Search

Immunoglobulin Y (IgY) could be used in serological diagnosis focused on several infectious agents. This study aims to produce IgY anti-hepatitis B virus surface antigen (anti-HBs) and to assess its use in enzyme immunoassays. Antibodies were produced by immunizing chickens with Hepatitis B vaccine associated (group A), or not, with adjuvant CpG-ODN (group B). Eggs were collected for 20 weeks, yolks were purified based on using polyethylene glycol and affinity chromatography. IgY anti-HBs was featured based on SDS-PAGE and Western Blot techniques. Total protein concentration was measured through spectrophotometry. In-house ELISA used to detect HBsAg was developed based on using IgG/HRP conjugate and IgY-anti-HBs sensitized microplates. Thus, IgY anti-HBs were confirmed through molecular pattern based on SDS-PAGE, whereas specificity of anti-HBs was confirmed through Western Blot. Mean total protein reached 3.27 ± 3.00 mg/mL and 3.11 ± 3.12 mg/mL in groups A and B, respectively. In-house ELISA was developed based on using a panel of HBV positive and negative serum samples; it recorded 100 % sensitivity and 78.9 % specificity to detect HBsAg. In conclusion, it was possible producing anti-HBs IgY by immunizing chickens with HBV vaccine; this molecule could be used as capture antibody to help detecting HBsAg in-house ELISA., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Dried blood spots (DBS) testing might increase the access for Hepatitis B virus (HBV) diagnosis, but little is known about the performance of these assays in real life conditions. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of HBsAg, anti-HBc and anti-HBs detection in DBS in clinical settings and field studies and to evaluate demographic and risk behaviour according the presence of HBsAg and anti-HBc. Paired sera and DBS samples were obtained from 2309 individuals from 3 groups, defined as follows: G1: clinical setting (n = 5-19), G2: general population (n = 1305) and G3: vulnerable individuals that could be more exposed to blood contact (n = 485). Sera and DBS were tested using commercial enzyme immunoassay (EIA), with some modifications added. Using DBS samples, the specificity values were above 90 % for HBsAg and anti-HBc in all groups and for anti-HBs range from 58.6%-85%. HBsAg testing had the best performance in GI (sensitivity = 84.4 %) and among those samples that the paired serum also presented anti-HBc marker (sensitivity = 91.6 %). High sensitivity of anti-HBc testing in DBS samples was observed in GI (80.8 %) and among HBV active cases (HBsAg+/anti-HBc+) (98.4 %). Testing of anti-HBs in DBS showed the highest sensitivity in GIII (65.5 %), in previous HBV exposed and cured individuals and when serum titers were above 100 IU/mL (86.7 %). DBS samples could be used for screening and prevalence studies for HBsAg and anti-HBc, particularly in clinical settings and among HBV active cases in field studies., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Influence of HIV status in HBV markers detection in saliva and dried blood spots (DBS) was not well established. This study aims to evaluate the performance of optimized commercial immunoassay for identifying HBsAg and anti-HBc in saliva and DBS according HIV status. A sum of 535 individuals grouped as HIV + , HBV + , HIV/HBV + and HIV/HBV- were recruited where 347 and 188 were included for HBsAg and anti-HBc evaluation, respectively. Serum, DBS collected in Whatman 903 paper and saliva obtained using salivette device were analyzed using EIA. Increased sample volume and ROC curve analysis for cut off determination were used for DBS and saliva testing. HBsAg detection in saliva and DBS exhibited sensitivities of 80.9% and 85.6% and specificities of 86.8% and 96.3%. Sensitivity of anti-HBc in saliva and DBS were 82.4% and 76.9% and specificities in saliva and DBS were 96.9% and 91.7%. Low sensitivities were observed for HBsAg (62%) and anti-HBc (47%) detection in saliva of HIV/HBV+ individuals. OD values were also lower for HBsAg detection in DBS and saliva of HIV/HBV+ individuals compared to their serum samples. Statistical significance was found for sensitivities in HBsAg detection between saliva and DBS demonstrating high sensitivity for DBS specimens. In conclusion, HIV status or antiretroviral treatment appears to interfere in the performance of HBsAg and anti-HBc detection in DBS and saliva samples using the adapted commercial EIA., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Rapid tests (RTs) can be used as an alternative method for the conventional diagnosis of hepatitis B virus (HBV). This study aims to evaluate antibodies to HBsAg (anti-HBs) and antibodies to HBeAg (anti-HBe) RTs under different Brazilian settings. The following three groups were included: GI: viral hepatitis outpatient services; GII: low resource areas; and GIII: crack users and beauticians. Imuno-rápido anti-HBsAg™ and Imuno-rápido anti-HBeAg™ RTs were evaluated and showed specificities greater than 95% in all groups. The sensitivity values to anti-HBs were 50.38%, 51.05% and 46.73% and the sensitivity values to anti-HBe were 76.99%, 10.34% and 11.76% in the GI, GII and GIII groups, respectively. The assays had a low sensitivity and high specificity, which indicated their use for screening in regions endemic for HBV.

Drug users have been reported to have an increased risk for acquisition of viral hepatitis. This study aims to evaluate the prevalence of HBV and HCV infection and usefulness of saliva for HBsAg and anti-HCV detection in alcoholic patients.A total of 90 alcoholic patients were recruited in 2013. HBsAg and anti-HCV were tested in serum and saliva, anti-HBc and anti-HBs were tested in serum using commercial enzyme immunoassays (EIA).Using serum samples, anti-HCV, HBsAg, anti-HBc and anti-HBs prevalences were 5.6%, 0%, 15.7%, and 29.2%. HBsAg detection in saliva showed 100% of specificity and anti-HCV detection demonstrated 100% of sensitivity and 94.7% of specificity. Low prevalence of HBV and high prevalence of anti-HCV were found and reinforced the recommendation of HBV vaccination to avoid the acute and chronic cases and HCV screening in this group to identify cases for antiviral therapy. Saliva samples could be used for anti-HCV detection in this population, what could increase the diagnosis access.

Background: Rapid tests (RTs) might have several advantages over standard laboratory procedures, increasing access to diagnosis, especially among vulnerable populations and/or those living in remote areas. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of RTs for the detection of hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) in samples from different populations/settings., Methods: Three RTs for HBsAg detection (Vikia® HBsAg, HBsAg Teste Rápido®, and Imuno-Rápido HBsAg®) and different biological specimens (serum, whole blood, and saliva) were evaluated. Analyses comprised a reference panel and samples from field studies targeting suspected cases of hepatitis B virus (HBV) (G I), individuals living in deprived areas (G II), and highly vulnerable individuals (G III). Enzyme immunoassay (EIA) was defined as the gold standard in this study. Reproducibility, repeatability, and cross-reactivity with other infectious agents such as dengue, immunodeficiency (HIV), and hepatitis C (HCV) viruses and T. pallidum were determined., Results: For the reference panel, the sensitivity and specificity of all HBsAg RTs were higher than 93.00 %. G I presented the highest kappa values for all rapid assays using sera samples. When using serum, the sensitivity values were higher than 93.40 for G I, 60.00 % for G II and 66.77 % for G III, and the specificity values were higher than 99.50 for GI, 97.20 for G II and 99.10 % for G III for all tests. For whole blood samples & the Vikia® HBsAg assay, the best performance was achieved for GIII (k = 79.75 %). For saliva samples, the Imuno-Rápido HBsAg® assay showed the highest concordance values with EIA for G I (40.68 %) and G II (32.20 %). The reproducibility and repeatability of all RTs for serum and saliva were excellent, and the concordance between HBsAg EIAs and RTs using samples reactive with other infectious agents varied from 70.10 % to 100.00 %., Conclusions: The overall performance of RTs for HBsAg in serum was high/moderately high for all groups, thereby promoting increased access to HBV diagnosis among vulnerable populations as well as samples from individuals in emergency settings or remote areas. Rapid tests for HBsAg using whole blood could be used in prevalence studies, though these assays should not be used for saliva samples.

