Search

Background/Aims: Colonic endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is safe for patients without antithrombotic therapy; however, EMR is associated with several risks. This study was performed to evaluate the risk of delayed hemorrhage in patients undergoing EMR without antithrombotic therapy. Methods: In the present retrospective single-center study, 1,792 patients without antithrombotic therapy underwent colonic EMR from March 2012 to December 2016 at the Saga Medical Centre Koseikan. Risk factors were evaluated with respect to patient and lesion characteristics, the endoscopist's experience, and preventive hemoclips. Delayed hemorrhage was defined as bleeding for which emergency endoscopic hemostasis was applied >24 h after EMR. Results: Among the 1,792 patients, 1,660 with 3,844 tumors were evaluated. Delayed hemorrhage occurred in 43 patients (2.6%) and 46 polyps (1.2%). Preventive hemoclips were applied in 996 patients (60.0%). Univariate analysis indicated that delayed hemorrhage occurred more frequently in young patients (3–39 years, p < 0.001, 40–59 years, p = 0.005) compared to > 60 years and in association with large polyps (> 10 mm, p = 0.003), hemoclip (p = 0.019), and pedunculated polyps (p = 0.024). Multivariate analysis indicated that risk factors for hemorrhage were young age (age of 3–39 years p < 0.001, 40–59 years, p = 0.005) and large polyps (> 10 mm, p < 0.001). The risk of delayed hemorrhage was increased by an estimated 8% with a 1-mm increase in polyp size. Conclusion: The present study suggests that young age (under 60 years old) and large polyp size are risk factors for causing delayed hemorrhage after colonic EMR in patients without antithrombotic therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This retrospective study aimed to determine risk factors associated with serious complications of endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric tumors in multicenters compared between high- and low-volume centers. Methods: Between 2001 and 2010, gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection was performed in 1,190 lesions of 1,082 patients in five hospitals in Saga, three high-volume and two low-volume centers. Risk factors for serious complications were evaluated. Patients' background characteristics were evaluated, including anticoagulants use and underlying diseases. Results: Postoperative bleeding was detected in 75 patients (6.9%), and perforation was detected in 40 patients (3.7%). Most postoperative bleeding and perforation cases were recovered with endoscopic procedures, although one case of each complication was treated by emergency surgery. Multivariate analysis indicated that risk factors for perforation were tumor location, massive submucusal invasion, endoscopists' experience of 100-149 cases and hypertension, and that risk factors for postoperative bleeding were tumor location, resected tumor size, and scar lesion. The serious complications were not different between high- and low-volume centers. Conclusions: The present study indicated that risk factors for perforation during endoscopic submucosal dissection were tumor, endoscopist and patient related, although risk factors for postoperative bleeding were tumor related. There was no difference in complications between high- and low-volume centers. Copyright © 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Endoscopic high-frequency soft coagulation, recently developed in Japan, is available for the management of gastric bleeding in cases of bleeding gastric ulcers and bleeding during endoscopic submucosal dissection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of hemostasis with soft coagulation for bleeding gastric ulcers by comparing it with hemoclips in a prospective, randomized trial. During the period of April 2006 to March 2008, 96 patients that had gastric ulcers with bleeding or nonbleeding visible vessels were enrolled in this study. All of the 96 patients were randomly divided into two groups: endoscopic hemostasis with soft coagulation (Group I) or endoscopic hemoclipping (Group II). A total of 41 (85%) out of 48 patients in Group I and 38 (79%) out of 48 patients in Group II were successfully treated with soft coagulation or clipping alone, respectively. The endoscopic hemostasis rate for the initial modality in combination with another endoscopic procedure performed after the initial method was 98% in both groups. One patient in Group I (2%) and five patients in Group II (10%) experienced recurrent bleeding. The time required to achieve hemostasis was shorter in Group I compared with Group II (9.2 ± 11.1 vs. 13.6 ± 9.4 min; P < 0.05). This study revealed that soft coagulation is as effective as hemoclipping for treating bleeding gastric ulcers. The time required to achieve hemostasis was shorter with the soft coagulation procedure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Bleeding from esophagogastric varices is a serious complication of portal hypertension. The aim of the present study was to determine whether endoscopic sclerotherapy with injection of N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate combined with variceal ligation was useful for hemostasis of bleeding gastric varices. Twenty-seven patients with bleeding gastric varices underwent endoscopic treatment with variceal ligation followed by sclerotherapy with N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate from November 1995 to November 2000. Patients underwent endoscopic variceal ligation only for the bleeding spot just before sclerotherapy. Injection was continued until varices were engorged. After these therapies, patients were followed for at least for 5 years. Retreatment was applied as necessary. Among these patients, 11 had active bleeding and 16 had recent bleeding within 24 h with white or red plaques on gastric varices. All varices presented as nodular or tumorous forms. The hemostasis rate at 1 week after treatment with N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate was 88.9% (24/27). Among the patients achieving hemostasis at 1 week, 33.3% (8/24) experienced recurrent bleeding between 5 and 53 months after the initial treatment. Five patients with rebleeding were treated with N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate, and the other three patients were treated by other procedures. The final hemostasis rate was 81.5% (22/27). The 5-year survival rate after initial hemostasis was 63.0% (17/27). This study showed that endoscopic variceal ligation combined with sclerotherapy might become a recommended choice for effective treatment of bleeding gastric varices. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

: ObjectiveAlthough metallic hemoclips have been used for hemostasis of bleeding ulcer, there have been few prospective trials to evaluate their efficacy. In this study, a prospective, randomized trial was performed to evaluate endoscopic hemoclipping for bleeding gastric ulcer in comparison with endoscopic injection of absolute ethanol.: MethodsDuring the period 1995–1998, 126 gastric ulcer patients with bleeding or nonbleeding visible vessel were considered for entry. They were randomly assigned to one of three groups: endoscopic hemostasis performed with injection of absolute ethanol (group I, n = 42), hemoclipping (group II, n = 42), and a combination of the two methods (group III, n = 42).: ResultsThe permanent hemostatic rate was 85.7% in group I, 90.5% in group II, and 92.9% in group III. The mean volume of blood transfusion was 313 ± 77 ml in group I, 274 ± 54 ml in group II, and 163 ± 42 ml in group III, which was significantly less than in groups I or II (p < 0.05). No patients required emergency surgery. Five patients died within a month after initial hemostasis as a result of unrelated conditions.: ConclusionsEndoscopic hemostasis with hemoclips for bleeding gastric ulcer was as effective and safe as that with injection of absolute ethanol, and a combination of ethanol injection and hemoclips did not result in a great advantage over the two individual procedures. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]