Search

Background: Although femoral retroversion has been linked to the onset of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE), and may result from a rotation of the femoral epiphysis around the epiphyseal tubercle leading to femoral retroversion, femoral version has rarely been described in patients with SCFE. Furthermore, the prevalence of actual femoral retroversion and the effect of different measurement methods on femoral version angles has yet to be studied in SCFE., Questions/purposes: (1) Do femoral version and the prevalence of femoral retroversion differ between hips with SCFE and the asymptomatic contralateral side? (2) How do the mean femoral version angles and the prevalence of femoral retroversion change depending on the measurement method used? (3) What is the interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility of these measurement methods?, Methods: For this retrospective, controlled, single-center study, we reviewed our institutional database for patients who were treated for unilateral SCFE and who had undergone a pelvic CT scan. During the period in question, the general indication for obtaining a CT scan was to define the surgical strategy based on the assessment of deformity severity in patients with newly diagnosed SCFE or with previous in situ fixation. After applying prespecified inclusion and exclusion criteria, we included 79 patients. The mean age was 15 ± 4 years, 48% (38 of 79) of the patients were male, and 56% (44 of 79) were obese (defined as a BMI > 95th percentile (mean BMI 34 ± 9 kg/m2). One radiology resident (6 years of experience) measured femoral version of the entire study group using five different methods. Femoral neck version was measured as the orientation of the femoral neck. Further measurement methods included the femoral head's center and differed regarding the level of landmarks for the proximal femoral reference axis. From proximal to distal, this included the most-proximal methods (Lee et al. and Reikerås et al.) and most-distal methods (Tomczak et al. and Murphy et al.). Most proximally (Lee et al. method), we used the most cephalic junction of the greater trochanter as the landmark and, most distally, we used the center base of the femoral neck superior to the lesser trochanter (Murphy et al.). The orientation of the distal femoral condyles served as the distal reference axis for all five measurement methods. All five methods were compared side-by-side (involved versus uninvolved hip), and comparisons among all five methods were performed using paired t-tests. The prevalence of femoral retroversion (< 0°) was compared using a chi-square test. A subset of patients was measured twice by the first observer and by a second orthopaedic resident (2 years of experience) to assess intraobserver reproducibility and interobserver reliability; for this assessment, we used intraclass correlation coefficients., Results: The mean femoral neck version was lower in hips with SCFE than in the contralateral side (-2° ± 13° versus 7° ± 11°; p < 0.001). This yielded a mean side-by side difference of -8° ± 11° (95% CI -11° to -6°; p < 0.001) and a higher prevalence of femoral retroversion in hips with SCFE (58% [95% CI 47% to 69%]; p < 0.001) than on the contralateral side (29% [95% CI 19% to 39%]). These differences between hips with SCFE and the contralateral side were higher and ranged from -17° ± 11° (95% CI -20° to -15°; p < 0.001) based on the method of Tomczak et al. to -22° ± 13° (95% CI -25° to -19°; p < 0.001) according to the method of Murphy et al. The mean overall femoral version angles increased for hips with SCFE using more-distal landmarks compared with more-proximal landmarks. The prevalence of femoral retroversion was higher in hips with SCFE for the proximal methods of Lee et al. and Reikerås et al. (91% [95% CI 85% to 97%] and 84% [95% CI 76% to 92%], respectively) than for the distal measurement methods of Tomczak et al. and Murphy et al. (47% [95% CI 36% to 58%] and 60% [95% CI 49% to 71%], respectively [all p < 0.001]). We detected mean differences ranging from -19° to 4° (all p < 0.005) for 8 of 10 pairwise comparisons in hips with SCFE. Among these, the greatest differences were between the most-proximal methods and the more-distal methods, with a mean difference of -19° ± 7° (95% CI -21° to -18°; p < 0.001), comparing the methods of Lee et al. and Tomczak et al. In hips with SCFE, we found excellent agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] > 0.80) for intraobserver reproducibility (reader 1, ICC 0.93 to 0.96) and interobserver reliability (ICC 0.95 to 0.98) for all five measurement methods. Analogously, we found excellent agreement (ICC > 0.80) for intraobserver reproducibility (reader 1, range 0.91 to 0.96) and interobserver reliability (range 0.89 to 0.98) for all five measurement methods in healthy contralateral hips., Conclusion: We showed that femoral neck version is asymmetrically decreased in unilateral SCFE, and that differences increase when including the femoral head's center. Thus, to assess the full extent of an SCFE deformity, femoral version measurements should consider the position of the displaced epiphysis. The prevalence of femoral retroversion was high in patients with SCFE and increased when using proximal anatomic landmarks. Since the range of femoral version angles was wide, femoral version cannot be predicted in a given hip and must be assessed individually. Based on these findings, we believe it is worthwhile to add evaluation of femoral version to the diagnostic workup of children with SCFE. Doing so may better inform surgeons as they contemplate when to use isolated offset correction or to perform an additional femoral osteotomy for SCFE correction based on the severity of the slip and the rotational deformity. To facilitate communication among physicians and for the design of future studies, we recommend consistently reporting the applied measurement technique., Level of Evidence: Level III, prognostic study., Competing Interests: All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request., (Copyright © 2020 by the Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons.)

