Search

Achieving automatic classification of femur trochanteric fracture from the edge computing device is of great importance and value for remote diagnosis and treatment. Nevertheless, designing a highly accurate classification model on 31A1/31A2/31A3 fractures from the X-ray is still limited due to the failure of capturing the scale-variant and contextual information. As a result, this paper proposes a deep scale-variant (DSV) network with a hybrid and progressive (HP) loss function to aggregate more influential representations of the fracture regions. More specifically, the DSV network is based on the ResNet and integrated with the designed scale-variant (SV) layer and HP loss, where the SV layer aims to enhance the representation ability to extract the scale-variant features, and HP loss is intended to force the network to condense more contextual clues. Furthermore, to evaluate the effect of the proposed DSV network, we carry out a series of experiments on the real X-ray images for comparison and evaluation, and the experimental results demonstrate that the proposed DSV network could outperform other classification methods on this classification task., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Yuxiang Kang et al.)

Objective: To evaluate the effect of external fixation compared with dynamic hip screw (DHS) for the treatment of elderly intertrochanteric hip fractures., Methods: We searched Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane central database (All to December 19th, 2015) for comparative studies relevant to external fixation versus DHS for the management of intertrochanteric hip fractures. Only randomized controlled trial (RCT) were included. We extracted the trial characteristics, intervention details, primary and secondary outcomes. Risk of bias was assessed. Fixed/random effect model was adapted according to the heterogeneity tested by I2 statistic. Sensitivity analysis was conducted and publication bias was assessed., Results: A total of 4 RCTs were retrieved involving 260 patients. Pooled results showed for the primary outcomes of Harris hip score and final mortality, no significant difference was found between external fixation and DHS, however, for the secondary outcomes, external fixation had advantages in the aspects of length of surgery, operative blood loss, blood transfusion and hospital stay while shortcomings in pin-track infection. For other secondary outcomes such as fracture reduction, cut out and varus malunion, no significant difference could be found., Conclusions: While there was no conclusive evidence, as external fixation with less surgery time, less blood loss and less post-operative pain while no compromise in final functional outcome and mortality compared with DHS, it could be considered as an alternative for the elderly intertrochanteric hip fractures, especially in highrisk patients who could not tolerate routine spinal anesthesia and open surgery., (Copyright © 2016 The Japanese Orthopaedic Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)