Search

Desirudin, a subcutaneously (SC) administered direct thrombin inhibitor, is indicated for prevention of venous thromboembolic events (VTEs) after total joint replacement surgery. DESIR-ABLE (multicenter trial of desirudin for the prophylaxis of thrombosis: an alternative to heparin-based anticoagulation) was a multicenter, open-label, single-arm study of hospitalized patients requiring VTE protection designed to extend the safety profile for desirudin to include a broad population of perioperative/critically ill patients. The primary end point was major bleeding. A total of 516 patients undergoing major surgery (378, 73%) or who were medically ill with prolonged immobility (138, 27%) were enrolled at 19 centers and received desirudin 15 mg Q12H. Many patients had high-risk features for bleeding and thrombosis such as thrombocytopenia (<100 x 10(9)/mL, n = 50), severe obesity (body mass index >35, n = 145), and renal impairment (creatinine clearance <60 mL/min, n = 292). There were no major bleeds and no VTE-related deaths in this study. The DESIR-ABLE demonstrated the safety of desirudin in critically ill perioperative and medical patients. Trials in specific surgical or medically ill patients are needed to confirm these findings.

A major potential side effect of heparin is immunogenicity, eliciting antibody development to a protein complex comprised of platelet factor 4 and heparin. Nevertheless, the clinical implications of heparin antibody positive patients remain broad, ranging from no apparent clinical consequences to life-threatening arterial and venous thromboemboli. The "Iceberg Model" has been proposed to depict this spectrum, with a relatively large population of antibody-positive patients forming the base of the iceberg, a smaller population of thrombocytopenic patients in the middle and a limited number of patients with thrombocytopenia and thrombosis comprising the apex. An underlying assumption of this model is that thrombosis occurs only in settings of relative or absolute thrombocytopenia. However, several recent studies suggest that antibody formation to platelet factor 4/heparin complexes, even in the absence of thrombocytopenia, may be associated with thrombotic events. In this review, we summarize these data, consider potential mechanisms for thrombosis, and suggest recommendations for testing and management of antibody-positive patients.

In 29 patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), we obtained blood samples at baseline, 10 minutes after standard weight-based abciximab (n=15) or double-bolus eptifibatide (n=14) and 5 minutes after unfractionated heparin (UFH; 70 U/kg bolus). The median percent inhibition was significantly higher in the eptifibatide group compared with the abciximab group both before (96.5% [94-100] vs. 85% [77-89.5] [adenosine diphosphate; ADP]; 89.5% [84-95] vs. 59% [37.5-76.5] [thrombin receptor agonist peptide; TRAP], p<0.001 for both) and after UFH (95% [93-100] vs. 79% [68.8-87.5] [ADP]; 82% [77-93] vs. 51% [34.5-71.3] [TRAP], p<0.001 for both). Addition of UFH significantly reduced platelet inhibition in the abciximab group (85% [77-89.5] vs. 79% [68.8-87.5] [ADP]; 59% [37.5-76.5] vs. 51% [34.5-71.3] [TRAP], p<0.05 for both) but not in the eptifibatide group (96.5% [94-100] vs. 95% [93-100] [ADP]; 89.5% [84-95] vs. 82% [77-93] [TRAP], p=ns for both). Eptifibatide achieved superior platelet inhibition before but especially after UFH compared with abciximab.

Background: We postulated that antibodies to platelet factor 4/heparin complex lead to a heightened inflammatory state, contributing to an increased risk of recurrent thrombotic events., Methods: We analyzed serum from a subset of patients in the placebo/unfractionated heparin arm of the GUSTO IV-ACS trial who had prior heparin exposure. We selected 109 patients with the 30 day primary endpoint (death, MI or revascularization) and an equal number of controls, excluding patients with thrombocytopenia. Anti-platelet factor 4/heparin antibodies and inflammatory markers (sVCAM-1, sICAM-1, sE-selectin, sP-selectin, us-CRP, IL-6) were measured on serum samples., Results: Patients with anti-PF4/heparin antibodies were more likely to have death or MI (30.4% vs. 11.3%, p = 0.01), or MI (21.7% vs. 6.2%, p = 0.01) than patients who were antibody negative. In a multiple logistic regression model that included inflammatory markers and clinical risk factors, antibody to PF4/heparin was a strong predictor of 30 day MI (odds ratio: 9.0; 95% confidence intervals 2.1-38.6; p < 0.01), with IL-6 being the only other predictor (odds ratio: 1.1; 95% confidence intervals 1.0-1.2; p = 0.03). Antibody positive patients had higher levels of sVCAM-1 (892 +/- 263 microg/l versus 780 +/- 228 microg/l; p = 0.04) and sICAM-1(246 +/- 50 microg/l versus 222 +/- 71microg/l; p = 0.02) than antibody-negative patients., Conclusions: Antibodies to the platelet factor 4/heparin complex were associated with elevated levels of endothelial but not platelet activation markers, or markers of a systemic inflammatory state. Anti-PF4/heparin antibodies were associated with a 9-fold increased risk of recurrent MI at 30 days. We measured soluble cell adhesion molecules, CRP and IL-6 from 218 non-thrombocytopenic patients, 23 of whom had antibodies to PF4/heparin. Antibody positive patients had higher levels of sVCAM-1 (892 +/- 263 microg/l versus 780 +/- 228 microg/l; p = 0.04) and sICAM-1(246 +/- 50 microg/l versus 222 +/- 71 microg/l; p = 0.02). In a multiple logistic regression model, antibody to PF4/heparin was a predictor of 30 day MI (odds ratio: 9.0; 95% CI: 2.1-38.6; p < 0.01). The presence of antibodies to PF4/heparin, even in the absence of thrombocytopenia, is a stronger predictor of 30 day MI than clinical variables or inflammatory markers.

