Search

The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of 14 weeks of treatment in patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 2 or 3 who achieve early virological response (EVR). In a noncontrolled multicenter trial, 122 treatment-naive patients received 1.5 mug/kg pegylated interferon alfa-2b subcutaneously once weekly and 800 to 1,400 mg/d ribavirin based on body weight. Treatment was stopped at week 14 in patients with EVR, defined as undetectable HCV RNA at weeks 4 and 8. Patients without EVR were assigned to 24 weeks of treatment. The primary end point was sustained virological response (SVR), defined as undetectable HCV RNA 24 weeks after end of treatment. Among the 122 patients, 95 (78%) had EVR and received 14 weeks of treatment. The remaining 27 (22%) were treated for 24 weeks. SVR was obtained in 85 (90%) of 95 patients in the 14-week treatment group and 15 of (56%) 27 in the 24-week treatment group. Altogether, SVR was obtained in 100 of 122 patients (82%; 95% CI, 75%-89%). SVR after 14 weeks of treatment was achieved more frequently among genotype 3a patients with low viral load compared with high viral load (98% vs. 79%; P = .019). Logistic regression analysis showed that absence of bridging fibrosis/cirrhosis was the only independent predictor of SVR. In conclusion, patients with genotype 2 or 3 and EVR obtained a high SVR after 14 weeks of treatment. The results need to be confirmed in a randomized, controlled study before this treatment approach can be recommended, particularly for patients with genotype 3 and high viral load or severe fibrosis.

Background: Interferon monotherapy for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection leads to sustained viral eradication in a minority of patients. However, in selected groups of patients, sustained virological response is observed in as many as 50% of patients. High initial interferon dose (induction therapy) has been reported to increase the initial response rate. We have studied the effect of interferon induction therapy in patients infected with HCV genotype 2b/3a, low viral load and no cirrhosis., Methods: A total of 71 treatment-naive HCV RNA-positive patients with biopsy-confirmed chronic hepatitis, with genotype 2b or 3a, viral load < or = 3 million copies per ml and no cirrhosis were randomized to receive either standard interferon therapy (3 MIU interferon-alpha-2a thrice weekly) for 26 weeks or 6 MIU interferon-alpha-2a daily for 4 weeks (induction group) followed by the standard dose (3 MIU thrice weekly) for 22 weeks. Those with persistent HCV RNA at 4 weeks stopped treatment. Patients were monitored for HCV RNA during and following treatment, and data were interpreted according to intention-to-treat analysis., Results: Viral clearance occurred more rapidly (after 4 weeks) in the induction group (33/36 = 92%) compared to the standard interferon group (21/35 = 60%) (P = 0.01). Among the initial responders, 23/33 (induction group) compared to 16/21 (standard group) were persistently HCV RNA-negative at the end of treatment. At 52 weeks (6 months' follow-up), 22/36 (61%) (induction group) compared to 10/35 (29%) (standard group) were HCV RNA-negative. Among initial responders, 22/33 (induction group) and 10/21 (standard group) achieved a sustained virological response. Among end-of-treatment responders, 22/24 (induction group) and 10/16 (standard group) were HCV RNA-negative at 6 months' follow-up (P = 0.013)., Conclusions: In patients infected with HCV genotype 2b/3a, low viral load and without cirrhosis, IFN induction therapy increases the initial viral clearance and reduces the risk of relapse in end-of-treatment responders. A sustained virological response was achieved in 61% of the patients receiving IFN induction therapy.

Among 116 patients with biopsy-confirmed chronic hepatitis C (Riba 2 or Riba 3 positive) in a multicenter study in southern Norway on interferon, we determined hepatitis C virus genotype by restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) of the 5' NCR. The RFLP method was supplemented by and compared with a serological typing method based on the detection of type-specific antibody to peptide from the NS-4 region. A total of 102/106 (96%) patient sera showed detectable type-specific antibody to NS-4 peptides and corresponded in all cases, except two, to the genotype detected by polymerase chain reaction. Combining the results from RFLP genotyping and serotyping, genotype 1 was found in 40 (35%) (27 with 1a and 10 with 1b, 3 subtypes not determined), genotype 2 in 15 (13%) (subtype 2b in 14 and 1 subtype not determined), and genotype 3 in 58 (50%) of patients. The low mean age of the patients (34 years), the low prevalence of cirrhosis (3.5%), the short duration of the disease, and a high prevalence of intravenous-drug abusers may account for the low prevalence of infection with genotype 1b (9%). The epidemiological features of hepatitis C patients are markedly different from patient groups described in southern Europe in terms of risk factors, age, and genotype distribution.