Background: Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) can occur after slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) regardless of slip severity and even after in situ pinning. These patients represent a rare and unique demographic that is largely unreported on. It is important to further characterize the clinical presentation of these patients, associated treatment modalities, and the efficacy of these treatment modalities., Questions/purposes: (1) How do patients with post-SCFE FAI typically present in terms of radiographic and surgical findings? (2) How do their hip-specific and general-health outcomes scores after mini-open femoroacetabular osteoplasty compare with those obtained in a matched group of patients with FAI caused by other etiologies? (3) How do those groups compare in terms of the proportion who undergo conversion to THA?, Methods: Between 2013 and 2017, 20 patients had femoroacetabular osteoplasty for post-SCFE FAI. During that time, general indications for this procedure were symptomatic FAI demonstrated on radiographs and physical exam. Of those, none was lost to follow-up before a minimum of 2 years, leaving all 20 available for matching, and all 20 had suitable matches in our database for patients who underwent femoroacetabular osteoplasty for other diagnoses. Matching was performed by surgeon, patient age, patient gender, and BMI. The matching group was drawn from a large database of patients who had the same procedure during the same period. We matched in a 1:3 ratio to arrive at 60 randomly selected control patients in this retrospective, comparative study. Patient demographics, medical history, clinical presentation, radiographic parameters, and intraoperative findings were compared between the two groups. At a minimum of 2 years of follow-up, the latest clinical functional outcome scores (Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Jr and SF-12) and proportions of conversion to THA were compared between the groups., Results: A greater percentage of patients with a history of SCFE than those without prior SCFE demonstrated full chondral lesions intraoperatively (90% [18 of 20] versus 32% [19 of 60], odds ratio 7 [95% confidence interval 1 to 178]; p < 0.01). A greater percentage of patients with a history of SCFE also demonstrated labral calcifications intraoperatively compared with those without prior SCFE (65% [13 of 20] versus 35% [21 of 60], OR 3 [95% CI 1 to 10]; p = 0.04). Radiographically, patients with SCFE had greater preoperative alpha angles than did patients without SCFE (94° ± 13° versus 72° ± 22°; p = 0.01) as well as lower lateral center-edge angles (25° ± 8° versus 31° ± 8°; p = 0.04). There was no difference in postoperative follow-up between patients with a history of SCFE and patients without a history of SCFE (4 ± 2 years versus 4 ± 2 years; p = 0.32). There was no difference in the mean postoperative outcome scores between patients with a history of SCFE and patients without (Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Jr: 75 ± 28 points versus 74 ± 17 points; p = 0.95; SF-12 physical score: 40 ± 11 points versus 39 ± 8 points; p = 0.79). There was no difference with the numbers available in the percentage of patients who underwent conversion to THA (15% [3 of 20] versus 12% [7 of 60], OR 1.36 [95% CI 0 to 6]; p = 0.71)., Conclusion: Patients with FAI after SCFE present with a greater degree of labral and chondral disease than do patients without a history of SCFE. However, at short-term follow-up, the proportion of patients who underwent conversion to THA and patients' postoperative outcome scores did not differ in this small, comparative series between patients with and without SCFE. Further evaluation with long-term follow-up is needed, especially given the more severe chondral damage we observed in patients with SCFE at the time of surgery., Level of Evidence: Level III, therapeutic study., Competing Interests: All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request. Each author certifies that neither he, nor any member of his immediate family, has funding or commercial associations (consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article., (Copyright © 2020 by the Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons.)

Background: Contemporary studies have described the rotational mechanism in patients with slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). However, there have been limited patient imaging data and information to quantify the rotation. Determining whether the epiphysis is rotated or translated and measuring the epiphyseal displacement in all planes may facilitate planning for surgical reorientation of the epiphysis., Questions/purposes: (1) How does epiphyseal rotation and translation differ among mild, moderate, and severe SCFE? (2) Is there a correlation between epiphyseal rotation and posterior or inferior translation in hips with SCFE? (3) Does epiphyseal rotation correlate with the size of the epiphyseal tubercle or the metaphyseal fossa or with epiphyseal cupping?, Methods: We identified 51 patients (55% boys [28 of 51]; mean age 13 ± 2 years) with stable SCFE who underwent preoperative CT of the pelvis before definitive treatment. Stable SCFE was selected because unstable SCFE would not allow for accurate assessment of rotation given the complete displacement of the femoral head in relation to the neck. The epiphysis and metaphysis were segmented and reconstructed in three-dimensions (3-D) for analysis in this retrospective study. One observer (a second-year orthopaedic resident) performed the image segmentation and measurements of epiphyseal rotation and translation relative to the metaphysis, epiphyseal tubercle, metaphyseal fossa, and the epiphysis extension onto the metaphysis defined as epiphyseal cupping. To assess the reliability of the measurements, a randomly selected subset of 15 hips was remeasured by the primary examiner and by the two experienced examiners independently. We used ANOVA to calculate the intraclass and interclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for intraobserver and interobserver reliability of rotational and translational measurements. The ICC values for rotation were 0.91 (intraobserver) and 0.87 (interobserver) and the ICC values for translation were 0.92 (intraobserver) and 0.87 (intraobserver). After adjusting for age and sex, we compared the degree of rotation and translation among mild, moderate, and severe SCFE. Pearson correlation analysis was used to assess the associations between rotation and translation and between rotation and tubercle, fossa, and cupping measurements., Results: Hips with severe SCFE had greater epiphyseal rotation than hips with mild SCFE (adjusted mean difference 21° [95% CI 11° to 31°]; p < 0.001) and hips with moderate SCFE (adjusted mean difference 13° [95% CI 3° to 23°]; p = 0.007). Epiphyseal rotation was positively correlated with posterior translation (r = 0.33 [95% CI 0.06 to 0.55]; p = 0.02) but not with inferior translation (r = 0.16 [95% CI -0.12 to 0.41]; p = 0.27). There was a positive correlation between rotation and metaphyseal fossa depth (r = 0.35 [95% CI 0.08 to 0.57]; p = 0.01), width (r = 0.41 [95% CI 0.15 to 0.61]; p = 0.003), and length (r = 0.56 [95% CI 0.38 to 0.75]; p < 0.001)., Conclusion: This study supports a rotational mechanism for the pathogenesis of SCFE. Increased rotation is associated with more severe slips, posterior epiphyseal translation, and enlargement of the metaphyseal fossa. The rotational nature of the deformity, with the center of rotation at the epiphyseal tubercle, should be considered when planning in situ fixation and realignment surgery. Avoiding placing a screw through the epiphyseal tubercle-the pivot point of rotation- may increase the stability of the epiphysis. The realignment of the epiphysis through rotation rather than simple translation is recommended during the open subcapital realignment procedure. Enlargement of the metaphyseal fossa disrupts the interlocking mechanism with the tubercle and increases epiphyseal instability. Even in the setting of a stable SCFE, an increased fossa enlargement may indicate using two screws instead of one screw, given the severity of epiphyseal rotation and the risk of instability. Further biomechanical studies should investigate the number and position of in situ fixation screws in relation to the epiphyseal tubercle and metaphyseal fossa., Level of Evidence: Level III, prognostic study., Competing Interests: All ICMJE Conflict of Interest Forms for authors and Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research® editors and board members are on file with the publication and can be viewed on request. Each author certifies that neither he nor she, nor any member of his or her immediate family, has funding or commercial associations (consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article., (Copyright © 2020 by the Association of Bone and Joint Surgeons.)

