1. Variability in physiological responses of Venezuelan cacao to drought
- Author
-
Ana Herrera, Gabriela Pereyra, Eleinis Ávila-Lovera, and Wilmer Tezara
- Subjects
0106 biological sciences ,Stomatal conductance ,δ13C ,Specific leaf area ,04 agricultural and veterinary sciences ,Biology ,Photosynthesis ,01 natural sciences ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,Horticulture ,chemistry ,Chlorophyll ,Dry season ,040103 agronomy & agriculture ,0401 agriculture, forestry, and fisheries ,Water-use efficiency ,Agronomy and Crop Science ,Water use ,010606 plant biology & botany - Abstract
In order to assess the response of cocoa trees to drought, changes in water status, gas exchange, leaf carbon isotopic ratio (δ13C), photochemical activity, and leaf N and chlorophyll content during the rainy and dry season were measured in 31 Venezuelan cocoa clones (17 Trinitarios, 6 Criollos, and 8 Modern Criollos) grown in a common garden. Drought caused a 40% decrease in water potential (ψ) in all but the Modern Criollos, and a reduction in net photosynthetic rate (A) and stomatal conductance (gs) without an increase in instantaneous water use efficiency (WUE) in 93% of clones, and an increase inδ13C (long-term WUE) in 74% of clones; these responses suggest differences in tolerance to drought among clones. A positive correlation betweenAand bothgsand leaf N content was found for all genotypes. Leaf N content, chlorophyll content, and photochemical activity were reduced during drought, suggesting that metabolism was also inhibited. The best performance during drought was shown by Modern Criollos with the highest WUE, while five Trinitario clones seemed to be less sensitive to drought, since neither chlorophyll, N, total soluble protein concentration, norgschanged with drought, indicating that those Trinitario clones, with lowerA, have a conservative water use. Modern Criollos showed no reductions in eitherψorgs;Aremained unchanged, as did WUE, which was the highest, suggesting that these clones would be more successful in environments with low water availability. Our results indicate large variation in physiological response to drought over a range of parameters, suggesting possible differences in tolerance among clones.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF