Search

Introduction: Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, 775 million cases have been reported globally. While many individuals recover fully, a significant proportion develop persistent symptoms. Numerous studies have investigated the long-term symptoms of COVID-19; however, the full extent and impact of these symptoms remain inadequately understood. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of self-reported persistent symptoms, focusing on respiratory symptoms and fatigue and the impact on functional status 2 years after hospitalization for COVID-19. Methods: This study is prospective and includes participants from a longitudinal multi-center cohort that follows patients previously hospitalized due to COVID-19 (n = 211). The current study encompasses the 2-year follow-up, using post-hospitalization questionnaire surveys. Analyzed data were collected before discharge and at the 2-year follow-up. Participants were grouped by age, sex and COVID-19 severity and group comparisons where conducted. Logistic regression analysis was used to study functional impairment. Results: Two years after hospital discharge due to COVID-19, 125 participants completed the 2-year follow-up. The mean age of participants was 66 years (SD 12.2), and 68% were male. The majority of participants reported present respiratory symptoms (n = 83, 69%) and fatigue (n = 98, 78%) at the 2-year follow-up. Persistent respiratory symptoms and fatigue impacted functional status substantially (p = <0.001, p = 0.028, respectively). No significant differences were observed among groups depending on age, sex, or severity of COVID-19. Conclusion: For some individuals regardless of age, sex or COVID-19 severity, respiratory symptoms and fatigue may persist for up to 2 years following COVID-19. Hence, having available support from professionals knowledgeable about COVID-19 is imperative. Further research is important to unravel the mechanisms of long-term symptoms following COVID-19 and to develop effective therapeutic and rehabilitative interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To examine patients' perception of performance and satisfaction with the activities in their set goals before and after very early supported discharge (VESD) with continued rehabilitation. A descriptive cohort study with data extracted from a randomized controlled trial. Sixty-nine patient allocated to the intervention group were eligible. Before discharge, the patients were asked to set rehabilitation goals, and they were asked to rate the performance and satisfaction of their set goals. At discharge from the rehabilitation, the patients were asked to re-evaluate their experience and satisfaction with the goal performance. One hundred and forty goals were registered. At 81.5% of the set goals, the patients estimated that they performed the task better at discharge than at enrolment and at 86.5% of the set goals the patients were more satisfied with the performance at discharge than at enrolment. Patients with mild to moderate stroke, undergoing a VESD after stroke, reported high performance level for their set goals and were satisfied with their performance execution. Further research is needed to investigate whether the goal should be set preferably at home or at hospital before discharge. Many of the patients can formulate achievable goals with their rehabilitation after stroke. Patients ongoing rehabilitation after stroke are satisfied with their performance of the set goals. As part of patient-centered care, stroke patients should be given the opportunity to formulate their own goals with their rehabilitation. Short hospital times and fast planning of goal-meetings, seems to influence patient goal setting in early discharge rehabilitation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Purpose: Early supported discharge (ESD) has been shown to be efficient and safe as part of the stroke care pathway. The best results have been seen with a multidisciplinary team and after mild to moderate stroke. However, how very early supported discharge (VESD) works has not been studied. The aim of this study was to investigate whether VESD for stroke patients in need of ongoing individualized rehabilitation affects the level of anxiety and overall disability for the patient compared with ordinary discharge routine.Methods: A randomized controlled trial was performed with intention to treat analyses comparing VESD and ordinary discharge from hospital. All patients admitted at the stroke care unit at Sahlgrenska University Hospital of Gothenburg between August 2011 and April 2016 were screened. Inclusion occurred on day 4 using a block randomization of 20 and with a blinded assessor. Assessments were made 5 days post-stroke and 3 and 12 months post-stroke. Patients in the VESD group underwent continued rehabilitation in their homes with a multidisciplinary team from the stroke care unit for a maximum of 1 month. The patients in the control group had support as usual after discharge when needed such as home care service and outpatient rehabilitation. The primary outcome was anxiety as assessed by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Anxiety subscale (HADS-A). The secondary outcome was the patients' degree of overall disability, measured by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS).Results: No significant differences were found between the groups regarding anxiety at three or 12 months post-stroke (p = 0.811). The overall disability was significantly lower in the VESD group 3 months post-stroke (p = 0.004), compared to the control group. However, there was no significant difference between the groups 1 year post-stroke.Conclusions: The VESD does not affects the level of anxiety compared to ordinary rehabilitation. The VESD leads to a faster improvement of overall disability compared to ordinary rehabilitation. We suggest considering coordinated VESD for patients with mild to moderate stroke in addition to ordinary rehabilitation as part of the service from a stroke unit.Trial Registration: Clinical Trials.gov: NCT01622205. Registered 19 June 2012 (retrospectively registered). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Postural balance is an important rehabilitation outcome, and screening stroke patients for confidence in postural balance during rehabilitation and before hospital discharge is recommended. Early supported discharge could improve postural balance self-confidence. This study aimed to investigate associations between patient self-confidence in postural balance and observer-assessed postural balance and anxiety during the first year after stroke. Whether very early supported discharge (VESD) affects self-confidence in postural balance compared with standard discharge was also evaluated.Methods: A longitudinal trial for with data extracted from a randomized controlled study of 140 adults with confirmed stroke was conducted. The experimental group received VESD. The control group was discharged according to the standard routine. Postural balance was assessed with Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Timed Up and Go (TUG) test, and Falls Efficacy Scale. Anxiety was assessed with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (rho) was used to test associations between independent variables. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to examine differences over time. A single test, according to Eid, Gollwitzer, and Schmidt, was used to test temporal differences in correlation.Results: The correlation between self-confidence in postural balance and observer-assessed postural balance was 0.62-0.78 in the first year after stroke. The correlation between self-confidence and anxiety was 0.22-0.41 in the first year after stroke. Correlations did not differ by group affiliation at any time point when the postural balance was assessed with BBS. The intervention group had a significantly higher correlation (r = - 0.709) than the control group (r = - 0.416) when postural balance was assessed with the TUG test 1 month after discharge. There were no significant differences in correlations between confidence in postural balance and anxiety between the two groups at any time point.Conclusions: Patients with mild stroke can accurately assess their confidence in performing daily activities without falling. VESD does not substantially affect the correlation between self-confidence in postural balance and observer assessed postural balance and is safe to use as an alternative to standard discharge. Assessment of self-confidence can provide important information for rehabilitation planning and supporting the physical activity of patients after discharge.Trial Registration: Clinical Trials.gov: NCT01622205 . Registered 19 June 2012 (retrospectively registered). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]