Background: Peripheral cupping of the capital femoral epiphysis over the metaphysis has been reported as a precursor of cam morphology, but may also confer stability of the epiphysis protecting it from slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between a novel morphologic parameter of inherent physeal stability, epiphyseal cupping, and the development of SCFE in a dual-center matched-control cohort study., Methods: We performed a dual-center age-matched and sex-matched cohort study comparing 279 subjects with unilateral SCFE and 279 radiographically normal controls from 2 tertiary children's hospitals. All SCFE patients had at least 18 months of radiographic follow-up for contralateral slip surveillance. Anteroposterior and frog lateral pelvis radiographs were utilized to measure the epiphyseal cupping ratio and the current standard measure of inherent physeal stability, the epiphyseal extension ratio., Results: Control hips were found to have greater epiphyseal cupping than the contralateral uninvolved hip of SCFE subjects both superiorly (0.28±0.08 vs. 0.24±0.06; P<0.001) and anteriorly (0.22±0.07 vs. 0.19±0.06; P<0.001). The 58/279 (21%) subjects who went on to develop contralateral slip had decreased epiphyseal cupping superiorly (0.25±0.07 vs. 0.23±0.05; P=0.03) and anteriorly (0.20±0.06 vs. 0.17±0.04; P<0.001). When we compared controls with hips that did not progress to contralateral slip and hips that further developed a contralateral SCFE, 1-way ANOVA demonstrated a stepwise decrease in epiphyseal cupping and epiphyseal extension ratio in the anterior and superior planes from control hips to contralateral hips without subsequent slip to contralateral hips that developed a SCFE (P<0.01 for each)., Conclusions: This study provides further evidence that epiphyseal cupping around the metaphysis is associated with decreased likelihood of SCFE and may reflect increased inherent physeal stability. Epiphyseal cupping may represent an adaptive mechanism to stabilize the epiphysis during adolescence at the long-term cost of the eventual development of associated cam-femoroacetabular impingement deformity., Levels of Evidence: Level III-prognostic Study.

Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients with chronic severe slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) treated by surgical dislocation and modified Dunn osteotomy (MDO)., Patients and Methods: This retrospective study, conducted between January 2010 and December 2017, included nine patients (8 males, 1 female; mean age 12.6 years; range, 7 to 16 years) with nine hips. The degree of corrections in Southwick angle and alpha angle were measured on frog-leg views. Range of motion (ROM) of the hips was measured at each follow-up visit. Heyman and Herndon classification system and Harris Hip Score (HHS) were evaluated for clinical and functional outcomes at the latest follow-up visit., Results: The mean follow-up time was 34.8 months. Avascular necrosis complication was observed in one hip. Except two patients with lateral femoral cutaneous neuropathy, none of the patients suffered from any other complications. Mean preoperative Southwick angle of 59.1° was corrected to an angle of -0.8° postoperatively. Alpha angles were calculated as 44.6° postoperatively. Modified Dunn osteotomy resulted in marked improvement in hip ROM in all directions and increased HHS., Conclusion: Our results encourage us to use this method in treating SCFE patients with chronic severe slips.

Background: The modified Dunn procedure (open subcapital realignment via a surgical dislocation approach) has been shown to be a safe and effective way of treating acute, unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). There is a paucity of literature comparing the modified Dunn procedure in stable SCFE. The purpose of this study was to compare acute, unstable versus chronic, stable SCFE managed with the modified Dunn procedure., Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed on 44 skeletally immature patients who underwent the modified Dunn procedure for SCFE. Patients were divided into stable or unstable based on clinical presentation and intraoperative findings. Demographics, radiographic measurements, and complications were recorded and compared. χ and t tests were used to compare variables., Results: In total, 31 consecutive hips (29 patients) with acute, unstable slips, and 17 consecutive hips (15 patients) with chronic, stable slips were reviewed. Average age was 12.5 and 13.8 years for acute and chronic, respectively (P=0.05). Mean follow-up was 27.9 months (unstable) and 35.5 months (stable). Average postoperative Southwick angle was 14.2 degrees; (unstable) and 25.3 degrees (stable) (P=0.001). Greater trochanteric height averaged 6.2 mm below the center of the femoral head in the acute group and 6.2 mm above center in the chronic group (P<0.001). Average femoral neck length measured 34.1 mm (unstable) and 27.1 mm (stable) (P<0.001). Two patients (6%) developed avascular necrosis (AVN) in the unstable group, with 5 patients (29.4%) in the stable group (P=0.027). All patients with hip instability (N=3) developed AVN., Conclusions: Although both acute, unstable and chronic, stable SCFE can be successfully treated with the modified Dunn procedure, the complication rate is statistically higher in patients with stable SCFE, specifically both AVN rate and postoperative instability. In addition, it is more difficult to establish normal anatomic indexes with regard to greater trochanteric height and femoral neck length. This procedure has great utility in the correction of the anatomic deformity associated with SCFE, but should be used with caution in patients with chronic, stable SCFE., Level of Evidence: Level III-retrospective review.

Background: Factors including obesity and morphologic parameters around the hip that increase physeal stress are associated with an increased risk of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). Recent evidence suggests that superior epiphyseal extension may confer stability to the physis and help protect against SCFE. The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between epiphyseal extension and SCFE using an age-matched and sex-matched cohort study., Methods: We generated 2 separate cohorts for comparison: 89 patients with unilateral SCFE and 89 healthy subjects with no evidence of hip disease or deformity. We utilized the anterior-posterior and lateral films of the hip to measure the Southwick angle and the epiphyseal extension ratio (EER), defined as the ratio of extension of the capital femoral epiphysis down the femoral neck relative to the diameter of the femoral head. We then compared these measurements between cohorts and in subgroup analysis based on slip stability and whether subjects progressed to a contralateral slip., Results: The SCFE cohort demonstrated a decreased superior epiphyseal extension ratio compared with control (superior EER 0.71 vs. 0.68, P=0.002). There was also a significant downward trend in superior EER from the control subjects (0.71±0.07) to the stable slips (0.69±0.06) to the unstable slips (0.65±0.04) with an overall difference between the groups (P=0.001). Eighteen of 44 (41%) subjects with unilateral stable slips and at least 6 months of follow-up went on to develop SCFE of the contralateral limb. The subjects who developed contralateral slips were younger (11.6±1.2 vs. 12.7±1.4 y, P=0.008); however, there was no difference in superior or anterior epiphyseal extension (P=0.75 and 0.23, respectively). There was no significant linear correlation between Southwick angle and superior or anterior EER (r=0.13 and 0.17, respectively, P>0.05 for both)., Conclusions: Increasing capital femoral epiphyseal extension may confer physeal stability in the setting of SCFE. We propose that this epiphyseal extension reflects an adaptive response to limit physeal stress and reduce the risk for progression to SCFE., Level of Evidence: Level III-prognostic study.

