Search

Introduction: There is uncertainty about whether hepatic resection (HR) combined with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) is effective., Methods: Nine hundred and thirty-five consecutive CRS/HIPEC procedures were performed between 1996 and 2016 of which 132(14%) involved concomitant HR. Peri-operative complications were graded according to the Clavien-Dindo Classification. The association of concomitant HR with 19 peri-operative outcomes and overall survival (OS) was assessed using univariate and multivariate analyses., Results: Patients undergoing HR had a lower peritoneal disease burden (peritoneal cancer index <17) (46 vs 29%, P < 0.001) and underwent a shorter operation (<9 h) (53 vs 42%, P = 0.019). After accounting for confounding factors, HR was not associated with in-hospital mortality (Relative risk [RR], 2.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.52-11.77; P = 0.577) or grade III/IV morbidity (RR, 1.18; 95%CI, 0.74-1.90; P = 0.488). Moreover, HR was not associated with an increased risk of other complications on univariate or multivariate analysis. Median OS for all colorectal cancer patients was 32.3 month with resected HM versus 30.5 months without HM (P = 0.587)., Conclusion: Given prudent patient selection, concomitant HR does not compromise peri-operative outcomes or survival after CRS/HIPEC., (© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: Surgical extirpation of neuroendocrine neoplasms hepatic metastases (NENHM) provides the best opportunity of long-term survival but is not feasible in the majority of patients given the widespread presentation of liver disease. Combining resection with local ablation can potentially expand the resection criteria and thereby improve survival. The present study critically evaluates the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of patients with NENHM who underwent concomitant hepatic resection and cryoablation., Methods: Forty patients with NENHM underwent concomitant hepatic resection and cryoablation between December 1992 and June 2010. PFS and OS were determined; clinicopathologic and treatment-related factors associated with PFS and OS were evaluated through univariate and multivariate analyses., Results: The median follow-up for the patients who were alive was 61 months (range, 1 to 162 mo). The median PFS and OS after hepatic resection were 22 and 95 months, respectively. Five-year and 10-year OS rate was 61% and 40%, respectively. One independent factor was associated with OS: histologic grade (P=0.001). One independent factor was associated with PFS: extrahepatic disease (P=0.003)., Conclusion: Concomitant hepatic resection and cryoablation to achieve tumor debulking is associated with excellent survival outcomes in selected patients. This approach may increase the number of patients with borderline resectable disease undergoing surgical management of advanced NENHM.

Background: Recent data suggest that hepatectomy for patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM) with concomitant extrahepatic disease (EHD) achieve encouraging survival result. The authors examine the clinical efficacy of this treatment approach through a systematic review of the published literature., Methods: Electronic search of the MEDLINE and PubMed databases (January 2000 to January 2011) to identify studies reporting outcomes of hepatectomy for CLM with resection of EHD was undertaken. Two reviewers independently appraised each study using a predetermined protocol. Clinical efficacy was synthesised through a narrative review with full tabulation of results of all included studies., Results: Twenty-two studies were examined. This comprised 1142 patients. The median disease-free survival was 12 (range, 4-22) months, median overall survival was 30 (range, 14-44) months and median 5-year survival rate was 19% (range, 0-42%). Median 5-year survival of patients with R0 hepatectomy with resection of EHD was 25% (range, 19-36%). Survival based on site of EHD include lung; median survival (M/S) was 41 (range, 32-46) months, porto-caval lymph node; M/S was 25 (range, 19-48) months, peritoneal metastases; M/S was 25 (range, 18-32) months., Conclusion: In the era of effective systemic therapies, surgical resection of CLM and concomitant EHD in carefully selected patients may achieve survival results superior to non-surgically treated patients. This treatment strategy may be considered appropriate especially when a R0 hepatectomy and complete resection of EHD may be achieved., (Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Background: Liver transplantation is believed to be the best treatment option for selected patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the shortage of organs and the risk of tumor progression while on the waiting list has hampered this effective treatment modality from being routinely offered. Hence, the second option of hepatic resection must be considered. The aim of this study is to report the results of hepatic resection in transplantable patients., Methods: From 1991 to 2009, 97 patients underwent liver resection for HCC. Thirty patients (31%) met transplant criteria [(Milan/University of California San Francisco (UCSF) Liver Transplant Criteria]. Outcomes after hepatic resection were evaluated with disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival as the endpoints by stratification of transplant eligibility., Results: There were 30 patients within the UCSF transplant criteria and 16 patients within the Milan transplant criteria. By using either transplant criteria, patients survived an actuarial median survival of 102 months. Patients selected based on the Milan criteria had a median DFS of 55 months and patients selected based on the UCSF criteria had a median DFS of 42 months. Patients who were Child Pugh B (UCSF criteria P<0.001) and with cirrhosis had a poorer outcome after hepatic resection (UCSF criteria P=0.011, Milan criteria P=0.002)., Conclusions: Long-term DFS and overall survival may be achieved through hepatic resection for transplantable HCC. This is an effective option and may be regarded as a first-line treatment option. Patients with Child Pugh B or are cirrhotics may benefit more from a transplantation than a resection.

