Search

Purpose: Before performing anterior sectionectomy (AS) or central bisectionectomy (CBS), the anatomy of the right posterior bile duct (RPBD) must be cautiously assessed owing to the many variations of the RPBD and its variations could be related to bile duct injury., Methods: Clinical data of patients who underwent AS or CBS from 2009 to 2018 were reviewed. The bile duct anatomy according to Okubo's criteria and the right bile duct (RBD) length were evaluated using MRI, and we performed a risk factor analysis of the RPBD stricture (RPBDS)., Results: A total of 68 patients were included. Type A bile ducts were the most common (n = 36, 52.9%). Five (7.2%) patients had RPBDS requiring intervention. RPBDS only occurred in patients with a type A bile duct and a type A portal vein undergoing surgery using the Glissonian sheath approach. Moreover, when the RBD length was > 12 mm, the sensitivity and specificity were 0.8 and 0.889, respectively. In multivariate analysis, RBD length of > 12 mm was significant., Conclusion: A careful review of RPBD anatomy especially in patient with long RBD and caution when using the anterior Glissonian sheath approach might be helpful to prevent RPBDS during AS or CBS., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: This study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of minimally invasive living donor hepatectomy in comparison with the open procedure, using Korean Organ Transplantation Registry data., Methods: We reviewed the prospectively collected data of all 1,694 living liver donors (1,071 men, 623 women) who underwent donor hepatectomy between April 2014 and December 2017. The donors were grouped on the basis of procedure type to the minimally invasive procedure group (n = 304) or to the open procedure group (n = 1,390) and analyzed the relationships between clinical data and complications., Results: No donors died after the procedure. The overall complication rates after operation in the minimally invasive procedure group and the open procedure group were 6.2% and 3.5%, respectively. Biliary complications were the most frequent events in both groups (minimally invasive procedure group, 2.4%; open procedure group, 1.6%). The majority of complications occurred within 7 days after surgery in both groups. The duration of hospitalization was shorter in the minimally invasive procedure group than in the open procedure group (9.04 ± 3.78 days versus 10.29 ± 4.01 days; P < .05)., Conclusion: Based on its similar outcomes in our study, minimally invasive donor hepatectomy cannot be an alternative option compared with the open procedure method. To overcome this, we need to ensure better surgical safety, such as lower complication rate and shorter duration of hospitalization., (Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: When a hepatic tumor is deeply located in segments 7 and 8 around the right hepatic vein (RHV), right hemihepatectomy (RH) could be excessive owing to the resection of large tumor-free segments. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of bisegmentectomy 7-8 (S7-8) and to compare its surgical outcomes with those of RH., Materials and Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent S7-8 and RH were enrolled in this study. In the S7-8 group, 14 patients with an obvious inferior right hepatic vein (IRHV) (median: 6 mm; range: 3.6-8.8 mm) underwent S7-8 without hepatic vein reconstruction. RHV reconstruction was performed in six patients without an IRHV, involving direct anastomosis of the RHV in five patients and reconstruction using a cryo-preserved iliac vein in one patient., Results: A total of 61 patients were included (20 in S7-8 group; 41 in RH group). No significant differences were observed other than higher a model of end-stage liver disease score in the RH group than in the S7-8 group (7 [6-20] vs. 6 [6-9], P = 0.003). Post-hepatectomy liver failure including severe grades was more frequent in the RH group (43.9% vs. 10%, P = 0.008). In the S7-8 group, two patients with direct RHV reconstruction had RHV anastomosis obstruction, and eventually required insertion of a metallic stent. However, computed tomography performed 4 weeks after the operation showed intact venous outflow of the right liver in the S7-8 group., Conclusion: S7-8 can be performed safely in selected patients with a thick IRHV. For patients with no obvious IRHV, RHV reconstruction could be a good surgical strategy to retain venous outflow of the right liver with feasible outcomes., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2020 IJS Publishing Group Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Conventional biochemical markers have limited usefulness in the prediction of early liver dysfunction. We, therefore, tried to find more useful liver failure biomarkers after liver resection that are highly sensitive to internal and external challenges in the biological system with a focus on liver metabolites. Twenty pigs were divided into the following 3 groups: sham operation group (n = 6), 70% hepatectomy group (n = 7) as a safety margin of resection model, and 90% hepatectomy group (n = 7) as a liver failure model. Blood sampling was performed preoperatively and at 1, 6, 14, 30, 38, and 48 hours after surgery, and 129 primary metabolites were profiled. Orthogonal projection to latent structures-discriminant analysis revealed that, unlike in the 70% hepatectomy and sham operation groups, central carbon metabolism was the most significant factor in the 90% hepatectomy group. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to develop a predictive model for mortality risk following hepatectomy. The recommended variables were malic acid, methionine, tryptophan, glucose, and γ-aminobutyric acid. Area under the curve of the linear combination of five metabolites was 0.993 (95% confidence interval: 0.927-1.000, sensitivity: 100.0, specificity: 94.87). We proposed robust biomarker panels that can accurately predict mortality risk associated with hepatectomy.

