Search

Background: Pavlik harness (PH) treatment is successful in treating over 90% of newborns with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). There is a need for close supervision, frequent adjustments, size changes, and monitoring of complications. This paper aims to provide a safe criterion for remote follow-up of DDH patients treated in a PH to reduce the risk of COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) exposure to patients, parents, and health practitioners., Methods: All infants with stable hips (Graf I, IIa/b/c/d, treated III/IV) with consenting parents after appropriate counseling were enrolled in a virtual clinic. Clinics were conducted using the NHS "Attend anywhere" virtual link service by an extended scope practitioner-specialist physiotherapist and a clinical nurse specialist. The virtual clinic group was compared with a matched cohort of patients from 2018/2019., Results: A total of 141 patients were referred to the neonatal hip clinic; 45 patients were eligible for harness treatment and 20 patients were selected for virtual clinics. In total, there were 35 virtual clinic appointments. Each of the patients had an average of 1.7 virtual appointments ranging from 1 to 3 (26.3% of total number of clinics). Age at presentation of the treated group was 7±4.2 weeks and control group 5.7±5.5 weeks (P=0.59). PH duration of the study group was 9±2.6 weeks and the control group, 7.8±2.5 weeks (P=0.12). There were no missed complications at the follow-up face-to-face appointment. Patients saved an average of 76 km total travel distance., Conclusions: This study demonstrates adequate evidence that children requiring routine follow-up appointments involving PH adjustment, skincare, and identification of clinical anomalies, can be treated and followed up safely using virtual clinics. Clinical triage of suitable patients for virtual clinic provision must always be made by experienced clinicians. Children presenting with Graf IIa, IIb, IIc, IId, as well as those with stable and improving Graf III at initial diagnoses, had successful treatment with virtual clinic follow-up appointments in this study., Level of Evidence: Level IV., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Bilateral developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is believed to have a worse outcome than unilateral DDH with the optimal treatment unclear. To define indications for treatment we report a retrospective series of 92 hips (46 patients) who underwent closed reduction (CR) and/or open reduction (OR)., Methods: A total of 58 hips in 29 patients underwent attempted CR using our standardized protocol. In the same 12 year time period, 54 hips in 27 patients underwent an OR. Outcome measures included resolution of acetabular dysplasia, need for further surgery, development of osteonecrosis (ON), and modified Severin Grade., Results: CR was successful in 57% of hips; in this group secondary surgery was required in 15% and ON was seen in 12%. In the OR group, 11% failed to stabilize and required further early surgery: ON rate was 15% overall, and secondary surgery was required in 5%. In Tonnis 2/3 hips younger than 2 years, Severin grading was comparable following CR and OR, with 92% and 90% graded as Severin 1, respectively. The rate of significant ON was higher after CR in Tonnis 2/3 hips (12%) than after OR (0%). Overall, Tonnis 4 hips did badly: 94% failed CR and following OR, further surgery for redislocation/residual dysplasia was required in 21%., Conclusions: CR can be successful in Tonnis 2/3 bilateral hips, with acceptable rates of secondary surgery, ON, and Severin grading, the latter equivalent to open reduction. Importantly, persisting with casting of a unilateral dislocation, to allow the contra-lateral hip to stabilize, does not have an adverse effect. CR is not advised in Tonnis 4 bilateral hips. Parents should be counseled that the outcome of surgery for bilateral hips is not as good as for unilateral DDH, particularly for Tonnis 4 hips which are more difficult to stabilize and more likely to require supplementary surgery even after open reduction., Level of Evidence: Level IV-Therapeutic Study.

Background: The purpose of this study is to describe the natural history of hip morphology in patients with mucopolysaccharidoses (MPS) I and MPS II., Methodology: This is a retrospective radiographic analysis of 88 hips in 44 children with MPS I and II. Radiographs were examined to determine hip migration, femoral head sphericity, and acetabular dysplasia at different ages throughout childhood. In individual hips, change in morphology and rate of change were analyzed., Results: There was a high rate of hip migration and femoral head dysplasia in both MPS I and MPS II. Progressive migration was seen in three quarters of hips and progressive femoral head deformity in over half of hips. Acetabular dysplasia was variable, ranging from normal to severely dysplastic, but did not change with time. Overall, hips were more dysplastic in MPS I than MPS II., Conclusions: Hip morphology is variable in MPS I and MPS II ranging from almost normal to severely dysplastic. Some hips do not deteriorate with time and thus surgical intervention may not be necessary in all cases. Deterioration is slow allowing time to plan a holistic approach to treatment., Level of Evidence: Level IV-case series.

