Search

Background & Aims: With long-term consequences like the development of liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma, chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is associated with a significant health burden. Information on HCV treatment outcomes and costs in routine care is still rare, especially for subgroups. The aim of this study was to analyse the treatment outcomes and costs of subgroups in routine care and to compare them over time with previous analyses., Methods: Data were derived from a noninterventional study including a subset of 10298 patients receiving DAAs with genotypes 1 and 3. Sociodemographic, clinical parameters and costs were collected using a web-based data recording system. The total sample was subdivided according to treatment regimen, cirrhosis status as well as present HIV infection and opioid substitution treatment (OST)., Results: 95% of all patients achieved SVR. Currently used DAA showed higher SVR-rates and less adverse events (AE) compared to former treatments. Concerning subgroups, cirrhotic patients, HIV-coinfected patients and OST patients showed lower but still high SVR-rates. In comparison, cirrhotic had considerably longer treatment duration and more frequent (serious) AE. Overall, average treatment costs were €48470 and costs per SVR were €51129; for currently used DAAs costs amounted to €30330 and costs per SVR to €31692. After the end of treatment, physical health is similar to the general population in all patients except cirrhotic. Mental health remains far behind in all subgroups, even for currently used DAA., Conclusions: Over time, some relevant factors developed positively (SVR-rates, costs, treatment duration, adverse events, health-related quality of life (HRQoL)). Further research on HRQoL, especially on mental health, is necessary to evaluate the differences between subgroups and HRQoL over time and to identify influencing factors., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest., (The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).)

Objectives: Grazoprevir/elbasvir and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (G/P) are the two preferred treatment options for patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and a glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <30 mL/min. Both therapies have been separately analyzed in different real-life cohorts; however, a direct comparison has not been performed so far. We, therefore, analyzed safety and effectiveness of both regimens in a concerted real-life population., Methods: The Germany Hepatitis C-Registry is a prospective national real-world registry. The analysis is based on 2773 patients with documented GFR at baseline treated with grazoprevir/elbasvir (N = 1041), grazoprevir/elbasvir + ribavirin (N = 53) and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (N = 1679)., Results: A total of 93 patients with GFR <30 mL/min were treated with grazoprevir/elbasvir (N = 56), grazoprevir/elbasvir + ribavirin (N = 4), and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (N = 33). They suffered significantly more frequent from diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and coronary heart disease than individuals with GFR >30 mL/min and showed the following baseline characteristics: 20.4, 55.9, 3.2, 12.9, and 5.3% were infected with HCV-genotypes 1a, 1b, 2, 3, and 4; 12.9% suffered from liver cirrhosis; 80.1% were treatment-naïve. Baseline characteristics except distribution of HCV-genotype 1b (n = 43/52 treated with grazoprevir/elbasvir) and sustained virologic response rates (SVR12) did not differ significantly between glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (SVR12: 100%) and grazoprevir/elbasvir (SVR12: 97.9%).Fatigue, headache, abdominal discomfort, and arthralgia were the most frequently reported adverse events without a statistical difference between grazoprevir/elbasvir and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir., Conclusion: In patients with chronic hepatitis C and a baseline GFR ≤30 mL/min grazoprevir/elbasvir and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir show an equally favorable safety profile and antiviral efficacy and can both be recommended for real-life use., (Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

The number of patients diagnosed with hepatitis C virus (HCV) is markedly higher than the number initiating treatment indicating gaps in the care cascade, likely centred around reaching at-risk populations. Understanding changing characteristics of patients with HCV allows for targeted programs that increase linkage to care. We investigated changes in demographic and clinical characteristics of patients registered in the German Hepatitis C-Registry (DHC-R) from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2019. The DHC-R is an ongoing, noninterventional, multicentre, prospective, observational cohort registry including 327 German centres. Patient characteristics were analysed over time in 7 phases for all patients completing a screening visit. Overall, 14,357 patients were enrolled. The percentage of treatment-naïve/non-cirrhotic patients increased from 34.4% in phase 1 (1 January-31 December 2014) to 68.2% in phase 7 (1 August-31 December 2019). The proportion of migrants, alcohol users, people who inject drugs, and those receiving opiate substitution therapy increased in later registry phases. Most patients (60.1%) were receiving comedication at baseline. The most prescribed comedications