1. Time to think: Selecting patients who may benefit from synchronous resection of primary pancreatic cancer and liver metastases.
- Author
-
Shi S and Yu XJ
- Subjects
- Hepatectomy adverse effects, Hepatectomy standards, Hepatectomy trends, Humans, Liver Neoplasms mortality, Liver Neoplasms secondary, Pancreatectomy adverse effects, Pancreatectomy standards, Pancreatectomy trends, Pancreatic Neoplasms mortality, Pancreatic Neoplasms pathology, Prognosis, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Hepatectomy methods, Liver Neoplasms surgery, Pancreatectomy methods, Pancreatic Neoplasms surgery, Patient Selection
- Abstract
Pancreatic cancer remains a lethal disease and is associated with poor prognosis, particularly for patients with distant metastasis at diagnosis. Recently, Oweira reported a retrospective study that included 13233 metastatic pancreatic cancer patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database. They demonstrated that pancreatic cancer patients with isolated liver metastases had worse outcomes than patients with isolated lung metastases or distant nodal metastases. At present, the standard treatment for metastatic pancreatic cancer is chemotherapy. However, improvement in the safety of pancreatic surgery has led to the consideration of more aggressive surgical approaches. Schneitler reported two cases of hepatic metastatic pancreatic cancer in which negative margin (R0) resection and long survival were achieved after effective preoperative chemotherapy. In general, these two studies indicate that although pancreatic cancer patients with liver metastasis have a poor prognosis, surgical approaches may prolong survival for a few of these patients. A strategy to select hepatic metastatic pancreatic cancer patients who may benefit from surgical intervention is urgently needed., Competing Interests: Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF