Search

Progressive liver fibrosis after anti-HCV treatment is a risk factor for HCC. Angiopoietin-2 (Ang2) is associated with non-regression of liver fibrosis after direct-acting antiviral (DAA). This study evaluated the predictive value of serum Ang2 levels for HCC occurrence or recurrence after DAA administration. In this retrospective study, 310 HCV-infected patients treated with DAAs in 2014-2020 were screened and evaluated for HCC occurrence or recurrence every three-six months. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that age ≥ 75 years (HR: 2.92, 95% CI: 1.34-6.33; p = 0.007) and baseline Ang2 level ≥ 464 pg/mL (HR: 2.75, 95% CI: 1.18-6.37; p = 0.019) were significantly associated with HCC occurrence after DAA therapy. A high or low risk of HCC after DAA therapy could be distinguished by the combination of age and baseline Ang2 level. The cumulative incidences of de-novo HCC at two and four years were 0.8% and 3.8% in the low-risk group and 22.6% and 27.1% in the high-risk group, respectively. Baseline Ang2 level ≥ 402 pg/mL was significantly associated with HCC recurrence in patients who achieved sustained virological response with DAAs (HR: 3.68). In conclusion, serum Ang2 levels can predict HCC occurrence and recurrence after successful HCV eradication by DAAs.

Background: The prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in hemodialysis patients is high and results in a poor prognosis. Thus, safer and more effective treatment regimens are required. In this prospective multicenter study, we investigated the efficacy and safety of the novel HCV-NS5A-inhibitor, elbasvir, and protease inhibitor, grazoprevir in Japanese hemodialysis patients with genotype 1b HCV infection., Methods: This study is registered at the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry as UMIN00002578. A total of 23 Japanese dialysis patients with genotype 1b HCV infection who were treated with elbasvir and grazoprevir between January 2017 and March 2018 and followed for more than 12 weeks after treatment completion were included. We evaluated the sustained virologic response at 12 weeks after treatment completion (SVR12) and safety during treatment., Results: Of the 23 patients, 7 had advanced liver fibrosis and 2 had a signature resistance-associated variant of NS5A (NS5A RAVs)-L31M/V or Y93H at baseline. All patients completed therapy, and 96.7% (22/23) of the patients achieved SVR12. All patients with advanced liver fibrosis and signature NS5A RAVs at baseline achieved SVR12 with a high safety profile. No patient experienced lethal or severe adverse events during therapy, and the most common adverse event was anemia. One patient, who was a non-responder to this therapy, had a history of failure with daclatasvir and asunaprevir therapies and had NS5A RAVs of A92K at baseline, but not signature NS5A RAVs., Conclusions: Grazoprevir and elbasvir combination is highly effective and safe for hemodialysis patients with genotype 1b HCV infection.

The purpose of this study is to study the usefulness of post-remission antiviral therapy in cases of HCV-RNA-positive diffuse large-cell lymphoma. Antiviral therapy against HCV was performed after remission using CHOP or CHOP-like chemotherapy in combination with rituximab in five successive cases of HCV-RNA-positive diffuse large-cell lymphoma. The control groups consisted of a group of HCV-RNA-positive diffuse large-cell lymphoma cases prior to this trial (control 1), and a group of cases that tested negative for HIV, HCV, and HBV (control 2). All the cases were in remission at the time of initial treatment. There were no significant differences between the three groups in terms of age, sex, treatment, stage, or International Prognosis Index (IPI). When HCV antiviral therapy was performed after treatment for diffuse large-cell lymphoma, we observed no recurrence or deaths, and the 2-year overall survival and progression-free survival rates were significantly greater than those in the control 1 group (P = 0.0246). It is possible that a better prognosis can be achieved by performing HCV antiviral therapy after achieving remission in cases of HCV-RNA-positive diffuse large-cell lymphoma through the use of R-CHOP or similar treatments.