were drugs used to treat opioid dependence which increased from 9.2% in phase 1 to 24.0% in phase 7. The patients' mean age decreased from 52.3 years in phase 1 to 48.7 years in phase 7. From 2014 to 2019, the proportion of at-risk patients enrolling in the registry increased. To eliminate viral hepatitis as a major public health threat, a continued commitment to engaging underserved populations into the HCV care cascade is needed., (© 2021 AbbVie Inc. Journal of Viral Hepatitis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Different parameters have been determined for prediction of treatment outcome in hepatitis c virus genotype 1 infected patients undergoing pegylated interferon, ribavirin combination therapy. Results on the importance of vitamin D levels are conflicting. In the present study, a comprehensive analysis of vitamin D levels before and during therapy together with single nucleotide polymorphisms involved in vitamin D metabolism in the context of other known treatment predictors has been performed., Methods: In a well characterized prospective cohort of 398 genotype 1 infected patients treated with pegylated interferon-α and ribavirin for 24-72 weeks (INDIV-2 study) 25-OH-vitamin D levels and different single nucleotide polymorphisms were analyzed together with known biochemical parameters for a correlation with virologic treatment outcome., Results: Fluctuations of more than 5 (10) ng/ml in 25-OH-vitamin D-levels have been observed in 66 (39) % of patients during the course of antiviral therapy and neither pretreatment nor under treatment 25-OH-vitamin D-levels were associated with treatment outcome. The DHCR7-TT-polymorphism within the 7-dehydrocholesterol-reductase showed a significant association (P = 0.031) to sustained viral response in univariate analysis. Among numerous further parameters analyzed we found that age (OR = 1.028, CI = 1.002-1.056, P = 0.035), cholesterol (OR = 0.983, CI = 0.975-0.991, P<0.001), ferritin (OR = 1.002, CI = 1.000-1.004, P = 0.033), gGT (OR = 1.467, CI = 1.073-2.006, P = 0.016) and IL28B-genotype (OR = 2.442, CI = 1.271-4.695, P = 0.007) constituted the strongest predictors of treatment response., Conclusions: While 25-OH-vitamin D-levels levels show considerable variations during the long-lasting course of antiviral therapy they do not show any significant association to treatment outcome in genotype 1 infected patients.

Background: For the medical management, it would be of great relevance to get a diagnostic marker predicting the outcome of infection., Objectives: For this purpose, the envelope antigens of the individual HCV strain in a patient was tested for their capacity to induce neutralizing antibodies and cytotoxic T lymphocytes., Study Design: A system for the measurement of neutralizing antibodies as well as for the stimulation of a HCV-specific T-cell response using pseudo-typed HCV particles (HCVpp) was established. A report on results of a pilot study conducted with blood specimens of 19 chronically infected patients is also presented., Results: Neutralization of HCVpp could be measured in nearly all HCV sero-positive patient samples. Nevertheless, in more than half of the patient samples (11/19), no HCV-specific CD4+ response was detectable. In addition, HCV-specific CD8+ response was measurable in most of the patients when HCVpp were used for T-cell stimulation. Although the same antigens (HCVpp) were used, there was no relevant correlation between neutralization titers and T-cell response., Conclusion: Our study shows that HCVpp are appropriate antigens for specific stimulation of lymphocytes as well as for the investigation of antibody neutralization activity.

Unlabelled: Individualized treatment on the basis of early viral kinetics has been discussed to optimize antiviral therapy in chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Individually tailored reduction in treatment duration in HCV type 1-infected patients represents one possible strategy. Four hundred thirty-three patients were randomly assigned to receive either 1.5 microg/kg peginterferon alfa-2b weekly plus 800-1,400 mg ribavirin daily for 48 weeks (n = 225, group A) or an individually tailored treatment duration (18-48 weeks; n = 208, group B). In the latter group, treatment duration was calculated using the time required to induce HCV RNA negativity (branched DNA [bDNA] assay; sensitivity limit, 615 IU/mL) multiplied by the factor 6. All bDNA negative samples were retested with the more sensitive transcription-mediated amplification (TMA) assay (sensitivity limit, 5.3 IU/mL). Sustained virologic response (SVR) rates were significantly lower in group B (34.6% versus 48.0% [P = 0.005]) due to higher relapse rates (32.7% versus 14.2% [P< 0.0005]). Important predictors of response were the levels of baseline viremia as well as the time to TMA negativity on treatment. Taking the simultaneous presence of low baseline viral load (<800,000 IU/mL) and a negative TMA test within the first 4 weeks as predictors for treatment response, SVR rates were comparable between both treatment schedules with an SVR probability of >80% obtained in patients treated for only 18 or 24 weeks., Conclusion: The individualized treatment strategy according to time to bDNA negativity failed to provide comparable efficacy compared with the standard of care. The inferiority of the individualized protocol may be explained by the use of a less sensitive HCV RNA assay, and also by underestimation of the importance of baseline viremia.

