Search

Background: In a restricted subset of HIV patients with suppressed viral load (i.e., pol-undetected HIV-RNA), the Aptima HIV-1 Quant Dx Assay (Aptima), a dual-target (pol and LTR) and dual-probe test for viral load (VL) monitoring, can detect HIV-RNA exclusively through amplification of the LTR region., Objectives: To analyze the virological characteristics of the HIV-RNA elements detected only through LTR amplification (LTR-e)., Study Design: LTR-e isolated from plasma and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were evaluated for their ability to trigger productive infections. Viral pellets morphology and ultrastructural characteristics of PBMC from LTR-e patients were examined by electron microscopy. Plasma LTR-e underwent Sanger sequencing. Exosomes were examined with Aptima for LTR-e content., Results: In-vitro, LTR-e could not infect PBMC, induce cytopathic effects, or cause syncytia, even at high VL (e.g., >10,000 copies/mL). Under the electron microscope, plasma pellets and PBMC from patients with LTR-e showed atypical vesicles. Sanger sequencing of LTR-e yielded no results. Moreover, in plasma samples, LTR-e were associated with cell debris, never with exosomes., Conclusions: Differently from other dual-target but single-probe assays, Aptima unveils VL based only on LTR amplification in some HIV patients. Here, we show that LTR-e represent partial/incomplete/non-canonical transcripts unable to trigger productive infection or transmit HIV-1 infection. The recognition of VL based only on LTR-e in infected individuals is crucial as it allows to avoid inappropriate decisions in the clinical management of HIV patients, such as retesting of VL and switching of ART. Physicians and HIV-RNA dual-target assay manufacturers should consider the important implications of not recognizing this singular type of VL., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

HIV-1 replication in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract causes severe CD4+ T-cell depletion and disruption of the protective epithelial barrier in the intestinal mucosa, causing microbial translocation, the main driver of inflammation and immune activation, even in people living with HIV (PLWH) taking antiretroviral drug therapy. The higher levels of HIV DNA in the gut compared to the blood highlight the importance of the gut as a viral reservoir. CD4+ T-cell subsets in the gut differ in phenotypic characteristics and differentiation status from the ones in other tissues or in peripheral blood, and little is still known about the mechanisms by which the persistence of HIV is maintained at this anatomical site. This review aims to describe the interaction with key subsets of CD4+ T cells in the intestinal mucosa targeted by HIV-1 and the role of gut microbiome and its metabolites in HIV-associated systemic inflammation and immune activation that are crucial in the pathogenesis of HIV infection and related comorbidities.

For effective management of HIV-1 patients, accurate measurement of HIV-1-RNA viral load (VL) is fundamental. The latest generation molecular assays for monitoring VL perform simultaneous detection of two regions of the viral genome, but without specifying the target used for VL quantitation. By using the "open" software (research use only [RUO]) of Aptima HIV-1 Quant Dx Assay (Aptima) which provides both results obtained with the pol and LTR targets, we were able to compare n  = 500 plasma samples results from chronically HIV-1-infected patients under antiretroviral therapy (ART). Correlation and concordance were analyzed. By stratifying VL into two groups (<30 and ≥30 copies/mL HIV-1-RNA) according to pol- based results and matching them with their respective LTR values, concordance was substantial (κ = 0.635; 95%CI = 0.569 to 0.700) as expected. Considering the specimens ( n  = 224) with VL exactly quantified (i.e., ≥30 copies/mL) with both targets, an optimal correlation subsisted ( r  = 0.8882; P < 0.0001) and Bland-Altman plot showed no significant mean difference between them. However, by stratifying all these data in three ranges (30 to 200, 201 to 1,000, and >1,000 copies/mL) according to pol- based results, concordance analysis showed fair agreement (κ = 0.344; 95%CI = 0.257 to 0.432). Indeed, after excluding mutually concordant VL values in each range ( n  = 134), the remaining discordant samples ( n  = 90; 40.1%) showed significant ( P < 0.05) difference between VL measured with the two targets. With the Aptima "open" software, samples with pol -based VL <1,000 copies (cp)/mL HIV-1-RNA, the corresponding LTR values were on average 0.5 log 10 cp/mL higher. Further studies on these discrepancies and the nature of viral RNA elements detected only with the LTR despite efficient ART are in progress. IMPORTANCE The last generation dual-target platforms for quantification of HIV-1 RNA return a single value of viral load (VL) derived from a combined reading of two HIV-1 genome targets. By using a modified version of Aptima software, providing both the VL results obtained from pol and LTR amplification separately, we observed discordant VL results in some samples from HIV-1-infected patients on antiretroviral therapy. In particular, some samples with pol -based quantified <1,000 copies/mL VL showed the LTR- based value on average 0.5 log 10 copies/mL higher, and other samples, always by treated patients, showed VL exclusively quantified with LTR target while the corresponding pol -based VL results were completely undetected. Standard software of double-target based diagnostic systems does not allow recognizing discrepant VL values in these particular, but not rare, clinical specimens. This issue could have implications for clinical management by leading physicians to consider changing antiretroviral regimen based on presumed failure of antiretroviral therapy.

New methods of HIV-1 RNA quantification based on dual-target detection are increasingly used in HIV viral load monitoring, but clinical implications and impact of dual-target detection on HIV-1 infection management are not established. Aptima HIV-1 Quant Dx assay is a last generation HIV viral load method, that uses pol and LTR as simultaneous target, providing quantitative results based mainly on pol target, while LTR target is used to report the results when pol signal is absent. In our laboratory, about 6% of results of all HIV-1 viral load tests performed with this platform in one year period resulted from LTR signal. Interestingly, LTR-based viremia (sometimes exceeding 1,000 copies/mL) was observed in a small proportion (up to 1%) of patients under ART, considered for long time virologically suppressed on the basis of a single target (pol-based) assay. Male gender, >700 vs <200 CD4 cell/mL and dual therapy including NRTI plus either NNRTI, or PI/b or INSTI were independently associated with increased risk of LTR-based HIV-1 viral load detection by multivariable logistic regression. A significant linear correlation was observed between LTR-based HIV-1 RNA levels and PBMC-associated proviral DNA. Moreover, in a small group of patients with HIV-1 RNA levels >200 copies/mL, longitudinal assessments showed parallel kinetics between plasma viremia and proviral DNA. Sequencing of pol region for drug resistance assessment in patients with LTR-based viremia failed on plasma HIV-1 RNA, while it was successful on proviral DNA. The detection/quantification of HIV-1 viremia based only on LTR signal with a dual target assay in samples resulting undetectable with the more conventional target pol needs accurate evaluation; unravelling the biological basis of this phenomenon, here described for the first time, is mandatory to establish relevance and implication by both pathogenetic (i.e. infectivity of LTR-detected viruses, reservoir turnover, immune activation, etc.) and clinical standpoint., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.