Background: In recent years, there has been a trend toward more aggressive management of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) with acute anatomical realignment; however, the literature is unclear with regard to the indications for this., Questions/purposes: To collect long-term patient-reported outcome scores on a group of SCFE patients using modern hip scores. The second aim was to determine whether there is a threshold level of deformity beyond which patients have predictably poor outcomes following in situ pinning., Patients and Methods: Patients presenting with SCFE between 2000 and 2009 completed a survey consisting of three modern hip scores and were classified into poor, intermediate, and good outcome groups. The posterior slope angle (PSA) was used to measure slip deformity. We examined the relationship between patient characteristics and functional outcomes. The relationship between PSA score and overall outcome was examined using receiver operator curve (ROC) analysis., Results: The total study population was 63; 14% patients had poor, 29% had intermediate, and 57% had good functional outcomes. The mean Non-Arthritic Hip Scores (NAHSs) for those with poor outcomes was 51, 76 in the intermediate group, and 95 in the good group ( p <0.001). PSA was significantly lower in those with good functional outcomes. ROC analysis demonstrated that a higher PSA was moderately predictive of a poor clinical outcome (area under the curve of 0.668). In both the poor and intermediate outcome groups, 50% of patients had a PSA of 40° or greater, whereas only 31% of those with good clinical outcomes had PSA of 40° or greater., Conclusions: A significant proportion of post-SCFE patients have ongoing suboptimal hip function after pinning in situ. Those with a PSA more than 40° have a higher chance of a poor outcome.

Background: In situ pinning, a low-risk treatment for slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE), leaves the slipped femoral head in place and may reduce range of motion (ROM) and cause impingement. It is unclear when a more complex surgery should be considered, because the relationships between severity, slip stability, remodeling, impingement, and ROM are unknown., Research Questions: (1) Do more severe acute SCFE deformities (no bony remodeling) result in a greater loss of flexion ROM?(2) Does the presence or location of impingement on the pelvis vary with severity of acute SCFE deformity?, Methods: We developed a 3D geometric model of acute SCFE deformity from 1 computed tomography scan of a normal adolescent hip. Ethics board approval was obtained from our institution. Bone models were created from the segmented pelvis, epiphysis, and subphyseal femur.In total, 3721 SCFE deformities were simulated by combining posterior and inferior slips in the axial and coronal planes, respectively. Southwick angles were estimated from a frog-leg lateral projection. Deformities were divided into mild (0 to 30 degrees), moderate (30 to 60 degrees), and severe (≥60 degrees) Southwick groups. Each joint was flexed in combination with internal/external rotation until contact occurred. A total of 121 ROM trials, with different degrees of internal/external rotation (0 to 90 degrees at 1.5-degree steps) were performed for each deformity., Results: In total, 3355 simulated SCFE deformities (363 could not be rotated out of impingement) were analyzed.Increasing slip severity reduced flexion ROM across the range of internal/external rotation. Contact occurred for most mild deformities, and for all moderate and severe deformities in at least 1 ROM trial. Impingement was observed mainly on the anterosuperior aspect of the acetabulum., Conclusions: Increasing slip severity in acute SCFE reduced flexion and increased incidence of impingement, primarily occurring on the anterosuperior aspect of the acetabulum. The impingement patterns observed are consistent with damaged cartilage locations seen in clinical literature., Clinical Relevance: In this experimental model, moderate and severe acute slips in SCFE lead to reduced ROM and impingement with the acetabulum. This suggests that in situ pinning may result in impingement of moderate and severe acute SCFE slips.

Background: The modified Dunn procedure facilitates femoral capital realignment for slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) through a surgical hip dislocation approach. Iatrogenic postoperative hip instability after this procedure has not been studied previously; however, we were concerned when we observed several instances of this serious complication, and we wished to study it further., Questions/purposes: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the frequency, timing, and clinical presentation (including complications) associated with iatrogenic instability after the modified Dunn procedure for SCFE., Methods: Between 2007 and 2014, eight international institutions performed the modified Dunn procedure through a surgical dislocation approach in 406 patients. During the period in question, indications varied at those sites, but the procedure was used only in a minority of their patients treated surgically for SCFE (31% [406 of 1331]) with the majority treated with in situ fixation. It generally was performed for patients with severe deformity with a slip angle greater than 40°. Institutional databases were searched for all patients with SCFE who developed postoperative hip instability defined as hip subluxation or dislocation of the involved hip during the postoperative period. We reviewed in detail the clinical notes and operative records of those who presented with instability. We obtained demographic information, time from slip to surgery, type of fixation, operative details, and clinical course including the incidence of complications. Followup on those patients with instability was at a mean of 2 years (range, 1-5 years) after the index procedure. Complications were graded according to the modified Dindo-Clavien classification. Radiographic images were reviewed to measure the preoperative slip angle and the presence of osteonecrosis., Results: A total of 4% of patients treated with the modified Dunn procedure developed postoperative hip instability (17 of 406). Mean age of the patients was 13 years (range, 9-16 years). Instability presented as persistent hip pain in the postoperative period or was incidentally identified radiographically during the postoperative visit and occurred at a median of 3 weeks (range, 1 day to 2 months) after the modified Dunn procedure. Eight patients underwent revision surgery to address the postoperative instability. Fourteen of 17 patients developed femoral head avascular necrosis and three of 17 patients underwent THA during this short-term followup., Conclusions: Anterolateral hip instability after the modified Dunn procedure for severe, chronic SCFE is an uncommon yet potentially devastating complication. Future studies might evaluate the effectiveness of maintaining anterior hip precautions for several weeks postoperatively in an abduction brace or broomstick cast to prevent this complication., Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study.