Introduction: Only 15% of patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM) are candidates for curative hepatectomy at time of diagnosis, limited by anatomical location and tumor burden. Ablative therapies may extend this. This study reports a single institution's long-term experience with hepatic cryotherapy for advanced CLM., Methods: Between April 1990 and June 2009, 304 patients were curatively treated with cryotherapy. Survival was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic factors for survivals were determined by using univariate and multivariate analyses., Results: A total of 293 patients were included into analysis. The median number of lesions treated per patient was three (range, 1-13). The median overall survival was 29 (range, 3-220) months. The 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year survivals were 87%, 41.8%, 24.2%, and 13.3%, respectively. A total of 161 patients developed intrahepatic recurrences: cryosite (23%); edge recurrence (14%); and within the liver remnant (78%). The median disease-free survival (DFS) was 9 (range, 1-220) months. The 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year DFS rates were 37.9%, 17.2%, 13.4%, and 10.8%, respectively. Univariate analysis identified four factors that significantly affect survival: node-positive primary tumor (p=0.001), preoperative CEA level (p<0.001), number of lesions (p<0.001), and use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (p<0.001). However, only primary tumor nodal status was independently prognostic (hazards ratio=2.023; 95% confidence interval, 1.444-2.835; p<0.001)., Conclusions: Hepatic cryotherapy seems to be a safe and effective ablative technique for the treatment of colorectal liver metastases and may offer long-term survival in otherwise unresectable disease.

