Search

Background Antazoline mesylate represents an antihistamine capable of rapid and safe cardioversion of atrial fibrillation, yet evidence concerning its efficacy in comparison to other medications is insufficient. The study aimed to evaluate the success rate and safety of pharmacological cardioversion of atrial fibrillation with intravenous antazoline ( CANT [Cardioversion With Antazoline Mesylate] study) in the setting of the emergency department. Methods and Results After reviewing 1984 medical records, 450 eligible patients (22.7%) with short-duration atrial fibrillation subject to pharmacological cardioversion were enrolled in a retrospective observational analysis. The choice of antiarrhythmic drug was left to the discretion of the attending physician. The primary end point was successful cardioversion in the emergency department. The safety end point comprised bradycardia <45 bpm, hypotension, syncope, or death. The study population (mean age, 65.5±11.9 years; 52.9% females) was characterized by a median atrial fibrillation episode duration of 10 hours. Antazoline, alone or in combination, was administered in 24.2% (n=109) and 40% (n=180), respectively; amiodarone was administered in 46.7% and propafenone in 9.3%, while ≥2 antiarrhythmic drugs were administered in 19.8% of patients. Antazoline had the highest success rate of pharmacological cardioversion among all drugs (85.3%), which was comparable with propafenone (78.6%; relative risk, 1.09, 95% confidence interval, 0.91-1.30; P=0.317) and higher than amiodarone treatment (66.7%; relative risk, 1.28, 95% confidence interval, 1.13-1.45; P<0.001; number needed to treat, 5.4). The rate of cardioversion with antazoline alone was higher than combined amiodarone and/or propafenone (68.1%; relative risk, 1.25; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-1.40, P=0.0001). No safety end points were reported in the antazoline group, while 5 incidents occurred in the non-antazoline cohort ( P=0.075). Conclusions Antazoline represents an efficacious and safe method of pharmacological cardioversion in a real-life setting.

Introduction: The antihistaminic antazoline (ANT) was reported to be highly effective and safe for rapid conversion of atrial fibrillation (AF). We therefore analyzed underlying mechanisms in an experimental whole-heart model., Methods and Results: Isolated and retrogradely perfused rabbit hearts underwent a standardized protocol employing atrial burst pacing-induced AF in five of 20 hearts under baseline conditions (seven episodes). Thereafter, a combination of acetylcholine and isoproterenol was employed to enhance AF occurrence. Two monophasic action potential recordings on the left- and two on the right atrial epicardium showed a decrease in atrial action potential duration (aAPD, -25 msec, P<.05) and atrial effective refractory period (aERP; -52 msec, P<.01) after infusion of acetylcholine (1 μmol/L) and isoproterenol (1 μmol/L). This led to induction of AF in 14 of 20 hearts (145 episodes). Simultaneous infusion of ANT (20 μmol/L) led to a complete suppression of AF in all inducible hearts. Treatment with ANT also led to a significant increase in aAPD (+41 msec, P<.01) and aERP (+74 msec, P<.05), leading to a marked increase in atrial postrepolarization refractoriness (aPRR, +33 msec, P<.01). Results were compared to 13 rabbits treated with flecainide. Flecainide induced a significant increase in aPRR and resulted in induction of AF in seven of 13 hearts (51 episodes) while 11 of 13 hearts were inducible with acetylcholine and isoproterenol (93 episodes)., Conclusion: Administration of ANT was highly effective in suppressing AF. The antiarrhythmic effect could be explained by a significant increase in postrepolarization refractoriness as a result of a more marked increase in aERP as compared with aAPD., (© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)