Search

Sustained virological response (SVR) results in reduced incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and mortality among chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients with advanced fibrosis. Since both advanced fibrosis and liver steatosis (LS) may coexist in CHC patients, we evaluated their individual effects on a composite outcome of all-cause mortality and HCC in CHC patients with SVR following direct-acting antivirals (DAA) treatment. We retrospectively evaluated inception cohort of 515 CHC patients who achieved SVR following treatment with DAA, with a mean follow-up of 24 months. Baseline liver fibrosis was assessed by transient elastography, and LS was validated by at least three independent ultrasonographic examinations. 211 of 515 patients (41%) had baseline LS. Patients with LS had a higher cumulative rate of all-cause mortality and HCC at 2 years of follow-up compared to patients without LS (15.75% and 2.79%, respectively, P < 0.001), although they did not have increased incidence of advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis. Consistently, multivariate analysis showed that LS was associated with a significant 7.5-fold increased risk of all-cause mortality and HCC (HR 7.51, 95% C.I 3.61-13.36, P < 0.001) even upon adjustment to components of the metabolic syndrome, whereas advanced fibrosis showed only a trend towards statistical significance (HR 2.32, 95% C.I 0.97-6.59, P = 0.06). In conclusion, LS is a major predictor of all-cause mortality and HCC in patients who achieved SVR following DAA treatment regardless of fibrosis stage. These patients should be rigorously screened for HCC.

Background & Aims Liver steatosis may occur concomitantly in patients with chronic hepatitis B infection (CHB) and is implicated in increased morbidity and mortality. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) viral load is a marker for disease progression and long-term outcomes in CHB. We investigated the association between liver steatosis and HBV viral load and their individual effects on all-cause mortality and the development of cancer in patients with CHB and liver steatosis. Methods This retrospective study included 524 treatment-naïve patients with CHB, with a mean follow-up of 6 years. Liver biopsy was available for 170 patients and liver steatosis was validated by at least 3 ultrasonographic examinations. Results A total of 241/524 (46%) patients with CHB had liver steatosis, with a strong correlation between the degree of liver steatosis as assessed by ultrasonography or by liver biopsy (r = 0.9, p, Graphical abstract Unlabelled Image, Highlights • HBV viral load is an important predictor of adverse outcomes in patients with chronic HBV (CHB). • Liver steatosis may co-occur with CHB but its effect on all-cause mortality and cancer has not been determined. • Liver steatosis is significantly associated with all-cause mortality and cancer in patients with CHB. • The effect of liver steatosis on mortality and cancer is stronger than the effect of HBV viral load. • Patients with CHB and liver steatosis should be closely monitored, irrespective of their viral load.

Aim of the study To compare [¹¹C] choline PET/CT findings between patients with cirrhosis and normal liver controls. Methods Included 11 patients with cirrhosis and 14 controls. All underwent a dynamic [11C] choline PET/CT. The maximal standard uptake values (SUVmax), the area under the curve (AUC) and kinetic parameters (K1 and K2), clinical and laboratory data, were compared between groups. Results Patients mean age was 68.4 ± 10.7 and controls, 69.7 ± 7.3 years. Mean SUVmax was higher in patients than controls (right lobe, 10.06 ± 12 vs. 6.3 ± 1.6, P = 0.011; left lobe, 8.6 ± 11.6 vs. 5.4 ± 0.9, P = 0.024; spleen 17.99 ± 27.8 vs. 13.4 ± 2.6, P = 0.027; kidney, 35.9 ± 59.5 vs. 19.3 ± 4.8, P = 0.025) and also AUC values (right lobe, 13,538 ± 20,020 vs. 8427.3 ± 1557.9, P = 0.026; left lobe 12,304 ± 18,871 vs. 6878.9 ± 1294.3, P = 0.024; spleen, 12,875 ± 17,930 vs. 8263.9 ± 1279.2, P = 0.023; kidney, 24,623 ± 36,025 vs. 13,667 ± 3873.9, P = 0.032). No difference in kinetic parameters was found. No correlations between severity of clinical signs and imaging-derived parametric data were found among patients with cirrhosis. Conclusions [11C] choline PET/CT may serve as a noninvasive biomarker for patients with cirrhosis.

KLF6-SV1 (SV1), the major splice variant of KLF6, antagonizes the KLF6 tumor suppressor by an unknown mechanism. Decreased KLF6 expression in human hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) correlates with increased mortality, but the contribution of increased SV1 is unknown. We sought to define the impact of SV1 on human outcomes and experimental murine hepatocarcinogenesis and to elucidate its mechanism of action. In hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related HCC, an increased ratio of SV1/KLF6 within the tumor was associated with features of more advanced disease. Six months after a single injection of diethylnitrosamine (DEN), SV1 hepatocyte transgenic mice developed more histologically advanced tumors, whereas Klf6-depleted mice developed bigger tumors compared to the Klf6fl(+/+) control mice. Nine months after DEN, SV1 transgenic mice with Klf6 depletion had the greatest tumor burden. Primary mouse hepatocytes from both the SV1 transgenic animals and those with hepatocyte-specific Klf6 depletion displayed increased DNA synthesis, with an additive effect in hepatocytes harboring both SV1 overexpression and Klf6 depletion. Parallel results were obtained by viral SV1 transduction and depletion of Klf6 through adenovirus-Cre infection of primary Klf6fl(+/+) hepatocytes. Increased DNA synthesis was due to both enhanced cell proliferation and increased ploidy. Coimmunoprecipitation studies in 293T cells uncovered a direct interaction of transfected SV1 with KLF6. Accelerated KLF6 degradation in the presence of SV1 was abrogated by the proteasome inhibitor MG132. Conclusion: An increased SV1/KLF6 ratio correlates with more aggressive HCC. In mice, an increased SV1/KLF6 ratio, generated either by increasing SV1, decreasing KLF6, or both, accelerates hepatic carcinogenesis. Moreover, SV1 binds directly to KLF6 and accelerates its degradation. These findings represent a novel mechanism underlying the antagonism of tumor suppressor gene function by a splice variant of the same gene. (HEPATOLOGY 2012)