1. Efficacy and Safety of Switching to Dolutegravir/Lamivudine Versus Continuing a Tenofovir Alafenamide-Based 3- or 4-Drug Regimen for Maintenance of Virologic Suppression in Adults Living With Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1: Results Through Week 144 From the Phase 3, Noninferiority TANGO Randomized Trial.
- Author
-
Osiyemi O, De Wit S, Ajana F, Bisshop F, Portilla J, Routy JP, Wyen C, Ait-Khaled M, Leone P, Pappa KA, Wang R, Wright J, George N, Wynne B, Aboud M, van Wyk J, and Smith KY
- Subjects
- Adenine adverse effects, Adult, Alanine, Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring adverse effects, Humans, Lamivudine adverse effects, Lipids, Oxazines, Piperazines, Pyridones, RNA therapeutic use, Tenofovir analogs & derivatives, Anti-HIV Agents adverse effects, HIV Infections drug therapy, HIV-1 genetics
- Abstract
Background: Switching to dolutegravir/lamivudine (DTG/3TC) was noninferior to continuing tenofovir alafenamide (TAF)-based regimens for maintaining virologic suppression at week 48 of the TANGO study. Here we present week 144 outcomes (efficacy, safety, weight, and biomarkers)., Methods: TANGO is a randomized (1:1, stratified by baseline third agent class), open-label, noninferiority phase 3 study. Virologically suppressed (>6 months) adults with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) switched to once-daily DTG/3TC or continued TAF-based regimens., Results: A total of 741 participants received study treatment (DTG/3TC, n = 369; TAF-based regimen, n = 372). At week 144, the proportion of participants with an HIV-1 RNA level ≥50 copies/mL (primary end point, Snapshot; intention-to-treat-exposed population) after switching to DTG/3TC was 0.3% (1 of 369) versus 1.3% (5 of 372) for those continuing TAF-based regimens, demonstrating noninferiority (adjusted treatment difference, -1.1 [95% confidence interval, -2.4 to .2), with DTG/3TC favored in the per-protocol analysis (adjusted treatment difference, -1.1 [-2.3 to -.0]; P = .04). Few participants met confirmed virologic withdrawal criteria (none in the DTG/3TC and 3 in the TAF-based regimen group), with no resistance observed. Drug-related adverse events were more frequent with DTG/3TC (15%; leading to discontinuation in 4%) than TAF-based regimens (5%; leading to discontinuation in 1%) through week 144, but rates were comparable after week 48 (4%; leading to discontinuation in 1% in both groups). Changes from baseline in lipid values generally favored DTG/3TC; no clinical impact on renal function and comparable changes in inflammatory and bone biomarkers across groups were observed., Conclusions: Switching to DTG/3TC demonstrated noninferior and durable efficacy compared with continuing TAF-based regimens in treatment-experienced adults with HIV-1, with good safety and tolerability, and no resistance through 144 weeks., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. O. O. has received personal fees from ViiV Healthcare, Gilead, and Merck; has received financial support for meeting attendance/travel from GlaxoSmithKline and Merck; and owns stock in Gilead, Pfizer, and GlaxoSmithKline. S. D. W. has received financial support or grants paid to his institution from ViiV Healthcare, Gilead, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, and Janssen and has participated in data safety monitoring or advisory boards for ViiV Healthcare and Curevac. F. B. has participated in advisory boards for Gilead and is the president of AusPATH. J. P. has received grants, personal fees, and nonfinancial support from ViiV Healthcare, Gilead, and Janssen-Cilag. C. W. has received personal fees from AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead, Janssen, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Roche, Theratechnologies, and ViiV Healthcare for speaking at educational events or participating in advisory boards. M. A. -K., P. L., K. A. P., R. W., B. W., M. A., J. v. W., and K. Y. S. are employees of ViiV Healthcare and own stock in GlaxoSmithKline. J. W. and N. G. are employees of and own stock in GlaxoSmithKline. F. A. and J. -P. R. report no potential conflicts. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF