Search

Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is a pathogen of global significance, but the value of HEV-related markers in the diagnosis of hepatitis E remains controversial. Previous studies on hepatitis E profiles have been mainly cross-sectional and conducted among inpatients in large hospitals, and hepatitis E cases have been primarily defined by limited partial markers. In this community-based study, 4,110 active hepatitis cases from a population of nearly 600,000 were followed over 48 months and serial serum samples were collected. Both HEV pathogen (HEV RNA and antigen) and anti-HEV antibody markers were used to determine HEV infection status and the relationship between hepatitis and HEV infection. In total, 98 hepatitis E patients were identified and all available isolates from 58 patients belonged to HEV genotype 4. The mean age of the patients was 58.14 years, with an overwhelming proportion of males (70.4%). Hepatitis E accounted for 22.86% of active hepatitis cases with alanine aminotransferase levels ≥15.0-fold the upper limit of normal, suggesting the need to include HEV in routine testing for these patients. Ninety-two hepatitis E patients were positive for at least 2 of HEV antigen, anti-HEV IgM, and HEV RNA markers at presentation, and 90.22% of them were positive for HEV antigen and anti-HEV IgM. HEV antigen, HEV RNA, and anti-HEV IgM positivity were observed in 89.80%, 82.65%, and 93.88% of hepatitis E patients at presentation, respectively. However, only 57.14% of anti-HEV IgM positivity occurred in hepatitis E patients. These findings will advance our understanding of hepatitis E and improve diagnosis.

In individuals with underlying chronic liver disease (CLD), hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection is a potential trigger of acute-on-chronic liver failure. In this systematic review, seven electronic databases were searched. Pooled incidence rates with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated by the Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation method. The association between death or liver failure and HEV superinfection in CLD patients was estimated by the odds ratios (OR) with a 95% CI. A total of 18 studies from 5 countries were eligible for systematic review. The prevalence of acute HEV infection in hospitalized CLD patients with clinical manifestations of hepatitis was 13.6%, which was significantly higher than that in CLD patients from the community (pooled prevalence 1.1%). The overall rates of liver failure and mortality in CLD patients with HEV superinfection were 35.8% (95% CI: 26.7%-45.6%) and 14.3% (95% CI: 10.6%-18.5%), respectively, with the rates in cirrhotic patients being approximately 2-fold and 4-fold higher than those in noncirrhotic patients, respectively. The risks of liver failure (OR = 5.5, 95% CI: 1.5-20.1) and mortality (OR = 5.0, 95% CI: 1.9-13.3) were significantly higher in CLD patients with HEV superinfection than in those without HEV superinfection. HEV testing in hospitalized CLD patients is necessary due to the high prevalence of HEV infection observed in hospitalized CLD patients. HEV superinfection could accelerate disease progression in patients with underlying CLD and increase mortality in these patients. HEV vaccination is appropriate for patients with pre-existing CLD., (© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Concerns about vaccine safety are an important reason for vaccine hesitancy, however, limited information is available on whether common adverse reactions following vaccination affect the immune response. Data from three clinical trials of recombinant vaccines were used in this post hoc analysis to assess the correlation between inflammation-related solicited adverse reactions (ISARs, including local pain, redness, swelling or induration and systematic fever) and immune responses after vaccination. In the phase III trial of the bivalent HPV-16/18 vaccine (Cecolin®), the geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) for IgG anti-HPV-16 and -18 ( P <0.001) were significantly higher in participants with any ISAR following vaccination than in those without an ISAR. Local pain, induration, swelling and systemic fever were significantly correlated with higher GMCs for IgG anti-HPV-16 and/or anti-HPV-18, respectively. Furthermore, the analyses of the immunogenicity bridging study of Cecolin® and the phase III trial of a hepatitis E vaccine yielded similar results. Based on these results, we built a scoring model to quantify the inflammation reactions and found that the high score of ISAR indicates the strong vaccine-induced antibody level. In conclusion, this study suggests inflammation-related adverse reactions following vaccination potentially indicate a stronger immune response.

