Search

Background This article presents a summary of the 2017 Annual Report of the European Renal Association–European Dialysis and Transplant Association (ERA-EDTA) Registry and describes the epidemiology of renal replacement therapy (RRT) for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in 37 countries. Methods The ERA-EDTA Registry received individual patient data on patients undergoing RRT for ESRD in 2017 from 32 national or regional renal registries and aggregated data from 21 registries. The incidence and prevalence of RRT, kidney transplantation activity and survival probabilities of these patients were calculated. Results In 2017, the ERA-EDTA Registry covered a general population of 694 million people. The incidence of RRT for ESRD was 127 per million population (pmp), ranging from 37 pmp in Ukraine to 252 pmp in Greece. A total of 62% of patients were men, 52% were ≥65 years of age and 23% had diabetes mellitus as the primary renal disease. The treatment modality at the onset of RRT was haemodialysis for 85% of patients. On 31 December 2017, the prevalence of RRT was 854 pmp, ranging from 210 pmp in Ukraine to 1965 pmp in Portugal. The transplant rate in 2017 was 33 pmp, ranging from 3 pmp in Ukraine to 103 pmp in the Spanish region of Catalonia. For patients commencing RRT during 2008–12, the unadjusted 5-year patient survival probability for all RRT modalities combined was 50.8%. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Dialysate conductivity is routinely used as a surrogate for dialysate sodium concentration. However, dialysis machine manufacturers apply different conductivity temperature correction coefficients. With the same conductivity in dialysis machines manufactured by different manufacturers, dialysate sodium may significantly differ. Also, electrolyte prescriptions are individualized (K, Ca, HCO3) and this is associated with another variation in dialysate sodium in the order of 1–5 mmol/L and both deviations are cumulative and chronic for each patient. Equivalence of the prescribed dialysate sodium and the concentration measured in it is not granted. Both variables differ and it is machine dependent! This paper analyses those variations from a technical point of view and suggests how to detect them and how to deal with or avoid them in clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Temperature and thermal balance have been studied in an effort to explain better tolerance of ultrafiltration during isolated ultrafiltration and other convective techniques as compared to conventional hemodialysis. The large number of published studies has led to the conclusion that negative thermal balance of the extracorporeal circuit ameliorates hemodynamic stability by increased vasoreactivity and increased peripheral resistance. On the other hand, measurement of dialysis efficiency (urea removal) did not unequivocally confirm the theoretically predicted decrease in efficiency of “cool” dialysis. Another suggested application of temperature and thermal balance for assessing bioincompatibility is currently hampered by the ability of existing technology to evaluate thermal parameters of the extracorporeal circuit only. Publications on impact of negative thermal balance of the extracorporeal circuit on ultrafiltration-induced changes in blood volume give contradictory results. Further studies are needed for elucidation of the impact of thermal balance on overall biological response to dialysis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]