Search

Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) is an oncogenic herpes virus associated with several human malignancies. Two main EBV genotypes (type 1 and type 2) distinguished by the differences in EBV nuclear antigens are known. Geographic variability in these genetic differences has been observed in the incidence of some EBV-related tumors. Here, we investigated the genetic variation of EBV in lymphoma specimens collected in Ethiopia. A total of 207 DNA samples were used for EBV detection and typing, and EBNA1 and EBNA3C genes were used to detect and subtype the EBV genome, respectively. EBV genotype 1 was detected in 52.2% of lymphoma patients. EBV genotype 2 was detected in 38.2% of the lymphoma patients, and 9.7% were coinfected by both EBV genotypes. Overall, 52.8% of the Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) patients and 51.8% of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) patients showed the presence of genotype 1. Meanwhile, 42.8% and 2.3% of HL patients and 35.8% and 12.4% of NHL patients showed EBV genotype 2 and both genotypes, respectively. Significant associations between the age groups and EBV genotypes were observed (p = 0.027). However, no significant association was seen between EBV genotypes and other sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. This study showed that the distribution of EBV genotype 1 was higher in Ethiopian lymphoma patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) is a well-known risk factor for the development of nasopharyngeal carcinoma, Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL), and Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). People with HIV infection (PWH) are at increased risk for EBV-associated malignancies such as HL and NHL. Nevertheless, there are limited data on the burden of EBV among this population group in Ethiopia. Hence, this study aimed to determine the burden of EBV infection among adult HIV-positive individuals in Ethiopia and assess the determinants of EBV DNA positivity. We conducted a cross-sectional study at the Tikur Anbessa Specialised Hospital from March 2020 to March 2021. Two hundred and sixty individuals were enrolled in this study, including 179 HIV-positive and 81 HIV-negative individuals. A structured questionnaire was used to capture demographic and individual attributes. In addition, the clinical data of patients were also retrieved from clinical records. EBV viral capsid antigen (VCA) IgG antibody was measured by multiplex flow immunoassay, and EBV DNA levels were tested by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (q-PCR) assays targeting the EBNA-1 open reading frame (ORF). Descriptive statistics were conducted to assess each study variable. A multivariable logistic regression model was applied to evaluate the determinants of EBV infection. Statistical significance was determined at a p-value < 0.05. Two hundred and fifty-three (97.7%) study participants were seropositive for the EBV VCA IgG antibody. Disaggregated by HIV status, 99.4% of HIV-positive and 93.8% of HIV-negative participants were EBV seropositive. In this study, 49.7% of HIV-positive and 24.7% of HIV-negative individuals were EBV DNA positive. PWH had a higher risk of EBV DNA positivity at 3.05 times (AOR: 3.05, 95% CI: 1.40–6.67). Moreover, among PWH, those with an HIV viral load greater than 1000 RNA copies/mL (AOR = 5.81, 95% CI = 1.40, 24.13) had a higher likelihood of EBV DNA positivity. The prevalence of EBV among PWH was significantly higher than among HIV-negative individuals. Higher HIV viral loads in PWH were associated with an increased risk of EBV DNA positivity. Since the increases in the viral load of EBV DNA among PWH could be related to the risk of developing EBV-associated cancers, it is necessary for more research on the role of EBV in EBV-associated cancer in this population group to be carried out. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Relapsed or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma (R/R HL) is a challenging disease with limited treatment options beyond brentuximab vedotin and checkpoint inhibitors. Herein we present the time‐trend analysis of R/R HL patients who received allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo‐HCT) at our center from 2001–2017. Methods: The patients were divided into two distinct treatment cohorts: era1 (2001–2010), and era2 (2011–2017). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included progression‐free survival (PFS), non‐relapse mortality (NRM), and cumulative incidence of acute and chronic graft versus host disease (GVHD). Results: Among the 51 patients included in the study, 29 were in era1, and 22 were in era2. There was decreased use of myeloablative conditioning in era2 (18% vs. 31%) compared to era1 and 95% of patients in era2 previously received brentuximab Vedotin (BV). Haploidentical donors were seen exclusively in era2 (0% vs. 14%) and more patients received alternative donor transplants (7% vs. 32%) in era2. The 4‐year OS (34% vs. 83%, p < 0.001) and 4‐year PFS (28% vs. 62%, p = 0.001) were significantly inferior in era1 compared to era2. The incidence of 1‐year NRM was lower in era2 compared to era1 (5% vs. 34%, p = 0.06). The cumulative incidence of acute GVHD at day 100 was similar in both eras (p = 0.50), but the incidence of chronic GVHD at 1 year was higher in era2 compared to era1 (55% vs. 21%, p = 0.03). Conclusions: Despite the advent of novel therapies, allo‐HCT remains an important therapeutic option for patients with R/R HL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma remains a difficult treatment challenge. Despite responses with the checkpoint inhibitors nivolumab and pembrolizumab, patients eventually progress. Combining other treatments with checkpoint inhibitors may provide more frequent and durable responses in this setting. We conducted a phase II study in relapsed or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma combining nivolumab with the Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor ibrutinib. Although we did not find an increase in the response rate of this combination compared to that previously reported, responses tended to be durable even in patients who progressed on nivolumab therapy prior to enrollment. Larger studies combining Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors with checkpoint blockade are warranted, especially in patients who had progressed previously on checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Background: Relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) remains a difficult treatment challenge. Although checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) have provided clinical benefit for these patients, responses are generally not durable, and progression eventually occurs. Discovering combination therapies which maximize the immune response of CPI therapy may overcome this limitation. We hypothesized that adding ibrutinib to nivolumab will lead to deeper and more durable responses in cHL by promoting a more favorable immune microenvironment leading to enhanced T-cell-mediated anti-lymphoma responses. Methods: We conducted a single arm, phase II clinical trial testing the efficacy of nivolumab in combination with ibrutinib in patients ≥18 years of age with histologically confirmed cHL who had received at least one prior line of therapy. Prior treatment with CPIs was allowed. Ibrutinib was administered at 560 mg daily until progression in combination with nivolumab 3 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks for up to 16 cycles. The primary objective was complete response rate (CRR) assessed per Lugano criteria. Secondary objectives included overall response rate (ORR), safety, progression free survival (PFS), and duration of response (DoR). Results: A total of 17 patients from two academic centers were enrolled. The median age of all patients was 40 (range 20–84). The median number of prior lines of treatment was five (range 1–8), including 10 patients (58.8%) who had progressed on prior nivolumab therapy. Most treatment related events were mild (

As a result of the anti-tumour activity observed in vitro and in vivo with combined anti-CD20 and anti-CD74 antibodies, we initiated a phase I/II trial of veltuzumab and milatuzumab in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma ( NHL). Patients received an induction of veltuzumab 200 mg/m2 weekly combined with escalating doses of milatuzumab at 8, 16 and 20 mg/kg weekly for 4 weeks. Patients without disease progression could receive an extended induction with treatment on weeks 12, 20, 28 and 36. A total of 35 patients enrolled on the study. Median age was 63 years, median number of prior therapies was 3, and 63% of patients were rituximab refractory. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed in the phase I study. Related grade 3-4 toxicities included lymphopenia, leucopenia, neutropenia, anaemia, infusion reactions, hyperglycaemia, fatigue and atrial tachycardia. Median weeks of therapy was 12 and 29% of patients completed all 36 weeks of therapy. The overall response rate was 24%, median duration of response was 12 months, and responses were observed at all dose levels and in 50% of patients refractory to rituximab. Combination therapy with veltuzumab and milatuzumab demonstrated activity in a population of heavily pre-treated patients with relapsed or refractory indolent NHL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We evaluated the safety and efficacy of the purine nucleoside analogue, clofarabine, in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Six patients with DLBCL (n = 5) or MCL (n = 1) and a median age of 68 years were treated with 40 mg/m2 clofarabine IV over 2 h for 5 days, repeated every 28 days, for 1-2 cycles. The overall response rate was 50% (complete response = 1, complete response unconfirmed = 1, partial response = 1). Median progression-free survival was 3.5 months (range 1.5-10 months) and the median overall survival was 7.8 months (range 3-31 months). Grade 3-4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia was universal, with a median of 34 (range 19-55) and 77 (range 0-275) days required for neutrophil and platelet recovery. Grade 3 non-hematologic toxicities included transaminitis, febrile neutropenia, non-neutropenic infections and orthostatic hypotension. Further accrual to the study was terminated due to prolonged Grade 3-4 myelosuppression and orthostatic hypotension in five of six patients. Clofarabine exhibits evidence of single agent activity in relapsed or refractory DLBCL. However, further study with novel administration schedules that maintain this efficacy and limit toxicity is warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]