Seven of 24 blood donors positive in Ortho's first-generation antibody to hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) test (EIA-1) were also positive in Ortho's second-generation test (EIA-2). All 7 had at least two anti-HCV positive recipients, whereas only 1 of the 17 EIA-2-negative donors had an anti-HCV-positive recipient. This recipient was a multitransfused patient with von Willebrand's disease. Five of the 7 EIA-2-positive donors had detectable HCV RNA. We traced and tested 38 of the still living blood recipients from the 7 EIA-2-positive donors. Twenty-eight of these were EIA-2 positive and 22 were HCV-PCR positive. One patient with Waldenstroem's hypergammaglobulinemia was EIA-2 negative but HCV-PCR positive. All the EIA-2-positive sera showed reactivity in Ortho's recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA-2), but 5 of the 28 recipients and 1 of the donors reacted with only one band (RIBA-2 indeterminate). Among 32 recipients who probably had received EIA-2-positive blood, 29 (91%) had markers of an HCV infection. Twenty-two (75%) of the HCV-infected recipients had detectable HCV RNA more than 6 months after transfusion and hence were chronic HCV carriers.

Twenty-four blood donors found positive for the first-generation hepatitis C antibody (anti-HCV) test (Ortho EIA-I) and 88 of their recipients over the period from 1972 to 1990 were retrospectively investigated with different first- and second-generation anti-HCV tests. The aim of the study was to identify the infective donors and to evaluate the tests. Seven donors, who probably were infective carriers of HCV, were also second-generation test (EIA-II) positive, compared to only 3 out of 17 noninfective donors. Among the infected recipients, 14 out of 29 (48%) were positive for the second-generation test only. The second-generation test identified the infective donors in our study and was more sensitive than the first-generation test. We therefore recommend that blood donors are screened with EIA-II. Positive test results should be confirmed by the recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA-II), and persons with positive or not conclusive RIBA-II should not be accepted as blood donors.

We investigated the infectivity of three hepatitis C virus antibody (anti-HCV) positive blood donors with either hepatitis B core antibodies (anti-HBc) (Nos 1 and 2) or raised alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (No. 3). The 57 recipients of blood products from these donors during the period 1971-1990 were identified and the living 23 were tested for anti-HCV. Among these, 11 out of 14 (78%) recipients from Nos 1 and 2, and 1 out of 9 (11%) recipients from No. 3 were anti-HCV positive. The former donors had high titres of anti-C100-3 and high rating scores in the HCV recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA). They were evidently infective, chronic carriers of HCV but had no clinical signs or medical history of hepatitis. The latter donor had low titres of anti-C100-3 and a low RIBA rating score. She had clinical signs of chronic hepatitis and persistently elevated ALT, but only one of her recipients was anti-HCV positive.

Testing for hepatitis B core antibodies (anti-HBc) was performed in 12,104 consecutive blood donors, 139 (1.15%) of whom were found to be positive. The first 6036 donors were also screened for ALT; 91 (1.51%) had repeatedly elevated values. ALT screening was of no help in detecting anti-HBc-positive donors. Those with anti-HBc or repeatedly raised ALT levels were further tested for hepatitis C virus antibodies (anti-HCV), and 3 (2.16%) and 1 (1.10%) anti-HCV-positive donors were detected, respectively. This prevalence of anti-HCV (0.5%) is not significantly different from that found in 1000 unselected donors at our blood bank. Testing for ALT and anti-HBc as surrogate markers for hepatitis C is therefore not recommended in Norwegian blood donors and should be replaced by anti-HCV screening.