Background: The modified Dunn procedure has the potential to restore the anatomy in hips with slipped capital femoral epiphyses (SCFE) while protecting the blood supply to the femoral head and minimizing secondary impingement deformities. However, there is controversy about the risks associated with the procedure and mid- to long-term data on clinical outcomes, reoperations, and complications are sparse., Questions/purposes: Among patients treated with a modified Dunn procedure for SCFE, we report on (1) hip pain and function as measured by the Merle d'Aubigné and Postel score, Drehmann sign, anterior impingement test, limp, and ROM; (2) the cumulative survivorship at minimum 10-year followup with endpoints of osteoarthritis (OA) progression (at least one Tönnis grade), subsequent THA, or a Merle d'Aubigné and Postel score < 15; (3) radiographic anatomy of the proximal femur measured by slip angle, α angle, Klein line, and sphericity index; and (4) the risk of subsequent surgery and complications., Methods: Between 1998 and 2005, all patients who presented to our institution with SCFE were treated with a modified Dunn procedure; this approach was applied regardless of whether the slips were mild or severe, acute or chronic, and all were considered potentially eligible here. Of the 43 patients (43 hips) thus treated during that time, 42 (98%) were available for a minimum 10-year followup (mean, 12 years; range, 10-17 years) and complete radiographic and clinical followup was available on 38 hips (88%). The mean age of the patients was 13 years (range, 9-18 years). Ten hips (23%) presented with a mild, 27 hips (63%) with a moderate, and six hips (14%) with a severe slip angle. Pain and function were measured using the Merle d'Aubigné and Postel score, limp, ROM, and the presence of a positive anterior impingement test or Drehmann sign. Cumulative survivorship was calculated according to the method of Kaplan-Meier with three defined endpoints: (1) progression by at least one grade of OA according to Tönnis; (2) subsequent THA; or (3) a Merle d'Aubigné and Postel score < 15. Radiographic anatomy was assessed with the slip angle, Klein line, α angle, and sphericity index., Results: The Merle d'Aubigné and Postel score improved at the latest followup from 13 ± 2 (7-14) to 17 ± 1 (14-18; p < 0.001), the prevalence of limp decreased from 47% (18 of 38 hips) to 0% (none in 38 hips; p < 0.001), the prevalence of a positive Drehmann sign decreased from 50% (nine of 18 hips) to 0% (none in 38 hips; p < 0.001), and both flexion and internal rotation improved meaningfully. Cumulative survivorship was 93% at 10 years (95% confidence interval, 85%-100%). Radiographic anatomy improved, but secondary impingement deformities remained in some patients, and secondary surgical procedures included nine hips (21%) with screw removal and six hips (14%) undergoing open procedures for impingement deformities. Complications occurred in four hips (9%) and no hips demonstrated avascular necrosis on plain radiographs., Conclusions: In this series, the modified Dunn procedure largely corrected slip deformities with little apparent risk of progression to avascular necrosis or THA and high hip scores at 10 years. However, secondary impingement deformities persisted in some hips and of those some underwent further surgical corrections., Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study.

Purpose: Stable slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) has been shown to have a lower rate of avascular necrosis than unstable SCFE. A recent study found increased intracapsular hip pressures in the setting of unstable SCFE, thus increasing the risk of osteonecrosis. The purpose of this study was to measure the intracapsular pressure in stable SCFE and compare it to the intracapsular pressure in normal hips and in unstable SCFE., Methods: Thirteen hips with stable SCFE and 15 hips with unstable SCFE were identified. Using a side-bored needle, intracapsular hip pressures were measured at the time of surgery. Within these 2 study groups, 11 unaffected (normal) hips were also measured. Diastolic blood pressure and mean arterial pressure at the time of measurement were also recorded., Results: The average intracapsular hip pressure in the stable SCFE group was 27.0 mm Hg, whereas the average pressure in the unstable SCFE group was 48.2 mm Hg and the average pressure in the normal group was 21.8 mm Hg. There was no significant difference between the normal and stable SCFE groups. There was a statistically significant difference between the stable SCFE and unstable SCFE groups (P<0.001). We found similar trends when comparing the intracapsular hip pressure as a percentage of the mean arterial pressure as well as the difference between diastolic blood pressure and hip pressure., Conclusions: As expected, the intracapsular pressure in the setting of stable SCFE approaches that of normal hips. This may explain why the risk of AVN in stable SCFE is significantly lower than that of unstable SCFE. It also supports the idea that capsulotomy is indicated for unstable slips to decrease the elevated hip pressure but not in stable SCFE.

Background: In situ pinning is the conventional treatment for a stable slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). However, with a severe stable SCFE the residual deformity may lead to femoroacetabular impingement and articular cartilage damage. A modified Dunn subcapital realignment procedure has been developed to allow for correction at the level of the deformity while preserving the blood supply to the femoral head., Questions/purposes: We compared children with severe stable SCFE treated with the modified Dunn procedure or in situ pinning in terms of (1) proximal femoral radiographic deformity; (2) Heyman and Herndon clinical outcome; (3) complication rate; and (4) number of reoperations performed after the initial procedure., Methods: In this nonmatched retrospective study, 15 patients treated with the modified Dunn procedure (between 2007 and 2012) and 15 treated with in situ pinning (between 2001 and 2009) for severe but stable SCFE were followed for a mean of 2.5 years (range, 1-6 years). During the period in question, the decision regarding which procedure to use was based on the on-call surgeon's discretion; six surgeons performed in situ pinning and three surgeons performed the modified Dunn procedure. A total of 15 other patients were treated for the same diagnosis during the study period but were lost to followup before 1 year; of those, 12 were in the in situ pinning group. Radiographs were reviewed to measure the AP and lateral alpha angles, femoral head-neck offset, and Southwick angle preoperatively and at the latest clinical visit. The Heyman and Herndon clinical outcome, complications, and subsequent hip surgeries were recorded., Results: At latest followup, the median AP alpha angle (52°, range 41°-59° versus 76°, interquartile range [IQR]: 68°-88°; p = 0.0017), median lateral alpha angle (44°, IQR: 40°-51° versus 87°, IQR: 74°-96°; p < 0.001), median head-neck offset (7 mm, IQR: 5-9 mm versus -5, IQR: -11 to -4 mm; p < 0.001), and median Southwick angle (16°, IQR: 6°-23° versus 58°, IQR: 47°-66°; p < 0.001) revealed better deformity correction with the modified Dunn procedure compared with in situ pinning. Nine patients had good or excellent results in the modified Dunn group compared with four of 15 in the in situ pinning group (p = 0.0343; odds ratio, 5.86; 95% CI, 1.13-40.43). With the numbers available, there were no differences in the numbers of complications in each group (five versus three complications in the in situ and modified Dunn groups, respectively; p = 0.66), but there were more reoperations in the in situ pinning group (three versus seven; p = 0.0230)., Conclusions: The modified Dunn procedure results in better morphologic features of the femur, a higher rate of good and excellent Heyman and Herndon clinical outcome, a lower reoperation rate, and a similar occurrence of complications when compared with in situ pinning for treatment of severe stable SCFE., Level of Evidence: Level III, therapeutic study.