Aim: The safety and efficacy of sofosbuvir (SOF) and ribavirin (RBV) have not been well clarified in patients with renal dysfunction because clinical trials have not included such patients. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of SOF and RBV for genotype 2 hepatitis C virus (HCV)‐infected patients with renal dysfunction. Methods: The study included genotype 2 HCV‐infected patients who received SOF and RBV between July 2014 and May 2017. The sustained virologic response (SVR) after the treatment and safety during the therapy were evaluated according to renal function. Results: A total of 231 patients were included in this study. The median age was 62 years old, and 45.9% (106/231) were men. Of the 231 patients, 191 (82.8%) and 40 (17.2%) were classified as having chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages G1/2 and G3, respectively. The overall SVR rate was 97% (224/231). The SVR rates in patients with CKD stages G1, 2, G3a, and G3b were 98.1%, 98.6%, 87.9%, and 100%, respectively, and this therapy was tolerated. Multivariate analysis indicated that renal dysfunction was significantly associated with a non‐SVR (odds ratio, 6.963; 95% confidence interval, 1.494–32.41; P = 0.013). The patients with renal dysfunction were older, had advanced liver fibrosis, lower baseline platelet and hemoglobin levels, and a higher rate of RBV dose reduction. Conclusions: Sofosbuvir and RBV therapy is highly effective and safe for genotype 2 HCV‐infected Japanese patients. However, attention should be paid to baseline renal function when SOF‐ and RBV‐containing regimens are used for patients with renal dysfunction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The optimal retreatment regimen for patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection who failed interferon-free, direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy is undetermined. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 12-week retreatment with ledipasvir (LDV) and sofosbuvir (SOF) with add-on ribavirin (RBV) for patients who previously failed to respond to HCV-NS5A inhibitor, daclatasvir (DCV), and HCV-NS3 inhibitor, asunaprevir (ASV), therapy.Methods: This multicenter, prospective study enrolled 15 patients with genotype-1 HCV infection who failed DCV/ASV combination therapy. They were retreated with SOF, LDV, and RBV for 12 weeks and underwent physical examinations and blood tests at baseline, during treatment, and after therapy. At baseline and relapse, NS3/NS5A and NS5B resistance-associated variants (RAVs) were evaluated.Results: Of the 15 enrolled patients, 73.3% (11/15), 86.7% (13/15), and 0% (0/15) had RAVs in NS3 D168A/V/T/E, NS5A L31I/M/F/V plus Y93H, and NS5B S282T, respectively. Overall, 86.7% (13/15) of patients achieved a sustained viral response, and all patients completed therapy. No patients experienced severe adverse events. Two patients who failed to respond to SOF, LDV, and RBV combination therapy were elderly women, had the IL28B non-TT genotype, and NS5A RAVs in L31I/Y93H or NS5A A92 K at baseline.Conclusions: This study revealed that SOF, LDV, and RBV combination therapy was effective and well-tolerated for patients with genotype-1 HCV infection who failed DCV and ASV combination therapy. Thus, RBV added to DAA therapy for difficult-to-treat patients might improve treatment outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a risk factor for end-stage renal disease, renal graft failure, and hemodialysis patient mortality. However, the efficacy of direct-acting antiviral therapy for HCV-infected patients with renal impairment is unclear. Additionally, the promising NS5B inhibitor sofosbuvir has not been recommended for patients with severe renal impairment. In this prospective, multicenter study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of daclatasvir and asunaprevir combination therapy, with a focus on patients with renal impairment. Methods The study included 322 genotype 1 HCV-infected patients who received daclatasvir and asunaprevir combination therapy. The safety and sustained virological response was examined at 12 weeks after the end of treatment and safety was evaluated according to renal function. Results Of 322 patients, 5% (16/322) and 2.5% (8/322) had chronic kidney disease stage G3b (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR], 30-44 mL/min/1.73 m2) and stage G4/5 (eGFR, 15-29/<15 mL/min/1.73 m2), respectively. Baseline presence of the NS5A resistance-associated variant, previous simeprevir treatment, and HCV RNA titers, which were predictors of a sustained viral response, were similar between patients with eGFR <45 mL/min/1.73 m2 and eGFR >45 mL/min/1.73 m2. Notably, the 12-week sustained viral response rate was comparable in patients with eGFR <45 mL/min/1.73 m2 (100%, 24/24) and those with eGFR >45 mL/min/1.73 m2 (88.9%, 265/298; P = 0.07). Treatment discontinuation rates and adverse events, including alanine aminotransferase elevation, anemia, and renal disorders, were similar between the two groups. Conclusion Daclatasvir and asunaprevir combination therapy for patients with renal dysfunction was highly effective and safe. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim Sofosbuvir (SOF), a nucleotide analog pro-drug, targets hepatitis C virus (HCV) NS5B polymerase and shows potential for treating HCV infection, given its high efficacy and good barrier to resistance. However, in addition to the rare resistant-associated variant (RAV) of non-structural protein NS5B S282T, several new potential RAVs of SOF have been reported, especially related to HCV genotype 1b. However, the prevalence and characteristics of these RAVs have not been clarified. Methods We analyzed the prevalence of variants in the NS3/NS5A/NS5B regions in 96 patients treated with simeprevir (SMV) combination therapy, and the prevalence of RAVs in patients showing treatment failure was determined by direct- or deep-sequencing methods. Associations between these potential RAVs and clinical factors were also analyzed. Results Prevalence of NS5B RAV C316N was high (46.9%, 45/96), whereas that of NS5B L159F was relatively low (1.04%, 1/96); however, deep sequencing showed that 30.0% of patients with C316N also had NS5B RAV L159F. Additionally, there was no significant relationship between the existence of potential NS5B and NS5A or NS3 RAVs. However, the presence of NS5B C316N was significantly associated with an HCV core amino acid 91 substitution. No significant difference was detected between each RAV and sustained virological response in simeprevir combination therapy. Conclusion We provide clear evidence of the high prevalence of two potential naturally occurring NS5B RAVs (C316N and L159F) in Japan. It may be important to pay particular attention to these new potential RAVs, especially when using SOF-based therapy in patients with RAVs due to previous direct-acting antiviral therapy failure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]