Search

Existing evidence about HIV and SARS-CoV-2 co-infection has, so far, yield conflicting results. Methods: This is a cohort, single center, clinical study aimed at identifying possible characteristics of PLWH that could correlate with the risk of acquiring SARS-CoV-2 and would influence the outcome. 155 cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection were compared with 307 PLWH who tested negative. No variable was associated with an increased risk of infection. SARS-CoV-2 PLWH were completely asymptomatic in 20.6% of cases. Factors associated with severe COVID-19 were age (P=0.001), diabetes (P=0.009) hypertension (P=0.004), cardiovascular disease (P=0.001) or an increasing number of chronic co-morbidities (P=0.002); only the first two variables retained statistical significance in a multivariable model. Only older age and a lower CD4 count were statistically associated with death in the multivariate model. Sixteen PLWH not included in the analysis were infected by SARS-Cov-2 after vaccination. In 4 cases the infection was completely asymptomatic, while in the remaining 12 cases the infection was mild and resembled a flu-like syndrome. Conclusions: No baseline characteristic defines patients at greater risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Older age and the presence of multi-comorbidities are risk factors for a severe clinical course. Lower CD4 counts correlate with a fatal outcome.

Background: forgiveness is the ability of a given regimen to maintain complete viral suppression despite a documented imperfect adherence. We explored forgiveness of bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide. Methods: drug refills were used to calculate the percent day covered (PDC) as a proxy of adherence. Forgiveness was calculated as the achieved rate of a selected HIV-RNA threshold by a given level of imperfect adherence. Results: 281 adult PLWH were followed for 343 patient/years. Adherence was very high with a median of 98% (IQR 95-100%). A PDC as low as 70% was sufficient to obtain 100% and maintain virologic suppression. According to probit analysis adherence was not related to the possibility to maintain an HIV-RNA TND or < 50 copies/ml. Conclusions: Long-term success of ART needs effective regimens that are the least intrusive of the patient's lifestyle, an elevated forgiveness may be considered as an additional feature that can further improve long-term outcomes.

Background: adherence and forgiveness are key factors for virologic success. We evaluated them for 3TC/DTG. Methods: pharmacy refills were used to calculate the proportion of days covered (PDC). Forgiveness was calculated as the achieved rate of HIV-RNA threshold by a given level of imperfect adherence. Results: 240 PLWH were included. The median follow-up was 819 days (IQR 450-1459) for a total of 681 person/years of follow-up. Adherence was very high with a median of 99% (IQR 95%-100%). Consequently, the virologic response was sustained with 83.8% of PLWH never exceeding a HIV RNA of 50 copies/ml and 95.8% of subjects with a steadily HIV-RNA < 200 copies/ml. A PDC lower than 80% was associated with a negative outcome irrespective of the HIV-RNA threshold considered. Conclusions: The extensive virologic efficacy of 3TC/DTG demonstrated both in clinical trials and real-world experiences seems to rely more on its friendliness than on its forgiveness.

Background: Primary analysis at 24 weeks showed that switching to rilpivirine plus darunavir/cobicistat was non-inferior to continuing a standard three-drug antiretroviral regimen in virologically suppressed people with HIV. We present efficacy and safety data from the 48-week analysis., Methods: PROBE 2 is a randomized, open-label trial. Adults who were on a three-drug therapy and had had <50 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL for at least 6 months were randomly assigned (1:1) to 25 mg rilpivirine plus 800/150 darunavir/cobicistat once daily (early switch group) or to continue their regimen for 24 weeks before switching (late switch group). In the 48-week analysis, the efficacy endpoint was the proportion of participants with <50 copies/mL of HIV-RNA (US Food and Drug Administration snapshot algorithm). The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT04064632., Findings: 160 participants were recruited and randomized. At week 48, 70 (87.5%) in the early switch group and 76 (94.8%) in the late switch group maintained HIV-RNA <50 copies/mL. Virological failure (≥50 HIV-RNA copies/mL) was not seen in any patient of the early switch group and in 2 subjects in the late switch group none of which had treatment emergent resistance-associated mutation. Adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation occurred in 7 (8.7%) participants in the early switch group and in none in the late switch group., Interpretation: The combination of rilpivirine plus darunavir/cobicistat sustained virological suppression, was associated with a low frequency of virological failure, and had a favorable safety profile, which support its use as a nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-sparing and integrase inhibitor-sparing alternative to three-drug regimens.

