Search

Background: Although genetic testing has improved our ability to diagnose Lynch syndrome (LS), there is still limited information on the extent of variations in the clinical and genetic landscape among LS variant heterozygotes (LSVH) in Africa. We sought to investigate the cancer spectrum, cumulative risk, and survival outcomes of LSVH with pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants (P/LPVs) in the MLH1 and MSH2 genes using a LS registry in South Africa over the last 30 years. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted to retrieve demographic, clinical, and genetic data of all LSVH with P/LPVs in the MLH1 and MSH2 genes from our LS registry. Genetic data were analyzed according to cancer spectrum, cumulative risk, and crude survival. We used the Chi-squared and t-test to assess differences between groups, and Kaplan–Meier survival analyses were used to analyze the cumulative risk and crude survival outcomes. A p-value < 0.05 at a 95% confidence interval was considered statistically significant. Results: We analyzed a total of 577 LSVH from 109 families. About 450 (78%) and 127 (22%) LSVH harbored a disease-causing mutation in MLH1 and MSH2, respectively. A South African founder PV (MLH1:c.1528C>T) accounted for 74% (n = 426) of all LSVH. CRC was the most common diagnosed cancer in both MLH1 and MSH2 LSVH. MLH1 LSVH had a younger age at cancer diagnosis than MSH2 LSVH (43 vs. 47 years, respectively, p = 0.015). Extracolonic cancers were predominantly higher in female LSVH (n = 33, 35%) than in male LSVH (n = 8, 7%) with the MLH1:c.1528C>T founder PV. The cumulative risk of any cancer and CRC at any age was higher in MLH1 LSVH than in MSH2 LSVH (p = 0.020 and p = 0.036, respectively). LSVH with the MLH1:c.1528C>T PV had a better 10-year overall survival after the first cancer diagnosis, particularly for CRC. Conclusions: LSVH with P/LPVs in the MLH1 and MSH2 genes exhibited significant gene- and sex-specific differences in cancer spectrum, cumulative risk and survival outcomes. Cancer risk and survival estimates described in this study can be used to guide surveillance and genetic counselling for LSVH in our population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: High variability in the age at cancer diagnosis in Lynch syndrome (LS) patients is widely observed, even among relatives with the same germline pathogenic variant (PV) in the mismatch repair (MMR) genes. Genetic polymorphisms and lifestyle factors are thought to contribute to this variability. We investigated the influence of previously reported genetic polymorphisms on the age at cancer diagnosis in a homogenous LS cohort with a South African founder germline PV c.1528C>T in the MLH1 gene. Methods: A total of 359 LS variant heterozygotes (LSVH) from 60 different families were genotyped for specific genetic polymorphisms in GSTM1, GSTT1, CYP1A1, CYP17, PPP2R2B, KIF20A, TGFB1, XRCC5, TNF, BCL2, CHFR, CDC25C, ATM, TTC28, CDC25C, HFE, and hTERT genes using Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction and MassArray methods. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis, univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards gamma shared frailty models adjusted for sex were used to estimate the association between age at cancer diagnosis and polymorphism genotypes. A p-value < 0.05 after correcting for multiple testing using the Benjamini–Hochberg method was considered significant at a 95% confidence interval. Results: We identified three genotypes in the cell-cycle regulation, DNA repair, and xenobiotic-metabolism genes significantly associated with age at cancer diagnosis in this cohort. The CYP1A1 rs4646903 risk (GG) and CDC25C rs3734166 polymorphic (GA+AA) genotypes were significantly associated with an increased risk of a younger age at cancer diagnosis (Adj HR: 2.03 [1.01–4.08], p = 0.034 and Adj HR: 1.53 [1.09–2.14], p = 0.015, respectively). LSVH who were heterozygous for the XRCC5 rs1051685 SNP showed significant protection against younger age at cancer diagnosis (Adj HR: 0.69 [CI, 0.48–0.99], p = 0.043). The risk of a younger age at any cancer diagnosis was significantly high in LS carriers of one to two risk genotypes (Adj HR: 1.49 [CI: 1.06–2.09], corrected p = 0.030), while having one to two protective genotypes significantly reduced the risk of developing any cancer and CRC at a younger age (Adj HR: 0.52 [CI: 0.37–0.73], and Adj HR: 0.51 [CI: 0.36–0.74], both corrected p < 0.001). Conclusions: Polymorphism genotypes in the cell-cycle regulation, DNA repair, and xenobiotic metabolizing genes may influence the age at cancer diagnosis in a homogenous LS cohort with a South African founder germline PV c.1528C>T in the MLH1 gene. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Lynch syndrome (LS) is an inherited cancer predisposition disorder associated with an elevated risk of developing various solid cancers, but mostly colorectal cancer (CRC). Despite having the same germline pathogenic variant (PV) in one of the mis-match repair genes or the EPCAM gene, Lynch syndrome variant heterozygotes (LSVH) exhibit a remarkable phenotypic variability in the risk of developing cancer. The role of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) in modifying cancer development risk prompted our hypothesis into whether HLA variations act as potential genetic modifiers influencing the age at cancer diagnosis in LSVH. To investigate this, we studied a unique cohort of 426 LSVH carrying the same germline PV in the hMLH1 gene (MLH1:c.1528C > T) in South Africa. We intuitively selected 100 LSVH with the greatest diversity in age at cancer diagnosis (N = 80) and the oldest cancer unaffected LSVH (N = 20) for a high-throughput HLA genotyping of 11 HLA class I and class II loci using the shotgun next-generation sequencing (NGS) technique on the Illumina MiSeq platform. Statistical analyses employed Kaplan–Meier survival analyses with log-rank tests, and Cox proportional hazards using binned HLA data to minimize type I error. Significant associations were observed between young age at cancer diagnosis and HLA-DPB1*04:02 (mean age: 37 y (25–50); hazard ratio (HR) = 3.37; corrected p-value (q) = 0.043) as well as HLA-DPB1 binned alleles (including HLA-DPB1*09:01, HLA-DPB1*10:01, HLA-DPB1*106:01, HLA-DPB1*18:01, HLA-DPB1*20:01, HLA-DPB1*26:01, HLA-DPB1*28:01, HLA-DPB1*296:01, and HLA-DPB1*55:01) (mean age: 37 y (17–63); HR = 2.30, q = 0.045). The involvement of HLA-DPB1 alleles in the age at cancer diagnosis may highlight the potential role of HLA class II in the immune response against cancer development in LSVH. When validated in a larger cohort, these high-risk HLA-DPB1 alleles could be factored into cancer risk prediction models for personalized cancer screening in LSVH. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]