Purpose: This study was conducted to assess the posterior inclination of the contralateral femoral epiphysis in patients with unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE)., Methods: The posterior sloping angle (PSA) was measured using lateral radiographs in 67 patients with a unilateral SCFE and in 41 age-matched normal controls. A symptomatic epiphyseal slip was defined as the development of SCFE., Results: The contralateral PSA in SCFE patients was more widely distributed and significantly larger compared to controls (15.0° vs. 9.0°, p < 0.0001). Forty-seven hips (70.1%) had a PSA of greater than 12.8°, which was +2SD of the control hips. Of the 65 hips excluding the two cases with prophylactic pinning, 11 hips (16.9%) eventually developed a contralateral SCFE during adolescence and their PSA at the initial visit was significantly larger compared to patients without a contralateral SCFE (18.0° vs. 14.3°, p < 0.005) with a cutoff value of 19°., Conclusions: These findings suggested the possibility of bilateral hip involvement in SCFE patients. Hips with greater degrees of PSA (> 19°) are likely to become symptomatic.

We have performed corrective osteotomies for moderate or severe slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) using an original blade plate (BP) until 2006 and using a hybrid external fixator (EF) since 2007. We designed a comparative study of the short-term results between BP and EF devices in the treatment of proximal femoral osteotomies in SCFE. Nineteen SCFE patients (12 BP; seven EF) who underwent corrective osteotomies at our institution were included. Clinical and radiographic valuables including the operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative improvement of head shaft angle, and posterior tilting angle, Harris hip score, limb-length discrepancy, and associated complications were compared between the two groups. Although there were no significant differences between the two groups in postoperative improvement of head shaft angle and posterior tilting angle, Harris hip score, and limb-length discrepancy, the EF group showed significantly shorter operative time and less intraoperative blood loss. Serious complications were observed in two patients of the BP group (deep infection and chondrolysis, respectively) and one of the EF group (chondrolysis). Percutaneous proximal femoral osteotomy using an EF appears to be safe, easy, and effective in correcting multiplanar deformities associated with SCFE. It has potential advantages over commonly used open techniques in terms of simplicity and less invasiveness.

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is a rare adolescent hip disease that leads to a hip shape abnormality. Typical treatment involves in-situ fixation. It is not known if the degree of initial hip shape abnormality associated with SCFE has a significant effect on long-term hip function. A cohort of patients aged 18-50 who had undergone in-situ fixation for SCFE from 1970 onwards in our institution provided IHOT-33 (hip function) outcome data. Frog lateral radiographs from the time of surgery were used to measure radiological hip shape using both Southwick angle and alpha angle. There were 38 patients (46 hips) SCFE patients who met the eligibility criteria. We obtained follow-up data for 32 patients (38 hips), 83% follow-up. Ten patients (20 hips) had bilateral SCFE. The mean follow-up was 12.7 years (95% CI 10.7-14.7). 32 patients matched for age and sex who had no history of SCFE provided control IHOT-33 outcome data. There was a significant difference (p<0.05) in long-term hip function between patients undergoing in-situ fixation for SCFE and the control population (mean IHOT-33 scores of 71.8 and 95.8 respectively). There was no significant (p>0.05) correlation between long-term hip function and Southwick angle or lateral alpha angle. The initial severity of hip shape abnormality due to SCFE was not a strong predictor of long-term hip function. Other extraneous factors not related to hip shape may have an equally if not more important role to play in the subsequent long-term outcome of SCFE.

Background: The characteristics of patients who sustain unstable slipped capital femoral epiphyses (SCFEs) are not well described compared to their counterparts who sustain stable SCFE. Although patients with unstable slips are usually identified owing to acute symptoms, it is unclear whether these patients have premonitory symptoms that could heighten the awareness of treating physicians to the possibility of an unstable slip and lead to timely diagnosis and treatment., Questions/purpose: We determined whether most patients experienced pain and limp before developing an unstable SCFE., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 582 patients and identified 82 (41 boys, 41 girls; 85 hips) with unstable SCFEs. Patient records were reviewed for sex, age at onset, weight at onset, and presence and location of pain and/or limp before the unstable slip. Boys averaged 13 years of age at the time occurrence and weighed on average in the 77th percentile. Girls averaged 12 years of age at the time of occurrence and weighed on average in the 79th percentile., Results: For all patients, 73 of 82 (88%) had pain in their hips, thighs, or knees for an average of 42 days before sustaining unstable SCFEs. Sex distribution was equal for patients with unstable SCFEs., Conclusions: Patients who sustained unstable SCFEs had premonitory pain in the limb. Early recognition and an appropriate diagnosis provide a critical opportunity to prevent a morbid unstable SCFE., Level of Evidence: Level IV, diagnostic study, See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Background: An unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is associated with a high rate of avascular necrosis (AVN). Etiology of the AVN is not completely known and likely multifactorial. Potential causes are a tear/anatomic disruption of the retinacular vessels to the epiphysis, kinking of the retinacular vessels, or vascular tamponade due to increased intracapsular pressure., Methods: A review of the recent literature of unstable SCFE was performed to abstract various potential causes of AVN., Results: The overall rate of AVN was 21% (88 of 417). Kinking of the retinacular vessels was demonstrated angiographically in 5 unstable SCFEs where the vessels did not fill in 3; in 1 the vascularity returned after reduction. Intracapsular joint pressure was measured in 13 unstable SCFEs with an average of 48 mm Hg on the unstable side compared with 23 mm Hg in the opposite normal hip. After manipulative reduction the pressures increased to 75 mm Hg, and dropped markedly to 17 mm Hg after capsulotomy and decompression. Although a complete tear of the vessels is another possibility, there are no described cases in the literature. Means to lower AVN depends upon its etiology. In 28 unstable SCFEs urgent reduction, internal fixation and decompressive arthrotomy resulted in a rate of 14% (4 of 28). Urgent open reduction through an anterior approach with smooth Kirschner wire fixation resulted in a rate of 5% (3 of 64). The modified Dunn procedure using a surgical dislocation resulted in a rate of 8% (2 of 26)., Conclusions: Larger and combined series will be needed to determine the best treatment to minimize the rate of AVN in the unstable SCFE. With today's present techniques, AVN in the unstable SCFE will never be a "never" event.