While direct‐acting antivirals (DAAs) cure chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in almost all patients, some patients remain at risk of liver disease despite HCV cure. In order to identify risk factors indicating liver‐related morbidity and death after viral cure, we included 6982 patients from the national multicenter real‐world German Hepatitis C Registry with regular follow‐up visits for up to 7 years after DAA therapy. Definitions for normal liver function tests (in women/men) were alanine aminotransferase (ALT; ≤35/≤50 U/L), ALT according to American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD; ≤19/≤30 U/L), and gamma‐glutamyltransferase (GGT; ≤40/≤60 U/L). In our cohort, 97.4% of patients achieved sustained virologic response (SVR). At 24 weeks after SVR (SVR24), elevated ALT occurred in 657/6982 (9.4%), elevated ALT (AASLD) in 2609/6982 (37.4%), and elevated GGT in 1777/6982 (25.5%) patients. Risk factors for increased ALT at SVR24 were obesity, alcohol, cirrhosis, elevated baseline ALT, and non‐SVR. Increased GGT at SVR24 was significantly (p < 0.05) and independently associated with male sex (odds ratio [OR], 2.12), higher body mass index (OR, 1.04), age >50 years (OR, 1.60), liver cirrhosis (OR, 3.97), alcohol consumption (OR, 2.99), diabetes (OR, 1.63), non‐SVR (OR, 8.00), and elevated GGT at baseline (OR, 17.12). In multivariate regression analysis, elevated GGT at SVR24, particularly in combination with cirrhosis, was the best predictor for hepatic decompensation, hepatocellular carcinoma development, and death, followed by elevated ALT (AASLD) and standard ALT, which predicted hepatic decompensation. Despite successful HCV therapy, elevated GGT at SVR24 and to a lesser extent ALT are predictive of the future clinical outcome and linked with liver‐associated comorbidities. This may highlight the relevance of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, diabetes mellitus, alcohol, and cirrhosis for the clinical outcome in a vulnerable population, even after HCV cure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Using data from the German Hepatitis C-Registry (Deutsche Hepatitis C-Register, DHC-R), we report the real-world safety and effectiveness of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB) treatment and its impact on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in underserved populations who are not typically included in clinical trials, yet who will be crucial for achieving hepatitis C virus (HCV) elimination. The DHC-R is an ongoing, non-interventional, multicenter, prospective, observational cohort study on patients treated for chronic HCV infection in Germany. The data cutoff was 17 January 2021. The primary effectiveness endpoint was sustained virologic response at post-treatment Week 12 (SVR12). Safety outcomes were assessed in all patients receiving GLE/PIB. PROs were assessed using the SF-36 survey. Of 2354 patients, 1964 had valid SVR12 data (intention-to-treat analysis). Of these, 1905 (97.0%) achieved SVR12 with rates similar across the comorbidities analyzed, except for people who actively use drugs (PWUD (active)) (86.4%). Excluding those who discontinued treatment and did not achieve SVR12, or were reinfected with HCV, the rate was 99.3%, with similar results regardless of comorbidity. PWUD (active) and those with psychiatric disorders had the most meaningful improvements in PROs. Adverse events (AEs) occurred in 631/2354 patients (26.8%), and serious AEs in 44 patients (1.9%). GLE/PIB was highly effective and well tolerated in this real-world study of patient groups key to HCV elimination. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Evidence based clinical guidelines are implemented to treat patients efficiently that include efficacy, tolerability but also health economic considerations. This is of particular relevance to the new direct acting antiviral agents that have revolutionized treatment of chronic hepatitis C. For hepatitis C genotypes 2/3 interferon free treatment is already available with sofosbuvir plus ribavirin. However, treatment with sofosbuvir-based regimens is 10–20 times more expensive compared to pegylated interferon alfa and ribavirin (PegIFN/RBV). It has to be discussed if PegIFN/RBV is still an option for easy to treat patients. We assessed the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C genotypes 2/3 with PegIFN/RBV in a real world setting according to the latest German guidelines. Overall, 1006 patients were recruited into a prospective patient registry with 959 having started treatment. The intention-to-treat analysis showed poor SVR (GT2 61%, GT3 47%) while patients with adherence had excellent SVR in the per protocol analysis (GT2 96%, GT3 90%). According to guidelines, 283 patients were candidates for shorter treatment duration, namely a treatment of 16 weeks (baseline HCV-RNA <800.000 IU/mL, no cirrhosis and RVR). However, 65% of these easy to treat patients have been treated longer than recommended that resulted in higher costs but not higher SVR rates. In conclusion, treatment with PegIFN/RBV in a real world setting can be highly effective yet similar effective than PegIFN± sofosbuvir/RBV in well-selected naïve G2/3 patients. Full adherence to guidelines could be further improved, because it would be important in the new era with DAA, especially to safe resources. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aims: In patients with advanced liver cirrhosis due to chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection antiviral therapy with peginterferon and ribavirin is feasible in selected cases only due to potentially life-threatening side effects. However, predictive factors associated with hepatic decompensation during antiviral therapy are poorly defined. Methods: In a retrospective cohort study, 68 patients with HCV-associated liver cirrhosis (mean MELD score 9.18±2.72) were treated with peginterferon and ribavirin. Clinical events indicating hepatic decompensation (onset of ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, upper gastrointestinal bleeding, hospitalization) as well as laboratory data were recorded at baseline and during a follow up period of 72 weeks after initiation of antiviral therapy. To monitor long term sequelae of end stage liver disease an extended follow up for HCC development, transplantation and death was applied (240weeks, ±SD 136weeks). Results: Eighteen patients (26.5%) achieved a sustained virologic response. During the observational period a hepatic decompensation was observed in 36.8%. Patients with hepatic decompensation had higher MELD scores (10.84 vs. 8.23, p<0.001) and higher mean bilirubin levels (26.74 vs. 14.63 µmol/l, p<0.001), as well as lower serum albumin levels (38.2 vs. 41.1 g/l, p = 0.015), mean platelets (102.64 vs. 138.95/nl, p = 0.014) and mean leukocytes (4.02 vs. 5.68/nl, p = 0.002) at baseline as compared to those without decompensation. In the multivariate analysis the MELD score remained independently associated with hepatic decompensation (OR 1.56, 1.18–2.07; p = 0.002). When the patients were grouped according to their baseline MELD scores, hepatic decompensation occurred in 22%, 59%, and 83% of patients with MELD scores of 6–9, 10–13, and >14, respectively. Baseline MELD score was significantly associated with the risk for transplantation/death (p<0.001). Conclusions: Our data suggest that the baseline MELD score predicts the risk of hepatic decompensation during antiviral therapy and thus contributes to decision making when antiviral therapy is discussed in HCV patients with advanced liver cirrhosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study demonstrates that a more precise prediction of the individual relapse risk in chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection can be obtained by kinetics of minimal residual viremia at weeks 4, 8, and 12 in combination with levels of baseline viremia. These data may also help to further individualize new protease inhibitor-based triple therapy regimens. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Many patients with chronic hepatitis C have not responded to therapy with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin. Objective: To evaluate use of peginterferon-α2a plus ribavirin to re-treat nonresponders to peginterferon-α2b plus ribavirin. Design: Randomized, parallel-group trial conducted between September 2003 and February 2007. Patients and researchers were not blinded to intervention assignment. Random assignment was centralized, computer-generated, and stratified by geographic region, hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype, and histologic diagnosis. Setting: 106 international centers. Patients: 950 nonresponders to 12 or more weeks of therapy with peginterferon-α2b plus ribavirin. Intervention: Peginterferon-α2a, 360 μg/wk, for 12 weeks, then 180 μg/wk to complete 72 weeks (group A) or 48 weeks (group B), or peginterferon-α2a, 180 μg/wk for 72 weeks (group C) or 48 weeks (group D). All patients received ribavirin, 1000 or 1200 mg/d. Measurements: Sustained virologic response (SVR), defined as undetectable (<50 IU/mL) HCV RNA levels 24 weeks after the end of treatment. Results: The SVR rates in groups A (n = 317), B (n = 156), C (n = 156), and D (n = 313) were 16%, 7%, 14%, and 9%, respectively (relative risk [RR] for group A vs. group D [the primary comparison], 1.80 [95% CI, 1.17 to 2.77]; P = 0.006). Extended treatment duration increased SVR rates (16% for 72 weeks [groups A and C] vs. 8% for 48 weeks [groups