Search

Purpose: The Children's Oncology Group protocol AHOD0831, for pediatric patients with high-risk classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL), used response-adapted radiation fields, rather than larger involved-field radiation therapy (IFRT) that were historically used. This retrospective analysis of patterns of relapse among patients enrolled in the study was conducted to study the potential effect of a reduction in RT exposure., Methods and Materials: From December 2009 to January 2012, 164 eligible patients under 22 years old with stage IIIB (43%) and stage IVB (57%) enrolled on AHOD0831. All patients received 4 cycles of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vincristine, etoposide, prednisone, and cyclophosphamide (ABVE-PC). Those patients with a slow early response (SER) after the first 2 ABVE-PC courses were nonrandomly assigned to 2 intensification cycles with ifosfamide/vinorelbine before the final 2 ABVE-PC cycles. Response-adapted RT (21 Gy) was prescribed to initial areas of bulky disease and SER sites. Rapid early response (RER) sites without bulk were not targeted. Imaging studies at the time of progression or relapse were reviewed centrally for this retrospective analysis. Relapses were characterized with respect to site (initial, new, or both; and initial bulk or initial nonbulk), initial chemotherapy response, and radiation field (in-field, out-of-field, or both)., Results: Of the entire cohort, 140 patients were evaluable for the patterns of failure analyses. To investigate the pattern of failure, this analysis focuses on 23 patients who followed protocol treatment and suffered relapses at a median 1.05 years with 7.97-year median follow-up time. These 23 patients (11 RER and 12 SER) experienced a relapse in 105 total sites (median, 4; range, 1-11). Of the 105 relapsed sites, 67 sites (64%) occurred within an initial site of involvement, with 12 of these 67 sites (18%) at an initial site of bulky disease and 63 of these 67 relapses (94%) occurring in sites that were not fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-avid after 2 cycles of ABVE-PC (PET2-negative). Of the 105 relapsed sites, 34 sites (32%) occurred in a new site of disease (that would not have been covered by RT); and, overall, only 4 of 140 patients (2.8%) (occurring in 3 RER and 1 SER) experienced isolated out-of-field relapses that would have been covered by historical IFRT., Conclusions: For a cohort of high-risk patients with cHL patients, most failures occurred in nonbulky, initially involved sites, largely due to response-based consolidation RT delivered to patients with bulky disease. In this analysis, we discovered low rates of failures outside of these modern risk-adapted radiation treatment volumes. Also, FDG uptake on PET2 did not identify most relapse sites., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Although radiation therapy improves progression-free survival in early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), substantial concerns remain regarding the impact of delayed normal tissue effects on quality of life and survival. We hypothesized that treatment with combined-modality therapy (CMT; chemotherapy and radiation therapy) improves overall survival among 10-year survivors compared with treatment with radiation therapy or chemotherapy alone., Methods and Materials: We compared patients in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database who received a diagnosis of stage I/II HL between 1983 and 2006 who received chemotherapy and/or external beam radiation and survived at least 10 years. Our primary study outcome was overall survival; we also analyzed cause-specific and other-cause-specific survival., Results: Of 10,443 ten-year survivors of stage I/II classical HL, 33.6% received chemotherapy alone, 23.8% radiation therapy alone, and 42.6% CMT. Median follow-up was 16.1 years. On multivariate analysis including race, stage, sex, age, and "modern" treatment in 1995 and later, 10-year survivors who received CMT had improved overall survival relative to survivors who received RT alone (hazard ratio, 1.41; 95% confidence interval, 1.21-1.64; P < .01) or chemotherapy alone (hazard ratio, 1.35; 95% confidence interval, 1.16-1.57; P < .01)., Conclusions: This survival difference was driven by an increase in death from both HL and non-HL causes in those treated with chemotherapy alone. Our analysis suggests that CMT offers optimal survivorship for patients with stage I/II HL., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The purpose of this study was to examine factors associated with disparities in overall survival (OS) by race in pediatric Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) patients. We evaluated clinical features and survival among patients ≤21 years of age diagnosed with stage I-IV HL from 2004 to 2015 from the National Cancer DataBase (NCDB) using a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model. Among 11,546 patients with pediatric HL, 9285 patients met eligibility criteria. Black patients experienced a 5-year OS of 91.5% vs 95.9% in White patients ( p  < .0001). After adjusting for confounders, Black race was associated with a significantly decreased OS (HR = 1.50; 95% CI: 1.12-1.99; p  < .01). In stratified analysis by ages ≤15 years, 16-18 years, and >18 years, Black race was associated with poorer OS among compared to Whites with rates of 95.4% vs 97.7%, 87.1% vs 96.1%, and 91.6% vs 94.6% respectively. Overall, Black pediatric HL patients had lower overall survival in this study.

