (eligible regardless of symptoms). Menopause-specific Quality of Life (MENQOL) questionnaire total and domain scores for CE 0.625 mg/BZA 20mg and CE 0.45 mg/BZA 20mg were evaluated and compared with established thresholds for clinically important differences (CID)., Results: Significant improvements compared with placebo were found with both CE/BZA doses in MENQOL vasomotor domain (-0.61 to -2.23 over 3-24 months) and total scores (-0.24 to -0.94) in the general and symptomatic VMS/VVA populations. Significant improvement compared with placebo in sexual domain (-0.11 to -0.72) was observed with the higher dosage for all populations, and with the lower dosage in the VVA (-0.71 at month 3) and general populations (-0.4 at months 12 and 24). Improvements in vasomotor domain exceeded the CID with both doses in symptomatic VMS populations and with the higher dosage in women with symptomatic VVA; for total MENQOL, the CID was exceeded with the higher dose in symptomatic VMS populations., Conclusions: CE/BZA significantly improved overall and vasomotor-related MSQOL across populations of postmenopausal women with varying baseline symptom statuses. Women with greater menopausal symptoms at baseline were more likely to experience clinically meaningful changes., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The goal of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of gastroretentive gabapentin (G-GR) for the treatment of moderate-to-severe menopausal hot flashes., Methods: The primary endpoints of this randomized, placebo-controlled study of G-GR (600 mg am/1,200 mg pm) were the mean daily frequency and severity of hot flashes at weeks 4 and 12. Secondary endpoints included Patients' Global Impression of Change, Clinicians' Global Impression of Change, and daily sleep interference at week 24., Results: Six hundred women with 7 or more moderate-to-severe hot flashes/day enrolled; 66.2% completed 24 weeks of treatment. At weeks 4 and 12, G-GR-treated women experienced significantly greater reductions in mean hot flash frequency and severity than placebo-treated women (frequency: week 4, -1.7, P < 0.0001; week 12, -1.14, P = 0.0007; severity: week 4, -0.21, P < 0.0001; week 12, -0.19, P = 0.012). Similar reductions were maintained up to week 24. On the Patient Global Impression of Change, more women receiving G-GR than placebo were "much" or "very much" improved (week 12: 58% vs 44%, P = 0.0008; week 24: 76% vs 55%, P < 0.0001). G-GR significantly reduced sleep interference compared with placebo at week 12 (P = 0.0056) and week 24 (P = 0.0084). Approximately 5% more women taking G-GR withdrew because of adverse events (G-GR/placebo, 16.7%/11.5%). The most common adverse events were dizziness (12.7%/3.4%), headache (9.3%/8.1%), and somnolence (6.0%/2.7%); incidences dropped to sustained low levels after a few weeks., Conclusions: G-GR is a modestly effective nonhormone therapy option for the treatment of moderate-to-severe hot flashes due to menopause and is well tolerated with titration.

Objective: A previous trial of the serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor desvenlafaxine (administered as desvenlafaxine succinate) raised concerns on potential serious cardiovascular and hepatic events. The current study was designed to estimate these events in desvenlafaxine versus placebo in a larger population followed for 1 year., Methods: Healthy postmenopausal women seeking treatment of vasomotor symptoms were randomized to placebo or desvenlafaxine 100 mg/day in a 1-year, multicenter, double-blind study. Safety was monitored throughout. Potential ischemic cardiovascular events (coronary heart disease-related death, new-onset myocardial infarction or unstable angina requiring hospitalization, and unscheduled revascularization procedures) and cerebrovascular events (definite stroke or probable stroke) identified by investigator reports and periodic adverse event review based on Standardized medical dictionary for regulatory activities Query were reviewed by blinded adjudication boards. Hepatic events (aspartate aminotransferase or alanine aminotransferase >5 times the upper limit of normal) were evaluated., Results: A total of 2,118 participants (1,066 desvenlafaxine, 1,052 placebo) took one or more doses of study medication (mean, 280 d). There was one cardiovascular event; a placebo-treated participant was adjudicated to have had a myocardial infarction. One desvenlafaxine-treated participant was adjudicated to have had a probable stroke. Two participants in each treatment group had hepatic events. The excess risk (90% CI) of desvenlafaxine over placebo per 1,000 woman-years was -1.07 (-2.86 to 0.72) for cardiovascular events, 1.11 (-0.68 to 2.9) for cerebrovascular events, and 0.08 (-3.51 to 3.67) for hepatic events., Conclusions: There is no evidence for an increased risk of cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, or hepatic events associated with desvenlafaxine 100 mg/day compared with placebo for the treatment of menopausal vasomotor symptoms.

