Search

Background: The indication for laparoscopic treatment of hepatolithiasis is early-stage regional hepatolithiasis. Open surgery (OS) is the traditional treatment for complex hepatolithiasis. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RLS) overcomes the limitations of the traditional laparoscopic approach in terms of the visual field, instruments, and operational flexibility. RLS is thus theoretically indicated for the treatment of complicated hepatolithiasis. This study aimed to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and feasibility of RLS for the treatment of complicated hepatolithiasis., Methods: From October 2010 to August 2017, 26 consecutive patients who underwent RLS and 287 consecutive patients who underwent OS for the treatment of complicated hepatolithiasis at our center were included in this study. We performed a propensity score matching (PSM) analysis between patients who underwent RLS and patients who underwent OS at a ratio of 1:2. Twenty-six patients were included in the RLS group, and 52 patients were included in the OS group., Results: The groups exhibited no differences with respect to age, sex, location of stones, liver function, history of previous surgery, or Child-Pugh classification. There were no differences in the postoperative complication rates (46.2% vs. 63.5%, p = 0.145), intraoperative stone clearance rates (96.2% vs. 90.4%, p = 1.000), or final stone clearance rates (100% vs. 98.1%, p = 0.652) between the two groups. The RLS group had less blood loss (315.38 ± 237.81 vs. 542.88 ± 518.70 ml, p = 0.037), a lower transfusion rate (15.4% vs. 46.2%, p = 0.008), shorter oral intake times (3.50 ± 1.30 vs. 5.88 ± 4.00 days, p = 0.004), and shorter postoperative hospital stays (13.54 ± 6.54 vs. 17.81 ± 7.49 days, p = 0.016) than the OS group. At a median follow-up of 48 months (range 7-90 months), there were no differences in stone recurrence rate (3.8% vs. 13.5%, p = 0.356) or recurrent cholangitis rate (3.8% vs. 3.8%, p = 1.000) between RLS and OS patients., Conclusion: RLS for complicated hepatolithiasis is safe and feasible with advantages over OS in terms of intraoperative blood loss, transfusion rate, duration of hospital stays, and postoperative recovery.

Background: The reported protocol was difficult to expose the hepatic veins for laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomy of segments VII and VIII. We introduce a new, convenient, applicable approach with the hepatic vein exposed from the head side., Methods: This study included 10 patients who underwent laparoscopic liver resection for HCC in the segments VII and VIII between October, 2014 and November, 2015. Their perioperative course and operative techniques were retrospectively evaluated., Results: All patients underwent laparoscopic anatomical segmentectomy of segments VII and/or VIII of the liver with the hepatic vein exposed from the head side. None of the cases was converted to open surgery. The average procedure duration was 326.20 ± 51.13 min, and the average blood loss volume was 375.0 ± 166.42 ml. No postoperative complications were observed. The average postoperative hospital stay was 6.7 ± 0.82 days. No recurrence or metastasis was observed., Conclusions: Laparoscopic anatomical segmentectomy of liver segments VII and VIII, with the hepatic vein exposed from the head side, may be safe, convenient, and applicable to perform. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;114:752-756. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., (© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: Traditional open liver resection remains the classic procedure for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) located in the posterosuperior segments of the liver (segments I, IVa, VII, and VIII). This study compared the perioperative and oncologic results for laparoscopic versus open liver resection of HCC located in the posterosuperior segments, especially in patients with cirrhosis., Methods: This study included 41 patients who underwent laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) and 86 who underwent open liver resection (OLR) for HCC in the posterosuperior segments between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2012. There perioperative course and oncologic outcomes were retrospectively evaluated., Results: There were no significant differences between the LLR and OLR groups in length of operation (242.41 ± 73.69 vs. 235.38 ± 65.80 min), transfusion rate (7.3 vs. 14.0 %), R0 resection rate (100 vs. 97.7 %), or tumor size (4.22 ± 2.05 vs. 4.30 ± 1.49 cm). In contrast, postoperative hospital stay (9.44 ± 2.72 vs. 14.53 ± 6.03 days) was significantly shorter, and postoperative complication rates (17.1 vs. 37.2 %) and intraoperative blood loss (272.20 ± 170.86 vs. 450.12 ± 344.70 mL) significantly lower in the LLR than in the OLR group. In addition, there was no significant difference between the two groups (LLR vs. OLR) regarding 1-year overall survival rate (95.1 vs. 89.5 %), 3-year overall survival rate (78 vs. 76.7 %,), 1-year disease-free survival rate (87.8 vs. 82.6 %,), and 3-year disease-free survival rate (70.7 vs. 68.6 %)., Conclusions: LLR for selected patients with HCC in the posterosuperior segments may offer the same oncologic outcomes as conventional procedures, while being associated with such advantages as lower blood loss, fewer postoperative complications, and shorter hospital stay.