Objective: Screening for hip dysplasia is controversial. A previous randomized controlled trial revealed that adding universal or selective ultrasound to routine clinical examination gave a nonsignificant reduction in rates of late presenting cases, but with higher treatment rates. This study assesses differences in outcome at skeletal maturity for the 3 newborn screening strategies in terms of radiographic markers of acetabular dysplasia and early degenerative change and avascular necrosis (AVN) secondary to neonatal treatment., Methods: From the initial trial including 11 925 newborns, a population-based sample of 3935 adolescents was invited for follow-up at age 18 to 20 years. A standardized weight-bearing anteroposterior view was obtained. The outcomes evaluated were the radiographic findings of dysplasia (center-edge angle, femoral head extrusion-index, acetabular depth-width ratio, Sharp's angle, subjective evaluation of dysplasia) and degenerative change (joint-space width). Signs of AVN were documented., Results: Of the 3935 subjects invited, 2038 (51.8%) attended the maturity review, of which 2011 (58.2% female patients) were included: 551, 665, and 795 subjects from the universal, selective, and clinical groups, respectively. Rates per group of positive radiographic findings associated with dysplasia or degenerative change varied depending on radiographic marker used. No statistically significant differences were detected between groups. No AVN was seen., Conclusions: Although both selective and universal ultrasound screenings gave a nonsignificant reduction in rates of late cases when compared with expert clinical programs, we were unable to demonstrate any additional reduction in the rates of radiographic findings associated with acetabular dysplasia or degenerative change at maturity. Increased treatment rates were not associated with AVN.

Purpose: Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is a leading cause of disability in childhood and early adult life. Clinical and sonographic screening programmes have been used to facilitate early detection but the effectiveness of both screening strategies is unproven. This article discusses the role for screening in DDH and provides an evidence-based review for early management of cases detected by such screening programmes., Methods: We performed a literature review using the key words 'hip dysplasia,' 'screening,' 'ultrasound,' and 'treatment.', Results: The screening method of choice and its effectiveness in DDH still needs to be established although it seems essential that screening tests are performed by trained and competent examiners. There is no level 1 evidence to advise on the role of abduction splinting in DDH although clinicians feel strongly that hip instability does improve with such a treatment regime. The definition of what constitutes a pathological dysplasia and when this requires treatment is also poorly understood., Conclusion: Further research needs to establish whether early splintage of clinically stable but sonographically dysplastic hips affects future risk of late-presenting dysplasia/dislocation and osteoarthritis. There is a need for high quality studies in the future if these questions are to be answered.

Context: A "missed" case of congenital hip dislocation (CDH) can be a disaster for the patient and the outcome may be poor. Considerable resources are expended on screening programmes to identify appropriate cases early but a recent change in terminology to developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) and a realisation that neonatal hip maturation is poorly understood has made it difficult to know who should be screened and why., Starting Point: Neonatal hip screening is well established although some experts feel that the effectiveness of clinical let alone ultrasound screening programmes is unproven. Several European countries undertake population screening, while selective screening occurs in 93% of UK units. K Holen and colleagues recently reported (J Bone Joint Surg 2002; 84-B: 886-90) a prospective randomised trial of just over 15 500 newborn babies in which they compare universal and selective screening programmes. With a follow-up of 6-11 years, one late-detected hip dysplasia was seen in the universal group compared with six in the selective group (not statistically significant). These investigators found, on the background of an excellent clinical programme, no additional benefit from universal screening and thus advocate selective screening., Where Next: The aims of a screening programme must be defined, then evaluated. A consideration of costs can never take into account family pain and distress. The results of the universal screening programme in Coventry, UK, are impressive and significantly better than results from other UK centres. If the Coventry results are the gold standard, then it is necessary to work out how this can be achieved elsewhere rather than worry about whether it is unachievable.