Background: Surgery confers the best chance of long-term survival in patients with neuroendocrine neoplasm hepatic metastases (NENHM). Disease progression invariably occurs in the majority of patients. No previous study has addressed the outcomes after treatment of hepatic disease progression in patients who initially underwent surgical extirpation of NENHM. This was the principal aim of the current study., Methods: Seventy-four patients with NENHM underwent surgery for NENHM between December 1992 and December 2009. Of these, 50 patients developed disease progression in the liver. These patients were then treated with specific liver-directed therapies according to consensus of a multidisciplinary team. The current study evaluates progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) following treatment of hepatic disease progression with specific liver-directed therapies., Results: No patient was lost to follow up. The median follow-up after treatment of progression was 29 months (range = 2-137). The median PFS and OS after diagnosis of disease progression were 15 and 48 months, respectively. Specific liver-directed therapies included surgery in 10 patients, radioembolization in 15, cytotoxic chemotherapy in 14, and conservative therapy in 11. Four independent factors associated with PFS and OS were identified through a multivariate analysis. These were initial progression-free survival (PFS, P = 0.006, HR= 0.32), extra-hepatic disease (OS, P = 0.029, HR = 4.04; PFS, P = 0.004, HR = 4.03), histological grade (PFS, P = 0.006, HR = 4.08), and type of secondary intervention (PFS, P = 0.024, HR = 0.63)., Conclusion: A multimodality approach towards treatment of disease progression as shown in this study that includes repeat surgery or radioembolization has been shown to achieve a superior outcome in the setting of disease progression/recurrence., (Copyright © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: Systemic chemotherapy is the mainstay of treatment for metastatic breast cancer with the role of surgery being strictly limited for palliation of metastatic complications or locoregional relapse. An increasing number of studies examining the role of therapeutic hepatic metastasectomy show encouraging survival results. A systematic review was undertaken to define its safety, efficacy and to identify prognostic factors associated with survival., Methods: Electronic search of the MEDLINE and PubMed databases (January 2000-January 2011) to identify studies reporting outcomes of hepatectomy for breast cancer liver metastases (BCLM) with hepatectomy was undertaken. Two reviewers independently appraised each study using a predetermined protocol. Safety and clinical efficacy was synthesised through a narrative review with full tabulation of results of all included studies., Results: Nineteen studies were examined. This comprised of 553 patients. Hepatectomy for BCLM was performed at a rate of 1.8 (range, 0.7-7.7) cases per year in reported series. The median time to liver metastases occurred at a median of 40 (range, 23-77) months. The median mortality and complication rate were 0% (range, 0-6%) and 21% (range, 0-44%), respectively. The median overall survival was 40 (range, 15-74) months and median 5-year survival rate was 40% (range, 21-80%). Potential prognostic factors associated with a poorer overall survival include a positive liver surgical margin and hormone refractory disease., Conclusion: Hepatectomy is rarely performed for BCLM but the studies described in this review indicate consistent results with superior 5-year survival for selected patients with isolated liver metastases and in those with well controlled minimal extrahepatic disease. To evaluate its efficacy and control for selection bias, a randomised trial of standard chemotherapy with or without hepatectomy for BCLM is warranted., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HC) is invariably fatal without surgical intervention. The primary aim of the current study was to report overall survival and recurrence-free survival outcomes after surgical resection of HC., Methods: Between December 1992 and December 2009, 85 patients were evaluated; of these, 42 patients underwent potentially curative surgery. These patients are the principal subjects of this study. Patients were assessed monthly for the first 3 months and then at 6-month intervals after treatment. Recurrence-free survival and overall survival were determined; 18 clinicopathologic and treatment-related factors associated with recurrence-free survival and overall survival were evaluated through univariate and multivariate analyses., Results: No patient was lost to follow-up evaluation. The median follow-up period was 20 months (range, 0-106 mo). The median recurrence-free survival and overall survival after resection was 15 and 28 months, respectively. The 5-year survival rate was 24%. Two factors were associated with overall survival: histologic grade (P = .002) and margin status (P = .033). Only histologic grade (P = .029) was associated with recurrence-free survival., Conclusions: Surgical resection is an efficacious treatment for HC. Patient selection based on identified prognostic factors can improve treatment outcomes., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Hepatic resection of colorectal liver metastases (CLM) is now regarded the standard of care. Evaluation of true long-term survivors will demonstrate the curative potential of this therapy with cure being defined as actual 10-year survival versus a satisfactory oncological outcome of 5-year survival. Limited data exists on outcomes of patients beyond 5 years. Studying the rates of cure and predictive factors for cure are essential to define the true benefit of this therapy., Methods: Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained hepatobiliary surgical database was performed on patients who underwent hepatic resection of CLM between 1991 and 2005 with a minimum of 5-year follow-up. Survival was calculated from the time of surgery using the Kaplan-Meier method., Results: There were 455 consecutive patients with a minimum of 5-year follow-up. The actuarial median overall survival was 33 months (95% CI, 29-37%), actuarial 5-, and 10-year survival rates were 34% and 25%, respectively. Hundred twenty four patients were identified as actual 5-year survivors (27%) with their actuarial median overall survival being 11.1 years, actuarial 10-year survival rate of 59%, and a median disease-free survival of 4.9 years. Patients requiring subsequent treatment of modern systemic chemotherapy for post-resection recurrence (P = 0.003) was a negative predictors of cure from multivariate analysis., Conclusion: This study demonstrate that approximately one in three patients undergoing resection for CLM will become actual 5-year survivors from which approximately half will go on to survive 10-years and be cured of CLM., (Copyright © 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)