We postulated that patients with recent acute coronary syndromes and antibodies to the platelet factor 4/heparin complex would have an increased risk of myocardial infarction (MI), even in the absence of thrombocytopenia. We analyzed sera from patients enrolled in the placebo/unfractionated heparin arm of the GUSTO IV-ACS trial who had a high likelihood of prior heparin exposure. We selected 109 patients without thrombocytopenia with the 30-day primary endpoint (death, MI, or revascularization) and 109 age-, gender-, and race-matched controls who did not achieve the primary endpoint. Twenty-three of 218 patients (10.6%) had anti-PF4/heparin antibodies. Patients with anti-PF4/heparin were more likely to have death or MI (30.4% vs. 11.3%, p = 0.011) or MI (21.7% vs. 6.2%, p = 0.008) than patients who were negative for the antibody. Antibody-positive patients had higher levels of sVCAM-1 (892 +/- 263 microg/L vs. 780 +/- 228 microg/L; p = 0.04) and sICAM-1 (246 +/- 50 microg/L vs. 222 +/- 71 microg/L; p = 0.02) than antibody-negative patients. In a multiple logistic regression model that included inflammatory markers and clinical risk factors, antibodies to PF4/heparin were a strong predictor of 30-day MI (odds ratio, 9.0; 95% confidence intervals, 2.1 to 38.6; p < 0.01), with IL-6 being the only other predictor (odds ratio, 1.1; 95% confidence intervals, 1.0 to 1.2; p = 0.03). Antibodies to the platelet factor 4/heparin complex are a novel, independent predictor of MI at 30 days in patients presenting with acute coronary ischemic syndromes. Antibodies to PF4/heparin are a stronger predictor of MI than clinical characteristics or inflammation markers.

We present three clinical cases that illustrate some of the key features of the diagnosis and management of immune-mediated heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). The importance of having a high clinical suspicion for HIT in the appropriate clinical setting is emphasized. Early therapeutic decisions should be based on a clinical diagnosis, with laboratory tests serving as confirmation. Low-molecular-weight and unfractionated heparins are to be strictly avoided in patients with HIT. Identification bracelets or necklaces may be useful to reduce inappropriate administration of these agents to patients with HIT presenting with acute coronary syndromes.

Heparin was first discovered in 1916 and at present is used in more than 12 million patients a year. In the 1950s, several physicians noticed an uncommon paradoxical phenomenon in which heparin appeared to function as a procoagulant instead of an anticoagulant. This phenomenon is now known as the immune-mediated heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and thrombosis syndrome (HITTS). Our understanding of this syndrome has evolved over the last 2 to 3 decades, and therapeutic options are arising. This article will focus on the most extensively studied therapy for HIT, which is the class of drugs known as the direct thrombin inhibitors. Specifically, we will focus on the mechanisms by which direct thrombin inhibitors may be useful in this syndrome, the evidence for their use, and the unique characteristics of the two FDA-approved agents in this class, lepirudin and argatroban.

Background: We postulated that antibodies to platelet factor 4/heparin complex might contribute to recurrent ischemic events in patients with acute coronary syndrome., Methods and Results: We analyzed serum from patients enrolled in the placebo/unfractionated heparin arm of the GUSTO IV-ACS trial who had high likelihood of prior heparin exposure. We selected 109 patients without thrombocytopenia with the 30-day primary end point (death, myocardial infarction [MI], or revascularization) and 109 age-, gender-, and race-matched controls who did not achieve the primary end point. An ELISA for anti-platelet factor 4/heparin antibodies was performed using 48-hour serum samples. The analyses were done by blinded investigators, and the results were correlated with clinical outcomes. Twenty-three of 218 patients (10.6%) had anti-PF4/heparin antibodies. Patients with anti-PF4/heparin antibodies were more likely to have death or MI (30.4% versus 11.3%, P=0.011) or MI (21.7% versus 6.2%, P=0.008) than patients who were negative for the antibody. After multiple logistic regression analysis, anti-PF4/heparin antibodies remained a predictor of 30-day death or MI (odds ratio, 4.0; 95% CI, 1.4 to 11.3; P=0.0093) and MI (odds ratio, 4.6; 95% CI, 1.4 to 15.0; P=0.0108). The antibody was not associated with the composite end point (death, MI, or revascularization) or with death or revascularization alone., Conclusions: Antibodies to the platelet factor 4/heparin complex are a novel, independent predictor of myocardial infarction at 30 days in patients presenting with acute coronary ischemic syndromes. This finding may explain the previous association between thrombocytopenia and adverse events in patients with acute coronary syndrome and may have important implications for the choice of anticoagulant regimens.

Vitronectin (VN) stabilizes plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1) activity and prevents the fibrin(ogen)-induced acceleration of plasminogen activation by t-PA. These antifibrinolytic activities as well as other functions are mediated by the glycosaminoglycan (GAG) binding domain of VN. Since the GAG binding region is rich in arginyl and lysyl residues, it is a potential target for enzymes such as plasmin. In this paper, the dose and time-dependent proteolysis of VN by plasmin is demonstrated. The addition of urokinase or streptokinase (200 units/ml) to plasma also produced proteolysis of VN. With minimal proteolysis, the 75 kDa band was degraded to a 62-65 kDa form of VN. This minimal proteolysis destroyed the binding of [3H]-heparin to VN and reversed the neutralization of heparin by VN. Thus, the plasmin-mediated proteolysis of the GAG binding activity of VN could destroy the antifibrinolytic activity of VN during physiologic conditions and during thrombolytic therapy. Furthermore, other functions of VN in complement and coagulation systems that are mediated by the GAG binding domain may be destroyed by plasmin proteolysis.