Background & Aims: Rat hepatitis E virus (Orthohepevirus species C; HEV-C1) is an emerging cause of viral hepatitis in humans. HEV-C1 is divergent from other HEV variants infecting humans that belong to Orthohepevirus species A (HEV-A). This study assessed HEV-C1 antigenic divergence from HEV-A and investigated the impact of this divergence on infection susceptibility, serological test sensitivity, and vaccine efficacy., Methods: Immunodominant E2s peptide sequences of HEV-A and HEV-C1 were aligned. Interactions of HEV-C1 E2s and anti-HEV-A monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) were modeled. Recombinant peptides incorporating E2s of HEV-A (HEV-A4 p239) and HEV-C1 (HEV-C1 p241) were expressed. HEV-A and HEV-C1 patient sera were tested using antibody enzymatic immunoassays (EIA), antigen EIAs, and HEV-A4 p239/HEV-C1 p241 immunoblots. Rats immunized with HEV-A1 p239 vaccine (Hecolin), HEV-A4 p239 or HEV-C1 p241 peptides were challenged with a HEV-C1 strain., Results: E2s sequence identity between HEV-A and HEV-C1 was only 48%. There was low conservation at E2s residues (23/53; 43.4%) involved in mAb binding. Anti-HEV-A mAbs bound HEV-C1 poorly in homology modeling and antigen EIAs. Divergence resulted in low sensitivity of commercial antigen (0%) and antibody EIAs (10-70%) for HEV-C1 diagnosis. Species-specific HEV-A4 p239/HEV-C1 p241 immunoblots accurately differentiated HEV-A and HEV-C1 serological profiles in immunized rats (18/18; 100%) and infected-patient sera (32/36; 88.9%). Immunization with Hecolin and HEV-A4 p239 was partially protective while HEV-C1 p241 was fully protective against HEV-C1 infection in rats., Conclusions: Antigenic divergence significantly decreases sensitivity of hepatitis E serodiagnostic assays for HEV-C1 infection. Species-specific immunoblots are useful for diagnosing HEV-C1 and for differentiating the serological profiles of HEV-A and HEV-C1. Prior HEV-A exposure is not protective against HEV-C1. HEV-C1 p241 is an immunogenic vaccine candidate against HEV-C1., Lay Summary: Rat hepatitis E virus (HEV-C1) is a new cause of hepatitis in humans. Using a combination of methods, we showed that HEV-C1 is highly divergent from the usual cause of human hepatitis (HEV-A). This divergence reduces the capacity of existing tests to diagnose HEV-C1 and also indicates that prior exposure to HEV-A (via infection or vaccination) is not protective against HEV-C1., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest Siddharth Sridhar has received speaker’s honoraria from Abbott Laboratories Limited. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest. Please refer to the accompanying ICMJE disclosure forms for further details., (Copyright © 2021 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Nepal is an endemic area for hepatitis E virus (HEV) epidemics. The research on viral hepatitis in Nepal is limited., Methods: Serum samples from 170 patients presenting with symptoms of hepatitis were collected from April to May 2014 in Biratnagar, Nepal, and then transported to Xiamen, China, for further evaluation. All samples were tested for HEV RNA, HEV antigen, anti-HEV IgM, anti-HEV IgG and anti-HBc IgM, anti-HCV IgG, and anti-HAV IgM., Results: Sixteen patients were identified as acute hepatitis E with the presence of ≥ 2 HEV acute phase markers (antigen, RNA, and anti-HEV IgM). HEV infection was the major cause of potential active viral hepatitis (59.2%, 16 of 27), followed by HBV (25.9%, 7 of 27, anti-HBc IgM positive), HAV (18.5%, 5 of 27, anti-HAV IgM positive), and HCV (3.7%, 1 of 27, anti-HCV antibodies). All 16 confirmed HE cases were positive for HEV antigen, while 5 cases were HEV RNA positive, as well as 15 anti-HEV IgM positive. The low positive rate of RNA might be related to the collection and/or the transportation of these samples., Conclusions: This study showed that HEV is a major cause of acute hepatitis in developing countries and regions. Application of immunoassay diagnostic kits, especially the HEV antigen tests, showed great potential for HE detection in these countries and regions.

All hepatitis E virus (HEV) variants reported to infect humans belong to the species Orthohepevirus A (HEV-A). The zoonotic potential of the species Orthohepevirus C (HEV-C), which circulates in rats and is highly divergent from HEV-A, is unknown. We report a liver transplant recipient with hepatitis caused by HEV-C infection. We detected HEV-C RNA in multiple clinical samples and HEV-C antigen in the liver. The complete genome of the HEV-C isolate had 93.7% nt similarity to an HEV-C strain from Vietnam. The patient had preexisting HEV antibodies, which were not protective against HEV-C infection. Ribavirin was an effective treatment, resulting in resolution of hepatitis and clearance of HEV-C viremia. Testing for this zoonotic virus should be performed for immunocompromised and immunocompetent patients with unexplained hepatitis because routine hepatitis E diagnostic tests may miss HEV-C infection. HEV-C is also a potential threat to the blood product supply.

Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is emerging as a potential threat to the safety of blood transfusions. In many countries and regions endemic for HEV, such as China, blood donors are not routinely tested for HEV infection. In this study, 11747 eligible blood donors were screened for anti-HEV immunoglobulin M (IgM)/immunoglobulin G (IgG) and HEV RNA and antigen in China. Twenty-four donors who were positive for both HEV antigen and RNA were followed for ≥ 70 days, and none of these donors reported clinical hepatitis or illness. At least 1 follow-up sample was provided by 17 donors, including 10 with viremia and/or antigenemia for ≥ 70 days and 3 with antigen and RNA positivity for >90 days. Fourteen of the 17 donors did not present with an obvious serologic response during the follow-up period. These results differed from previous reports, in which viremia lasted for 68 days and elicited an antibody response. These donors showed atypical HEV infection progression that differed from that of hepatitis E patients. The presence of these donors presents a challenge for transfusion transmission screening.

Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is one of the major pathogens that cause acute viral hepatitis. The human (genotypes 1 and 2) and zoonotic (genotypes 3 and 4) groups of HEV present different epidemiology and clinical features. In this study, we developed a classification method for rapidly classifying HEV into human or zoonotic groups that combines a general antigen test with a zoonotic group-specific antigen test. Evaluation of serial samples from HEV-infected rhesus monkeys indicated that HEV antigen-positive samples can be classified using the antigen-based classification method. The antigen-based classification method was evaluated further on 55 genotyped samples from acute hepatitis E patients, including 9 human and 46 zoonotic groups. The novel method was completely consistent with the sequencing results: 9/9 for the human groups (100%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 66.4-100%) and 46/46 for the zoonotic groups (100%, 95% CI 92.3-100%). This method was also successfully used for the clustering of some samples that could not be clustered by sequencing. Compared with the sequencing-based method, this method is less time-consuming, less expensive, and less technically complex and is therefore ideal for large numbers of samples. In conclusion, this study provides a convenient and sensitive method for classifying different groups of HEV, and it has potentially important public health applications, especially in underdeveloped areas that cannot afford the high cost of nucleic acid testing.

The hepatitis E virus (HEV) is one of the main causes of enterically transmitted hepatitis worldwide. Although the mortality rates associated with HEV are generally low, they can be up to 28% in HEV-infected pregnant women, and the elderly are more susceptible. The reasons for this selective severity are unclear, partially because there is no suitable, easy-to-use model in which to study HEV infection. Non-human primates and standard swine have been identified as being sensitive to infection with HEV and have been used for HEV infection studies. However, studies in these animals have been limited by high housing costs and the difficulty of manipulating these animals. In the current study, we established a model of HEV infection using Bama miniature swine. The model is easy to use and is sensitive to infections with HEV genotypes 3 and 4, which are classified as zoonotic HEVs. In this model, infection of Bama miniature swine with HEV genotypes 3 and 4 caused the typical features. All Bama miniature swine that were infected with HEV genotypes 3 and 4 exhibited significant HEV viremia, shedding, anti-HEV antibody responses and partial liver inflammation. Bama miniature swine may serve as an alternative to standard swine models for the study of zoonotic HEV infection and HEV genotype specificity research.

Background: The first commercialized hepatitis E vaccine, HEV 239, has been shown to be safe and highly immunogenic, the protection as well as the vaccine-induced anti-HEV maintained for at least 4.5 years. However, the longer term persistence of the vaccine-induced anti-HEV responses is unknown., Methods: Two statistical models, the power-law model and the modified power-law model, were applied to predict the long-term antibody response of the HEV 239 vaccine. The models were fit using the anti-HEV IgG data from a modeling subpopulation of 1278 baseline seronegative vaccinees who seroconverted within one month after finishing the whole vaccination course in the phase 3 trial of HEV 239. In addition, antibody data from a validation subpopulation were used to validate the robustness of the derived models., Results: In the vaccinees without pre-vaccination immunity, the power-law model and the modified power-law model estimated that the median duration of the detectable antibody (≥0.077 WU/ml) was 8 years and 13 years, respectively. The power-law model and the modified power-law model estimated that 50% of these vaccinees will maintain detectable levels of anti-HEV IgG for 8 years and >30 years, respectively., Conclusions: The recombinant hepatitis E vaccine HEV 239 is predicted to provide from 8 years to nearly life-long persistence of anti-HEV IgG above detectable levels. Model predictions are based on conservative mathematical assumptions. (NCT01014845)., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is a serious public health problem. The commonly used tests that are specific for current HEV infection diagnosis include the detection of anti-HEV IgM and HEV RNA. Here, we report an improved enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method for HEV antigen detection with a linear range equivalent to 6.3 × 10(3) to 9.2 × 10(5) RNA copies per ml. The monoclonal antibody (MAb) 12F12, a high-ability MAb that binds HEV virus, was selected as the capture antibody from a panel of 95 MAbs. The positive period of HEV antigenemia in infected monkeys using this test was, on average, 3 weeks longer than previously reported and covered the majority of the acute phase. The positive detection rates of IgM, RNA, and new antigen from the first serum samples collected from 16 confirmed acute hepatitis E patients were 81% (13/16), 81% (13/16), and 100% (16/16), respectively. In three patients, the initial serum specimens that tested negative for IgM, despite the presence of symptoms of acute hepatitis and elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels, were positive for HEV antigen and HEV RNA. In contrast, the serum samples of the three RNA-negative patients were antigen positive (and IgM positive), possibly due to the degradation of HEV nucleic acids. Our results suggest that this new antigen detection method has acceptable concordance with RNA detection and could serve as an important tool for diagnosing acute hepatitis E., (Copyright © 2015, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.)

Hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection is one of the main causes of acute hepatitis worldwide. A recombinant hepatitis E vaccine, HEV 239, has been licensed in China for immunizing adults of 16 y old and above. The vaccine antigen contains pORF2 aa 368 - 606 of the HEV genotype 1 expressed in E. coli. The quality of the vaccine is controlled through a combination of biophysical, biochemical and immunochemical methods. The vaccine is well tolerated in adults. The efficacy of the HEV 239 vaccine against symptomatic and asymptomatic infection had been proven to be high during a Phase III clinical trial and long-term follow up. The safety and efficacy of HEV 239 vaccine in certain high-risk populations remains to be further investigated.

Background: Hepatitis E is caused by two viral genotype groups: human types and zoonotic types. Current understanding of the epidemiology of the zoonotic hepatitis E disease is founded largely on hospital-based studies., Methods: The epidemiology of hepatitis E was investigated in a community-based surveillance study conducted over one year in a rural city in eastern China with a registered population of 400,162., Results: The seroprevalence of hepatitis E in the cohort was 38%. The incidence of hepatitis E was 2.8/10,000 person-years. Totally 93.5% of the infections were attributed to genotype 4 and the rest, to genotype 1. Hepatitis E accounted for 28.4% (102/359) of the acute hepatitis cases and 68.9% (102/148) of the acute viral hepatitis cases in this area of China. The disease occurred sporadically with a higher prevalence during the cold season and in men, with the male-to-female ratio of 3∶1. Additionally, the incidence of hepatitis E increased with age. Hepatitis B virus carriers have an increased risk of contracting hepatitis E than the general population (OR = 2.5, 95%CI 1.5-4.2). Pre-existing immunity to hepatitis E lowered the risk (relative risk  = 0.34, 95% CI 0.21-0.55) and reduced the severity of the disease., Conclusions: Hepatitis E in the rural population of China is essentially that of a zoonosis due to the genotype 4 virus, the epidemiology of which is similar to that due to the other zoonotic genotype 3 virus.

A recombinant hepatitis E vaccine, Hecolin, has been proven safe and effective in healthy adults. As hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positive individuals have a higher risk of poor prognosis after super-infection with hepatitis E virus (HEV), the safety and immunogenicity of Hecolin in this population should be assessed. The present study is an extending analysis of data from a large randomized controlled clinical trial of Hecolin. Healthy participants (n = 14,065) without current or previous evidence of chronic liver disease were randomized to receive Hecolin or placebo (hepatitis B vaccine) and donated their blood samples before vaccination and subsequently over 31 mo. Most of the adverse events were mild and comparable between participants with and without baseline hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg). No vaccine-related serious adverse events were reported. Rates of serious adverse events in HBsAg (+) or HBsAg (-) participants were also comparable between both groups. Almost all participants in the Hecolin group seroconverted to anti-HEV one month after full vaccination. The antibody response rates and levels were similar in HBsAg (+) and HBsAg (-) participants (98.38%, 19.32 Wu/mL vs. 98.69%, 19.00 Wu/mL). The two-year antibody dynamics of HBsAg (+) participants overlapped perfectly with those of HBsAg (-) participants. In conclusion, the safety and immunogenicity of Hecolin for HBsAg (+) adults is very similar to that for the general population.

Background: Hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection has become relevant to blood transfusion practice because isolated cases of blood transmission have been reported and because HEV has been found to cause chronic infection and severe liver disease in immunocompromised patients., Study Design and Methods: We tested for immunoglobulin (Ig)G and IgM antibodies to the HEV and for HEV RNA in 1939 unselected volunteer US blood donors. Subsequently, we tested the same variables in pre- and serial posttransfusion samples from 362 prospectively followed blood recipients to assess transfusion risk., Results: IgG anti-HEV seroprevalence in the total 1939 donations was 18.8%: 916 of these donations were made in 2006 at which time the seroprevalence was 21.8% and the remaining 1023 donations were in 2012 when the seroprevalence had decreased to 16.0% (p < 0.01). A significant (p < 0.001) stepwise increase in anti-HEV seroprevalence was seen with increasing age. Eight of 1939 donations (0.4%) tested anti-HEV IgM positive; no donation was HEV RNA positive. Two recipients had an apparent anti-HEV seroconversion, but temporal relationships and linked donor testing showed that these were not transfusion-transmitted HEV infections., Conclusion: No transfusion-transmitted HEV infections were observed in 362 prospectively followed blood recipients despite an anti-HEV seroprevalence among donations exceeding 16%., (Published 2013. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.)

Objectives: Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is an emerging pathogen. We evaluated the seroprevalence of HEV infection among swine farmers and the general population in Taiwan, a nonendemic country., Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional seroepidemiologic study in rural Taiwan in 2012 and 2013. The study included swine farmers, health examination attendees, pregnant women, and students. A commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to detect immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgM against HEV. Pertinent information was collected using a questionnaire., Results: In total, 660 participants were enrolled in the study, including 156 swine farmers, 314 health examination attendees, 100 pregnant women, and 90 students. IgG anti-HEV was detected in 29.5% of swine farmers, 11.5% of health examination attendees, 2% of pregnant women, and 1.1% of students. Two subjects were positive for IgM anti-HEV. Logistic regression analysis revealed that swine farmers had an approximately 3.5-fold increased risk (odds ratio [OR], 3.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.91-6.27; p<0.0001) for being seropositive for IgG anti-HEV as compared to the general population. Age was positively associated with seropositive rate (OR, 1.07 per year; 95% CI, 1.05-1.09; p<0.0001)., Conclusion: HEV infection is prevalent in Taiwan. The seroprevalence of HEV infection is high in swine farmers and in the elderly population.

There is emerging evidence for an under-recognized hepatitis E virus (HEV) as a human pathogen. Among different reasons for this neglect are the unsatisfactory performance and under-utilization of commercial HEV diagnostic kits; for instance, the number of anti-HEV IgM kits marketed in China is about one-fifth of that of hepatitis A kits. Over the last two decades, substantial progress has been achieved in furthering our knowledge on the HEV-specific immune responses, antigenic features of HEV virions, and development of serological assays and more recently prophylactic vaccines. This review will focus on presenting the evidence of the importance of HEV infection for certain cohorts such as pregnant women, the key antigenic determinants of the virus, and immunogenicity and clinical efficacy conferred by a newly developed prophylactic vaccine. Robust immunogenicity, greater than 195-fold and approximately 50-fold increase of anti-HEV IgG level in seronegative and seropositive vaccinees, respectively, as well as impressive clinical efficacy of this vaccine was demonstrated. The protection rate against the hepatitis E disease and the virus infection was shown to be 100% (95% CI 75-100) and 78% (95% CI 66-86), respectively.

Along with the improvement of diagnostic techniques, hepatitis E has attracted increasing awareness in recent years. Hepatitis E virus infection leads to high mortality in pregnant women and patients with underlying liver disease. Several hepatitis E vaccine candidates have been designed and have proved their efficacy in animal models; two candidates have successfully undergone clinical trials. Having proved safe and effective in a large phase III trials, an Escherichia coli expressed particulate protein, HEV 239, has been registered in China and is now available for use in China., (Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.)

