Search

The article discusses copyright law related to historical sources. Topics discussed include some writers confusing copyright infringement with plagiarism while some believe the copyrighted material is free to use because it was located in a university library or on a particular website, and the need for historians to have a working knowledge of copyright law when conducting research.

This article explores and critiques the use of social media as a primary source in the writing of twenty-first-century history. Since the introduction of so-called social media in the early 2000s, social scientists, journalists, and users have hailed this media form as a revolutionary departure from the ‘old media’ that dominated the twentieth century. Part of the narrative of ‘new media’ is it provides greater amounts of user agency, removes structural impediments for social dialog, and promotes an egalitarian exchange within the global sphere. This article suggests that this account is a product of the narrative structure of classical liberalism, through which social media as an object of knowledge and effectivity is produced. It concludes that the use of social media as a primary source for social histories of popular protest will require substantive theoretical scrutiny by scholars writing about these processes of the twenty-first century. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]