Search

To link to full-text access for this article, visit this link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eeh.2006.04.002 Byline: David S. Jacks Keywords: Futures markets; Commodity markets; Commodity price volatility; Speculation Abstract: In this paper, the divergence between popular and professional opinion on speculation in general and futures markets in particular is explored. Along the way, a synopsis of prevailing popular attitudes on futures markets is presented, and an outline of a formal model of futures markets and its implications for commodity price volatility are sketched. The heart of the analysis is drawn from the historical record on the establishment and prohibition of futures markets. Briefly, the results presented in this paper strongly suggest that futures markets were associated with -- and most likely caused -- lower commodity price volatility. The paper concludes with a discussion of potential sources of popular antagonism against futures markets. Author Affiliation: Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC, Canada V5A1S6 Article History: Received 26 August 2005 Article Note: (footnote) [star] The author thanks Chris Hanes, Tom Weiss, Jeffrey Williams, and participants at the All-UC Group in Economic History Conference on 'Agricultural Development in Economic History', the Canadian Network in Economic History April 2005 meetings, the NBER's 2005 Summer Institute on the Development of the American Economy, and the paper's referees. Any remaining errors are mine. The author also gratefully acknowledges research support from the Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada.

Introducing a concept of real, as opposed to nominal, inequality of income or wealth suggests some historical reinterpretations, buttressed by a closer look at consumption by the rich. The purchasing powers of different income classes depend on how relative prices move. Relative prices affected real inequality more strongly in earlier centuries than in the twentieth. Between 1500 and about 1800, staple food and fuels became dearer, while luxury goods, especially servants, became cheaper, greatly widening the inequality of lifestyles. Peace, industrialization, and globalization reversed this inegalitarian price effect in the nineteenth century, at least for England.

The estimates of trade costs and of speeds of price adjustment in wheat markets were used to determine the drivers of commodity market integration in the 19th century. The findings reveal that trade costs were found to be more responsive to changes in the choice of monetary regimes and commercial policy than changes in the underlying technology of transport and speeds of price adjustment present a more balanced account as transport, monetary, and commercial variables all seem to play a part.

The course of intra- and international market integration in the nineteenth century Atlantic economy is investigated. It is observed that the nineteenth century is somewhat misread in terms of the development of markets as the evidence is suggested which points to dramatic improvements in intra- and international market integration.

The degree of market integration in the North and Baltic Seas area is explored. The three means for assessing different facets of market integration are proposed and on the basis of these three tests, it is positively concluded that market integration was in effect throughout the region and time-period under consideration.