Search

Background & Aims: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype (GT) 4 infection is prevalent in sub-Saharan Africa and the Middle East, particularly in Egypt. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of elbasvir/grazoprevir administered for 8 and 12 weeks in participants with HCV GT4 infection., Methods: In this partially randomized, open-label multicentre study conducted in France (NCT03111108; Protocol MK5172-096), treatment-naive participants with GT4 infection and F0-F2 fibrosis were randomized 2:1 to elbasvir (50 mg)/grazoprevir (100 mg) for 8 or 12 weeks. Treatment-naive participants with F3-F4 fibrosis and all treatment-experienced participants (F0-F4) were assigned to elbasvir/grazoprevir for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was sustained virologic response (SVR) 12 weeks after the end of therapy., Results: One hundred and seventeen participants were enrolled. Among treatment-naive participants with F0-F2 fibrosis, SVR was achieved by 94% (50/53) and 96% (26/27) of those receiving elbasvir/grazoprevir for 8 or 12 weeks, respectively, and four participants relapsed. In the 12-week arm, 95% (35/37) achieved SVR and two participants relapsed. NS5A resistance-associated substitutions were present at baseline and virologic failure in five of the participants with relapse. Drug-related adverse events occurred in 42% (n = 22) and 50% (n = 32) of participants receiving 8 and 12 weeks of treatment, respectively. No participant discontinued treatment owing to an adverse event., Conclusion: These data confirm the efficacy of elbasvir/grazoprevir administered for 12 weeks in treatment-experienced individuals with HCV GT4 infection and those with advanced fibrosis. Treatment-naive individuals with mild fibrosis can be treated effectively with an 8-week regimen., (© 2019 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Data on extrahepatic cancers (EHCs) in compensated viral cirrhosis are limited. The objective of the prospective multicenter Agence Nationale de Recherche sur le SIDA et les Hépatites virales CO12 CirVir cohort was to assess the occurrence of all clinical events in patients with compensated viral cirrhosis, including all types of cancer. Patients with the following inclusion criteria were enrolled in 35 French centers: (1) biopsy-proven hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) cirrhosis, (2) Child-Pugh A, or (3) absence of previous liver complications including primary liver cancer (PLC). Patients were followed up prospectively every 6 months. The standardized mortality ratio (SMR) was calculated according to age and gender using 5-year periods. The impact of sustained viral response (SVR) in HCV patients and maintained viral suppression in HBV patients were assessed using time-dependent analysis. A total of 1,671 patients were enrolled between 2006 and 2012 (median age, 54.9 years; men, 67.3%; HCV, 1,323; HBV, 317; HCV-HBV, 31). Metabolic features and excessive alcohol and tobacco consumption were recorded in 15.2%, 36.4%, and 56.4% of cases, respectively. After a median follow-up of 59.7 months, 227 PLCs were diagnosed (5-year cumulative incidence [CumI] 13.4%) and 93 patients developed EHC (14 patients with lymphoid or related tissue cancer and 79 with solid tissue cancer; 5-year EHC CumI, 5.9%). Compared to the general French population, patients were younger at cancer diagnosis, with significantly higher risk of EHC in HCV patients (SMR, 1.31; 95 confidence interval [CI], 1.04-1.64; P = 0.017) and after SVR (SMR = 1.57; 95% CI, 1.08-2.22; P = 0.013). EHC was the fourth leading cause of death in the whole cohort and the first in patients with viral control/eradication., Conclusion: Compared to the general French population, HCV cirrhosis is associated with a higher risk of EHC and the first cause of death in patients with viral cirrhosis who achieve virological control/eradication. (Hepatology 2018)., (© 2018 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.)