Background: Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is a common hip problem in adolescents that results in a cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) deformity. Although the treatment for mild (slip angle of 0°-30°) and moderate (slip angle of 31°-60°) SCFE has historically been in situ fixation, recent studies have demonstrated impingement-related articular damage, irrespective of slip severity. Our series confirms previous reports that acetabular chondral injury occurs in mild to low-moderate (slip angle of ≤ 40°) SCFE., Case Description: We retrospectively reviewed five patients who underwent arthroscopy and femoral osteoplasty within 18 months after in situ stabilization. All had labral and/or acetabular damage., Literature Review: Osteoarthritis rates after SCFE range from 24% to 92% at 11 to 28 years, depending on how osteoarthritis is defined. Long-term followup suggests patients have acceptable outcomes, but these studies are limited by heterogeneity and a ceiling effect from the instruments used to assess function. Although the femoral deformity remodels, it is unclear what secondary changes occur in the acetabulum. Recent investigations suggest patients are functionally limited after SCFE owing to FAI compared with controls. MRI findings and surgical reports document impingement-related joint damage after SCFE, even in the absence of symptoms. Based on this, some advocate timely correction of the cam deformity inherent in SCFE., Purposes and Clinical Relevance: Further study is warranted to determine whether immediate osteoplasty after in situ fixation of mild SCFE is beneficial to limit articular damage and improve long-term outcomes.

Background: Recent biplanar radiographic studies have demonstrated acetabular retroversion and increased superolateral femoral head coverage in hips with slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE), seemingly divergent from earlier CT-based studies suggesting normal acetabular version., Question/purposes: We therefore asked: Are there differences in (1) acetabular version at the superior ¼ of the acetabular dome (AV(sup)), (2) acetabular version at the center of the femoral head (AV(cen)), and (3) superolateral femoral head coverage (lateral center-edge angle [LCEA]) among affected SCFE hips, unaffected hips, and normal controls?, Methods: We identified 32 patients with SCFE who underwent CT between 2007 and 2012. Twenty-three met our inclusion criteria. Seventy-six age- and sex-matched normal patients comprised the control group. Pelvic rotation, tilt, and inclination were corrected on each CT. AV(sup), AV(cen), and LCEA were measured., Results: The mean AV(sup) of the affected hips (-1.71°) demonstrated retroversion compared to the unaffected hips and the control group; the mean AV(sup) of the unaffected hips was similar to that of the normal controls. Mean AVcen was similar among the three groups. The LCEA was higher in affected and unaffected SCFE hips than in the control group (34.3° versus 34.5° versus 28.9°, respectively), but we found no difference between affected and unaffected hips., Conclusions: Our data suggest an association of superior acetabular retroversion and increased superolateral femoral head coverage in SCFE. Whether this represents a primary abnormal morphology or a secondary pathologic response remains unclear. Further studies investigating the role of acetabular morphology in SCFE and its implications for development of symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement are warranted.