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the 12-week efficacy of desvenlafaxine in treating moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms and the clinical relevance of improvements in postmenopausal women experiencing 50 or more moderate to severe hot flashes per week., Methods: Participants were randomized to placebo or desvenlafaxine 100 mg/day in the 12-week efficacy substudy of a year-long, multicenter, parallel-group, double-blind study. Coprimary outcomes were changes from baseline in the daily number and severity of hot flashes on weeks 4 and 12. The percentage of women achieving the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in the number of hot flashes on week 12 was determined., Results: The efficacy substudy modified intent-to-treat population included 365 women (desvenlafaxine, n = 184; placebo, n = 181). Desvenlafaxine 100 mg/day significantly reduced the number and severity of hot flashes versus placebo on week 4 (P < 0.001) and week 12 (P < 0.001). On week 12, desvenlafaxine reduced the number of moderate and severe hot flashes by 7.3 (62%) per day (placebo, -4.5 [38%] per day) and the severity score by 0.59 (25%) per day (placebo, -0.28 [12%] per day). MCID-a reduction of 5.35 moderate and severe hot flashes per day-was achieved by 64% of desvenlafaxine-treated women (placebo, 41%; P < 0.001). In all, 17.2% (67/390) of participants discontinued, 10.0% (20/200) of participants taking desvenlafaxine and 3.7% (7/190) of participants taking placebo discontinued because of adverse events (P = 0.016), and 2.5% (5/200) of participants taking desvenlafaxine and 8.4% (16/190) of participants taking placebo discontinued because of lack of efficacy (P = 0.012)., Conclusions: Postmenopausal women with moderate to severe hot flashes who are treated with desvenlafaxine achieve rapid symptom reduction that is clinically relevant based on MCID.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the 1-year maintenance of the efficacy of desvenlafaxine 100 mg/day (administered as desvenlafaxine succinate) established on week 12 in a 1-year, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in postmenopausal women seeking treatment of bothersome vasomotor symptoms., Methods: Primary efficacy endpoints were changes in hot flush (HF) frequency and severity on weeks 12, 26, and 52 in an efficacy substudy population (≥50 moderate and severe HFs per week at baseline). Secondary endpoints were Greene climacteric scale, patient global impression symptom rating, and patient global impression of change scores (weeks 12, 26, and 52) for the main study efficacy population. Safety was assessed throughout the trial., Results: The mean baseline HF frequency (efficacy substudy population, n = 365) was 12 moderate and severe HFs per day; the mean baseline severity score was 2.4. At 1 year, women treated with desvenlafaxine maintained the efficacy established on week 12. Desvenlafaxine reduced HF frequency by 7.47 moderate and severe HFs per day on week 12 (adjusted mean difference from placebo, -2.48; 95% CI, -3.47 to -1.50; P < 0.001) and by 7.70 moderate and severe HFs per day on month 12 (adjusted mean difference from placebo, -2.86; 95% CI, -4.14 to -1.57; P < 0.001). Desvenlafaxine reduced the mean severity score by 0.63 on week 12 (placebo, -0.30; P < 0.001) and by 0.75 on month 12 (placebo, -0.44; P = 0.003). Reductions in Greene Climacteric Scale total score (main study efficacy population, n = 1,950) were significantly greater for desvenlafaxine than for placebo on months 3, 6, and 12 (all P < 0.001). Treatment-emergent adverse event rates were 84% for desvenlafaxine and 79% for placebo (P = 0.006). Full safety results are reported separately., Conclusions: The treatment efficacy of desvenlafaxine 100 mg/day achieved on week 12 in postmenopausal women with vasomotor symptoms is maintained for 1 year.

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of bazedoxifene (BZA)/conjugated estrogens (CE) treating moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms in the Selective Estrogen Menopause and Response to Therapy 2 trial., Methods: This was an outpatient, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study conducted in the United States. Healthy postmenopausal women (N = 332; aged 40-65 y) with moderate to severe hot flushes (>or=7/d or 50/wk) were randomized to BZA 20 mg/CE 0.45 mg, BZA 20 mg/CE 0.625 mg, or placebo once daily for 12 weeks. Changes from baseline in the average daily number of moderate and severe hot flushes and daily severity score were assessed at weeks 4 and 12; adverse events were recorded., Results: BZA/CE significantly reduced the number and severity of hot flushes at weeks 4 and 12 (P < 0.001). At week 12, BZA 20 mg/CE 0.45 mg and BZA 20 mg/CE 0.625 mg reduced hot flushes from baseline by 74% (10.3 hot flushes [baseline] vs 2.8 [week 12]) and 80% (10.4 vs 2.4), respectively, compared with 51% (10.5 vs 5.4) for placebo. More participants at week 12 had at least a 75% decrease in hot flushes with BZA 20 mg/CE 0.45 mg (61%) and BZA 20 mg/CE 0.625 mg (73%) versus placebo (27%; P < 0.001). The safety profile was similar between BZA/CE and placebo, and no unexpected safety findings were reported., Conclusions: BZA 20 mg paired with CE 0.45 or 0.625 mg is effective, with short-term safety, for treating vasomotor symptoms in postmenopausal women.

Objective: To evaluate the effects of a tissue-selective estrogen complex (TSEC) composed of bazedoxifene/conjugated estrogens (BZA/CE) on menopausal symptoms, metabolic parameters, and overall safety., Design: Multicenter, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled phase 3 trial (Selective estrogens, Menopause, And Response to Therapy [SMART]-1)., Setting: Outpatient clinical., Patient(s): Healthy, postmenopausal women (n = 3,397) age 40 to 75 with an intact uterus., Intervention(s): Single tablets of BZA (10, 20, or 40 mg), each with CE (0.625 or 0.45 mg); raloxifene 60 mg; or placebo taken daily for 2 years., Main Outcome Measure(s): Hot flushes, breast pain, vaginal atrophy, metabolic parameters, and adverse events., Result(s): BZA (20 mg)/CE (0.625 or 0.45 mg) significantly reduced the frequency and severity of hot flushes and improved measures of vaginal atrophy compared with placebo. At week 12, the daily number of hot flushes decreased by 51.7% to 85.7% with all BZA/CE doses vs. 17.1% for placebo. BZA/CE improved lipid parameters and homocysteine levels, did not significantly change carbohydrate metabolism, and had only minor effects on some coagulation parameters. The incidences of breast pain and adverse events were similar between BZA/CE and placebo., Conclusion: The TSEC composed of BZA (20 mg)/CE (0.625 or 0.45 mg) is an effective and safe treatment for menopausal symptoms.

During peri- and postmenopausal stages, the majority of women experience moderate-to-severe vasomotor symptoms, such as hot flashes and night sweats, that interfere with sleep and reduce quality of life. Estrogen alone or in combination with a progestagen has been the standard therapy for such vasomotor symptoms; however, this therapeutic regimen is associated with severe side effects, such as breast cancer or cardiovascular events. To provide a better treatment option for menopausal women, Bionovo Inc is developing the estrogen receptor (ER)beta-selective agonist MF-101. Selective ER agonists can stimulate either ERalpha or ERbeta and induce tissue-specific estrogen-like effects, thus providing a safer alternative to conventional hormone therapy. MF-101 is derived from 22 herbs that are traditionally used in Chinese medicine for the treatment of menopausal symptoms. MF-101 did not promote the growth of breast cancer cells or stimulate uterine growth in preclinical studies and, in a phase II trial, was demonstrated to be safe and more effective in reducing the frequency and severity of hot flashes in postmenopausal women compared with placebo. To confirm the safety and efficacy of MF-101, larger phase III trials were planned for 2009. Although MF-101 appears to be a promising therapeutic, the herbal composition of the drug may be a disadvantage, because of the increased risk of causing allergic reactions in the general population. Studies with the MF-101-isolated active compounds liquiritigen and chalcone demonstrated selectivity for ERbeta, with no induction of proliferative events. If these isolates were demonstrated to be as effective and safe in clinical trials as preliminary data suggest regarding MF-101, these compounds could change the way clinicians treat menopause-associated symptoms.

The decline in gonadal hormones during menopause gives rise to a wide range of physiological and psychological changes with the potential to significantly impact a woman's health and quality of life. Most notable among these are menopausal vasomotor symptoms, hot flushes and night sweats, along with mood and sleep disturbances. Given the biological and social significance of menopause, it is remarkable that the language used to describe this event and its associated symptoms is inconsistent. This review traces the history of Western medical writing about menopause-associated vasomotor symptoms and considers how terminology has contributed to the current confusion regarding symptoms and symptom reporting. Although hormone therapy is the only treatment for menopausal symptoms currently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, other forms of therapy are under evaluation. Agreement about the definition of menopause and its associated symptoms is critically important for the design and evaluation of new therapies and for the optimal treatment of women during this important phase of their lives.