Patients with advanced chronic kidney disease who receive direct-acting antiviral drugs require special consideration regarding comorbid conditions. Here we assessed the efficacy and safety of grazoprevir plus elbasvir in 93 patients infected with HCV genotype 1 or 4 and with advanced chronic kidney disease in a non-randomized, multicenter, nationwide observational survey. Twenty patients with HCV genotype 1a, 51 patients with 1b, four unclassified genotype 1, 17 with genotype 4 and one with genotype 6 received grazoprevir plus elbasvir (100/50 mg) once daily. All patients had severe chronic kidney disease with 70 patients stage G5, including patients on hemodialysis (74.2%), and 23 were stage G4 chronic kidney disease. Severe liver disease (Metavir F3/F4) was found in 33 patients. A sustained virologic response 12 weeks after the end of therapy was achieved in 87 of 90 patients. Two patients had a virologic breakthrough and one had a relapse after treatment withdrawal. Most patients received many concomitant medications (mean 7.7) related to comorbid conditions. Serious adverse events occurred in six patients, including three deaths while on grazoprevir plus elbasvir, not related to this therapy. Thus, once-daily grazoprevir plus elbasvir was highly effective with a low rate of adverse events in this advanced chronic kidney disease difficult-to-treat population with an HCV genotype 1 or 4 infection., (Copyright © 2018 International Society of Nephrology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: Optimally effective treatment for hepatitis C virus genotype 3 (GT3) is urgently needed, particularly in advanced liver disease. Daclatasvir plus sofosbuvir was efficacious in phase 3 studies. Real-world data for daclatasvir+sofosbuvir in advanced GT3 infection are presented from the French Temporary Authorisation for Use programme, which allowed patients in need without other treatment options access to daclatasvir ahead of its market authorization., Methods: Patients with F3/F4 fibrosis and/or extrahepatic hepatitis C virus manifestations, post-liver transplant hepatitis C virus recurrence and/or indication for liver/kidney transplant, were treated with daclatasvir+sofosbuvir (60+400 mg daily) for a recommended duration of 24 weeks. Addition of ribavirin and/or shorter treatment was at physician's discretion. The primary efficacy analysis was sustained virological response at post-treatment week 12 (SVR12; modified intention-to-treat). Safety was assessed by spontaneous adverse event reporting., Results: The efficacy population comprised 333 patients, mostly cirrhotic (77%, of whom 18% were decompensated) and treatment experienced (72%). After 24 weeks of daclatasvir+sofosbuvir, SVR12 was 89% (174/196) overall (95% CI 83.6-92.5%), 98% (43/44) without cirrhosis (95% CI 88.2-99.6%) and 86% (129/150) with any degree of cirrhosis (95% CI 79.5-90.7%), without SVR12 increase in those who received additional ribavirin for 24 weeks (SVR12 82% [50/61; 95% CI 70.5-89.6%]). Among 516 GT3-infected patients with safety data, 5 discontinued for adverse events and 11 died., Conclusions: Daclatasvir+sofosbuvir achieved high SVR12 rates and was well tolerated in this large real-world cohort of GT3-infected patients with advanced liver disease, without benefit of ribavirin in those treated 24 weeks., (© 2017 The Authors Liver International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Ribavirin-induced anemia is the major side effect observed during HCV therapy. In an in vitro study, we recently discovered that DHEA can strongly inhibit this adverse event. We also evaluated a possible link between pre-treatment serum DHEA and hemoglobin during HCV therapy. Among the 108 patients of our cohort serum baseline DHEA levels were associated with hemoglobin levels at week 12 of treatment (r = 0.35; P = 0.0021). Patients with low baseline serum DHEA developed severe anemia. A serum level of DHEA less than 1,500 ng/ml had a sensitivity of 94.3% and a positive predictive value of 93.1% for the detection of hemoglobin less than 11 g/dl during the first 12 week of treatment. With pre-treatment DHEA levels below the cutoff, anemia was observed in 24.4% and 60.5% of patients treated with dual therapy and triple therapy, respectively, versus 0% and 15% of patients with higher DHEA levels. At week 12, the mean difference between patients with serum DHEA below and above the cutoff, in terms of absolute hemoglobin for dual and triple therapy groups were 1.2 and 1.7 g/dl, respectively (P = 0.005 and <0.001). Pretreatment DHEA levels are associated with hemoglobin levels during treatment. Based on these data, pretreatment assay of DHEA could be considered systematically in order to propose DHEA supplementation to potentiate the efficacy of the current and future use of ribavirin for HCV and HEV therapy. J. Med. Virol. 89:1033-1039, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., (© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Anemia is a well-known RBV-related event in HCV therapy which is exacerbated by the addition of telaprevir and boceprevir. This retrospective study evaluated and compared ribavirin exposure and parameters able to influence hemoglobin decrease in a large population of patients treated with dual or triple therapy. Patients on triple therapy had higher ribavirin concentrations at week 12 of treatment (3460 ng/mL vs. 1843 ng/mL; P < .0001). An association was also observed between week 12 eGFR and ribavirin concentration only for patients on triple therapy (P = .002). The proportion of patients with a  >20 mL/min/1.73 m(2) decrease in eGFR at week 12 was higher among patients on triple therapy: 32%, 14%, and 5% for boceprevir, telaprevir, and dual therapy, respectively (P = .025 and .026). No correlation was observed between boceprevir and telaprevir concentrations and hemoglobin or eGFR decrease. Exacerbation of anemia in patients on triple therapy is related to higher ribavirin concentrations. We provide an explanation for this increase in plasma RBV concentration. Triple therapy with PEG-IFN, RBV, and telaprevir or boceprevir will remain the only HCV treatment option for many patients. Our data show that the RBV dose can be decreased while maintaining adequate plasma concentrations and reducing anemia., (© 2015, The American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

