1. Non-homeodomain regions of Hox proteins mediate activation versus repression of Six2 via a single enhancer site in vivo.
- Author
-
Yallowitz AR, Gong KQ, Swinehart IT, Nelson LT, and Wellik DM
- Subjects
- Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Branchial Region anatomy & histology, Branchial Region embryology, Branchial Region metabolism, DNA metabolism, Genes, Reporter, Homeodomain Proteins genetics, Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins genetics, Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins metabolism, Mice, Mice, Transgenic, Molecular Sequence Data, Nuclear Proteins genetics, Nuclear Proteins metabolism, PAX2 Transcription Factor genetics, PAX2 Transcription Factor metabolism, Protein Isoforms genetics, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases genetics, Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases metabolism, Recombinant Fusion Proteins genetics, Recombinant Fusion Proteins metabolism, Sequence Alignment, Sequence Homology, Amino Acid, Transcription Factors genetics, Enhancer Elements, Genetic, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, Homeodomain Proteins metabolism, Protein Isoforms metabolism, Transcription Factors metabolism
- Abstract
Hox genes control many developmental events along the AP axis, but few target genes have been identified. Whether target genes are activated or repressed, what enhancer elements are required for regulation, and how different domains of the Hox proteins contribute to regulatory specificity are poorly understood. Six2 is genetically downstream of both the Hox11 paralogous genes in the developing mammalian kidney and Hoxa2 in branchial arch and facial mesenchyme. Loss-of-function of Hox11 leads to loss of Six2 expression and loss-of-function of Hoxa2 leads to expanded Six2 expression. Herein we demonstrate that a single enhancer site upstream of the Six2 coding sequence is responsible for both activation by Hox11 proteins in the kidney and repression by Hoxa2 in the branchial arch and facial mesenchyme in vivo. DNA-binding activity is required for both activation and repression, but differential activity is not controlled by differences in the homeodomains. Rather, protein domains N- and C-terminal to the homeodomain confer activation versus repression activity. These data support a model in which the DNA-binding specificity of Hox proteins in vivo may be similar, consistent with accumulated in vitro data, and that unique functions result mainly from differential interactions mediated by non-homeodomain regions of Hox proteins.
- Published
- 2009
- Full Text
- View/download PDF