Background: Unboosted atazanavir with raltegravir has been investigated at 300mg twice daily showing frequent hyperbilirubinemia and selection of resistance-associated mutations., Objectives: Atazanavir 200mg twice daily could increase tolerability and plasma exposure., Study Design: Patients on atazanavir/raltegravir (200/400 twice daily), with self-reported adherence >95% and no concomitant interacting drugs were retrospectively evaluated., Results: 102 patients [72.5% male, age 46.4 years (42-54), BMI 24kg/m 2 (22-26)] were included. CD4+ T lymphocytes were 417 cell/μL (302-704) and 76 patients (74.5%) had HIV-RNA <50 copies/ml. After 123 weeks 18.6% patients showed virological failure and 3.9% discontinued for intolerance. Available genotypes showed selection of major integrase (7/10 patients) and protease resistance-associated mutations (5/13 patients). In patients switching with dyslipidemia (n=67) total, LDL cholesterol and triglycerides significantly decreased. Patients switching with eCRCL<60ml/min (n=27) had no significant changes while patients with eCRCL >60ml/min showed significant decrease (-9.8ml/min, p=0.003) at 96-weeks. Atazanavir and raltegravir trough concentrations were 321ng/mL (147-720) and 412ng/mL (225-695). Self-reported non-adherence (n=4) was significantly associated with virological failure (p=0.02); patients with virological success had borderline longer previous virological control (33 vs. 18 months, p=0.07)., Discussion: Switch to atazanavir/raltegravir was safe and well tolerated allowing optimal drugs' plasma exposure. However, a concerning rate (18.6%) failed with newly selected mutations and stopped ATV/RAL because of DDI and intolerance issues or were lost to follow-up. This regimen might be considered in selected patients, without history of protease inhibitors failure or HBV infection, showing optimal adherence and prolonged suppression., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Rilpivirine (RPV) is a next-generation non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) of the diarylpyrimidine family. RPV can be given once daily, is well absorbed and should be administered with food. It is eliminated mainly by hepatic metabolism. Two phase III noninferiority trials (ECHO and THRIVE), compared RPV 25mg with efavirenz (EFV) 600 mg, both given once daily, and combined with 2NRTI backbone. At week 48, response rate for pooled data were 84 versus 82% (difference: 2%; 95% CI: -2.0 to 6.0%). EFV arms performed better than RPV arms when at higher baseline HIV RNA, so RPV was approved for treatment-naïve patients with HIV RNA below 100,000 copies/ml. Approximately 90% of viruses phenotypically resistant to RPV showed cross-resistance to ETR. Conversely, phenotypic analysis showed that in EFV arm, none were resistant to the second-generation NNRTIs. CD4 count increases were similar between groups, but RPV showed a lower rate of discontinuation due to adverse events and lower rates of central nervous system effects, rash and lipid abnormalities. Potency, tolerability and co-formulation in a single tablet (Eviplera(®), Complera(®)) make this drug a new and attractive option for the treatment of HIV.

Purpose: To assess in an HIV-positive cohort the cumulative probability of failing to return for scheduled medical visits and to address the factors associated with follow-up discontinuation., Method: This was a hospital-based cohort study conducted from January 1985 through September 1999. Out of 3,300 HIV-1 infected patients, 1,680 patients with CD4 count <500 cells/mL or with AIDS diagnosis were included in the analysis because they received scheduled medical visits for follow-up at our center. Baseline visit was the first visit when patients met the criteria for enrollment. The main outcome measure was failure to return for scheduled medical visits for at least 12 consecutive months., Results: The probability of returning decreased rapidly in the first months after the baseline visit. After 1 year since enrollment, 25% of patients failed to return and after 2 years 34% of patients failed to return. Most patients who failed to return for visits (78%) discontinued their follow-up within 6 months since enrollment. In multivariate analysis, patients in the intravenous drug use (IDU) category were most likely to fail to return for scheduled appointments, as were patients with higher CD4 count (CD4 >50 cells/microL) or patients without AIDS diagnosis. Patients with shorter follow-up had a higher risk of failing to return (odds ratio [OR]: 0.12, 0.36, 0.45, and 0.74 for >36, 24-36, 12-24, and 6-12 months of follow-up respectively vs. <6 months). Patients who were enrolled in more recent years had a higher compliance to follow-up visits (OR: 0.33, 0.63, and 0.61 for > or = 1997, 1995-1996, and 1988-1994 vs. <1988)., Conclusion: Patients in the IDU category, patients without AIDS diagnosis, or patients with higher CD4 counts are more likely to miss medical appointments and discontinue their follow-up. More recently enrolled patients have a lower risk of failing to return. It is possible that the recent and more effective anti-HIV treatment played a major role in increasing adherence to follow-up.

Our objective was to assess, in the clinical setting, the predictors of immune reconstitution (IR) and its relation with long-term clinical benefit, in HIV patients with advanced disease after highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) through an observational study. A retrospective cohort study in a clinical setting of 383 consecutive adult patients with advanced HIV infection (CD4+ cells <200/mm³ at baseline), starting their first protease inhibitor (PI)-containing regimen was observed. Immune reconstitution was defined as CD4 count >200 cells/mm³ and an increase &ges;100 cells from baseline, anytime since starting HAART. Clinical benefit was defined as decreased mortality and reduction in AIDS-defining events, AIDS-related complex (ARC) events, major infections and hospitalization (days spent in hospital). During a mean follow-up of 808 days, 261 patients (68.1%) achieved IR. About 50% of these patients reached this result within one year after starting HAART. In multivariate analysis, predictors of immune recovery were sex (female) and baseline CD4 count higher than 50 cells/mm³. The group of patients with IR had greater clinical benefit with lower mortality, fewer AIDS-defining events, shorter lengths of stay in hospital, fewer ARC events and fewer major infections during all the follow-up (P < 0.0001, tests for trends). However, although they did less remarkably than the first group of patients, even those patients who did not achieve IR experienced a significant decrease in the incidence of all the above events, as compared with the first and sometimes the second trimester after starting their HIV therapy. About 70% of HIV patients with advanced disease achieved IR after starting HAART. Such a benefit is a time-dependent effect and may even take more than 2 years to occur. Predictors of IR were sex (female) and higher baseline CD4 count (>50 cells/mm³). The patients who achieved immune recovery performed clinically better than patients who did not. Also the patients who failed to gain such a strong immunological recovery experienced a long-term clinical benefit. This suggests that PI-containing regimens, in advanced HIV disease, may produce a significant clinical benefit, at least temporary, even for patients who do not achieve a substantial immune response. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction The long-term effects of an intensified induction regimen are unknown. In this pilot, randomized, prospective study we evaluate the effect of a short-term four-drugs induction regimen in patients with high baseline viral load. Methods Naive patients with HIV-RNA>100.000 copies/ml receiving TDF+FTC+EFV+RAL (group ER) for 4 months and were then simplified to TDF+FTC+EFV. Two randomized control groups treated ab-initio with TDF+FTC+EFV (E) or TDF+FTC+RAL (R) were used. Results 19 patients with a mean age of 38 years and mean baseline CD4 count of 334 (SD 216) cells/mcL and HIV-RNA of 5.47 log (SD 0.32) copies/mL were enrolled. No baseline significant difference was observed among groups. Early HIV-RNA reduction was significantly higher in ER compared to the other groups from week 1 to week 4 (P from 0.026 to 0.003) (figure 1), thereafter HIV-RNA values were comparable among the groups. At week 96, all patients had an HIV-RNA < 50 copies/mL, however only patients in the ER group had in all cases an HIV-RNA level < 3 copies/mL with a statistically significant difference compared to E (60%; P=0.038) and R (50%; P=0.020). At 96 weeks, CD4 cell median counts were 765 cells/mcL for ER, 600 cells/mcL for E and 771 for R (P=0.16), however patients in the ER group presented a lower proport ion of activated CD4+CD38+HLADR+ cells (1.9% versus 3.9 and 3.8%) and CD8+CD38+HLADR+ cells (10.3% versus 16.8 and 16.5%) and a significantly better CD4/CD8 ratio (0.98 versus 0.53 and 0.61; P=0.03). Conclusions A four-drug regimen in naive patients with high pre-therapy viral load improves early virologic response. A quick drop of HIV-RNA seems to correlate with a sustained virologic response. Although limited in time (four months), the four-drug regimens correlates with an improved immunological response as measured by the CD4/CD8 ratio or the percentage of activated CD4+ and CD8+ cells. The reasons why this happens deserve further studies. This study highlights the importance of a personalised therapy especially in high risk patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]