Objective: Sofosbuvir and simeprevir in combination with standard therapy are now available for the treatment of patients chronically infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1. With boceprevir and telaprevir, four treatment options are, therefore, now available to clinicians. Phase 3 studies conducted with simeprevir and sofosbuvir compared sustained virological response (SVR) data with those obtained with standard combination therapy and did not include a control arm. It is important to quantify the contribution of these molecules compared to the first direct antiviral agents available., Material and Methods: For HCV genotype 1 patients, we performed a literature review and compared all SVR data from phase 3 randomized placebo-controlled trials conducted with these four molecules according to virological characteristics (genotype, viral load) and patient characteristics (IL28B polymorphism, stage of fibrosis)., Results: Simeprevir and sofosbuvir provide a net gain in terms of SVR compared to boceprevir and telaprevir except in the case of telaprevir for treatment-naïve HCV genotype 1b patients. Sofosbuvir achieves higher SVR rates than simeprevir except for treatment-naïve IL28B CC patients and naïve HCV genotype 1b patient. Further, simeprevir moderately improve SVR rates compared to telaprevir in treatment-naïve patients with F3-F4 fibrosis and with HCV genotype 1a infection., Conclusion: Sofosbuvir and simeprevir greatly improve the virological response rate compared to first-generation protease inhibitors. All of these data may help in guiding the physician's treatment decisions, based on financial constraints and patient characteristics. These data can be easily updated with future treatment and demonstrate the contribution of new treatment regimens to achieve optimal SVR rates.

Background: The optimization of combination therapy with ribavirin (RBV) and pegylated interferon alpha has substantially improved sustained virologic response (SVR) rates and lowered virologic relapse rates in patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV). In this study, we performed an analysis of the relationship between the end-of-treatment plasma RBV concentration and virologic relapse., Methods: Thirty-four patients with HCV treated with pegylated interferon/RBV and with an end-of-treatment response were assayed for plasma RBV concentration using liquid chromatography assay coupled to tandem mass-spectrometric detection on the last day of the treatment. Clinical data and the concentration of RBV were compared between patients classified as either relapsers or nonrelapsers., Results: Eleven patients (32.4%) relapsed and 23 patients (67.6%) achieved an SVR. The mean plasma RBV concentration on the last day of treatment was 1380 ± 312 ng/mL for relapsers and 2278 ± 569 ng/mL for SVR patients (P < 0.0001). A receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that a threshold of 1960 ng/mL was associated with the greatest sensitivity and specificity (100% and 83%, respectively, with an area under the curve of 0.94; P < 0.0001) for discriminating between patients who relapsed and those who did not. A univariate logistic regression analysis indicated that a plasma RBV concentration of <1960 ng/mL at the end of the treatment was strongly associated with relapse (odds ratio, 55; 95% confidence interval, 7.24-∞; P = 0.0001) independently of age, body weight, RBV dose, baseline viral load, the interleukin-28B genotype, and response to previous courses of treatment., Conclusions: Our study results highlight the relevance of measuring plasma RBV concentrations during and at the end of HCV treatment, with a view to avoiding virologic relapse.