Background: Radical resection is the only curative treatment for patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma. While left-side hepatectomy (LH) may have an oncological disadvantage over right-side hepatectomy (RH) owing to the contiguous anatomical relationship between right hepatic inflow and biliary confluence, a small future liver remnant after RH could cause worse surgical morbidity and mortality. We retrospectively compared surgical morbidity and long-term outcome between RH and LH to determine the optimal surgical strategy for the treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma., Methods: This study considered 83 patients who underwent surgical resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma between 2010 and 2017. Among them, 57 patients undergoing curative-intent surgery including liver resection were enrolled for analysis-33 in the RH group and 27 in the LH group. Prospectively collected clinicopathologic characteristics, perioperative outcomes, and long-term survival were evaluated., Results: Portal vein embolization was more frequently performed in the RH group than in the LH group (18.2% vs. 0%, P = 0.034). The proportion of R0 resection was comparable in both groups (75.8% vs. 75.0%, P = 0.948). The 5-year overall and recurrence-free survival rates did not differ between the groups (37.7% vs. 41.9%, P = 0.500, and 26.3% vs. 33.9%, P = 0.580, respectively). The side of liver resection did not affect long-term survival. In multivariate analysis, transfusion (odds ratio, 3.12 [1.42-6.87], P = 0.005) and post-hepatectomy liver failure (≥ grade B, 4.62 [1.86-11.49], P = 0.001) were independent risk factors for overall survival., Conclusions: We recommend deciding the side of liver resection according to the possibility of achieving radical resection considering the anatomical differences between RH and LH.

Curative treatments for very early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), defined as single HCC with a maximum diameter of <2 cm in patients with well-preserved liver function, consist of surgical resection or radiofrequency ablation (RFA). In this retrospective study, we compared the efficacy of both treatments in 154 patients with very early-stage HCCs who underwent resection or RFA as initial therapy and were followed up for a median of 56.8 months. Propensity score matching analysis was also conducted. Overall survival was comparable between treatment groups (median survival time of 143 vs 97 months for resection and RFA, respectively; P = .132). Resection group; however, demonstrated a significantly lower recurrence rate after initial therapy than RFA group (42.3% vs 65.7%; P = .006) with a longer median recurrence-free survival time (66.7 vs 33.8 months; P = .002), which was confirmed even after matching (P = .04). In contrast, the recurrence pattern in advanced-stage (9.6% vs 1.0%; P = .01) or incurable recurrences (19% vs 13%; P = .04) was more frequent following resection than RFA. Recurrent lesions were comparatively more curable in RFA group than in resection group (80% vs 54.5%; P = .02). The recurrence of HCC was independently associated with lower serum albumin level (P = .027), the presence of comorbid diabetes mellitus (P = .010), and RFA (P = .034). In conclusion, in patients with very early-stage HCC, surgical resection has achieved significantly better recurrence-free survival than RFA. A closer follow-up is required after resection.