B and D]; RR, 2.00 [CI, 1.32 to 3.02]; P < 0.001). Complete viral suppression (HCV RNA level <50 IU/mL)at week 12 was achieved in 21% of patients in groups A and B and 13% of those in groups C and D. Rates of SVR were 49% (77 of 157 patients) and 4% (32 of 719 patients) among those with and without complete viral suppression at week 12, respectively. Limitation: Nonresponders to peginterferon-α2a plus ribavirin were not evaluated. Conclusion: Re-treating nonresponders to therapy with peginterferon-α2b plus ribavirin for 72 weeks significantly increases SVR rates compared with re-treating them for 48 weeks. The overall SVR rate was low, but patients who are most likely to respond to re-treatment can be identified at week 12. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Aims: Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is impaired in patients with chronic hepatitis C. We investigated HRQoL and fatigue in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in relation to the degree of fibrosis and inflammation, and controlled for the influence of relevant demographic and medical variables. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional two-center study including 215 outpatients with chronic hepatitis C applying the Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) and the Fatigue Impact Scale (FIS-D). The contribution to the variability of these psychometric scores was evaluated for the degree of fibrosis as well as viremia, gender, age, mode of transmission, genotype, and ALT. Results: There was a strong negative association between the degree of liver fibrosis and the physical SF-36 summary score (p =0.016). This was independent of the covariate age, also significantly predicting physical HRQoL (p =0.001). The absolute FIS score was significantly increased in patients with advanced fibrosis (p =0.043). In females, mental SF-36 summary score (p =0.007) and fatigue (p =0.017) were significantly more impaired. Conclusions: Our study suggests a significant association of physical aspects of HRQoL and fatigue with the extent of fibrosis. Fibrosis stage should be considered for the identification and management of HCV patients at risk for reduced physical HRQoL. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background/Aims: Efficacy and safety of interferon-α (IFN-α)/ribavirin retreatment with or without amantadine sulphate were evaluated in non-responders with chronic hepatitis C.Methods: Two hundred twenty five consecutive non-responders to previous antiviral treatment(s) with IFN-α alone or in combination with ribavirin or amantadine were treated with IFN-α 2b 5 MU daily for 4 weeks, 5 MU tiw for 20 weeks, followed by 3 MU tiw for additional 24 weeks combined with ribavirin 1000–1200 mg/d. One hundred fifteen of 225 patients were randomized to receive amantadine sulphate 100 mg bid for 48 weeks. Treatment was discontinued in patients with detectable serum hepatitis C virus (HCV)-RNA at treatment week 24.Results: An overall sustained virologic response with undectable serum HCV-RNA levels was observed in 49/225 patients (22%). Patients infected with HCV-genotype non-1 (P<0.001), low viremia (P=0.011) and only one previous antiviral treatment (P=0.032) were more likely to respond to antiviral retreatment. There was a trend towards higher sustained virologic response rates in patients receiving triple retreatment compared with those treated with IFN-α/ribavirin alone (25 versus 18%, P=0.172).Conclusions: The addition of amantadine was well tolerated and led to an improvement of sustained virologic responses compared with retreatment with IFN-α/ribavirin alone, in particular in patients with low baseline viremia. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background: Combination therapy with interferon alpha (IFNα) plus ribavirin has been shown to improve the sustained response rate in patients with chronic hepatitis C but there is little information regarding the lengths of time for this therapeutic regimen. In this study we therefore tried to evaluate whether the analysis of different virological parameters could provide new clues with respect to the early determination of the efficacy of this form of combination therapy. Furthermore, we also examined whether short-term induction combination therapy followed by IFNα alone is more effective than monotherapy in mounting an initial as well as a sustained virological response. Methods: 185 patients with histologically proven chronic hepatitis C (mean age 42 years (range 19–65 years); 110 males, 75 females) were enrolled in the study. The patients were randomly assigned to receive, over the first 12 weeks, either interferon alpha 2a 6 million units (MU) three times weekly plus ribavirin 14 mg/kg per day (n=93) or the same dose of