Importance: To date, there is no well-defined standard of care for early-stage pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), which may include chemotherapy alone or combined modality therapy (CMT) with chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy. Although the use of radiotherapy in pediatric HL is decreasing, this strategy remains controversial., Objective: To examine the use of CMT in pediatric HL and its association with improved overall survival using data from a large cancer registry., Design, Setting, and Participants: This observational cohort study used data from the National Cancer Database to evaluate clinical features and survival outcomes among 5657 pediatric patients (age, 0.1-21 years) who received a diagnosis of stage I or II HL in the United States from January 1, 2004, to December 31, 2015. Statistical analysis was conducted from May 1 to November 1, 2018., Exposures: Patients received definitive treatment with chemotherapy or CMT, defined as chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy., Main Outcomes and Measures: Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to examine overall survival. The association between CMT use, covariables, and overall survival was assessed in multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models. Use of radiotherapy was assessed over time., Results: Among the 11 546 pediatric patients with HL in the National Cancer Database, 5657 patients (3004 females, 2596 males, and 57 missing information on sex; mean [SD] age, 17.1 [3.6] years) with stage I or II classic HL were analyzed. Of these patients, 2845 (50.3%) received CMT; use of CMT vs chemotherapy alone was associated with younger age (<16 years, 1102 of 2845 [38.7%] vs 856 of 2812 [30.4%]; P < .001), male sex (1369 of 2845 [48.1%] vs 1227 of 2812 [43.6%]; P < .001), stage II disease (2467 of 2845 [86.7%] vs 2376 of 2812 [84.5%]; P = .02), and private health insurance (2065 of 2845 [72.6%] vs 1949 of 2812 [69.3%]; P = .002). The 5-year overall survival was 94.5% (confidence limits, 93.8%, 95.8%) for patients who received chemotherapy alone and 97.3% (confidence limits, 96.4%, 97.9%) for those who received CMT, which remained significant in the intention-to-treat analysis and multivariate analysis (adjusted hazard ratio for CMT, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.42-0.78; P < .001). In the sensitivity analysis, the low-risk cohort (stage I-IIA) and adolescent and young adult patients had the greatest benefit from CMT (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.40-0.56; P < .001). The use of CMT decreased by 24.8% from 2004 to 2015 (from 59.7% [271 of 454] to 34.9% [153 of 438])., Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, pediatric patients with early-stage HL receiving CMT experienced improved overall survival 5 years after treatment. There is a nationwide decrease in the use of CMT, perhaps reflecting the bias of ongoing clinical trials designed to avoid consolidation radiotherapy. This study represents the largest data set to date examining the role of CMT in pediatric HL.

The purpose of this large observational study was to examine outcomes in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) by timing to definitive chemotherapy (TTC) using standard and propensity score (PS)-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models. From 1998-2011, 56,457 patients with stage I-IV HL were studied, with a median follow-up of 6.0 years (median age=39). Median TTC was 26 days from diagnosis. The cohort of "early" (<60 days from diagnosis) TTC patients included 45,307 (80.3%) patients and "late" (≥60 days) TTC was 11,150 (19.7%). Patients were more likely to experience early TTC if they were of a younger age, at an advanced stage, with "B" symptoms, favorably insured, favorable socioeconomic status, and treated at comprehensive cancer center (all p<0.05). Ten-year overall survival for patients with early TTC was 73.2% vs. 70.0% for those with late TTC (HR=0.87; 95%CI, 0.83-0.92, p<0.0001). After PS-matching for co-variates, early TTC was not associated with overall survival (HR=0.96; 95%CI, 0.85-1.08, p=0.51). This represents the only study to evaluate overall survival by time to definitive treatment for HL.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients receiving IMRT (intensity-modulated radiation therapy), versus those receiving 2D/3D-CRT (3-dimensional conformal RT) in a large observational cohort., Patients and Methods: We evaluated patients diagnosed with stage I-IV HL from 1998 to 2011 from the National Cancer Database (NCDB). The association between IMRT use vs. 2D/3D-CRT, co-variables, and outcome was assessed in a Cox proportional hazards model. Propensity score (PS) matching was performed to balance known confounding factors. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method., Results: Of the 76,672 patients with HL within the NCDB, 12,393 patients with stage I-IV HL received RT (median dose=30.6 Gy) and were eligible for this study, and 6013 patients analyzed for overall survival. The cohort had a median follow-up of 6.2 years and median age of 37 years (range: 18-90). The RT modalities used were: 2D/3D-CRT (n=11,491, 92.7%) or IMRT (n=902, 7.3%). Patients were more likely to receive IMRT if they were of male gender, early stage, no "B" symptoms, and treated at comprehensive cancer programs (all p<0.05). During this time period, there was a significant decrease in use of 2D/3D-CRT from 100% to 81.5%, with a subsequent increase in IMRT utilization from 0% to 18.5%. Five-year overall survival for patients receiving 2D/3D-CRT (n=5844) was 89.9% versus 95.2% for those receiving IMRT (n=169; HR=0.45; 95% CI, 0.23-0.91, p=0.02). After PS-matching based on clinicopathologic characteristics, IMRT use remained associated with improved overall survival (HR=0.40; 95% CI, 0.16-0.97, p=0.04)., Conclusions: Our study reveals that HL patients receiving modern RT techniques were associated with an improvement in overall survival. This may have been related to patient selection, access to improved staging and management, or improvements in treatment technology. This represents the only study examining survival outcomes of advanced RT modalities, which may be considered on a case-by-case basis for highly selected patients with HL., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To examine the association between radiation therapy (RT) utilization and overall survival (OS) for patients with early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma (HL)., Methods and Materials: Using the National Cancer Database, we evaluated clinical features and survival outcomes among patients diagnosed with stage I/II HL from 1998 to 2011. The association between RT use, covariables, and outcome was assessed in a Cox proportional hazards regression model. Propensity score matching was performed to balance observed confounding factors. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method., Results: Among the 41,943 patients in the National Cancer Database with stage I/II HL, 29,752 patients were analyzed for this study. Radiation therapy use was associated with younger age (≤40 years), favorable insured status, higher socioeconomic status (income, education), and treatment at comprehensive community cancer centers (all P<.05). Five-year OS for patients receiving RT was 94.5%, versus 88.9% for those not receiving RT (P<.01). Radiation therapy use was a significant predictor of OS in the "As-Treated" cohort (hazard ratio 0.53, 95% confidence interval 0.49-0.58, P<.01) and intention-to-treat analysis (P<.01). After propensity score matching based on clinicopathologic characteristics, RT use remained associated with improved OS (hazard ratio 0.46, 95% confidence interval 0.38-0.56, P<.01). Over the study period, RT utilization for this cohort decreased from 55% to 44%, most commonly because it was not part of the planned initial treatment strategy., Conclusions: Consolidation RT was associated with improved OS for patients with early-stage classic HL. We also have identified patient-specific variations in the use of RT that may be targeted to improve patient access to care., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The association between insurance status and outcomes has not been well established for patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). The purpose of this study was to examine the disparities in overall survival (OS) by insurance status in a large cohort of patients with HL., Methods: The National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) was used to evaluate patients with stage I to IV HL from 1998 to 2011. The association between insurance status, covariables, and outcomes was assessed in a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model. Survival was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method., Results: Among the 76,681 patients within the NCDB, 45,777 patients with stage I to IV HL were eligible for this study (median follow-up, 6.0 years). The median age was 39 years (range, 18-90 years). The insurance status was as follows: 3247 (7.1%) were uninsured, 7962 (17.4%) had Medicaid, 30,334 (66.3%) had private insurance, 3746 (8.2%) had managed care, and 488 (1.1%) had Medicare. Patients with an unfavorable insurance status (Medicaid/uninsured) were at a more advanced stage, had higher comorbidity scores, had B symptoms, and were in a lower income/education quartile (all P < .01). These patients were less likely to receive radiotherapy and start chemotherapy promptly and were less commonly treated at academic/research centers (all P < .01). Patients with unfavorable insurance had a 5-year OS of 54% versus 87% for those favorably insured (P < .01). When adjustments were made for covariates, an unfavorable insurance status was associated with significantly decreased OS (hazard ratio, 1.60; 95% confidence interval, 1.34-1.91; P < .01). The unfavorable insurance status rate increased from 22.8% to 28.8% between 1998 and 2011., Conclusions: This study reveals that HL patients with Medicaid and uninsured patients have outcomes inferior to those of patients with more favorable insurance. Targeting this subset of patients with limited access to care may help to improve outcomes. Cancer 2015;121:3435-43. © 2015 American Cancer Society., (© 2015 American Cancer Society.)