Background: Neuroendocrine neoplasms most commonly metastasize to the liver. Operative extirpation of neuroendocrine neoplasm hepatic metastases improves symptoms and seems to improve survival, but subsequent evidence is required. The current study evaluates the progression-free survival and overall survival of patients after resection (with or without ablation) of neuroendocrine neoplasm hepatic metastases. As a secondary endpoint, the prognostic factors associated with progression-free survival and overall survival were evaluated., Methods: Seventy-four patients with neuroendocrine neoplasm hepatic metastases underwent hepatic resection between December 1992 and December 2009. Thirty-eight patients underwent synchronous cryoablation. Patients were assessed radiologically and serologically at monthly intervals for the first 3 months and then at 6-month intervals after treatment. Progression-free survival and overall survival were determined; clinicopathologic and treatment-related factors associated with progression-free survival and overall survival were evaluated through univariate and multivariate analyses., Results: No patient was lost to follow-up. The median follow-up for the patients who were alive was 41 months (range, 1-162). The median progression-free survival and overall survival after hepatic resection were 23 and 95 months, respectively. Five- and 10-year overall survival were 63% and 40%, respectively. Two independent factors were associated with overall survival: histologic grade (P < .001) and extrahepatic disease (P = .021). The only independent predictor for progression-free survival was pathologic margin status (P = .023)., Conclusion: In selected patients, aggressive operative extirpation of neuroendocrine neoplasm hepatic metastases is effective in achieving long-term survival. Disease progression, however, is a common occurrence; therefore, a multimodality treatment approach for progressive disease is necessary. Integrating the knowledge of identified prognostic factors can both improve patient selection and identify patients at greatest risk of treatment failure., (Copyright © 2011 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Identification of clinicopathological determinants that predict for risk of recurrence and overall survival after undergoing potentially curative hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma is a strategy towards personalizing therapy to improve outcome. Through evaluation of a center's experience with treatment of a disease, determinants unique to the treated patient cohort may be identified., Methods: Ninety-seven patients with hepatocellular carcinoma underwent liver resection. Clinical, treatment, and histopathological variables were collected and evaluated using univariate and multivariate analyses with disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) as the endpoints., Results: The median follow-up period of 19 (range, 1 to 188) months from the time of hepatic resection. The median DFS and OS after resection of HCC were 17 and 41 months, respectively. Five-year overall survival rate was 45%. Eight independent factors associated with disease-free and overall survival were identified through a multivariate analysis. Three factors: Child-Pugh score (DFS p = 0.045, OS p = 0.001), histopathological grade (DFS p < 0.001, OS p < 0.001), and histological diagnosis of cirrhosis (DFS p < 0.001, OS p < 0.001) predicted for both disease-free and overall survival., Conclusion: Integrating the knowledge of identified prognostic factors into clinical decision making may provide a clinicopathological signature that could identify patients at greatest risk of treatment failure such that novel interventions may be applied to improve the survival outcome.

Background: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is rare, but its incidence is rapidly increasing in developed countries. Early detection and surgical extirpation offer the only hope for cure. Given the rarity of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, there is limited knowledge regarding its natural history, clinicopathological characteristics, or outcomes following surgery. The primary aim of the current study is to report overall survival and recurrence-free survival outcomes following resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. The secondary aim is to evaluate the impact of prognostic variables on outcomes., Methods: Between November 1990 and November 2009, 88 patients were evaluated for their suitability for potentially curative surgery; of these, 40 patients underwent potentially curative surgery. These patients are the principal subjects of the current analysis. Patients were assessed at monthly intervals for the first 3 months and then at six monthly intervals after treatment. Recurrence-free survival and overall survival were determined; 17 clinicopathological and treatment-related factors associated with recurrence-free survival and overall survival were evaluated through univariate and multivariate analyses., Results: No patient was lost to follow-up. The median follow-up was 31 months (range = 0-142 months). The median recurrence-free survival and overall survival after resection were 21 and 33 months, respectively. The 5-year survival rate was 28%. Four factors were associated with overall survival: carbohydrate antigen 19.9 (p = 0.020), clinical stage (p = 0.018), histological grade (p = 0.020), and lymph node metastases (p = 0.003). Two factors were associated with recurrence-free survival: carbohydrate antigen 19.9 (p = 0.002) and margin status (p = 0.002)., Conclusion: Hepatic resection is an efficacious treatment for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Clincopathological factors can predict outcome and should be used in the preoperative assessment of operability.

Resection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) offers the only hope for cure. However, in patients undergoing resection, recurrences, in particular, intrahepatic recurrence are common. The effectiveness of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) as a neoadjuvant therapy for unresectable HCC was exploited by numerous liver units and employed preoperatively in the setting of resectable HCC with an aim to prevent recurrence and prolong survival. A systematic literature search of databases (Medline and PubMed) to identify published studies of TACE administered preoperatively as a neoadjuvant treatment for resectable HCC was undertaken. A systematic review by tabulation of the results was performed with disease-free survival (DFS) as the primary endpoint. Overall survival (OS), rate of pathological response, impact on surgical morbidity and mortality and pattern of recurrences were secondary endpoints of this review. Eighteen studies; three randomized trials and 15 observational studies were evaluated. This comprised of 3927 patients, of which, 1293 underwent neoadjuvant TACE. The median DFS in the TACE and non-TACE group ranged from 10 to 46 and 8 to 52 months, respectively, with 67% of studies reporting similar DFS between groups despite higher extent of tumour necrosis from the resected specimens indicating a higher rate of pathological response (partial TACE 27–72% vs. non-TACE 23–52%; complete TACE 0–28% vs. non-TACE zero), with no difference in surgical morbidity and mortality outcome. No conclusion could be drawn with respect to OS. Both randomized and non-randomized trials suggest the use of TACE preoperatively as a neoadjuvant treatment in resectable HCC is a safe and efficacious procedure with high rates of pathological responses. However, it does not appear to improve DFS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]