Objective: To determine the potential interaction of oral raloxifene 60 mg/day on the efficacy of a low-dose, estradiol-releasing vaginal ring used to treat signs and symptoms of vaginal atrophy in postmenopausal women., Design: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel treatment trial of raloxifene and placebo with open-label 17beta-estradiol ring. At 10 sites in the United States, 91 postmenopausal women with at least two signs of vaginal atrophy were treated with a 17beta-estradiol ring and randomized to receive concomitant raloxifene 60 mg/day or placebo for 6 months. Efficacy of treatments was evaluated by comparing investigator assessments of genitourinary atrophic signs, vaginal maturation value, and participant assessments of vaginal symptoms at 6 months. Other measures included rate and severity of hot flashes and assessment of sexual function. Uterine safety was assessed by endometrial biopsy and transvaginal ultrasound., Results: In women treated with a 17beta-estradiol ring, both the raloxifene and placebo treatment groups showed improvements in signs and symptoms of vaginal atrophy at 6 months, with no significant differences in degree of improvement between groups. There were no signs of endometrial proliferation in either group., Conclusions: Concomitant administration of raloxifene does not alter the effects of the 17beta-estradiol ring on alleviating signs and symptoms of genitourinary atrophy in postmenopausal women.

Selective estrogen receptor (ER) modulators have variable tissue specific estrogen agonist and antagonist activities. Tamoxifen is approved for treatment and prevention of breast cancer; acts as an endometrial estrogen agonist. Raloxifene is approved for prevention and treatment of osteoporosis and prevention of breast cancer. The selective ER modulators bazedoxifene paired with conjugated estrogens relieves vasomotor symptoms and prevents bone loss with neutral effects on breast and amenorrhea similar to placebo. Ospemifene is approved to treat dyspareunia. Lasofoxifene is in development for resistant ER positive breast cancer. Estetrol (E4), synthesized by human fetal liver, has dual weak-estrogenic/antiestrogenic features, now approved as a contraceptive. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article presents a case study of a 53-year-old nonobese, menopausal woman presents with an 8-month history of menopausal symptoms, noting worsening hot flashes, soaking night sweats, and sleep disruption with fatigue that is affecting her work and had breast cancer at 75 years of age. Results of a mammogram were negative. The patient has heard that hormone therapy may be harmful but worries about functioning at work.

