Search

Background: Several advanced treatments of high-risk patients with pulmonary embolism have been used in recent decades. We assessed the 19-year national trend in mortality of high-risk patients with pulmonary embolism to determine what impact, if any, advanced therapy might have had on mortality., Methods: Mortality (case fatality rate) was assessed in patients with a primary (first-listed) diagnosis of high-risk pulmonary embolism who were hospitalized during the period from 1999 to 2014 and in 2016 and 2017. High-risk was defined as patients with pulmonary embolism who were in shock or suffered cardiac arrest. International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, Clinical Modification codes were used for data on the period from 1999 to 2014, and version 10 codes were used for data on the years 2016 and 2017. Trends in mortality were assessed according to treatment., Results: From 1999 to 2017 (excluding 2015), 58,784 patients were hospitalized in United States with a primary diagnosis of pulmonary embolism that was high risk. Mortality in all high-risk patients decreased from 72.7% in 1999 to 49.8% in 2017 (P < .0001). Most high-risk patients (60.3%) were treated with anticoagulants alone and did not receive an inferior vena cava filter. Mortality in these patients decreased from 79.0% in 1999 to 55.7% in 2017 (P < .0001). Thrombolytic therapy was administered to 16.1% of high-risk patients, open pulmonary embolectomy alone was used in 4.3%, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was used in 0.4%., Conclusions: Mortality of high-risk patients with pulmonary embolism has decreased. This decrease can be attributed to improved treatment of patients with shock and with cardiac arrest, and does not reflect advances in therapy for pulmonary embolism., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Mortality with adjunctive therapy in patients with unstable pulmonary embolism, defined as those in shock or on ventilator support, is sparsely studied and requires further investigation. This was a retrospective cohort study based on administrative data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample, 2016. In-hospital all-cause mortality in unstable patients with acute pulmonary embolism was assessed according to treatment. Patients were identified by International Classification of Diseases-10-Clinical Modification Codes. Most unstable patients, 85%, received only anticoagulants. Their mortality was 3,080 of 6,635 (46%) without an inferior vena cava (IVC) filter, and mortality was much less with an IVC filter, 285 of 1,185 (24%) (p <0.0001). Mortality with catheter-directed thrombolysis alone, 70 of 235 (30%), did not differ significantly from mortality with anticoagulants plus an IVC filter, p = 0.07, although a trend favored the latter. Intravenous thrombolytic therapy without an IVC filter showed a mortality of 295 of 695 (42%) which tended to be lower than mortality with anticoagulants alone (p = 0.06). The addition of an IVC filter to intravenous thrombolytic therapy resulted in a mortality of 20 of 165 (12%), which was the lowest mortality with any combination of adjunctive treatments. Intravenous thrombolytic therapy, however, was associated with more adverse effects of therapy than catheter-directed thrombolysis or anticoagulants., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