Background: Oral fluid (OF) sample collection and stability for HBsAg detection are not fully established. This study aims to investigate the applicability of OF collectors and sample stability for Hepatitis B virus surface antigen detection., Methods: Paired serum and OF samples were obtained from 191 individuals, and Chembio (Chembio Diagnostic System, USA) and Salivette (Sarstedt, Germany) devices were used for OF collection. Two HBsAg enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) were used (HBsAg One kit, Radim, Rome, Italy and ETI-MAK-4, DiaSorin, Vercelli, Italy) to determine the most efficient method according OF collector. Sample volume, incubation time, and cutoff (CO) value were evaluated. The stability of OF samples was determined under different environmental conditions., Results: Chembio samples analyzed using DiaSorin EIA without modification of the manufacturer's instructions, demonstrated a sensitivity of 95.24% and a specificity of 100%. Salivette samples analyzed with Radim EIA with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for calculating the CO showed a sensitivity of 78.26% and a specificity of 89.88%. HBsAg was detected in Chembio and Salivette samples under different environmental conditions, but the Chembio samples were the most stable., Conclusions: Both collectors can be used for HBsAg detection in OF samples, but some modifications of commercial EIAs should be incorporated for Salivette device. OF samples were reliably stable and could be stored for up to 90 days at 2-8°C., (© 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Detection of hepatitis B virus (HBV) serological markers in dried blood spot (DBS) samples by enzyme immunoassay (ELISA) has not yet been fully optimized. In this study, the ability to detect three HBV markers (HBsAg, anti-HBc, and anti-HBs) was evaluated in DBS samples using a modified commercial ELISA. Matched serum and DBS samples were obtained from individuals with or without a past history of HBV infection. Sera samples were tested according to the manufacturer's instructions, but for DBS testing, paper diameters, elution buffer, volume of input sample, and cut-off values were evaluated to optimize the assay. Stability studies were done on DBS stored at for up to 180 days at different temperatures. The absorbance values that yielded the maximum sensitivity and specificity were determined based on the area under the ROC curve (AUROC) and chosen as the cut-off value. Using this parameter, sensitivity was 90.5%, 97.6%, and 78% for anti-HBc, HBsAg, anti-HBs assays, respectively. Specificity was 92.6%, 96.7%, and 97.3% for anti-HBc, HBsAg, and anti-HBs assays, respectively. HBV markers could be detected in DBS samples until 63 days after sample collection at most temperatures, but storage at -20°C yielded more consistent results. These results indicate that modified ELISA can be used to detect HBV markers in DBS samples, particularly if the samples are stored appropriately., (Copyright © 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)

In this study, a modified enzyme immunoassay (EIA) was evaluated for the Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) among whole saliva and oral fluid samples. Specimens were collected from 115 individuals who gave serum and oral fluid using Salivette (Sarstedt, Nümbrecht, Germany) and whole saliva. Saliva specimens were tested following a modified ELISA, and the results were compared with paired serum specimens that were tested according to the supplier's instructions. Transport buffer for the oral fluids, sample volume for assay, incubation period of sample with conjugate as well as cut-off values were evaluated to optimize the assay. The highest sensitivity and specificity were obtained by increasing the incubation of sample and conjugate to 16  hr and using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve to calculate cut-off values. HBsAg was detected in 40 oral fluids and 44 whole saliva samples out of 47 paired positive serum specimens and not detected in 64 oral fluids and 63 whole saliva samples out of 68 matched negative sera samples by the ELISA assay. There was excellent agreement between the results for the serum and saliva specimens kappa value (κ): 0.80 for oral fluid and κ: 0.87 for whole saliva and there was excellent reproducibility. Using an optimized protocol, the sensitivities of whole saliva and oral fluid were 93.6 and 85.1%, respectively, whereas specificities of whole saliva and oral fluid were 92.6 and 94.1%, respectively. Our data showed a significant promise for the use of whole saliva and oral fluid together with the modified commercial EIA for Hepatitis B virus infection surveillance.