Background: Multiple mechanical factors affecting the hip have been associated with the development of slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). Whether acetabular depth plays a role in the development of a SCFE has not been elucidated., Questions/purposes: (1) What is the prevalence of a deep acetabulum in SCFE? (2) Is the presence of a deep acetabulum associated with physeal instability? (3) Is the presence of a deep acetabulum associated with the occurrence of a contralateral SCFE?, Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 232 patients (156 males) who presented with a unilateral SCFE. Fifty (22%) subsequently developed a contralateral SCFE. The involved and uninvolved sides were evaluated for the presence of a deep acetabulum (DA). Preoperative radiographic parameters, slip stability, development of a contralateral SCFE, and demographic factors were then compared between patients with and without DA., Results: DA was present in 120 hips (52%) with a SCFE. DA was more common in females (55 of 76 [72%]) than males (65 of 156 [42%]). Patients with DA presented with a higher lateral center-edge angle (33° versus 31°), slip angle (52° versus 43°), and with a lower body mass index (28.1 versus 30.0 kg/m(2)). Increased acetabular depth was more common in patients with an unstable SCFE (29 of 41 [71%]) than those with a stable SCFE (91 of 191 [48%]). The presence of DA either on the affected side or the contralateral side did not predict a contralateral SCFE., Conclusions: Despite not predicting a contralateral SCFE, DA may influence physeal stability if a SCFE does develop. Therefore, the contralateral hip with DA should be closely monitored., Level of Evidence: Level II, prognostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Background: The indications for prophylactic pinning of the contralateral hip after unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) remain controversial in part because the natural history of the contralateral hip is unclear., Questions/purposes: We therefore determined (1) the incidence of contralateral slips in patients with unilateral SCFE, (2) the rate of subsequent corrective surgery, and (3) the Harris hip score (HHS) and VAS pain score for hips that sustained a contralateral slip after unilateral pinning., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 226 patients with unilateral SCFE at initial presentation between 1965 and 2005; of these, 133 met our inclusion criteria and were followed at least 2 years. Latest followup included examination and radiographs for 52 patients and HHS (without radiographs) and VAS pain score for 81 hips. Minimum followup was 2 years (median, 13 years; range, 2-43 years)., Results: Of the 133 patients at risk for a subsequent slip, 20 patients developed a contralateral slip (15%). One patient developed avascular necrosis requiring arthroplasty, and another patient had a mild contralateral slip with disabling pain. For the 15 patients with contralateral slips and scores available, the mean HHS was 90 (range, 49-100) and the mean VAS pain score was 20 of 100. Six found the contralateral hip painful., Conclusions: The contralateral slip sustained by the majority of patients was for the most part mild. However, nearly 1/3 of the contralateral slipped hips were painful. One patient has severe pain, and a second required THA for avascular necrosis after an unstable slip. These may have been preventable by prophylactic pinning., Level of Evidence: Level III, therapeutic study. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Background: Patients with slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) may develop cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Early management of FAI has been advocated for patients with symptomatic FAI. The various treatment options, including reorientation surgeries, realignment procedures, and osteoplasty, remain controversial., Questions/purposes: We asked whether an intertrochanteric flexion osteotomy improved the clinical symptoms of FAI in patients with SCFE and confirmed whether the radiographic signs were compatible with the clinical signs of FAI., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 32 symptomatic patients who underwent 32 intertrochanteric flexion osteotomies for severe SCFE. FAI was diagnosed clinically with a positive impingement sign. The osteotomies were designed preoperatively using CT. Cam-type FAI was evaluated with the modified α angle (β angle) on a Lauenstein view, measured between the proximal femoral shaft axis and the line from the center of the femoral head to the anterior point where the distance of the head center exceeded the femoral head radius. The minimum followup was 2 years (mean, 5 years; range, 2-9 years)., Results: At last followup, only two patients complained of pain or inconvenience in daily life; the impingement sign was negative in 24 hips (75%). The β angles at last followup were reduced on average by 39°. The postoperative β angle was higher in hips with positive clinical signs of FAI than in those with negative signs., Conclusions: Intertrochanteric flexion osteotomy for SCFE improved the clinical and radiographic signs of FAI. The β angle and clinical findings showed compatible improvement. We believe our intertrochanteric flexion osteotomy is a viable option for treating severe SCFE., Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Background: Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is occurring in greater numbers, at increasingly younger ages, and more frequently bilaterally (BL-SCFE). Obesity is one risk factor for SCFE. However, it is unclear whether postoperative decreases or increases in body mass index (BMI) alter the risk of subsequent contralateral SCFE., Questions/purposes: We therefore determined whether (1) BMI percentile was a risk factor for BL-SCFE; and (2) postoperative increases and/or decreases in BMI percentile influenced the risk for BL-SCFE., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 502 patients surgically treated for SCFE and identified 138 (27%) with BL-SCFE and 364 (73%) with unilateral SCFE (UL-SCFE); 173 patients, 60 (35%) with BL-SCFE and 113 (65%) with UL-SCFE met our inclusion criteria. Risk factors included sex, age, slip stability, slip chronicity, slip angle, and obesity. Percentile BMI was recorded at the time of first SCFE surgery, at the time of last followup for patients undergoing UL-SCFE, and at the time of second SCFE surgery for patients undergoing BL-SCFE., Results: Sex, age, slip stability, and slip angle were not associated with BL-SCFE. Postoperative obesity (odds ratio [OR], 3.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-9.7) and acute slip chronicity (OR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.3-6.7) had higher risks for sequential BL-SCFE. Obese patients who became nonobese postoperatively had a decreased risk of sequential BL-SCFE compared with those who remained obese (OR, 0.16; 95% CI, 1.2-116.5)., Conclusions: Only postoperative obesity and an acute slip were risk factors for sequential BL-SCFE. BMI reduction to lower than the 95% percentile after SCFE surgery was associated with lower risk for BL-SCFE development. The data suggest early supervised therapeutic weight management programs for patients treated for UL-SCFE are important to reduce risk of subsequent SCFE., Level of Evidence: Level III, prognostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Background: Obesity is a risk factor for developing slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). The long-term outcome after SCFE treatment depends on the severity of residual hip deformity and the occurrence of complications, mainly avascular necrosis (AVN). Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is associated with SCFE-related deformity and dysfunction in both short and long term., Questions/purposes: We examined obesity prevention, early diagnosis, reducing AVN and hip deformity as strategies to reduce SCFE prevalence, and the long-term outcomes after treatment., Methods: A search of the literature using the PubMed database for the key concepts SCFE and treatment, natural history, obesity, and prevalence identified 218, 15, 26, and 49 abstracts, respectively. WHERE ARE WE NOW?: A correlation between rising childhood obesity and increasing incidence of SCFE has been recently reported. Residual abnormal morphology of the proximal femur is currently believed to be the mechanical cause of FAI and early articular cartilage damage in SCFE. WHERE DO WE NEED TO GO?: Reducing the increasing prevalence rate of SCFE is important. Treatment of SCFE should aim to reduce AVN rates and residual deformities that lead to FAI to improve the long-term functional and clinical outcomes. HOW DO WE GET THERE?: Implementing public health policies to reduce childhood obesity should allow for SCFE prevalence to drop. Clinical trials will evaluate whether restoring the femoral head-neck offset to avoid FAI along with SCFE fixation allows for cartilage damage prevention and lower rates of osteoarthritis. The recently described surgical hip dislocation approach is a promising technique that allows anatomic reduction with potential lower AVN rates in the treatment of SCFE.

Purpose: Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) represents the preliminary stage of osteoarthritis. Reliable tools for outcome evaluation should be developed to prevent persisting defects. The functional outcome of SCFE-patients after growth arrest is analysed by instrumented 3D-gait analysis (GA). The results are matched to the clinical examination findings., Methods: A total of 39 SCFE patients after growth arrest (18.8 years; BMI 26.5 kg/m²) with unilateral affection were included. The clinical results were classified according to Harris hip and clinical Heyman Herndon scores. 3D-GA-parameters were evaluated and compared to the sound side and a group of 40 healthy adults (28.0 years; 21.9 kg/m²). The subgroup analysis was performed according to clinical results., Results: The clinical examination revealed very good results. GA could detect even small alterations. Some parameters indicated sustained functional impairments: Compared to the control group patients' walking speed (p = 0.022), step frequency (p < 0.001) and single support of the slip side (p < 0.001) decreased, while step width (p = 0.014), double support (p = 0.004) and stance time of sound side increased (p = 0.001). For kinematics patients, the sagittal range of motion (ROM) of pelvis (p < 0.001) and the external rotation of the ankle on both sides increased (p = 0.011) and sagittal ROM of hip (p = 0.002) and knee flexion of slip side (p < 0.001) decreased. The sagittal ROM of the ankle on the slip side decreased compared to the sound side (p = 0.003). Subgroup analysis revealed a positive correlation between clinically unsatisfying results and GA parameters., Conclusions: Functional impairments in SCFE-patients can be found even after growth arrest. Alterations are explained partly by the disease and partly by patients' constitution. BMI-matched controls and long-term follow-up are needed.

The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical and radiographic presentation of young adults in the mid-term follow-up after pinning in situ for mild to moderate slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). We postulated that there was a correlation between the degree of head-neck-offset decrease and clinical and radiographic signs of hip joint degeneration. Thirty-eight young adults (average age 23.4 ± 3.6 years old) with various grades of femoral head-neck-offset pathologies were assessed clinically via Harris hip score (HHS), Tegner-Lysholm score (TLS) and Short Form 36 (SF-36), and radiographic signs of OA were measured on plain X-ray films after a follow-up of 11.1 ± 3.8 years. We conclude that clinical and radiographic signs of joint degeneration appear early in the follow-up after SCFE, but there is no linear correlation between offset-pathology and joint degeneration.