Search

Importance: Repeat hepatectomy and percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (PRFA) are most commonly used to treat early-stage recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (RHCC) after initial resection, but previous studies comparing the effectiveness of the 2 treatments have reported conflicting results., Objective: To compare the long-term survival outcomes after repeat hepatectomy with those after PRFA among patients with early-stage RHCC., Design, Setting, and Participants: This open-label randomized clinical trial was conducted at the Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital and the National Center for Liver Cancer of China. A total of 240 patients with RHCC (with a solitary nodule diameter of ≤5 cm; 3 or fewer nodules, each ≤3 cm in diameter; and no macroscopic vascular invasion or distant metastasis) were randomized 1:1 to receive repeat hepatectomy or PRFA between June 3, 2010, and January 15, 2013. The median (range) follow-up time was 44.3 (4.3-90.6) months (last follow-up, January 15, 2018). Data analysis was conducted from June 15, 2018, to September 28, 2018., Interventions: Repeat hepatectomy (n = 120) or PRFA (n = 120)., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included repeat recurrence-free survival (rRFS), patterns of repeat recurrence, and therapeutic safety., Results: Among the 240 randomized patients (216 men [90.0%]; median [range] age, 53.0 [24.0-59.0] years), 217 completed the trial. In the intention-to-treat (ITT) population, the 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year OS rates were 92.5% (95% CI, 87.9%-97.3%), 65.8% (95% CI, 57.8%-74.8%), and 43.6% (95% CI, 35.5%-53.5%), respectively, for the repeat hepatectomy group and 87.5% (95% CI, 81.8%-93.6%), 52.5% (95% CI, 44.2%-62.2%), and 38.5% (95% CI, 30.6%-48.4%), respectively, for the PRFA group (P = .17). The corresponding 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year rRFS rates were 85.0% (95% CI, 78.8%-91.6%), 52.4% (95% CI, 44.2%-62.2%), and 36.2% (95% CI, 28.5%-46.0%), respectively, for the repeat hepatectomy group and 74.2% (95% CI, 66.7%-82.4%), 41.7% (95% CI, 33.7%-51.5%), and 30.2% (95% CI, 22.9%-39.8%), respectively, for the PRFA group (P = .09). Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation was associated with a higher incidence of local repeat recurrence (37.8% vs 21.7%, P = .04) and early repeat recurrence than repeat hepatectomy (40.3% vs 23.3%, P = .04). In subgroup analyses, PRFA was associated with worse OS vs repeat hepatectomy among patients with an RHCC nodule diameter greater than 3 cm (hazard ratio, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.05-2.84) or an α fetoprotein level greater than 200 ng/mL (hazard ratio, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.15-2.96). Surgery had a higher complication rate than did ablation (22.4% vs 7.3%, P = .001)., Conclusions and Relevance: No statistically significant difference was observed in survival outcomes after repeat hepatectomy vs PRFA for patients with early-stage RHCC. Repeat hepatectomy may be associated with better local disease control and long-term survival in patients with an RHCC diameter greater than 3 cm or an AFP level greater than 200 ng/mL., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00822562.

Objectives: To compare combined percutaneous radiofrequency ablation and ethanol injection (RFA-PEI) with hepatic resection (HR) in the treatment of resectable solitary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with 2.1-5.0 cm diameter., Methods: From June 2009 to December 2015, 271 patients whom underwent RFA-PEI (n = 141) or HR (n = 130) in three centres were enrolled. The overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) between groups were compared with Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests. Complications, hospital stay and cost were assessed., Results: The OS rates at 1, 3 and 5 years were 93.5%, 72.7%, 58.6% in RFA-PEI group and 82.3%, 57.5%, 51.8% in HR group (p = 0.021). The corresponding 1-, 3- and 5-year RFS rates were 65.8%, 41.3%, 34.3% in RFA-PEI group and 50.5%, 33.8%, 28.4% in HR group (p = 0.038). For patients with 2.1-3.0 cm tumours, the 1-, 3- and 5-year OS after RFA-PEI and HR were 98.0%, 82.3%, 74.2% and 89.4%, 65.1%, 61.9%, respectively (p = 0.024). The corresponding RFS were 79.6%, 54.7%, 45.1% in RFA-PEI group, and 57.6%, 43.9%, 31.7% in HR group, respectively (p = 0.020). RFA-PEI was superior to HR in major complication rates, length of hospital stay and cost (all p < 0.001)., Conclusion: RFA-PEI had a survival benefit over HR in the treatment of solitary HCCs, especially for those with 2.1-3.0 cm in diameter., Key Points: • RFA-PEI provided superior survival to HR in solitary HCC with 2.1-5.0 cm in diameter. • RFA-PEI is superior to HR in complications, length of hospital stay and cost. • RFA-PEI might be an alternative treatment for solitary HCC within 5.0 cm in diameter.

Purpose To retrospectively investigate the safety and efficacy of sorafenib combined with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) (hereafter, TACE-RFA) in the treatment of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (rHCC) with portal vein tumor thrombosis, extrahepatic metastases (advanced hepatocellular carcinoma), or both after initial hepatectomy. Materials and Methods The study was centrally approved by the ethics committee of three tertiary medical centers in China. From January 2010 to January 2015, 207 consecutive patients with advanced rHCC after initial hepatectomy received sorafenib combined with TACE-RFA (combination group, n = 106) or sorafenib alone (sorafenib group, n = 101) at the three medical centers. Overall survival (OS) and time to progression (TTP) were compared between the two groups. Complications were assessed. Survival curves were constructed with the Kaplan-Meier method and were compared with the log-rank test. Results Baseline characteristics were balanced between the two groups. No treatment-related death occurred in either group. The toxicity profile in the combination group was similar to that in the sorafenib group. After treatment, median OS (14.0 vs 9.0 months, respectively; P < .001) and TTP (7.0 vs 4.0 months, respectively; P < .001) were significantly longer in the combination group than in the sorafenib group. Multivariate analysis showed that treatment allocation was a significant predictor of OS and TTP, while the number of intrahepatic tumors was another prognostic factor of OS. Conclusion Sorafenib combined with TACE-RFA was well tolerated and safe and was superior to sorafenib alone in improving survival outcomes in patients with advanced rHCC after initial hepatectomy. © RSNA, 2018 Online supplemental material is available for this article.