Surveillance Strategy After Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Gastric Cancer: A Multicenter Study by Osaka University ESD Study Group Motohiko Kato, Tsutomu Nishida, Katsumi Yamamoto, Shinji Kitamura, Takeshi Nakamura, Akihiro Nishihara, Naoki Kawai, Shinichiro Zushi, Masato Komori, Kazuo Kinoshita, Tomoki Michida, Takuya Yamada, Shusaku Tsutsui, Masahiko Tsujii, Norio Hayashi Graduate School of Medicine, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka University, Suita, Japan; Department of Gastroenterology, Toyonaka Municipal Hospital, Toyonaka, Japan; Department of Gastroenterology, Sakai Municipal Hospital, Sakai, Japan; Department of Gastroenterology, Kansai Rosai Hospital, Amagasaki, Japan; Department of Gastroenterology, Minoh City Hospital, Minoh, Japan; Department of Gastroenterology, Osaka Police Hospital, Osaka, Japan; Department of Gastroenterology, Ikeda Municipal Hospital, Ikeda, Japan; Department of Gastroenterology, Osaka Rosai Hospital, Sakai, Japan; Department of Gastroenterology, Sumitomo Hospital, Osaka, Japan; Endoscopy Center, Osaka Koseinenkin Hospital, Osaka, Japan Background and Aim: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been accepted as a treatment for early gastric cancer (EGC). However, it is known that the patient after endoscopic treatment of EGC is at risk of synchronous and metachronous multiple cancers, even though initial lesion is completely resected, and there is not enough evidence concerning surveillance strategy after ESD for EGC. The aim of this multicenter study is to clarify the surveillance strategy after ESD by assessing the incidence of multiple cancers during follow-up. Methods: This is a multicenter retrospective study from 6 institutes. From March 2003 to November 2010, of total 1567 consecutive cases with gastric neoplasm performed ESD at these 6 institute, 1041 cases were diagnosed as EGC after ESD and were included in this study. Cumulative incident rates of gastric cancer after initial ESD were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier methods. Results: In 1041 cases, multiple cancers were detected in 101 cases and incident rate was 9.7% in the median follow-up period of 28.3 months. The cumulative incident rates of gastric cancer were 7.4% at 1 year, 9.5% at 2 years, and 11.5% at 3 years, respectively. The cumulative incident rates curve showed an inflection point at 1.7 months, after that those increased constantly about 2% per year. Median and 90 percentile of duration between initial ESD and cancer incidence were 22.9 and 36.0 months, respectively. There were no significant differences in institute, patients’ background, and characteristics of initial lesion between cases with and without multiple cancers. All lesions detected during follow-up were successfully treated by re-ESD except 2 cases of mucosal cancers where ESD was not applicable because of undifferentiated histological type. Conclusion: These results suggested multiple cancers detected within 3 months after initial ESD for EGC were overlooked synchronous cancers in the pre-ESD survey. Metachronous lesions were detected with low but constant frequency during follow up. Our recommendation is that initial endoscopic surveillance should be performed within 3-6 months after ESD to check up synchronous lesions and scheduled endoscopic surveillance should be performed annually for at least 3 years. 1174 Randomized Controlled Trial of Conventional vs. Jumbo Forceps Biopsy for the Diagnostic Accuracy of Gastric Neoplasia Before Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Hyun-Soo Kim, Hyo Keun Jeon, Jae Woo Kim, Hong Jun Park, so Yeon Park, Bo RA Kim, Chan Sik Won, Mee-Yon Cho Internal medicine, Yonsei Univ. Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Republic of Korea; Pathology, Yonsei Univ. Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Republic of Korea Aim: An endoscopic forceps biopsy carries the risk of missing the neoplastic foci within a gastric neoplastic lesion and underestimating the grade of neoplasia because only a small portion of the lesion is sampled using this technique. The aim of this prospective study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of gastric neoplasia before endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) between conventional forceps and jumbo forceps. Patients and Methods: Between May 2009 and November 2010, 162 gastric neoplastic lesions (adenomas or early gastric cancers without ulcer) from 148 patients were randomized to two groups, conventional forceps (7 mm) and jumbo forceps (8 mm), and four specimens were obtained from each lesion. Each pathologic result of the four endoscopic biopsied specimens between the two groups was compared with that of ESD specimens. Results: Of the 148 patients, 123 (76.9%) were, men; median age was 64.66 10 years. Twenty-nine gastric neoplastic lesions in 26 patients were excluded because ESD was not performed or because pathologic result was inappropriate. Finally, 66 gastric neoplastic lesions in 60 patients and 65 gastric neoplastic lesions in 62 patients were allocated to conventional group and jumbo group. A total of 131 ESD specimens in 122 patients were analyzed. The pathological diagnoses of ESD specimens were as follows: 47 (35.9%) adenomas with low grade dysplasia, 20 (15.3%) adenomas with high grade dysplasia, and 63 (48.1%) adenocarcinomas. The mean diameter of the biopsy specimens were 2.48 0.53mm with conventional group, 2.89 0.60mm with jumbo group. Thus, significantly larger biopsy specimens were obtained by jumbo forceps than conventional forceps(p 0.001). The rates of concordance from the first to all four endoscopic forceps biopsy specimens and the ESD specimens were 66.7%, 72.7%, 74.2% and 80.3% in conventional forceps group and 72.3%, 76.9%, 81.5% and 84.6% in jumbo forceps group (p 0.483, p 0.580, p 0.315, p 0.517), respectively. The concordance rate was not associated with location of gastric neoplastic lesions or with experience of endoscopists (p 0.05). There were no variables found to be significantly associated with rates of concordance in multivariate analysis. Conclusions: Obtaining 4 endoscopic biopsy specimens rather than only one before ESD improved diagnostic accuracy by about 15%. Despite of bigger specimen size, however, jumbo forceps was not proven to be superior to the conventional forceps for better diagnostic accuracy of gastric neoplasia.