Background: The aim of the present study was to compare the prognostic impact of anatomic resection (AR) versus non-anatomic resection (NAR) on patient survival after resection of a single hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)., Methods: To control for confounding variable distributions, a 1-to-1 propensity score match was applied to compare the outcomes of AR and NAR. Among 710 patients with a primary, solitary HCC of <5.0 cm in diameter that was resectable by either AR or NAR from 2003 to 2007 in Japan and Korea, 355 patients underwent NAR and 355 underwent AR of at least one section with complete removal of the portal territory containing the tumor., Results: Overall survival (OS) was better in the AR than NAR group (hazard ratio 1.67, 95% confidence interval 1.28-2.19, P < 0.001) while disease-free survival showed no significant difference. Significantly fewer patients in the AR than NAR group developed intrahepatic HCC recurrence and multiple intrahepatic recurrences. Patients with poorly differentiated HCC who underwent AR had improved disease-free survival and OS., Conclusions: Anatomic resection decreases the risk of tumor recurrence and improves OS in patients with a primary, solitary HCC of <5.0 cm in diameter., (© 2017 Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery.)

Major concerns about donor safety cause controversy and limit the use of living donor liver transplantation to overcome organ shortages. The Korean Organ Transplantation Registry established a nationwide organ transplantation registration system in 2014. We reviewed the prospectively collected data of all 832 living liver donors who underwent procedures between April 2014 and December 2015. We allocated the donors to a left lobe group (n = 59) and a right lobe group (n = 773) and analyzed the relations between graft types and remaining liver volumes and complications (graded using the Clavien 5-tier grading system). The median follow-up was 19 months (range, 10-31 months). During the study period, 553 men and 279 women donated livers, and there were no deaths after living liver donation. The overall, biliary, and major complication (grade ≥ III) rates were 9.3%, 1.7%, and 1.9%, respectively. The graft types and remaining liver volume were associated with significantly different overall, biliary, and major complication rates. Of the 16 patients with major complications, 9 (56.3%) involved biliary complications (2 biliary strictures [12.5%] and 7 bile leakages [43.8%]). Among the 832 donors, the mean aspartate transaminase, alanine aminotransferase, and total bilirubin levels were 23.9 ± 8.1 IU/L, 20.9 ± 11.3 IU/L, and 0.8 ± 0.4 mg/dL, respectively, 6 months after liver donation. In conclusion, biliary complications were the most common types of major morbidity in living liver donors. Donor hepatectomy can be performed successfully with minimal and easily controlled complications. Our study shows that prospective, nationwide cohort data provide an important means of investigating the safety in living liver donation. Liver Transplantation 23 999-1006 2017 AASLD., (© 2017 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.)

