Search

The US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) Draft Recommendation statement on Menopausal Hormone Therapy: Primary Prevention for Chronic Diseases, released in May 2017, perpetuates a major disconnect between the primary population affected, women within roughly 10 years of menopause, and the data cited. Furthermore, major elements of the evidence relied upon have been misinterpreted or misstated, particularly in regard to coronary heart disease and breast cancer, for which there is no statistically significant evidence of harm. As currently drafted, the recommendations reiterate the USPSTF statements of 2012, 2005 and 2002, and will perpetuate egregious harm to the public health. In an attempt to avoid that outcome and to facilitate a return to rational discourse regarding menopausal hormone therapy, an ad hoc group of experts in menopausal health submitted this comprehensive response to the USPSTF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article focuses on the 2013 International Menopause Society (IMS) recommendations on menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) and the strategies to maintain the health of middle-age women. Topics discussed include the lifestyle recommendations for peri- and postmenopausal women, the importance of MHT, and the prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Prior to 1996, the use of postmenopausal estrogen was not believed to increase the risk of venous thrombosis. Subsequent studies, particularly the prospective, randomized, double-blind, clinical trial of the Women's Health Initiative, have clearly shown an increase in the incidence and risk of venous thrombosis in postmenopausal women using conjugated equine estrogens with or without medroxyprogesterone acetate. The risk of venous thrombosis in postmenopausal women is also increased by obesity and age. Oral hormone therapy has been used principally for management of menopausal symptoms. Transdermal estrogens have not been used as extensively in the United States but have a significant use in Europe. Recent observational studies have indicated no increased risk of venous thrombosis with use of transdermal estrogens. Norpregnane derivatives have been associated with an increased risk of venous thrombosis, suggesting that progestins may contribute to the increased risk in postmenopausal women using estrogen plus progestin therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Prior to 1996, the use of postmenopausal estrogen was not believed to increase the risk of venous thrombosis. Subsequent studies, particularly the prospective, randomized, double-blind, clinical trial of the Women's Health Initiative, have clearly shown an increase in the incidence and risk of venous thrombosis in postmenopausal women using conjugated equine estrogens with or without medroxyprogesterone acetate. The risk of venous thrombosis in postmenopausal women is also increased by obesity and age. Oral hormone therapy has been used principally for management of menopausal symptoms. Transdermal estrogens have not been used as extensively in the United States but have a significant use in Europe. Recent observational studies have indicated no increased risk of venous thrombosis with use of transdermal estrogens. Norpregnane derivatives have been associated with an increased risk of venous thrombosis, suggesting that progestins may contribute to the increased risk in postmenopausal women using estrogen plus progestin therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Premature menopause and bilateral oophorectomy in young women are associated with an increased incidence of cardiovascular disease, myocardial infarction and overall mortality. Observational studies suggest an interval of 5-10 years between loss of ovarian function and the increased risk of cardiovascular disease. This finding is consonant with a published autopsy study of women who had undergone bilateral oophorectomy. The progression of atherosclerosis is retarded with the use of estrogen replacement therapy in non-human primates and women. Hormone therapy reduced the incidence of cardiovascular disease in women following bilateral oophorectomy. These findings support the use of hormone therapy in young women who have lost ovarian function. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article offers information on the updated recommendations for hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in the peri- and postmenopause. It states that updated recommendations are derived from the original consensus group guidelines of experts and modified by a new expert working group in October 2007. It offers information on whether or not to use HRT, and mentions that new guidelines prescribe low and ultra-low doses to maintain the benefits and to minimize side-effects and risks.

The efficacy of estrogen with or without a progestogen as hormone replacement therapy (HRT) for menopausal symptoms is well-established. Recent large-scale randomized studies with combined estrogen/progestogen therapy (EPT) have raised a number of safety issues, specifically the potential risk for coronary heart disease. Subsequent analyses and other studies have indicated that HRT may be cardioprotective in younger postmenopausal women. A new continuous EPT combines natural 17β-estradiol (E2) 1 mg with the novel progestin, drospirenone (DRSP) either 0.5 or 2 mg. DRSP has a physiological profile closer to that of natural progesterone than any other synthetic progestin. This paper reviews recent clinical trial data demonstrating the efficacy and safety of combined DRSP/E2 therapy as EPT in postmenopausal women. DRSP/E2 provides symptomatic relief of vasomotor symptoms and improvement in genitourinary atrophy. DRSP/E2 protects against endometrial hyperplasia and reduces the risk of osteoporosis. Combined DRSP/E2 therapy has a favorable impact on cholesterol and triglyceride levels, and decreases blood pressure in women with elevated blood pressure. The favorable efficacy and safety profile of DRSP/E2, and potential for long-term health benefits, represents a new option for the effective management of menopause and its clinical sequelae. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Our purpose was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 3 dosages of Esclim, delivering 0.025 mg, 0.050 mg, or 0.100 mg 17beta-estradiol per 24 hours, in the treatment of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms.Study Design: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter trial, 196 highly symptomatic menopausal women received 12 weeks of continuous unopposed treatment with 1 of the 3 dosages of Esclim or a matching placebo patch.Results: The reduction in frequency of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms was statistically significant compared with placebo (P <.05) from week 2 onward in the Esclim 50 and 100 groups and from week 3 onward in the Esclim 25 group. Symptom severity was also reduced. Estrogen-related adverse events, particularly metrorrhagia and endometrial hyperplasia, were less frequent in the Esclim 25 group than in the higher-dosage groups.Conclusion: All 3 dosages of Esclim were effective in the treatment of vasomotor symptoms. The efficacy and safety of Esclim 25 indicate a good risk-benefit ratio. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]