Search

Introduction: Flavocoxid is a proprietary blend of two flavonoids, baicalin and catechin, and recent evidence has shown that bioflavonoids may exert antiviral activities. The potential antiviral activity of Flavocoxid against hepatitis B virus (HBV) was evaluated. Additionally, it was investigated if Flavocoxid used in combination with Entecavir could potentiate its anti-HBV activity., Materials and Methods: Hepatoma cells replicating HBV were treated with Flavocoxid, or Entecavir alone or in combination for up to 5 days. Viral replicative intermediates, transcripts, and cccDNA levels were evaluated in HBV-replicating cells by real-time PCR, Southern and Northern blotting. Expression profiling was performed using TaqMan low-density arrays., Results: Flavocoxid treatment induced a reduction of HBV replicative intermediates, the amount of transcripts, and HBsAg levels. Flavocoxid and Entecavir combination therapy further decreased the amount of HBV replicative intermediates, compared to Flavocoxid alone. Importantly, Flavocoxid alone or in combination with Entecavir also induced a reduction of cccDNA. Gene-expression analysis showed that Flavocoxid activates type I IFNs-signaling and dampens the HBV-induced inflammatory response., Conclusions: Flavocoxid inhibits HBV replication by targeting multiple steps of viral life cycle. These results indicate that the antiviral activity of Entecavir is potentiated by Flavocoxid, suggesting that this medical food might be considered as an adjuvant for anti-HBV therapy.

The hepatitis D virus (HDV) is a compact, enveloped, circular RNA virus that relies on hepatitis B virus (HBV) envelope proteins to initiate a primary infection in hepatocytes, assemble, and secrete new virions. Globally, HDV infection affects an estimated 12 million to 72 million people, carrying a significantly elevated risk of developing cirrhosis, liver failure, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) compared to an HBV mono-infection. Furthermore, HDV-associated HCC often manifests at a younger age and exhibits more aggressive characteristics. The intricate mechanisms driving the synergistic carcinogenicity of the HDV and HBV are not fully elucidated but are believed to involve chronic inflammation, immune dysregulation, and the direct oncogenic effects of the HDV. Indeed, recent data highlight that the molecular profile of HCC associated with HDV is unique and distinct from that of HBV-induced HCC. However, the question of whether the HDV is an oncogenic virus remains unanswered. In this review, we comprehensively examined several crucial aspects of the HDV, encompassing its epidemiology, molecular biology, immunology, and the associated risks of liver disease progression and HCC development. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) may integrate into the genome of infected cells and contribute to hepatocarcinogenesis. However, the role of HBV integration in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) development remains unclear. In this study, we apply a high-throughput HBV integration sequencing approach that allows sensitive identification of HBV integration sites and enumeration of integration clones. We identify 3339 HBV integration sites in paired tumour and non-tumour tissue samples from 7 patients with HCC. We detect 2107 clonally expanded integrations (1817 in tumour and 290 in non-tumour tissues), and a significant enrichment of clonal HBV integrations in mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) preferentially occurring in the oxidative phosphorylation genes (OXPHOS) and D-loop region. We also find that HBV RNA sequences are imported into the mitochondria of hepatoma cells with the involvement of polynucleotide phosphorylase (PNPASE), and that HBV RNA might have a role in the process of HBV integration into mtDNA. Our results suggest a potential mechanism by which HBV integration may contribute to HCC development. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) integration events are profiled in liver tissues from hepatocellular carcinoma patients using a high-throughput HBV integration sequencing method and bioinformatics. HBV is often found to integrate in mitochondrial DNA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background & Aims: Obesity is associated with non‐alcoholic fatty liver (NAFL), which may progress towards non‐alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Occult hepatitis B virus infection (OBI) may contribute to hepatic damage in patients with chronic liver disease of different aetiologies (eg HCV, alcohol). However, information on the prevalence and clinical impact of OBI in obese individuals is lacking. The aims of this study were to investigate NASH prevalence and risk factors in obese people who underwent bariatric surgery. Methods: Two‐hundred and twenty‐six subjects (160 females; mean age 42.9 years ±10.8 SD) without evidence of any further cause of liver disease consecutively underwent bariatric surgery in two Italian liver centers. During surgery, all patients underwent liver biopsy for histological evaluation and molecular studies. Liver DNA extracts were tested for PNPLA3, TM6SF2, MBOAT7, IRGM polymorphisms and for OBI. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify predictors of NASH. Results: Histology showed NASH in 115 (50.9%) and NAFL in 111 cases (49.1%). Twenty‐nine/226 (12.8%) cases had OBI, 24 (82.8%) of whom had NASH and 5 (17.2%) NAFL, whereas among the 197 OBI‐negative cases, 91 (46.2%) had NASH and 106 (53.8%) NAFL (P =.0002). Multivariate analysis showed that older age (P =.03, OR 1.034), alanine aminotransferase values (P =.005, OR 1.023), insulin resistance/diabetes (P =.02, OR 2.257), TM6SF2 polymorphism (P =.04, OR 3.168) and OBI (P =.004, OR 5.503) were independent predictors of NASH. Conclusion: NASH is highly prevalent in obese individuals undergoing bariatric surgery. OBI is one of the strongest risk factors of NASH in these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]