Background: Anti-adhesive agents are increasingly used to reduce the incidence of postoperative adhesions following abdominal surgery. Bile leakage after liver resection remains a major cause of postoperative morbidity. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of anti-adhesive agent on bile leakage after liver resection., Materials and Methods: 77 patients were enrolled to receive an anti-adhesive agent (study group) during liver resection between May 2012 and August 2013. The study group was compared to a match-paired control group. Clinical data were collected including bilirubin concentration in serum and drain fluid and bile leakage rate. In addition, a separate analysis was performed between patients with and without postoperative bile leakage., Results: There was no difference in bile leakage rate or hospital stay between the study group (n = 77) and control group (n = 77). Of the total number of patients (n = 154), there were 29 patients with postoperative bile leak and 125 patients without bile leak. On univariate analysis, patients without history of hepatitis were significantly associated with bile leakage. In addition, liver resection with broader cut surface area was associated with bile leakage. Application of anti-adhesive agent was not associated with bile leakage. On multivariate analysis, resection with broader cut surface area (OR = 2.788, p = 0.026) and patients without history of hepatitis (OR = 5.153, p = 0.039) were significantly associated with bile leakage., Conclusions: Larger area of cut-surface and patients without history of hepatitis were significant risk factors for bile leakage. The use of anti-adhesive agent was not associated with increased risk of bile leakage., (Copyright © 2016 IJS Publishing Group Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: There has been remarkable progress in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) during the last several decades, but its effect on the prognosis of HCC patient needs clarification. We analysed the changes that affected prognosis of HCC patients diagnosed over two different eras., Methods: A retrospective study of 1318 patients diagnosed with HCC from 1986 to 2012 was conducted. Analysis was done according to two cohorts, cohort 1 (patients diagnosed with HCC from 1986 to 1992) and cohort 2 (patients diagnosed from 2006 to 2012)., Results: Hepatitis B virus was the most common cause of liver disease for both cohorts (66.2% and 66.0%). The proportion of patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage 0/A was significantly lower in cohort 1 than in cohort 2 (14.4% vs. 39.5%, P < 0.001). The proportions of patients diagnosed during surveillance and general health check-up were significantly higher in cohort 2 than in cohort 1 (28.6% vs. 10.6% and 26.3% vs. 7.9%, respectively) while those diagnosed during symptomatic evaluation was significantly higher in cohort 1 than in cohort 2 (45.1 vs. 81.4%, P < 0.001). Surgical resection rate was similar between the two cohorts (26.1% vs 26%) while the transcatheter arterial chemoembolization rate which was the highest in cohort 1 (40.6%) was overtaken by radiofrequency ablation in cohort 2 (55%) at BCLC stage 0/A. Median survival duration in cohort 2 was significantly longer than cohort 1 (65.0 vs. 7.9 months, P < 0.001)., Conclusions: Implementation of national cancer surveillance and the advancement of treatment modalities have likely led to early detection of HCC and improvements in prognosis over the last 20 years., (© 2015 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background/aims: Combined resection of segments 5 and 8, or right anterior segmentectomy, is one of the most difficult hepatic resections because of the danger of bleeding from the two major hepatic veins, the middle and right hepatic veins, during hepatectomy. We describe here the operative procedure and clinical analysis of right anterior segmentectomy in 35 patients with hepatic malignancy., Methodology: Between March 1993 and December 2004, 35 patients underwent right anterior segmentectomy for hepatic malignancy. The technique used was based on the extraglissonian approach and parenchymal Kelly crushing, during which the two major hepatic veins were almost fully exposed., Results: Thirty-three patients had hepatocellular carcinoma, one had peripheral cholangiocellular carcinoma, and one had primary hepatic sarcoma. The mean operation time was 331 +/- 73 minutes and the mean transfusion of packed RBC was 1.09 +/- 1.57 pints. There was one in-hospital death as a result of sepsis and hepatic failure. The cumulative 1-, 2- and 5-year survival rates were 94%, 72% and 62%, respectively., Conclusions: For surgeons who accurately know the anatomy of the liver, this procedure is safe and suitable in selected patients with hepatic malignancies and may increase the survival rate.

Abstract: INTRODUCTION: Hepatocellular carcinoma, the most frequent primary hepatic tumor, metastasizes in more than 50% of cases. However, parotid gland metastatic HCCs are very uncommon. We report a patient in whom the finding of a left parotid mass revealed metastatic HCC. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A thirty-six-year-old male presented with a round palpable left neck mass that persisted for 3 months. He had received right hemihepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Preoperative evaluation revealed a benign tumor of the parotid gland. We performed superficial parotidectomy. Metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma of the parotid gland was diagnosed. DISCUSSION: Although HCC metastases to the oral cavity have been reported, to date, only 4 cases HCC metastasis to the parotid gland have been reported. Although clinicians and cytopathologists alike both agree that salivary gland fine needle aspiration biopies (FNABs) are highly useful and safe diagnostic alternatives to biopsies and resections, we believe that in specific clinical situations, awareness of potential diagnostic pitfalls in salivary gland FNAB is a necessary part of the microscopic interpretations of these lesions. CONCLUSION: Although rare, since HCC can metastasize to the parotid gland, high suspicion should be maintained in a patient presenting with a parotid mass with a history of HCC. In addition, since potential diagnostic pitfalls in salivary gland fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsies exist, incisional or excisional biopsy may be necessary for definite diagnosis of metastatic HCC to the parotid gland. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]