There have been increased attentions on HEV and its associated diseases in recent years as a result of an increased number of reports on autochthonous patients from many developed countries. Vaccine development and better disease management are expected from protective immunity with increased knowledge on the pathogenesis and virology of HEV. This review summarizes the current understanding of the HEV virology, the key neutralization sites (epitopes) on the surface of the viral capsid, the host humoral immune responses for HEV infection, and the protective immunity conferred by natural infection and vaccination. Recombinant VLPs were prepared to mimic the protective and neutralizing epitopes on the virion surface, thus being capable of eliciting protective immunity when injected to nonhuman primates or human volunteers during preclinical tests and clinical trials. Four markers-viral RNA, anti-HEV IgM, anti-HEV IgG, and low avidity of anti-HEV IgG-are important in the diagnosis of HEV infection, particularly for patients presenting with acute hepatitis symptoms. This toolbox of genomic and immunological assays is valuable in furthering our understanding of the time course of HEV infection and the subsequent hepatitis during preclinical and clinical development of an efficacious vaccine. Two vaccine candidates had shown good tolerability, high immunogenicity, and high efficacy against symptomatic and/or asymptomatic HEV infection. One of them has been licensed in China recently. However, many issues need to be resolved before new technological progresses can benefit the people who need them most., (Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

Hepatitis E virus (HEV) was discovered during the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan in the 1980s, after an outbreak of unexplained hepatitis at a military camp. A pooled faecal extract from affected soldiers was ingested by a member of the research team. He became sick, and the new virus (named HEV), was detected in his stool by electron microscopy. Subsequently, endemic HEV has been identified in many resource-poor countries. Globally, HEV is the most common cause of acute viral hepatitis. The virus was not initially thought to occur in developed countries, but recent reports have shown this notion to be mistaken. The aim of this Seminar is to describe recent discoveries regarding HEV, and how they have changed our understanding of its effect on human health worldwide., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Seroprevalence data suggest that a third of the world's population has been infected with the hepatitis E virus. Our aim was to assess efficacy and safety of a recombinant hepatitis E vaccine, HEV 239 (Hecolin; Xiamen Innovax Biotech, Xiamen, China) in a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial., Methods: Healthy adults aged 16-65 years in, Jiangsu Province, China were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive three doses of HEV 239 (30 microg of purified recombinant hepatitis E antigen adsorbed to 0.8 mg aluminium hydroxide suspended in 0.5 mL buffered saline) or placebo (hepatitis B vaccine) given intramuscularly at 0, 1, and 6 months. Randomisation was done by computer-generated permuted blocks and stratified by age and sex. Participants were followed up for 19 months. The primary endpoint was prevention of hepatitis E during 12 months from the 31st day after the third dose. Analysis was based on participants who received all three doses per protocol. Study participants, care givers, and investigators were all masked to group and vaccine assignments. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01014845., Findings: 11,165 of the trial participants were tested for hepatitis E virus IgG, of which 5285 (47%) were seropositive for hepatitis E virus. Participants were randomly assigned to vaccine (n=56,302) or placebo (n=56,302). 48,693 (86%) participants in the vaccine group and 48,663 participants (86%) in the placebo group received three vaccine doses and were included in the primary efficacy analysis. During the 12 months after 30 days from receipt of the third dose 15 per-protocol participants in the placebo group developed hepatitis E compared with none in the vaccine group. Vaccine efficacy after three doses was 100.0% (95% CI 72.1-100.0). Adverse effects attributable to the vaccine were few and mild. No vaccination-related serious adverse event was noted., Interpretation: HEV 239 is well tolerated and effective in the prevention of hepatitis E in the general population in China, including both men and women age 16-65 years., Funding: Chinese National High-tech R&D Programme (863 programme), Chinese National Key Technologies R&D Programme, Chinese National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars, Fujian Provincial Department of Sciences and Technology, Xiamen Science and Technology Bureau, and Fujian Provincial Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars., (Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

A point prevalence study of hepatitis E virus (HEV) in Chinese blood donors was conducted, and the prevalences of antibodies against HEV immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgM among Chinese blood donors were 32.60% and 0.94%, respectively. HEV viremia was 0.07%.

The candidate recombinant hepatitis E vaccine, HEV 239, protect monkeys against infection by hepatitis E virus (HEV). The safety and immunogenicity of the vaccine for humans was assessed in a randomized controlled phase II clinical trial. The study was conducted in an endemic area of southern China and consisted of a dose scheduling, involving 457 adults and a dose escalation component involving 155 high school students. The results showed that the vaccine is safe and immunogenic for humans and suggest that it could prevent new HEV infection.

Aims: To evaluate the specific T cell response together with IgM anti-hepatitis-E-virus (HEV) antibodies in acute hepatitis E (HE) patients., Methods: Blood samples were collected from 11 HE patients every week and assayed for routine blood investigation after onset of disease until their convalescence. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were separated from some of the blood samples (1-3 samples per patient) and tested for specific T cell response by enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot assay and IgM anti-hepatitis E virus by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay., Results: A particulate HEV capsid protein, HEV 239, effectively stimulated the response of T cells from HE patients infected by type 1 or type 4 HEV. In acute HE, a burst of HEV-specific cellular immune response occurred, which decreased along with the decreasing IgM anti-HEV antibody titre and normalization of liver function., Conclusions: HEV open reading frame 2 amino acids 368-606 can effectively stimulate the HEV-specific T cell response in vitro; the specific T cell response decreases along with convalescence and may play a role in the pathogenesis of acute HE and recovery., (2008 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Objective: To evaluate two commercial anti-hepatitis E virus (HEV) IgM kits used for differential diagnosis of acute enteric viral hepatitis., Methods: The kit for IgM capture assay, was produced with a recombinant HEV structural protein protecting primates against experimental infection by different HEV genotypes, while the other kit for indirect ELISA was produced with recombinant structural proteins from different HEV genotypes. The serum specimens were taken from 241 cases with a confirmed or presumptive diagnosis of hepatitis A and 74 cases with a confirmed or presumptive diagnosis of hepatitis E., Results: The sensitivity and specificity of the IgM capture assay kit were 97% and 100%, respectively, and the corresponding values for the other kit were 70% and 78%, respectively., Conclusion: The IgM capture assay kit has higher sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing acute enteric viral hepatitis E.

Genotype 4 hepatitis E virus (HEV) is the dominant cause of hepatitis E in the People's Republic of China; swine are the principal reservoir. Our study was conducted in 8 rural communities of southern China, where families keep pigs near their homes. Phylogenetic analysis showed that 23 of 24 concurrent virus isolates from this region are genotype 4 strains. Among the study populations, immunoglobulin G anti-HEV seroprevalence accumulated with age at approximately equal to 1% per year for persons < or =60 years of age. After age 30 years, seroprevalence increased at higher rates for male than for female study participants. The overall seroprevalence was 43% (range 25%-66%) among the communities. Infection rates were higher for participants between 25 and 29 years of age. The results suggest that HEV infection probably has been endemic in southern China for at least 60 years, with swine being the principal reservoir of human HEV infection in recent years.

Aim: To study the significance of serum anti-hepatitis E virus (HEV) IgA in patients with hepatitis E., Methods: A new method was established to assay anti-HEV IgA, which could be detected in the middle phase of the infection. We compared anti-HEV IgA assay with anti-HEV IgM and anti-HEV IgG assay in sera from 60 patients with positive HEV-RNA., Results: The 60 patients with positive HEV-RNA had both anti-HEV IgA and anti-HEV IgM and 410 patients with negative HEV-RNA were used as control. Periodic serum samples obtained from 60 patients with hepatitis E were tested for HEV RNA, anti-HEV IgM, anti-HEV IgA and anti-HEV IgG. Their HEV-RNA was detectable in the serum until 20 +/- 11 d. We used anti-HEV IgM and anti-HEV IgA assay to detect HEV infection and positive results were found in 90 +/- 15 d and 120 +/- 23 d respectively, the positive rate of anti-HEV IgA was higher than that of anti-HEV IgM and HEV-RNA (P < 0.05)., Conclusion: The duration of anti-HEV IgA in serum is longer than that of anti-HEV IgM, and anti-HEV IgA assay is a good method to detect HEV infection.

It was evaluated its antigenicity, immunogenicity and efficacy of a candidate recombinant hepatitis E virus (HEV) vaccine, referred hitherto as HEV 239 vaccine. The vaccine peptide has a 26 amino acids extension from the N terminal of another peptide, E2, of the HEV capsid protein, which has been shown to protect monkeys against HEV infection previously. The vaccine peptide is similar as E2 in that: first, the vaccine peptide migrates predominantly as dimer in SDS-PAGE and it is dissociated into monomers by heating; second, its dimeric form of which predominantly recognized by HEV reactive human serum; and third, it shows the same pattern of reaction as E2 with a panel of eight monoclonal antibodies that had been raised against E2. In contrast to E2, the vaccine peptide aggregates to form particles of 13 nm mean radius, and consequently, it is more than 240 times more immunogenic than E2. Using alum as adjuvant, immunizing dose determined in mice was 80-250 ng for the vaccine and >60 microg for E2. Rhesus monkeys twice vaccinated with a 10 microg or a 20 microg formulation of this vaccine showed essentially the same antibody response, whereas the response to a 5 microg formulation was delayed but reached similar antibody levels. All the three vaccine formulations afford complete protection against infection with 10(4) genome equivalent dose of the homologous genotype 1 virus. At higher virus dose of 10(7), the same vaccine formulation partially protected against the infection and completely protected against hepatitis. The efficacy of the vaccine was essentially the same for the homologous genotype 1 virus and heterologous genotype 4 virus.

Background: Understanding the genotype and clinical features of the hepatitis E virus (HEV) are important for understanding its characteristics, for evaluating region-specific diagnostic assays, and producing vaccines., Objectives: To investigate the epidemiology and the genotypes of HEV among outpatients and inpatients in the Department of Infectious Diseases of Tongji Hospital in Wuhan, China., Methods: Clinical data were elicited from the hospital records of patients who were clinically diagnosed with acute hepatitis between January 2000 and August 2004 (4920 patients). Of these cases, 120 patients with anti-HEV-IgM, IgG-positive were selected to analysis. Conserved genomic sequences of open reading frame 2 (345 bp) in the HEV gene were detected using polymerase chain reaction, 25 of which were cloned and sequenced. Clustal X and Mega software were used for phylogenetic analysis of genotypes strains., Results: The HEV infection rate is gradually increasing in Wuhan. The number of male patients was 3.3-fold greater than the number of female patients found in clinical investigations. People aged 30-59 years are more susceptible to infection, and people are more susceptible in March-June. Twenty-five isolates shared the same genotype, genotype IV, with 82.61-98.55% nucleotide identity. This genotype had 76.52-81.74%, 70.43-73.04%, 76.52-81.16%, and 84.35-88.70% homology with the nucleotide sequence of HEV genotypes I-IV, respectively. Phylogenetic analysis suggested that these 25 isolates represented at least three different subtypes, but there were no significant differences found in the epidemiological features or liver function of patients with the three subtypes., Conclusions: HEV sequences isolated from patients in Wuhan belong to different subtypes of HEV genotype IV.

Objective: To evaluate the reliability of different hepatitis E diagnosis reagent tests on the acute hepatitis E., Methods: Three acute hepatitis E diagnosis tests, E2-IgM (Wantai, China), GL-IgM and GL-IgG (Genelabs, Singapore) were compared for their reliability in a sera panel composed by 273 healthy individuals and 525 hepatitis., Results: The specificity of E2-IgM on the diagnosis of acute hepatitis E was 100.0%, it was significantly higher than GL-IgM (96.7%) and GL-IgG (85.4%). The sensitivity of E2-IgM and GL-IgG were 97.9% and 93.8% respectively, both significantly higher than GL-IgM (72.9%). Among 65 acute hepatitis cases being positive on GL-IgM test but negative on E2-IgM, 58 (89.2%) cases were found to be positive with anti-hepatitis A virus IgM, it indicated that the GL-IgM test might be interfered by other IgM antibodies on serum., Conclusion: E2-IgM is a good test for the diagnosis of acute hepatitis E.

Objective: To evaluate the serological markers and biological marker in the diagnosis of hepatitis E infection in a rhesus monkey model., Methods: 86 rhesus monkeys had been infected with different doses of HEV. Hence, they were taken sequential blood samples at intervals up to 86 weeks for 4 hepatitis E virus (HEV) specific antibody assays (E2-IgM, E2-IgG, GL-IgG, and YES-IgG), and nucleic acid assay., Results: All the animals produced E2-IgG and all but one also produced E2-IgM and excreted the virus in stool, whereas positive rate of GL-IgG and YES IgG were low and correlated with virus level. Hepatitis occurred over a period of 4 weeks (between 3 an 7 weeks) after infection. Virological marker occurred mainly during incubation period and declined rapidly after onset of hepatitis. Seroconversion of E2-IgM occurred before onset of hepatitis in 70% monkeys and declined rapidly up to 50% of peak value after 4 weeks. E2-IgM seroconversion was closely paralleled by E2-IgG; however, E2-IgG persisted in all animals for the entire duration of experiment of up to 86 weeks. Production of GL-IgG and YES-IgG was delayed by one week after the E2 antibodies, these antibodies showed a transient occurrence and seroprevalence declined to 50% of the peak value over a period of 12 weeks., Conclusion: E2-IgM might be used as a suitable acute hepatitis E marker, and E2-IgG as a suitable epidemiological marker. The seroconversion or titer elevation of GL-IgG and YES-IgG antibodies probably used to confirm the infection. The viral markers are optional for early diagnosis.

Objective: To understand the infectivity and pathogenicity of the plasma of hepatitis E virus (HEV) viremia to primate animals., Methods: RNA fragment of HEV genotype IV was detected on one healthy donor who was positive for anti-HEV IgM and negative for anti-HEV IgG. Then 10 ml plasma from above donor was transfused to rhesus monkey to observe its infectivity and pathogenicity., Results: Acute hepatitis E was developed in rhesus monkey who accept HEV RNA positive plasma. It was confirmed by virological, immunological, biochemical and histopathological data., Conclusion: Acute hepatitis E can be induced by plasma transfusion of HEV viremia, which indicate the possibility of transfusion transmitted hepatitis E

Objective: To look into the serological characteristics of a hepatitis E outbreak., Methods: Sera from the first five patients with acute icteric hepatitis who developed the disease successively within ten days and the 1,675 employees routinely having their lunch in a dining hall of a department (outbreak population) were examined for anti.HEV IgM and IgG at 26th days after the outbreak, and the 883 employees of a neighboring department not having their lunch in the hall were selected as control (control population)., Results: The five patients were all positive for anti-HEV IgM and IgG. The positive rates of anti-HEV IgM and IgG in outbreak population were 8.7% and 38.4% respectively, both significantly higher than those in control population which were only 0.1% and 28.6%. The numbers with abnormal ALT in the 145 individuals with anti-HEV IgM(+) of outbreak population were significantly higher than those in the IgM(-) individuals of the same group as well as in control, while the abnormal ALT ratio in the IgM(-) individuals of the outbreak was not higher than that in control. The results from the four patients' serial sera showed that the anti-HEV IgM titers declined gradually and were undetectable at about 4th month after infection, and the IgG titers increased to peak in about 2-3 months after infection, then declined very slowly. The mean IgG titer of the anti-HEV IgM(+) individuals was significantly higher than that of the IgM(-) but IgG(+) individuals in outbreak population, and the latter was significantly higher than the IgG(+) individuals in control, which suggested that the post-infection individuals' immunities to HEV were boosted during the outbreak. There was no difference between sex or age groups for the anti-HEV IgM(+) ratio, but the abnormal ALT was much more frequent in the anti-HEV IgM(+) male than in the female, and no difference was observed between age groups., Conclusion: The pathogen of the outbreak of acute icteric hepatitis was hepatitis E virus and associated with food intake. Anti-HEV IgM and IgG were used not only for diagnosis of hepatitis E but also for surveilance in mass population. The attack risk was not associated with age or sex, but the abnormal ALT was much more frequent fresh infectors in male.