IFNα alone (n=92). Patients with a virological response (serum HCV RNA undetectable) after 12 weeks were subsequently treated with 3 MU IFNα alone thrice weekly for a further 40 weeks. Otherwise, treatment was discontinued. After the end of treatment, patients were followed up for 24 weeks. Results: Patient characteristics at baseline were not significantly different in the two treatment groups. An initial virological response at week 12 was seen in 61 (66%) patients receiving IFNα plus ribavirin and in 44 (48%) being treated with IFNα alone (p=0.015) and this improvement in the response rate was mainly restricted to HCV genotype 1-infected patients (58% vs. 38%). In contrast, end-of-treatment (week 52) and sustained virological response rates were similar in both groups (37% vs. 29% and 26% vs. 17% [p=0.1], respectively). Interestingly, patients with HCV genotype 3, however, clearly benefited from short-term combination therapy. Thus, sustained virological response rates in these patients significantly increased from 25% (IFNα monotherapy) to 59% (combination therapy) (p=0.05). Conclusions: Short-term combined therapy for 12 weeks is more effective than the monotherapy with respect to the induction of an initial virological response but this effect applies only to genotype 1-infected patients. However, there is no significant difference between both therapeutic schedules with regard to the induction of sustained response. Although HCV genotype 3-infected patients seem to benefit from this short-term combined therapy, prolonged combined therapy may be necessary in HCV genotype 1-infected patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Aims: Combination therapy with interferon-α (IFN-α) plus ribavirin is more efficacious than IFN-α monotherapy in previously untreated patients with chronic hepatitis C and patients with IFN-α relapse. Only limited data are available in IFN-α non-responders. In a multicenter trial we therefore evaluated the efficacy of combination therapy in IFN-α-resistant chronic hepatitis C. Methods: Eighty-two patients (mean age 46.8 years, 54 males, 28 females) with chronic hepatitis C were treated with IFN-α-2a (3 × 6 MIU/week) and ribavirin (14 mg/kg daily) for 12 weeks. Thereafter, treatment was continued only in virological responders (undetectable serum HCV RNA at week 12) with an IFN-α dose of 3 × 3 MIU/week and without ribavirin for a further 9 months. The primary study endpoint was an undetectable HCV RNA by RT-PCR at the end of the 24-week follow-up period. Results: After 12 weeks of combination therapy, an initial virological response was observed in 29 of 82 (35.4%) patients. Due to a high breakthrough rate after IFN-α dose reduction and ribavirin discontinuation, an end-of-treatment response was only achieved in 12 of 82 (14.6%) patients. After the follow-up period, a sustained virological response was observed in 8 of 82 (9.8%) patients. Infection with HCV genotype 3 was the only pretreatment parameter, which could predict a sustained response (HCV-1, 5%; HCV-3, 57.1%; p < 0.001). Conclusions: Despite a high initial response rate of 35.4%, sustained viral clearance was achieved only in 9.8% of the retreated primary IFN-α non-responders. Higher IFN-α induction and maintenance dose, as well as prolonged ribavirin treatment may possibly increase the virological response rates in non-responders, particularly in those infected by HCV-1.Copyright © 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Aims: Intercross studies in inbred mice susceptible or resistant to liver fibrosis revealed complement factor 5 as a quantitative trait gene associated with the development of fibrosis. In 277 patients with hepatitis C, two C5 SNPs, rs17611 and rs2300929, have been associated with advanced fibrosis. Methods: We investigated the association of these C5 SNPs with advanced fibrosis in 1435 HCV infected patients and in 1003 patients with other liver diseases. We performed genotyping with melting curve analysis using fluorescence resonance energy transfer probes in the LightCycler. Results: The defined high-risk genotypes (AA and TT) and alleles (A and T) were not associated with advanced fibrosis in HCV patients when Chi square testing and logistic regression analysis were applied (rs17611A 0.45 in F0-1 vs. 0.43 in F2-4, P =0.31; rs2300929T 0.91 F0-1 and 0.91 in F2-4, P =0.82). In the group of patients with liver diseases other than HCV we neither found an association of the C5 SNPs with advanced fibrosis nor an overrepresentation of the SNPs in patients with cirrhosis. Conclusions: We found no evidence that these C5 SNPs are genetic risk factors for the development of advanced fibrosis in chronic HCV infection or other chronic liver diseases. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]