Hormone therapy remains the most effective treatment for menopausal symptoms but decisions are complex, requiring an assessment of benefits and risks and determination of best treatment type, dose, and duration. Benefits exceed risks for most women with bothersome menopausal symptoms or high risk for fracture if initiated under age 60 years or within 10 years since menopause. Long-term mortality and safety data from the Women's Health Initiative is reassuring, with no increase in deaths from cardiovascular disease or cancer compared with placebo after 18 years of follow-up and a trend towards less mortality in those who initiate hormone therapy ages 50 to 59 years. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The first approved tissue-selective estrogen complex is a pairing of conjugated estrogen combined with the selective estrogen-receptor modulator, bazedoxifene. Advantages include relief of menopausal symptoms without the increased chance of bleeding or breast tenderness unlike with traditional estrogen-progestin therapy, which is associated with both bleeding and breast tenderness. Tissue-selective estrogen complex effects on relief of vasomotor symptoms, prevention of bone loss, improvement in vaginal symptoms, lack of significant cardiovascular effects beyond the expected 2-fold increase in venous thrombosis, neutral effect on breast, and protective effects on the endometrium are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Highlights: [•] FDA approved selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) prevent and treat breast cancer, osteoporosis and dyspareunia. [•] SERMs have varying agonist and antagonist activities at the level of the estrogen receptor (ER) in target tissues. [•] Targeted agonist effects of SERMs are hot flashes, lipids, bone, vagina, and brain. [•] Antagonist SERM effects are desired in breast and endometrium. [•] The first tissue selective estrogen complex (TSEC) pairs the SERM bazedoxifene with conjugated equine estrogens. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Bazedoxifene/conjugated estrogens (BZA/CE), a novel tissue-selective estrogen complex (TSEC), has been evaluated in the Selective estrogens, Menopause And Response to Therapy (SMART) trials. Secondary outcomes from these trials were evaluated to determine whether the effects of BZA/CE are influenced by years since menopause (YSM). Methods: SMART-1 and SMART-2 were randomized, double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled phase 3 trials in nonhysterectomized postmenopausal women. Outcomes were evaluated for women <5 or ≥5 YSM in SMART-1 (BZA 20 mg/CE 0.45 mg, n=433; BZA 20 mg/CE 0.625 mg, n=414; PBO, n=427) and SMART-2 (BZA 20 mg/CE 0.45 mg, n=127; BZA 20 mg/CE 0.625 mg, n=128; PBO, n=63). Hot-flush frequency and severity, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), sleep, treatment satisfaction, cumulative amenorrhea, and breast pain were assessed for each study individually, using defined statistical analysis protocols. Results: For <5 and ≥5 YSM subgroups, BZA 20 mg/CE 0.45 and 0.625 mg showed significant decreases in hot-flush frequency and severity at 3 months compared with PBO ( p<0.05 for both). Both BZA/CE doses showed significant improvements compared with PBO in HRQoL scores, sleep parameters, and satisfaction with treatment at 3 months irrespective of YSM ( p≤0.05 vs. PBO for all). Similar to PBO, BZA/CE showed high proportions of cumulative amenorrhea (SMART-1) and low incidences of breast pain (SMART-1 and SMART-2) for women <5 and ≥5 YSM. Conclusions: The positive effects of BZA/CE on secondary outcomes were consistent among women <5 or ≥5 YSM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Menopause occurs on average at age 51.4 years. Most, but not all, women who undergo menopause experience significant vasomotor symptoms (VMS). Although single agent estrogen therapy can relieve VMS. over time estrogen can stimulate the endometrial lining leading to an increased risk for endometrial hyperplasia and adenocarcinoma. Although a progestin has traditionally been given in combination with estrogen to 'protect' the endometrium, a new and innovative approach to this traditional combination hormone therapy is to substitute the progestin with an alternative agent. One such alternative agent is bazedoxifene, an estrogen agonist-antagonist. Based on data from randomized trials, when bazedoxifene is given in combination with oral conjugated estrogens to post-menopausal women, the risk of estrogen-associated endometrial stimulation is significantly reduced. The combination of bazedoxifene and conjugated estrogens has also been shown to relieve menopause-associated VMS and vaginal atrophy, and has been shown to be safe for short-term use. Long-term studies of this combination are needed to determine if the combination of conjugated estrogens/bazedoxifene can be used for >3 years without increasing the risk of breast cancer, stroke, cognitive deficit, pulmonary embolism or coronary heart disease. Short-term data regarding this combination has been submitted to the FDA and is currently under review for clinical use, with the relief of VMS as its primary indication. Data regarding the effects of combination conjugated estrogens/bazedoxifene therapy on bone are promising in terms of the prevention and treatment of post- menopausal osteoporosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Determine the direct and indirect effects of conjugated estrogens/bazedoxifene (CE/BZA) treatment on menopause-specific quality of life in a post-hoc analysis of 2 phase 3 Selective estrogens, Menopause, And Response to Therapy (SMART-1, SMART-2) trials.Study Design: Data from participants in SMART-1 and SMART-2 who received CE 0.45mg/BZA 20mg, CE 0.625mg/BZA 20mg, or placebo were analyzed, including week 12 data from 1274 healthy postmenopausal women in SMART-1 and pooled week 1-4 and 9-12 data from 332 women with moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms (≥7 HFs/d or ≥50/wk) in SMART-2.Main Outcome Measures: A statistical mediation model included treatment as a binary predictor variable (pooled active treatment vs placebo), Menopause-Specific Quality of Life (MENQOL) questionnaire domains (vasomotor, sexual, psychosocial, and physical function) as the outcomes variables, and frequency/severity of hot flushes (HFs) as treatment effect mediators on MENQOL.Results: Vasomotor function was affected directly (SMART-1: 35.8%, P<0.05; SMART-2: 48.7%, P<0.05)] by CE/BZA and indirectly through improvements in HF severity (57.0%, P<0.05; 42.1%, P<0.05), and to a lesser extent, through reduction in HF frequency (7.2%, P<0.05; 9.2%, P<0.05). The effects of CE/BZA on the sexual, psychosocial, and physical function domains were fully mediated via improvements in HF severity. Final models for both studies were similar, indicating that direct and indirect effects of CE/BZA on menopause-specific quality of life are consistent and stable in different samples of women.Conclusions: CE/BZA affected the MENQOL vasomotor domain both directly and indirectly, whereas effects on other domains were fully mediated via HF severity reductions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]