We have evaluated four hepatitis E virus (HEV) specific antibody assays, using sequential samples taken from 86 rhesus monkeys at intervals for up to 86 weeks after they had been infected with different doses of HEV. The animals are a common experimental model of hepatitis E. The large collection of sequential samples used avoids uncertainties encountered in previous studies regarding the precise infection status of study subjects and minimizes bias due to the individuality of response to infection. One assay (YES IgG) was produced with synthetic peptides; the others (E2 IgM, E2 IgG, and GL IgG) were produced with recombinant antigens. The results were compared with the viral RNA contents of the serum and stool samples and the occurrence of these virological and immunological markers in the course of the infection was temporally related to the development of hepatitis. Diagnostic utility of the markers was assessed according to their response rates and prevalence at different times in the course of infection. All the animals produced E2 IgG and developed viremia and all but one also produced E2 IgM and excreted the virus in stool, whereas response rates for the other antibodies were lower and decreased with virus dose. Hepatitis occurred over a period of 4 weeks between 3 and 7 weeks after infection. Virological activity occurred mainly during the incubation period and the prevalence of viral markers declined rapidly after the onset of hepatitis. Production of the E2 antibodies immediately preceded the onset of hepatitis, and this was followed about one week later by production of the other antibodies. Seroprevalence E2 IgM reached a peak value 3 weeks after the onset of hepatitis, whereas seroprevalence of GL IgG and YES IgG peaked after the disease had subsided. E2 IgG persisted in all animals for the entire duration of the experiment of up to 86 weeks and possibly beyond and, thus, can serve as a useful epidemiological marker of HEV infection., (Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)

Aim: To transfer hepatitis E virus (HEV) ORF2 partial gene to tomato plants, to investigate its expression in transformants and the immunoactivity of expression products, and to explore the feasibility of developing a new type of plant-derived HEV oral vaccine., Methods: Plant binary expression vector p1301E2, carrying a fragment of HEV open reading frame-2 (named HEV-E2), was constructed by linking the fragment to a constitutive CaMV35s promoter and nos terminator, then directly introduced into Agrobacterium tumefaciens EHA105. With leaf-disc method, tomato plants medicated by EHA105 were transformed and hygromycin-resistant plantlets were obtained in selective medium containing hygromycin. The presence and integration of foreign DNA in transgenic tomato genome were confirmed by Gus gene expression, PCR amplification and Southern dot blotting. The immunoactivity of recombinant protein extracted from transformed plants was examined by enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay (ELISA) using a monoclonal antibody specifically against HEV. ELISA was also used to estimate the recombinant protein content in leaves and fruits of the transformants., Results: Seven positive lines of HEV-E2-transgenic tomato plants confirmed by PCR and Southern blotting were obtained and the immunoactivity of recombinant protein could be detected in extracts of transformants. The expression levels of recombinant protein were 61.22 ng/g fresh weight in fruits and 6.37-47.9 ng/g fresh weight in leaves of the transformants., Conclusion: HEV-E2 gene was correctly expressed in transgenic tomatoes and the recombinant antigen derived from them has normal immunoactivity. Transgenic tomatoes may hold a good promise for producing a new type of low-cost oral vaccine for hepatitis E virus.

Evidence that hepatitis E is zoonotic is accumulating. Serum samples were collected from pigs, cattle, and goats from various regions of China to determine whether they had been infected with hepatitis E virus (HEV). An in-house enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) with primers from open reading frame (ORF) 2 were used to detect anti-HEV antibodies and HEV RNA. The mean positivity rates of anti-HEV antibody for pigs and cattle were 78.8% and 6.3% but none of the goat sera were positive. Pigs may be more susceptible to infection with HEV than cattle or goats. Five of 263 pig sera were positive for HEV RNA and four of these five were also positive for anti-HEV. The PCR products (nt 6007-6354) were cloned and sequenced and compared to other HEV sequences in the nucleotide databases. The five sequences shared 83-93% identity to each other at the nucleotide level and 74-79%, 73-74%, 73-78%, and 83-99% identity to HEV genotypes 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. They were closely related to human isolates of HEV genotype 4. Phylogenetic analyses also place these swine sequences in HEV genotype 4, resembling most closely viruses isolated from Chinese patients with acute hepatitis. These data support the hypothesis that sporadic hepatitis E in China is zoonotic., (Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)

Efficacy evaluation through human trials is crucial for advancing a vaccine candidate to clinics. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) can be used to quantify B cell repertoire response and trace antibody lineages during vaccination. Here, we demonstrate this application with a case study of Hecolin®, the licensed vaccine for hepatitis E virus (HEV). Four subjects are administered the vaccine following a standard three-dose schedule. Vaccine-induced antibodies exhibit a high degree of clonal diversity, recognize five conformational antigenic sites of the genotype 1 HEV p239 antigen, and cross-react with other genotypes. Unbiased repertoire sequencing is performed for seven time points over six months of vaccination, with maturation pathways characterize for a set of vaccine-induced antibodies. In addition to dynamic repertoire profiles, NGS analysis reveals differential patterns of HEV-specific antibody lineages and highlights the necessity of the long vaccine boost. Together, our study presents a quantitative strategy for vaccine evaluation in small-scale human studies. The authors provide a comprehensive characterization of the human antibody response to a licensed hepatitis E virus (HEV) vaccine, Hecolin, in four individuals over the course of six months post vaccination. They demonstrate diverse patterns of antibody response underlying the vaccine protection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is a serious public health problem that causes acute hepatitis in humans and is primarily transmitted through fecal and oral routes. The major anti-HEV antibody responses are against conformational epitopes located in a.a. 459–606 of HEV pORF2. All reported neutralization epitopes are present on the dimer domain constructed by this peptide. While looking for a neutralizing monoclonal antibody (MAb)-recognized linear epitope, we found a novel neutralizing linear epitope (L2) located in a.a. 423–437 of pORF2. Moreover, epitope L2 is proved non-immunodominant in the HEV-infection process. Using the hepatitis B virus core protein (HBc) as a carrier to display this novel linear epitope, we show herein that this epitope could induce a neutralizing antibody response against HEV in mice and could protect rhesus monkeys from HEV infection. Collectively, our results showed a novel non-immunodominant linear neutralizing epitope of hepatitis E virus, which provided additional insight of HEV vaccine. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]