To optimize standard treatment of chronic hepatitis C in responder patients who have achieved undetectable viral load, a prospective study was conducted to determine the factors and kinetics of virologic relapse. Responder patients were monitored 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24 weeks after the end of treatment with pegylated interferon and ribavirin. Forty-seven of the 154 patients (30.5%) relapsed. Relapse was significantly associated with absence of rapid virologic response (RVR), retreatment, higher baseline viral load, older age, and lower weight-based dose of pegylated interferon. Relapse was more frequent in patients failing to achieve a RVR after receiving pegylated interferon alpha 2a < 2.5 µg/week or alpha 2b < 1.5 µg/week (P = 0.002). Among patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 with non-CC IL-28B polymorphism (rs12979860), viral decay during treatment was lower in relapsers (P = 0.003 at week 4). Relapse was detected at weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12 after the end of treatment for 5, 8, 10, and 6 patients infected with HCV genotype 1, respectively. Positive predictive values for sustained virologic response were 70.9%, 80.2%, 91.9%, and 98.8% at weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12, respectively. Only one patient relapsed beyond 24 weeks. Closer follow-up and treatment adaptation in patients failing to achieve RVR may decrease the relapse rate in slower responders and heavier patients. Monitoring viral load as early as 1 month after the end of treatment could be useful to assess virologic response., (Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Two types of peginterferon alfa (2a and 2b) are available for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 or non-1. Comparative studies of bitherapy suggest equivalent results in terms of sustained virologic response for the two types of interferon possibly with a slight advantage in favor of type 2a. However, these studies report only limited data concerning relapse. We analyzed studies comparing the two types of peginterferon with data concerning relapse. In the 6 studies examined (8538 patients), peginterferon 2a was clearly associated with a much higher rate of end of treatment response but also a higher relapse rate than type 2b (29.3% vs 21.1%; relative risk of relapse with peginterferon 2a:1.54 [1.35-1.76], p=0.0024). These data are highlighted in overweight patients. We tried to explain these differences between these two types of interferon by discussing in terms of pharmacokinetics. Peginterferon remains the cornerstone of HCV treatment and must be carefully chosen on the basis of the patient's history and cofactors. These data are important and must be considered in the era of DAA., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The current treatment of chronic hepatitis C is based on pegylated alpha interferon (PEG-IFN-α) and ribavirin. The aim of this study was to identify biological and clinical variables related to IFN therapy that could predict patient outcome. The study enrolled 47 patients treated with PEG-IFN and ribavirin combined therapy. The interferon concentration was measured in serum by a bioassay. The expression of 93 interferon-regulated genes in peripheral blood mononuclear cells was quantified by real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) before and after 1 month of treatment. The interferon concentration in the serum was significantly lower in nonresponders than in sustained virological responders. Moreover, a significant correlation was identified between interferon concentration and interferon exposition as well as body weight. The analysis of interferon-inducible genes in peripheral blood mononuclear cells among the genes tested did not permit the prediction of treatment outcome. In conclusion, the better option seems to be to treat patients with weight-adjusted PEG-IFN doses, particularly for patients with high weight who are treated with PEG-IFN-α2a. Although the peripheral blood mononuclear cell samples are the easiest to obtain, the measurement of interferon-inducible genes seems not be the best strategy to predict treatment outcome.

The standard treatment of HCV infection with pegylated interferon-alpha2a or -alpha2b and ribavirin is effective in <50% of HCV genotype-1-infected patients. To improve this figure, it might be desirable to obtain optimal plasma concentrations of the drug by increasing the dose. Unfortunately, there is great interpatient variability in ribavirin pharmacokinetics. In the present review, we describe the mechanism of ribavirin-induced anaemia in detail, evaluate host predictive factors for this harmful side effect and assess the literature data on attempts to improve the sustained virological response rate by increasing the dose of ribavirin. We suggest an optimal steady-state concentration range for ribavirin in monoinfected and coinfected patients. Lastly, we propose that it would be of particular value to monitor ribavirin concentrations in HCV genotype-1-infected patients and (regardless of the genotype) coinfected patients, haemodialyzed patients and obese patients.

Chronic hepatitis C is a major health concern. The current standard therapy is based on a combination of pegylated (PEG)-IFN-alpha and ribavirin (RBV). This treatment produces a sustained virological response (SVR) in approximately 55% of chronically infected patients. A number of virological factors (e.g., the hepatitis C virus [HCV] genotype and baseline titer of HCV RNA) may influence the treatment response. Indeed, the SVR rate is approximately 80% for patients infected with HCV genotypes 2 or 3, and approximately 45% for genotype 1 or 4 patients. Furthermore, the treatment duration can be modified as a function of the genotype. New drugs are being developed for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C but will probably be used in combination with the current standard therapy. This means that improvements in therapy based on a PEG-IFN-RBV combination will remain a true challenge in the coming years. Recent clinical trial results have demonstrated that the current therapy can be optimized. Modulation of the treatment duration and/or the RBV dose may increase the SVR rate. The present article reviews the current approaches to optimizing the treatment of chronic hepatitis C.