Search

Introduction: There are limited data about the safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) in chronic renal failure (CRF). In this study, we aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of TDF in renal transplant recipients and hemodialysis patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) during long-term follow-up. Material and methods: CHB patients undergoing hemodialysis (group 1), renal transplant recipients (group 2) and patients with normal renal function were included in the study. All patients were treated with TDF for at least 6 months. The groups were compared with regards to safety and efficacy. HBV-DNA levels were studied using a Cobas-TaqMan 96 system. Results: A total of 217 patients with CHB (group 1: 8 patients, group 2: 9 patients, group 3: 200 patients) were enrolled in this study. The frequency of clinical adverse effects was significantly higher in groups 1 and 2 compared with group 3 (37.5% vs. 11.1% vs. 0.5%, respectively, p < 0.001). However, no patients discontinued the drug due to the adverse effects. Serum creatinine levels were similar at baseline and at the end of follow-up in groups 1 and 2 (6.5 ±1.8 mg/dl and 6.9 ±1.5 mg/dl; 1.3 ±0.2 and 1.4 ±0.4 mg/dl, respectively, p < 0.05). HBV-DNA negativity rates were comparable at the 12th month and at the end of follow-up (50-83% for group 1, 60-67% for group 2 and 70-75% for group 3, respectively, p > 0.05). Conclusions: Clinical adverse effects of TDF were more common in patients with CRF in comparison with patients without CRF. However, the occurrence of adverse effects did not necessitate discontinuation of the drug. TDF was safe and effective for this group of patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Aims: End-stage renal disease patients on chronic hemodialysis are at risk for both hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Although the prevalence is unknown in hemodialysis patients, occult HBV infection is frequent in subjects with chronic HCV infection. We aimed to investigate (1) the prevalence and clinical impact of occult HBV infection in hemodialysis patients with chronic HCV infection, and (2) the frequency of YMDD variants (tyrosine-methionine-aspartate-aspartate amino acid motif of HBV polymerase) in this setting.Methods: Thirty-three anti-HCV and HCV-RNA-positive, HBsAg-negative hemodialysis patients (mean age 36.9±10.4 years, 22 male) were admitted to this study. HBV-DNA (Innogenetics kit) and HCV-RNA (Cobas Amplicor HCV kit) were investigated by polymerase chain reaction technique (PCR). YMDD mutation was studied in all HBV-DNA-positive patients by the BOOM method.Results: HBV-DNA was detected in 12 of 33 patients (36.4%) by PCR. Their mean age was 33.0±9.0 years. Age, dialysis period (years) and biochemical parameters were not significantly different in patients with and without occult HBV infection. YMDD variants were identified in six of 12 (50%) patients with occult HBV infection.Conclusions: Occult HBV infection is frequent in hemodialysis patients with chronic HCV infection. YMDD variants are common in this setting. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]