In the absence of a randomized controlled trial, it is important to obtain as much evidence as possible by other methods on whether inferior vena cava (IVC) filters reduce mortality in patients who undergo pulmonary embolectomy. Therefore, this retrospective cohort study based data from the National Inpatient Sample 2009 to 2014 was undertaken. We assessed in-hospital all-cause mortality in stable and unstable (in shock or on ventilator support) patients with acute pulmonary embolism who underwent pulmonary embolectomy. International Classification of Diseases-9-Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes were used to identify patients. Co-morbidities were assessed by the updated Charlson co-morbidity index. A time-dependent analysis was performed to control for immortal time bias. In stable patients who underwent pulmonary embolectomy, mortality with an IVC filter was 50 of 1,212 (4.1%) compared with 202 of 755 (27%) with no IVC filter (p <0.0001). In unstable patients, mortality with an IVC filter was 108 of 598 (18%) compared with 179 of 358 (50%) with no IVC filter (p <0.0001). Mortality was reduced with IVC filters only if the filters were inserted in the first 4 or 5 days. Co-morbid conditions and immortal time bias could not explain these results. We conclude that both stable and unstable patients who underwent pulmonary embolectomy had a lower mortality with IVC filters if inserted in the first 4 or 5 days., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Immortal time bias is a possible confounding factor in cohort studies. In this investigation, we assessed mortality with inferior vena cava (IVC) filters in unstable patients with pulmonary embolism using a design to control for immortal time bias., Methods: Data were from the Premier Healthcare Database, 2010-2014. International Classification of Diseases-Ninth Revision-Clinical Modification codes were used. Unstable patients with pulmonary embolism and an admitting diagnosis of pulmonary embolism, as well as a primary diagnosis of pulmonary embolism, were included. A time-dependent analysis was used according to the day of insertion of the IVC filter to control for immortal time bias., Results: Among all unstable patients, irrespective of the use of thrombolytic therapy, in-hospital all-cause mortality was 35 of 180 (19.4%) in those who received an IVC filter vs 122 of 299 (40.8%) with no filter (P < .0001). Mortality was lower in patients in whom the IVC filter was inserted on days 1 or 2 (on day 1, 21.4% compared with 40.8%, P = .017, and on day 2, 14.8% compared with 29.2%, P = .023), but it was not lower in those in whom the filter was inserted on subsequent days., Conclusions: Mortality in unstable patients with pulmonary embolism appeared to be reduced with IVC filters only when the filter was inserted on the first or second day of admission. The design used for these analyses controlled for immortal time bias as a cause of the lower mortality with IVC filters., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Little is known about the in-hospital mortality of deep venous thrombosis in recent years. This investigation was undertaken to determine trends in in-hospital mortality in patients with deep venous thrombosis and mortality according to age., Methods: Administrative data were analyzed from the National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample, 2003-2012. We determined in-hospital all-cause mortality according to year and age among patients with a primary (first-listed) diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis. We analyzed all such patients and we analyzed those who had none of the comorbid conditions listed in the Charlson Comorbidity Index., Results: From 2003-2012, 1,603,690 hospitalized patients had a primary diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis. All-cause in-hospital mortality decreased from 1.3% in 2003 to 0.6% in 2012. Mortality increased with age from 0.1% in those aged 18-20 years to 1.5% in those over age 80 years. All-cause in-hospital mortality in those with no comorbid conditions according to the Charlson Comorbidity Index (1,094,184 patients) decreased from 1.1% in 2003 to 0.5% in 2012. Presumably, these deaths were from pulmonary embolism. All-cause mortality in those with no comorbid conditions increased with age from 0.1% in those aged 18-20 years to 1.4% in those over aged 80 years., Conclusion: All-cause death and death due to pulmonary embolism in patients hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis decreased from 2003-2012. The death rate increased with age. The decreased mortality over the period of investigation may have resulted from a shift toward use of low-molecular-weight heparins and newer anticoagulants., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: In view of the high risk of pulmonary embolism in patients with cancer, we tested the hypothesis that stable patients with pulmonary embolism who have cancer might be a subset of patients who would show a lower case fatality rate with vena cava filters than without filters., Methods: Stable patients with pulmonary embolism and cancer at discharge from short-stay hospitals throughout the US from 1998-2009 were identified from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. Patients with pulmonary embolism who had a diagnostic code for shock, ventilatory support, thrombolytic therapy, or pulmonary embolectomy were excluded because such patients have been shown to have lower case fatality rate with filters., Results: In-hospital all-cause case fatality rate was lower with vena cava filters in stable patients with pulmonary embolism and solid malignant tumors providing they were aged >30 years, but there was variability according to type of tumor and age of patient. On average, case fatality rate among those >30 years with filters was 7070 of 69,350 (10.2%) (95% confidence interval, 10.0-10.4) versus 36,875 of 247,125 (14.9%) (95% confidence interval, 14.8-15.1) without filters (P <.0001) (relative risk 0.68). Among stable patients with hematological malignancies, case fatality rate, except in the elderly, was higher among those with vena cava filters than those without filters., Conclusion: Stable patients with pulmonary embolism and solid malignant tumors who are older than age 30 years appear to be a subset of patients with pulmonary embolism who would benefit from vena cava filters, but this needs to be tested prospectively., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

In view of the high case fatality rates of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who have pulmonary embolism (PE) we speculated that such patients might benefit from vena cava filters. To test this hypothesis we assessed the database of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. From 1998-2009, 440,370 patients were hospitalised with PE and COPD who were not in shock or ventilator-dependent and did not receive thrombolytic therapy or pulmonary embolectomy. In-hospital all-cause case fatality rate among those with filters was 5,890 of 68,800 (8.6%) (95% confidence interval [CI] = 8.4-8.8) compared with 38,960 of 371,570 (10.5%) (95% CI = 10.4-10.6) (p<0.0001) who did not receive filters. Case fatality rate was age-dependent. Only those who were older than aged 50 years had a lower in-hospital all-cause case fatality rate with filters. Among such patients, absolute risk reduction was 2.1% (95% CI = 1.9-2.3). The greatest reduction of case fatality rate with vena cava filters was shown in patients >aged 80 years, 11,720 of 81,600 (14.4%) compared with 1,570 of 17,220 (9.1%) (p<0.0001). In conclusion, a somewhat lower in-hospital all-cause case fatality rate was shown with vena filters in stable patients with PE >aged 50 years who also had COPD. The benefit was greatest in elderly patients. The benefit in terms of a decreased case fatality rate would seem to outweigh the risks of vena cava filters in such patients.

During the short while of 5 years, between 1984 and 1985, two large clinical trials have been performed in Italy concerning fibrinolytic therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction: GISSI 1 and GISSI 2. They made possible to evaluate the evolution of demographic and clinical features, the in-hospital mortality rate, and the causes of death of a huge number of patients admitted to CCU throughout the whole country. Out of 31,826 patients with acute myocardial infarction admitted to 176 CCU participating to the GISSI 1 16.9% were 75 years old and 24.7% were females; 21.8% and 26.4% were the percentages in the 38,086 patients admitted to the 223 CCU participating in the GISSI 2. Despite the higher prevalence of the two demographic characteristic with the worse prognosis, the in-hospital mortality rates were respectively 12.2% in the GISSI 1 and 10.0% in the GISSI 2 studies, with a statistically significant decrease (RR 0.84; C.L. 0.80-0.88). The significant decrease in the in-hospital mortality concerns also the patients populations selected according to the same criteria of inclusion in the two trials (within 6 hours from the onset of symptoms and with only ST elevation at the ECG of admission) and to the treatment with fibrinolytic drug (SK or rtPA). As a matter of fact 468 patients died of the 4,696 (10.0%) treated with SK in the GISSI 1 against 1,092 patients of 12,381 (8.8%) enrolled in the GISSI 2 and treated with SK or rtPA (RR 0.87; L.C. 0.78-0.98). The reduction of in-hospital mortality may be explained by some differences in the two groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)