Background: Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) is a breakthrough in the field of hepatobiliary surgery [1], resulting in the growth of remnant liver volume by 74-87.2% in 9-13 days [2, 3]. However, patients required to undergo two open operations in a short period of time [2-5]. To our knowledge, this video is the first description of the technical aspects of totally laparoscopic ALPPS for the treatment of cirrhotic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)., Methods: A patient with 6-cm cirrhotic HCC in the right liver was referred for surgical treatment. Preoperative examination confirmed that the remnant liver volume to standard liver volume ratio was 27%. Therefore, a totally laparoscopic ALPPS was planned. In the first stage of the operation, the right portal vein was ligated after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A tape was passed along the retrohepatic avascular space and the liver was suspended during parenchymal transection, resulting in the successful completion of liver partition using the anterior approach, which conformed to the "No Touch" principle. Thirteen days after the first stage, the ratio had reached 40.6%. The second stage involved the transections of the right hepatic pedicle and the right hepatic vein., Results: The operative times were 255 min for the first stage and 210 min for the second stage. Pathology confirmed the diagnosis of HCC. A complication, pleural effusion, occurred after the second stage. Following pleural puncture drainage, the patient was discharged 9 days postoperatively. Follow-up 4 months after surgery was uneventful. Comparing with our open ALPPS results in two patients, the laparoscopic approach reduced the rate of postoperative complications and peritoneal adhesions, which often complicate the second stage of the operation, thus contributing to more rapid recovery., Conclusion: Totally laparoscopic ALPPS is feasible, with satisfactory short-term efficacy, conforming to the "No Touch" principle. ALPPS may be safe for the treatment of HCC in cirrhotic patients, but the interval between the two stages may be extended.

Background: An increasing number of patients with hepatolithiasis were diagnosed at an early stage in China. Laparoscopic surgery has introduced new methods of treating this condition., Aim: To investigate the patient selection, operative technique, and efficacy of laparoscopic hepatectomy with bile duct exploration for the treatment of hepatolithiasis., Patients and Methods: The clinical data of 116 patients who underwent laparoscopic hepatectomy (laparoscopic group) and 78 patients who underwent open hepatectomy (open group) for hepatolithiasis were retrospectively analyzed, and were compared with the recent reports., Results: The laparoscopic group had a longer duration of operation (323.3 ± 103.0 min vs. 272.8 ± 66.8 min, p<0.05) and shorter postoperative hospital stay (13.1 ± 5.6 days vs. 16.5 ± 8.4 days, p<0.05) than the open group. There were no significant differences between the two groups in intraoperative blood loss or transfusion rate, postoperative complications, calculus clearance, calculus recurrence, or recurrent cholangitis (p>0.05 for all). Efficacy in the laparoscopic group was similar to that in other recently reported studies., Conclusions: Laparoscopic hepatectomy with bile duct exploration is safe and feasible for early stage localized hepatolithiasis, with an efficacy similar to that of open surgery. Anatomic hepatectomy is important for achieving good therapeutic outcomes., (Copyright © 2013 Editrice Gastroenterologica Italiana S.r.l. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

To investigate the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic resection of focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) in the hepatic caudate lobe. The clinical data of eight patients who underwent laparoscopic hepatic caudate lobe FNH resection at the Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Southwest Hospital, First Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University, were retrospectively analyzed. The laparoscopic procedures were successful in all eight patients, and no patients required conversion to open surgery. Five patients underwent partial caudate lobe resection, one patient underwent caudate lobe resection, and two patients underwent combined left hemihepatectomy with caudate lobe resection. Tumor resection was performed using the left approach in five cases, the right approach in one case, the middle hepatic fissure approach in one case, and the left and right combined approach in one case. The operation time ranged from 120 to 360 min, with a mean of 225 min. The intraoperative blood loss ranged from 50 to 600 ml, with a mean of 235 ml. No postoperative bleeding, bile leakage or abdominal infection occurred. Laparoscopic resection of hepatic caudate lobe FNH was safe and feasible in appropriate patients. Skilled laparoscopic hepatectomy techniques, adequate preoperative evaluation, appropriate choice of surgical approach and the control of intraoperative bleeding are critical to perform this surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]